FDA Lowers Age for Next-Day Birth Control (Page 3)
-
No new posts
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller | Reply |
|
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() gsmacleod - 2013-05-02 10:00 AM Gaarryy - 2013-05-02 11:48 AM I believe that the reason is that plan b is a one time thing that research shows has few side effects while bc, at a much lower dose, taken on an ongoing basis has a much higher chance of side effects and also a much higher chance of serious side effects. ShaneIsn't the plan b pill the same as a birth control pill but a much higher dosage. I think it's strange that you have to have a prescription to get a lessor dose medication but not a higher dose one. Regardless of the reasons. I can understand that reasoning,,, to a point. I'm just stuck for some reason on this. That product "A" at a lower dose needs a Doc to write a script, Product "B" is a much higher dose but can be obtained over the counter anytime, everyday and/or multiple times a day by visiting different pharmacies. That just seems out of place for me. |
|
![]() ![]() |
Elite ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() mehaner - 2013-05-02 5:43 AM powerman - 2013-05-02 12:40 AM switch - 2013-05-01 7:20 PM powerman - 2013-05-01 7:41 PM Jeez, Powerman, just when we were playing so nicely together :/ Young women need access to this for many reasons, unplanned, unprotected sex is just one of them. I always hope that men making statements like this have had "responsible" and/or protected sex every single time they've had sex. I don't know very many men who can say that though...Hook'em - 2013-05-01 3:33 PM While it is sad that a girl in her early teens would need this, I would rather them have access to this and other forms of birth control than have an unwanted pregnancy or an abortion. That's what's sad... that the morning after pill is thought of as birth control. We have birth control... it's called birth control. This is call ed the morning after pill.... meaning oh crap I had unplanned sex and I'm too irresponsible for birth control and now I have to clean up my mess. I find that sad on many levels. So differing opinions are not "playing nicely"? Exactly how is the morning after pill "protected sex"? And I was not having unprotected sex at 15. At the time I sure wish I was, but I wasn't.... and the fact that a girl gets pregnant at 15 and can't discuss options with parents and needs to "sneek" to a drug store instead of to a doctor to OD on birth control to save herself is sad on many levels. I'll stand by that statement. If you are 18, go do what ever the heck you darn well please. Plan B does NOT terminate a pregnancy. If you are already pregnant (fertilized egg implanted in uterine lining) Plan B DOES NOTHING. If you missed a BC pill (which for some pills can mean as much as taking it an hour later than you usually take it) or a condom broke, this is an effective and safe backup plan. Not everyone's parents are as cool as you all think you are, and most of you were NEVER teenage girls, so I guess I don't expect you to understand.
Thanks... many kids don't even have parents... or certainly not ones that give a crap about them. I don't think I live in La La land. But ya... since I'm a guy... I'll just keep my mouth shut. |
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() dontracy - 2013-05-02 8:31 AM Big Appa - Marry had sex with Joseph and I bet she liked it too. No, she didn't. But here's the point again. Fornication is a really bad idea. The pill, more than any single thing, has contributed to the increase in fornication in our culture. Since the pill, we've had a majorly significant increase in:
I'll leave aside what seems to be major increases in mental health issues among teens and young people. And the solution for all of these problems? More contraception. Really, it seems like a type of insanity. Yes she did people just don't want to believe it so they don't. Also if god made us he also made sex enjoyable so I think that is all a part of his plan and I am not one to go against his plan. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() | ![]() Big Appa - Yes she did people just don't want to believe it so they don't. Also if god made us he also made sex enjoyable so I think that is all a part of his plan and I am not one to go against his plan. No, really. She didn't. And yes, part of God's plan is for sex to be enjoyable. Central to the plan in fact. Mary agrees with me. |
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() mehaner - 2013-05-02 8:35 AM dontracy - 2013-05-02 11:31 AM Big Appa - Marry had sex with Joseph and I bet she liked it too. No, she didn't. But here's the point again. she may have. after they were married. If she didn't then they were never married by the laws of the day. So she did.... and she liked-a-did it |
![]() ![]() |
Elite ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() switch - 2013-05-02 6:27 AM powerman - 2013-05-01 11:40 PM switch - 2013-05-01 7:20 PM powerman - 2013-05-01 7:41 PM Jeez, Powerman, just when we were playing so nicely together :/ Young women need access to this for many reasons, unplanned, unprotected sex is just one of them. I always hope that men making statements like this have had "responsible" and/or protected sex every single time they've had sex. I don't know very many men who can say that though...Hook'em - 2013-05-01 3:33 PM While it is sad that a girl in her early teens would need this, I would rather them have access to this and other forms of birth control than have an unwanted pregnancy or an abortion. That's what's sad... that the morning after pill is thought of as birth control. We have birth control... it's called birth control. This is call ed the morning after pill.... meaning oh crap I had unplanned sex and I'm too irresponsible for birth control and now I have to clean up my mess. I find that sad on many levels. So differing opinions are not "playing nicely"? Exactly how is the morning after pill "protected sex"? And I was not having unprotected sex at 15. At the time I sure wish I was, but I wasn't.... and the fact that a girl gets pregnant at 15 and can't discuss options with parents and needs to "sneek" to a drug store instead of to a doctor to OD on birth control to save herself is sad on many levels. I'll stand by that statement. If you are 18, go do what ever the heck you darn well please. Differing opinions are great, that was more a statement about me preparing myself for a heated discussion about a very difficult subject. And I was specifically making a (facetious) joke about us butting heads (again). The morning after pill is not protected sex in any way. My point with that part of the statement is that I often bristle when men criticize women, or in this case girls, about their reproductive health choices. I think there are very few men who have made the "right" choice with birth control EVERY SINGLE TIME they've had sex in their entire lives. Unfortunately, it only takes one instance of this for a woman to become pregnant and it then is HER responsibility to deal with that. I am often arguing this point with conservative Christians and I like to remind them: "Let he who is without sin among you, cast the first stone at her." I'm not religious at all (though I was raised that way), but I have spent a lot of time with the Bible, and that is always the one that comes to mind when a man is judging a woman on her reproductive health choices. I really wish 15 year olds weren't having sex. I work with kids a lot, and 15 year olds are just not ready for that. Of course, that doesn't mean that it isn't happening. Sometimes that sex is consensual sex (fornication) between two young people. I think that's what most people imagine when they think about young girls having sex, but it's just that it's not always like that. I can go through and describe the other various scenarios if you really can't think of them; they're grim, but they happen. Of course, the best way to handle those situations is for the girl to be able to go see a doctor, talk to her parents, and go to the police, but again, that is not always possible, and more importantly--the victim does not always feel it is possible. I have volunteered for Planned Parenthood and worked with rape victims. You do not want to spend a lot of time thinking about all the different ways a 15 year old can be forced to have sex, and you definitely don't want to spend a lot of time thinking about who can be doing that forcing, but it is often people who are closest to her and who should be in the role of protecting her. Often this is accompanied by YEARS of emotional and, sometimes physical, abuse. Of course we want these victims to get proper healthcare (see a doctor) and get help from law enforcement, but the reality is that these victims do not always feel like either of those things are real options, especially in smaller communities.
Perhaps you should save your religious arguments for those that are religious, and actually respond to a comment made by me. I do not have a problem with kids having BC. I do not have a problem with abortion. I do not have a problem with abortion by a pill. I made a comment that in my opinion lowering the age to 15 for OTC morning after pill is sad on many levels... I still maintain that. Feel free to form your own opinions. |
|
![]() ![]() |
Master ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() dontracy - 2013-05-02 8:54 AM I think you're misinterpreting the conclusion. They say other new drugs targeting endometrial development could increase efficacy, but they aren't saying that's what's going on here. In the results portion they state:drewb8 - Here's another recent study which also found the same thing. Here's their conclusion (my bold): CONCLUSIONS The two regimens of levonorgestrel caused either only minor or no alterations in markers of endometrial receptivity. New agents targeting the endometrial development should be explored in order to increase EC efficacy. So the manufacturer of Plan B is in fact correct in saying that it may prevent implatation. I mean gosh, you're arguing with the manufacturer's own claims. I didn't make that up. "In previous studies, levonorgestrel, 1.5 mg or even a higher dose, administered during the luteal phase caused no alterations in either cycle length or endometrial morphology (Spona et al., 1975; Landgren et al., 1989; Durand et al., 2001). Neither pre-ovulatory nor postovulatory administration of levonorgestrel in the standard oral regimen could alter the expression of factors suggested as markers of endometrial receptivity (Marions et al., 2002). These results were consistent with our in vitrostudies which showed that levonorgestrel did not affect markers of endometrial receptivity (Meng et al., 2009) or embryo attachment." |
![]() ![]() |
Regular ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() powerman - 2013-05-02 10:49 AM I responded to each of your comments, civilly.switch - 2013-05-02 6:27 AM powerman - 2013-05-01 11:40 PM switch - 2013-05-01 7:20 PM powerman - 2013-05-01 7:41 PM Jeez, Powerman, just when we were playing so nicely together :/ Young women need access to this for many reasons, unplanned, unprotected sex is just one of them. I always hope that men making statements like this have had "responsible" and/or protected sex every single time they've had sex. I don't know very many men who can say that though...Hook'em - 2013-05-01 3:33 PM While it is sad that a girl in her early teens would need this, I would rather them have access to this and other forms of birth control than have an unwanted pregnancy or an abortion. That's what's sad... that the morning after pill is thought of as birth control. We have birth control... it's called birth control. This is call ed the morning after pill.... meaning oh crap I had unplanned sex and I'm too irresponsible for birth control and now I have to clean up my mess. I find that sad on many levels. So differing opinions are not "playing nicely"? Exactly how is the morning after pill "protected sex"? And I was not having unprotected sex at 15. At the time I sure wish I was, but I wasn't.... and the fact that a girl gets pregnant at 15 and can't discuss options with parents and needs to "sneek" to a drug store instead of to a doctor to OD on birth control to save herself is sad on many levels. I'll stand by that statement. If you are 18, go do what ever the heck you darn well please. Differing opinions are great, that was more a statement about me preparing myself for a heated discussion about a very difficult subject. And I was specifically making a (facetious) joke about us butting heads (again). The morning after pill is not protected sex in any way. My point with that part of the statement is that I often bristle when men criticize women, or in this case girls, about their reproductive health choices. I think there are very few men who have made the "right" choice with birth control EVERY SINGLE TIME they've had sex in their entire lives. Unfortunately, it only takes one instance of this for a woman to become pregnant and it then is HER responsibility to deal with that. I am often arguing this point with conservative Christians and I like to remind them: "Let he who is without sin among you, cast the first stone at her." I'm not religious at all (though I was raised that way), but I have spent a lot of time with the Bible, and that is always the one that comes to mind when a man is judging a woman on her reproductive health choices. I really wish 15 year olds weren't having sex. I work with kids a lot, and 15 year olds are just not ready for that. Of course, that doesn't mean that it isn't happening. Sometimes that sex is consensual sex (fornication) between two young people. I think that's what most people imagine when they think about young girls having sex, but it's just that it's not always like that. I can go through and describe the other various scenarios if you really can't think of them; they're grim, but they happen. Of course, the best way to handle those situations is for the girl to be able to go see a doctor, talk to her parents, and go to the police, but again, that is not always possible, and more importantly--the victim does not always feel it is possible. I have volunteered for Planned Parenthood and worked with rape victims. You do not want to spend a lot of time thinking about all the different ways a 15 year old can be forced to have sex, and you definitely don't want to spend a lot of time thinking about who can be doing that forcing, but it is often people who are closest to her and who should be in the role of protecting her. Often this is accompanied by YEARS of emotional and, sometimes physical, abuse. Of course we want these victims to get proper healthcare (see a doctor) and get help from law enforcement, but the reality is that these victims do not always feel like either of those things are real options, especially in smaller communities.
Perhaps you should save your religious arguments for those that are religious, and actually respond to a comment made by me. I do not have a problem with kids having BC. I do not have a problem with abortion. I do not have a problem with abortion by a pill. I made a comment that in my opinion lowering the age to 15 for OTC morning after pill is sad on many levels... I still maintain that. Feel free to form your own opinions. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() | ![]() If she didn't then they were never married by the laws of the day. So she did.... and she liked-a-did it Yes, Mary and Joseph were married according to Jewish law, and they never had sexual intercourse. I think they took in dinner and a movie once in a while. Edited by dontracy 2013-05-02 11:02 AM |
![]() ![]() |
Elite ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() switch - 2013-05-02 9:56 AM I responded to each of your comments, civilly. You get a gold star. |
![]() ![]() |
Expert ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]()
There are two issues IMO. 1. The age old question of when does life begin which is the central tenant in the abortion argument. If you don't believe a fertilized egg is a person then there is no problem here. 2. The main issue for me is making this so readily available for kids under 18. So they can't smoke, can't drink, can't vote, in most states can't drive, but they don't need to consult with anyone before taking this drug. I can't by cold medicine off the shelf but a 15 year old can buy this. Seems off to me that people under 18 or 21 can't be trusted with anything else but they are definitely mature enough for this. For me, I don't like the government taking the place of a parent for a 15 year old. I agree with Powerman it is sad that we have gotten to the point where the parenting is so bad that the government steps in like this. My wife and I don't have kids yet but one of the things we talk about the most is how we are going to discipline in a fair manner that gets the point across but also builds trust between us and our kids so they will come to us first when they mess up.
Solution... male birth control. I swear if there was a pill guys could take to make the fishies not swim there wouldn't be an issue. Every guy would carry a container of them and eat them like tic tacs. |
|
![]() ![]() |
Elite ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Aarondb4 - 2013-05-02 10:02 AM
There are two issues IMO. 1. The age old question of when does life begin which is the central tenant in the abortion argument. If you don't believe a fertilized egg is a person then there is no problem here. 2. The main issue for me is making this so readily available for kids under 18. So they can't smoke, can't drink, can't vote, in most states can't drive, but they don't need to consult with anyone before taking this drug. I can't by cold medicine off the shelf but a 15 year old can buy this. Seems off to me that people under 18 or 21 can't be trusted with anything else but they are definitely mature enough for this. For me, I don't like the government taking the place of a parent for a 15 year old. I agree with Powerman it is sad that we have gotten to the point where the parenting is so bad that the government steps in like this. My wife and I don't have kids yet but one of the things we talk about the most is how we are going to discipline in a fair manner that gets the point across but also builds trust between us and our kids so they will come to us first when they mess up.
Solution... male birth control. I swear if there was a pill guys could take to make the fishies not swim there wouldn't be an issue. Every guy would carry a container of them and eat them like tic tacs. I sure as heck would have. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() | ![]() Aarondb4 - For me, I don't like the government taking the place of a parent for a 15 year old. That's an important central question here about this particular issue. It is the encroachment of statism into the natural rights of parents. Many will argue though that they're really not your children. |
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() dontracy - 2013-05-02 12:05 PM Aarondb4 - For me, I don't like the government taking the place of a parent for a 15 year old. That's an important central question here about this particular issue. It is the encroachment of statism into the natural rights of parents. Many will argue though that they're really not your children. i don't know of many of MY friends that reported out to their parents when they decided to start having sex. i was 16 and actually went to a gyno and got BC on my own AND made my boyfriend use condoms, and plan B would NOT have been an option for me back then should something have gone wrong. i have used it since (as an adult, so irrelevant to the discussion) but like it or not, TEENAGERS ARE HAVING SEX AND PROBABLY ARE NOT GOING TO TELL THEIR PARENTS. no matter HOW close they are. ESPECIALLY girls. PS teenagers having sex is not a new thing. |
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() dontracy - 2013-05-02 9:00 AM If she didn't then they were never married by the laws of the day. So she did.... and she liked-a-did it Yes, Mary and Joseph were married according to Jewish law, and they never had sexual intercourse. I think they took in dinner and a movie once in a while. Sounds like a loveless marrage. |
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() dontracy - 2013-05-02 12:00 PM If she didn't then they were never married by the laws of the day. So she did.... and she liked-a-did it Yes, Mary and Joseph were married according to Jewish law, and they never had sexual intercourse. I think they took in dinner and a movie once in a while. but - according to jewish law your marriage is not official until you hit it under the chuppah...and mary likely wouldn't have been old enough to get plan b Edited by mehaner 2013-05-02 11:12 AM |
|
![]() ![]() |
Pro ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Big Appa - 2013-05-02 10:41 AM dontracy - 2013-05-02 8:31 AM Big Appa - Marry had sex with Joseph and I bet she liked it too. No, she didn't. But here's the point again. Fornication is a really bad idea. The pill, more than any single thing, has contributed to the increase in fornication in our culture. Since the pill, we've had a majorly significant increase in:
I'll leave aside what seems to be major increases in mental health issues among teens and young people. And the solution for all of these problems? More contraception. Really, it seems like a type of insanity. Yes she did people just don't want to believe it so they don't. Also if god made us he also made sex enjoyable so I think that is all a part of his plan and I am not one to go against his plan. God also made fire, and it is enjoyable. When that fire is kept in the confines of a fire ring it's great, it can be used for cooking, staying warm, etc... However, when that fire gets out of the fire ring it's one of the most destructive forces on earth. It will level an entire town killing everything in its path. Same thing with sex. It was designed to be enjoyable in the confines of a marriage, but when you get it outside of the ring of marriage it's one of the most destructive things our society faces. |
![]() ![]() |
Elite ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() dontracy - 2013-05-02 10:05 AM Aarondb4 - For me, I don't like the government taking the place of a parent for a 15 year old. That's an important central question here about this particular issue. It is the encroachment of statism into the natural rights of parents. Many will argue though that they're really not your children. How so? The parents still maintain the right to parent. They still have the right to tell their kids they don't want them having sex and they are not to take that pill. The child has free will and can indeed have sex and take that pill. But they can also smoke pot, listen to bad music, and get drunk. So I'm not sure in that respect it takes away parental rights. Yes the government is allowing access to something the parent does not agree with, but there are many cases of that happening. |
![]() ![]() |
Regular ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() powerman - 2013-05-02 11:00 AM switch - 2013-05-02 9:56 AM I responded to each of your comments, civilly. You get a gold star. Powerman wrote: "Thanks... many kids don't even have parents... or certainly not ones that give a crap about them. I don't think I live in La La land. But ya... since I'm a guy... I'll just keep my mouth shut." I'm not sure what I said to you that was so different that I didn't get this response ^ instead of sarcasm and this: Powerman wrote: "Perhaps you should save your religious arguments for those that are religious, and actually respond to a comment made by me. I do not have a problem with kids having BC. I do not have a problem with abortion. I do not have a problem with abortion by a pill. I made a comment that in my opinion lowering the age to 15 for OTC morning after pill is sad on many levels... I still maintain that. Feel free to form your own opinions." The quote that I used was a very minor part of my argument and I explained that I often used that because I was often in this conversation with conservative Christians. I didn't say that you were or were not one. If you don't think the reasons I presented in my last paragraph are reasons enough for a 15 year old to have access, or even your own, "many kids don't even have parents... or certainly not ones that give a crap about them," then I guess we just disagree. |
![]() ![]() |
Regular ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() tuwood - 2013-05-02 10:02 AM switch - 2013-05-02 7:27 AM powerman - 2013-05-01 11:40 PM switch - 2013-05-01 7:20 PM powerman - 2013-05-01 7:41 PM Jeez, Powerman, just when we were playing so nicely together :/ Young women need access to this for many reasons, unplanned, unprotected sex is just one of them. I always hope that men making statements like this have had "responsible" and/or protected sex every single time they've had sex. I don't know very many men who can say that though...Hook'em - 2013-05-01 3:33 PM While it is sad that a girl in her early teens would need this, I would rather them have access to this and other forms of birth control than have an unwanted pregnancy or an abortion. That's what's sad... that the morning after pill is thought of as birth control. We have birth control... it's called birth control. This is call ed the morning after pill.... meaning oh crap I had unplanned sex and I'm too irresponsible for birth control and now I have to clean up my mess. I find that sad on many levels. So differing opinions are not "playing nicely"? Exactly how is the morning after pill "protected sex"? And I was not having unprotected sex at 15. At the time I sure wish I was, but I wasn't.... and the fact that a girl gets pregnant at 15 and can't discuss options with parents and needs to "sneek" to a drug store instead of to a doctor to OD on birth control to save herself is sad on many levels. I'll stand by that statement. If you are 18, go do what ever the heck you darn well please. Differing opinions are great, that was more a statement about me preparing myself for a heated discussion about a very difficult subject. And I was specifically making a (facetious) joke about us butting heads (again). The morning after pill is not protected sex in any way. My point with that part of the statement is that I often bristle when men criticize women, or in this case girls, about their reproductive health choices. I think there are very few men who have made the "right" choice with birth control EVERY SINGLE TIME they've had sex in their entire lives. Unfortunately, it only takes one instance of this for a woman to become pregnant and it then is HER responsibility to deal with that. I am often arguing this point with conservative Christians and I like to remind them: "Let he who is without sin among you, cast the first stone at her." I'm not religious at all (though I was raised that way), but I have spent a lot of time with the Bible, and that is always the one that comes to mind when a man is judging a woman on her reproductive health choices. I really wish 15 year olds weren't having sex. I work with kids a lot, and 15 year olds are just not ready for that. Of course, that doesn't mean that it isn't happening. Sometimes that sex is consensual sex (fornication) between two young people. I think that's what most people imagine when they think about young girls having sex, but it's just that it's not always like that. I can go through and describe the other various scenarios if you really can't think of them; they're grim, but they happen. Of course, the best way to handle those situations is for the girl to be able to go see a doctor, talk to her parents, and go to the police, but again, that is not always possible, and more importantly--the victim does not always feel it is possible. I have volunteered for Planned Parenthood and worked with rape victims. You do not want to spend a lot of time thinking about all the different ways a 15 year old can be forced to have sex, and you definitely don't want to spend a lot of time thinking about who can be doing that forcing, but it is often people who are closest to her and who should be in the role of protecting her. Often this is accompanied by YEARS of emotional and, sometimes physical, abuse. Of course we want these victims to get proper healthcare (see a doctor) and get help from law enforcement, but the reality is that these victims do not always feel like either of those things are real options, especially in smaller communities. Man, I sound like such a square. :) You do make a lot of great points and it may shock you, but I agree with you. I'm every bit as passionate about protecting life as Don is, and I do everything I can to teach kids abstinence and so they are never put in this situation. However, I'm not so naive to think that kids aren't going to have sex and banning teen sex would ever do anything so I am not opposed to teens having access to birth control. I don't like it, I don't want them to do it, but if they're going to then I want them to be safe about it. As I mentioned with Plan B, I'm conflicted, because I'm against all forms of abortion but as is being discussed this one is in that gray area for me. I believe the same hormone used in Plan B is used in regular birth control pills and does the same thing to the uterine walls. So, technically standard birth control could be described as an abortifacient. Even to throw in a personal story. My wife always took the pill for birth control and when we were 20 she became pregnant while still on the pill. She was sick after a few weeks and went to the doctor and discovered she had miscarried. Could the pill have caused the miscarriage? possibly. Do either of us think she had an abortion? Absolutely not. You're also correct about sexual assaults, in that most are perpetrated by somebody close which really sucks. I commend you for helping kids in this area. I do a lot of work trying to prevent these things on the other end of the spectrum. I run a group that help's men who suffer from sexual addictions. Thanks Tony :) You don't sound like "a square" at all. You sound like an open-minded guy who has a strong set of guiding principals who engages in good discussion. I appreciate that. And thanks for the work you do with sex-addicts. I don't think a lot of people realize how many men struggle with that and the different, often unpleasant and abusive ways it can manifest. |
![]() ![]() |
Regular ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() mehaner - 2013-05-02 11:12 AM dontracy - 2013-05-02 12:00 PM If she didn't then they were never married by the laws of the day. So she did.... and she liked-a-did it Yes, Mary and Joseph were married according to Jewish law, and they never had sexual intercourse. I think they took in dinner and a movie once in a while. but - according to jewish law your marriage is not official until you hit it under the chuppah...and mary likely wouldn't have been old enough to get plan b FTW! |
|
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() tuwood - 2013-05-02 9:23 AM Big Appa - 2013-05-02 10:41 AM dontracy - 2013-05-02 8:31 AM Big Appa - Marry had sex with Joseph and I bet she liked it too. No, she didn't. But here's the point again. Fornication is a really bad idea. The pill, more than any single thing, has contributed to the increase in fornication in our culture. Since the pill, we've had a majorly significant increase in:
I'll leave aside what seems to be major increases in mental health issues among teens and young people. And the solution for all of these problems? More contraception. Really, it seems like a type of insanity. Yes she did people just don't want to believe it so they don't. Also if god made us he also made sex enjoyable so I think that is all a part of his plan and I am not one to go against his plan. God also made fire, and it is enjoyable. When that fire is kept in the confines of a fire ring it's great, it can be used for cooking, staying warm, etc... However, when that fire gets out of the fire ring it's one of the most destructive forces on earth. It will level an entire town killing everything in its path. Same thing with sex. It was designed to be enjoyable in the confines of a marriage, but when you get it outside of the ring of marriage it's one of the most destructive things our society faces. It's destructive in marriages too. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() | ![]() mehaner - but - according to jewish law your marriage is not official until you hit it under the chuppah...and mary likely wouldn't have been old enough to get plan b They were legally married under both Jewish and Roman law at the time. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() | ![]() tuwood - God also made fire, and it is enjoyable. When that fire is kept in the confines of a fire ring it's great, it can be used for cooking, staying warm, etc... However, when that fire gets out of the fire ring it's one of the most destructive forces on earth. It will level an entire town killing everything in its path. Same thing with sex. It was designed to be enjoyable in the confines of a marriage, but when you get it outside of the ring of marriage it's one of the most destructive things our society faces. That's a beautiful analogy. We like playing with matches and are burning the house down. |
![]() ![]() |
Extreme Veteran![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() tuwood - 2013-05-02 12:23 PM God also made fire, and it is enjoyable. When that fire is kept in the confines of a fire ring it's great, it can be used for cooking, staying warm, etc... However, when that fire gets out of the fire ring it's one of the most destructive forces on earth. It will level an entire town killing everything in its path. Same thing with sex. It was designed to be enjoyable in the confines of a marriage, but when you get it outside of the ring of marriage it's one of the most destructive things our society faces. OMFG are you kidding me? This has GOT to be one of the most inflammatory, bold, and arrogant statements I've ever read on here. Are you telling me that sex between two adults committed to one another, as "one of the most destructive things in our society", ranks up there with poverty, racism, drug abuse, terrorism, etc? Because I would submit that my list of destroyers of society trumps yours, and your suggestion that they belong together is yet another example of unsubstantiated claims made by the religious to make a faith based and unproven point. Furthermore, your comment that only sex within this so-called "ring of marriage" (a pompous and self important phrase at that), betrays your prejudice against any and all relationships not currently recognized by the state as "married". This would include all responsible, moral, decent, and committed couples straight and gay. |
|