Protien Shakes or Chocolate Milk? (Page 3)
-
No new posts
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller | Reply |
|
2012-03-19 3:55 PM in reply to: #4101706 |
Extreme Veteran 389 | Subject: RE: Protien Shakes or Chocolate Milk? energy usage is same, central nervous system programming different... |
|
2012-03-19 3:55 PM in reply to: #4101976 |
Expert 1123 Falls Church, VA | Subject: RE: Protien Shakes or Chocolate Milk? bryancd - 2012-03-18 8:17 PM Coconut Water Nutrition Facts Serving size: 8 Fl. Oz. (237mL) Ingredients: 100% natural coconut water Amount/Serving % DV* Total Fat 0g 0% Calories 43 2% Calories from fat 0 0% Cholesterol 0mg 0% Sodium 39mg 2% Amount/Serving % DV* Potassium 495mg 14% Total Carb 11g 4% Dietary Fiber 0g 0% Sugars 10g Protein 0g Amount/Serving % DV* Calcium 29mg 3% Phosphorus 12mg 1% Magnesium 18mg 5%* Precent Daily Values are based on a 2000 cal. diet Chocolat Milk nutrition facts: Nutrition Facts Serving Size 1 cup (8 fl oz) (266.0 g) Amount Per Serving Calories 226Calories from Fat 78 % Daily Value* Total Fat 8.6g13% Saturated Fat 4.9g25% Polyunsaturated Fat 0.5g Monounsaturated Fat 2.2g Cholesterol 24mg8% Sodium 154mg6% Total Carbohydrates 31.7g11% Dietary Fiber 1.1g4% Sugars 32.2g Protein 8.6g Vitamin A 5% • Vitamin C 0% Calcium 25% • Iron 4% Pick up the rest of the carbs and protein from a better quality source like real food. Have fun with 3x the sugar content and low quality fats. It's not a fad, it's just math. If you take nutrition and recovery and health and competitiveness seriously, coconut water wins hands down.Magnesium and potassium are KEY to endurance recovery and chocolate milk has nothing. Sure it's pricey, and so are a lot of "recovery" drinks made, but it's at least natural and legit. Chocolate milk is milk, which is fine, and added flavored sugar crap, which is not. I stand by my assertion that chocolate milk is an excuse, not a recovery product.
Not sure where you're pasting that from, but milk is very high in potassium
and has more magnesium than coconut water as well.. Edited by Bioteknik 2012-03-19 4:02 PM |
2012-03-19 4:04 PM in reply to: #4103588 |
Pro 6011 Camp Hill, Pennsylvania | Subject: RE: Protien Shakes or Chocolate Milk? synthetic - 2012-03-19 4:55 PMenergy usage is same, central nervous system programming different... No. It's not. Weight lifting uses anaerobic processes, and endurance sports use aerobic. |
2012-03-19 5:11 PM in reply to: #4101706 |
Veteran 246 Edwards AFB | Subject: RE: Protien Shakes or Chocolate Milk? Chocolate milk tastes good cuz' its chalk full of sugar. Stay away. Find a decent clean protein that tastes good and has no sugar. Sugar is the devil's playground |
2012-03-19 5:17 PM in reply to: #4101706 |
Veteran 246 Edwards AFB | Subject: RE: Protien Shakes or Chocolate Milk? Ok, here we go.. something I do know a bit about to make up for my lack of tri knowledge..
"Low fat" choc milk, even the lowest fat, is FULL of simple sugar. Read the back. 4 grams of sugar is about a teaspoon. Think of it like that. I dont even drink 'real' milk anymore because real milk also contains quite a bit of natural sugar.. A better option is almond milk, unsweetened. It has very little sugar at all, twice the calcium of cow milk, and tons of Vitamin E. And if you're doing protein shakes with a good protein theres absolutely no need to mix it with chocolate milk.. ever. Eeeeekk.. so much sugar. |
2012-03-19 5:19 PM in reply to: #4101976 |
Veteran 246 Edwards AFB | Subject: RE: Protien Shakes or Chocolate Milk? bryancd - 2012-03-18 5:17 PM Coconut Water Nutrition Facts Serving size: 8 Fl. Oz. (237mL) Ingredients: 100% natural coconut water Amount/Serving % DV* Total Fat 0g 0% Calories 43 2% Calories from fat 0 0% Cholesterol 0mg 0% Sodium 39mg 2% Amount/Serving % DV* Potassium 495mg 14% Total Carb 11g 4% Dietary Fiber 0g 0% Sugars 10g Protein 0g Amount/Serving % DV* Calcium 29mg 3% Phosphorus 12mg 1% Magnesium 18mg 5%* Precent Daily Values are based on a 2000 cal. diet Chocolat Milk nutrition facts: Nutrition Facts Serving Size 1 cup (8 fl oz) (266.0 g) Amount Per Serving Calories 226Calories from Fat 78 % Daily Value* Total Fat 8.6g13% Saturated Fat 4.9g25% Polyunsaturated Fat 0.5g Monounsaturated Fat 2.2g Cholesterol 24mg8% Sodium 154mg6% Total Carbohydrates 31.7g11% Dietary Fiber 1.1g4% Sugars 32.2g Protein 8.6g Vitamin A 5% • Vitamin C 0% Calcium 25% • Iron 4% Pick up the rest of the carbs and protein from a better quality source like real food. Have fun with 3x the sugar content and low quality fats. It's not a fad, it's just math. If you take nutrition and recovery and health and competitiveness seriously, coconut water wins hands down.Magnesium and potassium are KEY to endurance recovery and chocolate milk has nothing. Sure it's pricey, and so are a lot of "recovery" drinks made, but it's at least natural and legit. Chocolate milk is milk, which is fine, and added flavored sugar crap, which is not. I stand by my assertion that chocolate milk is an excuse, not a recovery product. 32 grams of table sugar. Exactly. Thanks for posting this. That's like 8 tsps of sugar. |
|
2012-03-19 5:25 PM in reply to: #4103369 |
Champion 6627 Rochester Hills, Michigan | Subject: RE: Protien Shakes or Chocolate Milk? synthetic - 2012-03-19 3:24 PM Another side note , while on chocolate milk - be aware of pseudo chocolate products, such as "yoohoo" is not chocolate milk - they like to substitute the expensive chocolate with partially hydrogenated oil, just like chocolate protein bars use fractionated palm oil. Uh oh, now it's a throwdown. Yoohoo is the deisel in NYC's tank. Blasphemous. |
2012-03-19 5:44 PM in reply to: #4102441 |
Subject: ... This user's post has been ignored. |
2012-03-19 8:03 PM in reply to: #4103378 |
Payson, AZ | Subject: RE: Protien Shakes or Chocolate Milk? Scout7 - 2012-03-19 12:26 PM If you're hungry, have some fruit. Otherwise, drink some water. It's not complex. So you are saying my cookie was a bad idea? What if it has fruit in the cookie? Banana and dates... |
2012-03-19 8:13 PM in reply to: #4103752 |
Extreme Veteran 378 Acton, Ontario | Subject: RE: Protien Shakes or Chocolate Milk? I use POWERTHIRST |
2012-03-19 8:14 PM in reply to: #4101706 |
Expert 2355 Madison, Wisconsin | Subject: RE: Protien Shakes or Chocolate Milk? interestingly enough i read a survey today that mentioned about how 30% of the athletes they asked knew how much protein they should ingest post-workut, the other 70% had no clue....or thought they did. |
|
2012-03-19 8:36 PM in reply to: #4103716 |
Master 10208 Northern IL | Subject: RE: Protien Shakes or Chocolate Milk? I Tri Hard - 2012-03-19 5:17 PM And if you're doing protein shakes with a good protein theres absolutely no need to mix it with chocolate milk.. ever. Eeeeekk.. so much sugar. Could you elaborate on what would constitute a "good protein"? I don't doubt it, but rather think it would be good information to have and would fit in with the direction this thread has been going. |
2012-03-19 11:36 PM in reply to: #4101706 |
38 | Subject: RE: Protien Shakes or Chocolate Milk? Wow. 4 pages and no one has mentioned the reason that choc milk is so well thought of. Most chocolate milk comes in around 4:1 ratio of carbs to protein. Right now, it is pretty well accepted in nutritional science that 4:1 is the "best" ratio for glycogen replacement during the "window" ( which is another commonly accepted scientific theory). Will these theories change? Yes, but right now they are what the scientific community has accepted. Does it matter what you eat to get to the 4:1 ratio? Not really. However, doesn't it seem smart to eat something with lots of healthy nutrients and not a lot of empty calories or negative fats. Choc milk just happens to be a quick and easy filler until you can sit down to your plate of chicken breast, sweet potatoes and kale. Really, the op just asked if you prefered choc milk or protein. |
2012-03-20 7:34 AM in reply to: #4104090 |
Champion 7595 Columbia, South Carolina | Subject: RE: Protien Shakes or Chocolate Milk? mk12mod1 - 2012-03-20 12:36 AM it is pretty well accepted in nutritional science that 4:1 is the "best" ratio for glycogen replacement during the "window" ( which is another commonly accepted scientific theory). Right. The question is: 'best' for what? 'window' for what? I'll grant (though I'm not 100% convinced) that it is the best way to maximize absorption during the window. And why does rapid absorption during the window matter? In typical measures of performance it is shown to make a difference to one's ability to do another very very hard effort (like time to exhaustion) a few hours later. Who cares? Who trains that way? I'm much more interested in my long term ability to maintain my workout schedule, day in, day out, for weeks and months, while staying healthy and maintaining a good bodyweight. Sometimes what is of interest to scientists -- even exercise scientists -- is not particularly relevant to actual training and performance. If I did a race where we went all-out for an hour, rested for 4 hours, then all-out again for an hour, I might drink chocolate milk during the rest. While I am training, I'll stick with my current diet. |
2012-03-20 8:24 AM in reply to: #4101706 |
Subject: ... This user's post has been ignored. |
2012-03-20 9:29 AM in reply to: #4104090 |
Expert 2355 Madison, Wisconsin | Subject: RE: Protien Shakes or Chocolate Milk? mk12mod1 - 2012-03-19 11:36 PM Wow. 4 pages and no one has mentioned the reason that choc milk is so well thought of. Most chocolate milk comes in around 4:1 ratio of carbs to protein. Right now, it is pretty well accepted in nutritional science that 4:1 is the "best" ratio for glycogen replacement during the "window" ( which is another commonly accepted scientific theory). Will these theories change? Yes, but right now they are what the scientific community has accepted. Does it matter what you eat to get to the 4:1 ratio? Not really. However, doesn't it seem smart to eat something with lots of healthy nutrients and not a lot of empty calories or negative fats. Choc milk just happens to be a quick and easy filler until you can sit down to your plate of chicken breast, sweet potatoes and kale. Really, the op just asked if you prefered choc milk or protein.
Great reference to the 4:1 ratio as well as the 30-45 minute window too. However, the statement that it doesn't matter what you eat to get that ratio may not be entirely correct. For example if you eat a meal that is high in protein and carbs to boost your recovery, but also fiber, then your digestion will slow from the fiber and your body will not get it's nutrients asorbed as quickly. Also a skinless chicken breast is different from a breast with skin as with one that is fried. Nutrient timing plans a huge role here as well, but I guess that could be saved for another thread of its own. |
|
2012-03-20 11:10 AM in reply to: #4104505 |
Extreme Veteran 389 | Subject: RE: Protien Shakes or Chocolate Milk? bcagle25 - 2012-03-20 9:29 AM mk12mod1 - 2012-03-19 11:36 PM Wow. 4 pages and no one has mentioned the reason that choc milk is so well thought of. Most chocolate milk comes in around 4:1 ratio of carbs to protein. Right now, it is pretty well accepted in nutritional science that 4:1 is the "best" ratio for glycogen replacement during the "window" ( which is another commonly accepted scientific theory). Will these theories change? Yes, but right now they are what the scientific community has accepted. Does it matter what you eat to get to the 4:1 ratio? Not really. However, doesn't it seem smart to eat something with lots of healthy nutrients and not a lot of empty calories or negative fats. Choc milk just happens to be a quick and easy filler until you can sit down to your plate of chicken breast, sweet potatoes and kale. Really, the op just asked if you prefered choc milk or protein.
this is also why fat is not recommended post workout since it has a typical digestion rate of 4 hours, although it is essential that have fat in the system pre workout, as the hormones are made from them (testosterone)and are essential for synthesizing that program
Great reference to the 4:1 ratio as well as the 30-45 minute window too. However, the statement that it doesn't matter what you eat to get that ratio may not be entirely correct. For example if you eat a meal that is high in protein and carbs to boost your recovery, but also fiber, then your digestion will slow from the fiber and your body will not get it's nutrients asorbed as quickly. Also a skinless chicken breast is different from a breast with skin as with one that is fried. Nutrient timing plans a huge role here as well, but I guess that could be saved for another thread of its own. |
2012-03-20 12:57 PM in reply to: #4103945 |
Veteran 246 Edwards AFB | Subject: RE: Protien Shakes or Chocolate Milk? brigby1 - 2012-03-19 6:36 PM I Tri Hard - 2012-03-19 5:17 PM And if you're doing protein shakes with a good protein theres absolutely no need to mix it with chocolate milk.. ever. Eeeeekk.. so much sugar. Could you elaborate on what would constitute a "good protein"? I don't doubt it, but rather think it would be good information to have and would fit in with the direction this thread has been going. |
2012-03-20 1:00 PM in reply to: #4103945 |
Veteran 246 Edwards AFB | Subject: RE: Protien Shakes or Chocolate Milk? brigby1 - 2012-03-19 6:36 PM I Tri Hard - 2012-03-19 5:17 PM And if you're doing protein shakes with a good protein theres absolutely no need to mix it with chocolate milk.. ever. Eeeeekk.. so much sugar. Could you elaborate on what would constitute a "good protein"? I don't doubt it, but rather think it would be good information to have and would fit in with the direction this thread has been going. Yes, and it depends on your individual body. If you feel like you need extra calories and fat there are great tasting proteins (such as mucle milk) available. If you want less fat and calories there are clean proteins with almost no fat and calories like "pure whey" and things like that. All may be found at GNC and similar stores. I highly recommend paring down the dosage. They often want to pump you full of 40 or 50 g of protein which is crazy. I like to pare it down 'til im getting about 20 g of protein a serving 'cuz that's around the general consensus for body absorption in an hour, or something like that. |
2012-03-21 8:53 AM in reply to: #4105027 |
Expert 2355 Madison, Wisconsin | Subject: RE: Protien Shakes or Chocolate Milk? I Tri Hard - 2012-03-20 1:00 PM brigby1 - 2012-03-19 6:36 PM I Tri Hard - 2012-03-19 5:17 PM And if you're doing protein shakes with a good protein theres absolutely no need to mix it with chocolate milk.. ever. Eeeeekk.. so much sugar. Could you elaborate on what would constitute a "good protein"? I don't doubt it, but rather think it would be good information to have and would fit in with the direction this thread has been going. Yes, and it depends on your individual body. If you feel like you need extra calories and fat there are great tasting proteins (such as mucle milk) available. If you want less fat and calories there are clean proteins with almost no fat and calories like "pure whey" and things like that. All may be found at GNC and similar stores. I highly recommend paring down the dosage. They often want to pump you full of 40 or 50 g of protein which is crazy. I like to pare it down 'til im getting about 20 g of protein a serving 'cuz that's around the general consensus for body absorption in an hour, or something like that. Best sources of protein: 1. Egg, 2. Soy, 3. Whey All expensive but whey protein is the highest quality in supplements. It is also very popular since it is very easily digestible and absorb into the body quickly. And yes people go way too crazy on protein intake and generally take in far more protein then their body ever needs. Lots of people spend a ton of money on protein supplements and essentially throw their money away but ingesting too much and wasting it. Basically they are pooping out cash into the toilet |
2012-03-21 9:28 AM in reply to: #4106261 |
Expert 1123 Falls Church, VA | Subject: RE: Protien Shakes or Chocolate Milk? bcagle25 - 2012-03-21 9:53 AM I Tri Hard - 2012-03-20 1:00 PM brigby1 - 2012-03-19 6:36 PM I Tri Hard - 2012-03-19 5:17 PM And if you're doing protein shakes with a good protein theres absolutely no need to mix it with chocolate milk.. ever. Eeeeekk.. so much sugar. Could you elaborate on what would constitute a "good protein"? I don't doubt it, but rather think it would be good information to have and would fit in with the direction this thread has been going. Yes, and it depends on your individual body. If you feel like you need extra calories and fat there are great tasting proteins (such as mucle milk) available. If you want less fat and calories there are clean proteins with almost no fat and calories like "pure whey" and things like that. All may be found at GNC and similar stores. I highly recommend paring down the dosage. They often want to pump you full of 40 or 50 g of protein which is crazy. I like to pare it down 'til im getting about 20 g of protein a serving 'cuz that's around the general consensus for body absorption in an hour, or something like that. Best sources of protein: 1. Egg, 2. Soy, 3. Whey All expensive but whey protein is the highest quality in supplements. It is also very popular since it is very easily digestible and absorb into the body quickly. And yes people go way too crazy on protein intake and generally take in far more protein then their body ever needs. Lots of people spend a ton of money on protein supplements and essentially throw their money away but ingesting too much and wasting it. Basically they are pooping out cash into the toilet
best is subjective.. considering whey's high absorption rate also increases protein metabolism, you end up much of it out. Athletes don't need the high anabolic response of a fast digesting protein either, but the anti-catabolizing effect of a slow digesting protein post-workout. Most of our goals is to maintain what muscle we've got, and lean up. Not gain muscle/weight. While the amount of protein isn't as much as a bodybuilder, it is important to consume enough since the body is constantly breaking down and rebuilding muscle. Most studies show that 0.8-1g/kg of body weight is sufficient for an athlete which means protein supplementation isn't necessary for most.
for the same reason people say sugar is bad.. well it depends. Excess sugar is bad, otherwise it is pretty neutral so it depends on the person's goals/history.. do we need to post up the Kenyan diet in which they consume much of their carbs from the sugar they use to sweeten their 10 cups of tea a day? |
|
2012-03-21 11:05 AM in reply to: #4106261 |
Extreme Veteran 389 | Subject: RE: Protien Shakes or Chocolate Milk? bcagle25 - 2012-03-21 8:53 AM I Tri Hard - 2012-03-20 1:00 PM brigby1 - 2012-03-19 6:36 PM I Tri Hard - 2012-03-19 5:17 PM And if you're doing protein shakes with a good protein theres absolutely no need to mix it with chocolate milk.. ever. Eeeeekk.. so much sugar. Could you elaborate on what would constitute a "good protein"? I don't doubt it, but rather think it would be good information to have and would fit in with the direction this thread has been going. Yes, and it depends on your individual body. If you feel like you need extra calories and fat there are great tasting proteins (such as mucle milk) available. If you want less fat and calories there are clean proteins with almost no fat and calories like "pure whey" and things like that. All may be found at GNC and similar stores. I highly recommend paring down the dosage. They often want to pump you full of 40 or 50 g of protein which is crazy. I like to pare it down 'til im getting about 20 g of protein a serving 'cuz that's around the general consensus for body absorption in an hour, or something like that. Best sources of protein: 1. Egg, 2. Soy, 3. Whey All expensive but whey protein is the highest quality in supplements. It is also very popular since it is very easily digestible and absorb into the body quickly. And yes people go way too crazy on protein intake and generally take in far more protein then their body ever needs. Lots of people spend a ton of money on protein supplements and essentially throw their money away but ingesting too much and wasting it. Basically they are pooping out cash into the toilet
sorry soy is at the bottom of the barrel in terms of being a useful protein...
http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/protein-bio-availability-explained.htm
you have to combine it with other proteins to make it more bio-available |
2012-03-21 11:25 AM in reply to: #4106587 |
Not a Coach 11473 Media, PA | Subject: RE: Protien Shakes or Chocolate Milk? synthetic - 2012-03-21 12:05 PM sorry soy is at the bottom of the barrel in terms of being a useful protein... http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/protein-bio-availability-explained.htm you have to combine it with other proteins to make it more bio-available
If you're going to keep quoting bodybuilding sales websites as your source, you should at least note that there are some scientific critiques of using that scoring system--especially in humans. There are other systems which rate eggs, whey, soy and casein as essentially equal. I'm sure there are criticisms of those, as well. But to state "soy is at the bottom of the barrel", based on the info you presented, is fairly presumptuous. Anyway, this is so far off topic from where the OP started that it should probably be discussed in its own thread for those really interested. The OP is probably best off eating a reasonably healthy, balanced diet and not getting overly concerned about recovery drinks of any sort. Use them if you're in a hurry, feel you need some kind of recovery fuel, and they're easily available. |
2012-03-21 11:52 AM in reply to: #4101766 |
Extreme Veteran 821 | Subject: RE: Protien Shakes or Chocolate Milk? |
2012-03-21 12:09 PM in reply to: #4106673 |
Not a Coach 11473 Media, PA | Subject: RE: Protien Shakes or Chocolate Milk? camaleon - 2012-03-21 12:52 PM bryancd - 2012-03-18 5:47 PM Niether.
I know ur secret...
I may be mistaken, but I believe it is this: |
|