Election 2016 (Page 69)
-
No new posts
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller | Reply |
|
2016-11-28 11:56 AM in reply to: Bob Loblaw |
Pro 15655 | Subject: RE: Election 2016 Originally posted by Bob Loblaw Originally posted by tuwood So about that "accepting the election results"? I love how the fake news was pumping the hacking of the vote machines narrative leading up to this, even though all of those states use paper ballots... lol Honestly I love that she is doing this because it's just destroying the DNC more and more. Talk about the party of the millennial generation... I was originally opposed to the recounts; you lost, get over it. But now that Trump has declared millions of people voted illegally and there's serious voter fraud in Virginia, New Hampshire, and California, clearly we need a full recount. Every state, every county. Shoot, let's just throw out the first election entirely and all vote again. LOL
BWAHAHAHAHAHAAA!!! I knew the left would somehow blame republicans......you can't help yourselves. |
|
2016-11-28 12:35 PM in reply to: Left Brain |
Veteran 1019 St. Louis | Subject: RE: Election 2016 Originally posted by Left Brain Originally posted by Bob Loblaw Originally posted by tuwood So about that "accepting the election results"? I love how the fake news was pumping the hacking of the vote machines narrative leading up to this, even though all of those states use paper ballots... lol Honestly I love that she is doing this because it's just destroying the DNC more and more. Talk about the party of the millennial generation... I was originally opposed to the recounts; you lost, get over it. But now that Trump has declared millions of people voted illegally and there's serious voter fraud in Virginia, New Hampshire, and California, clearly we need a full recount. Every state, every county. Shoot, let's just throw out the first election entirely and all vote again. LOL
BWAHAHAHAHAHAAA!!! I knew the left would somehow blame republicans......you can't help yourselves. Maybe I should have used a sarcasm font? Seriously, you don't find the humor and hypocrisy in all of this? Of course the recounts are a joke. But ffs, both sides are now claiming massive voter fraud. Go back a few weeks and you'll see conservatives worrying about electronic voting without a paper backup, Trump saying the election is rigged and he wouldn't accept the results if he loses, people posting videos of electronic votes for Trump that were automatically switching to Clinton, and the whole time liberals were saying there's absolutely no voter fraud. Then all of a sudden Trump wins, the left claims voter fraud with electronic voting and want the paper backups checked, Trump and conservatives say we must accept the results and move on. Meanwhile, since the left is clinging to this theory that Hillary should be president because she won the popular vote (even though they're flat out wrong because that's not the system we have), Trump is now proclaiming there were millions of illegal votes. Millions. Someone needs to tell Jill Stein to shut up and accept that Trump won the swing states. Hillary needed to step up and say she disavowed the recounts. Someone also needs to tell Trump to shut up and admit he lost the popular vote, he still gets to be president. But screw it, if both sides think there was massive cheating then I fully support throwing out the election results and starting over. Preferably with two new candidates! |
2016-11-28 12:58 PM in reply to: Left Brain |
Champion 10157 Alabama | Subject: RE: Election 2016 Originally posted by Left Brain Originally posted by Bob Loblaw Originally posted by tuwood So about that "accepting the election results"? I love how the fake news was pumping the hacking of the vote machines narrative leading up to this, even though all of those states use paper ballots... lol Honestly I love that she is doing this because it's just destroying the DNC more and more. Talk about the party of the millennial generation... I was originally opposed to the recounts; you lost, get over it. But now that Trump has declared millions of people voted illegally and there's serious voter fraud in Virginia, New Hampshire, and California, clearly we need a full recount. Every state, every county. Shoot, let's just throw out the first election entirely and all vote again. LOL
BWAHAHAHAHAHAAA!!! I knew the left would somehow blame republicans......you can't help yourselves. Liberals thought everybody was getting a Trophy |
2016-11-28 1:05 PM in reply to: Bob Loblaw |
Pro 15655 | Subject: RE: Election 2016 Originally posted by Bob Loblaw Originally posted by Left Brain Originally posted by Bob Loblaw Originally posted by tuwood So about that "accepting the election results"? I love how the fake news was pumping the hacking of the vote machines narrative leading up to this, even though all of those states use paper ballots... lol Honestly I love that she is doing this because it's just destroying the DNC more and more. Talk about the party of the millennial generation... I was originally opposed to the recounts; you lost, get over it. But now that Trump has declared millions of people voted illegally and there's serious voter fraud in Virginia, New Hampshire, and California, clearly we need a full recount. Every state, every county. Shoot, let's just throw out the first election entirely and all vote again. LOL
BWAHAHAHAHAHAAA!!! I knew the left would somehow blame republicans......you can't help yourselves. Maybe I should have used a sarcasm font? Seriously, you don't find the humor and hypocrisy in all of this? Of course the recounts are a joke. But ffs, both sides are now claiming massive voter fraud. Go back a few weeks and you'll see conservatives worrying about electronic voting without a paper backup, Trump saying the election is rigged and he wouldn't accept the results if he loses, people posting videos of electronic votes for Trump that were automatically switching to Clinton, and the whole time liberals were saying there's absolutely no voter fraud. Then all of a sudden Trump wins, the left claims voter fraud with electronic voting and want the paper backups checked, Trump and conservatives say we must accept the results and move on. Meanwhile, since the left is clinging to this theory that Hillary should be president because she won the popular vote (even though they're flat out wrong because that's not the system we have), Trump is now proclaiming there were millions of illegal votes. Millions. Someone needs to tell Jill Stein to shut up and accept that Trump won the swing states. Hillary needed to step up and say she disavowed the recounts. Someone also needs to tell Trump to shut up and admit he lost the popular vote, he still gets to be president. But screw it, if both sides think there was massive cheating then I fully support throwing out the election results and starting over. Preferably with two new candidates! I have said all along that we are getting the election we deserve......and we still are. I'm only willing to blame the candidates so far.....this is what we all get since we can't get along with each other. |
2016-11-28 1:07 PM in reply to: Rogillio |
Champion 10157 Alabama | Subject: RE: Election 2016 In 2010 Democrats lost the House to Republicans. In 2014 Democrats lost the Senate to Republicans. Since Obama took office Democrats have lost: ** 14 Senate seats ** 69 House seats ** 12 governorships ** 910 state legislature seats Democrats are still in denial. Yesterday my daughter took a picture of me sitting by the pool in shorts and tee shirts sipping on some wine with a propane heater on my feet. I was driving a remote controlled boat around the pool skimming leaves....very cool toy/tool BTW. She said it is freezing our here and that I was in denial that summer was over! |
2016-11-28 1:19 PM in reply to: Bob Loblaw |
Pro 9391 Omaha, NE | Subject: RE: Election 2016 Originally posted by Bob Loblaw Originally posted by tuwood So about that "accepting the election results"? I love how the fake news was pumping the hacking of the vote machines narrative leading up to this, even though all of those states use paper ballots... lol Honestly I love that she is doing this because it's just destroying the DNC more and more. Talk about the party of the millennial generation... I was originally opposed to the recounts; you lost, get over it. But now that Trump has declared millions of people voted illegally and there's serious voter fraud in Virginia, New Hampshire, and California, clearly we need a full recount. Every state, every county. Shoot, let's just throw out the first election entirely and all vote again. LOL The Democrats really don't want that to happen. I feel pretty confident that there were several million illegals that voted in states like Florida and California. It is becoming pretty obvious what the strategy was with illegal immigration from a DNC standpoint which is to make it so anyone with a pulse can vote (no ID's or verification) and then get as many dependent people as possible into the country. It's pretty disgusting when you really think about it. Before you call me a conspiracy theorist, Obama himself was actively encouraging illegals to vote prior to the election because it makes them "American" and that there would be no legal ramifications. The recent talking point that you mention is pretty funny when it comes to justification for Clinton meddling in the election. I know you're being somewhat tongue in cheek, but the liberal elites are dead serious. The irony of this whole thing IMHO, is that any semblance of leniency Trump had towards Clinton post election is likely gone now and this will ultimately land her in jail. #oops |
|
2016-11-28 1:46 PM in reply to: tuwood |
Veteran 1019 St. Louis | Subject: RE: Election 2016 Originally posted by tuwood Originally posted by Bob Loblaw Originally posted by tuwood So about that "accepting the election results"? I love how the fake news was pumping the hacking of the vote machines narrative leading up to this, even though all of those states use paper ballots... lol Honestly I love that she is doing this because it's just destroying the DNC more and more. Talk about the party of the millennial generation... I was originally opposed to the recounts; you lost, get over it. But now that Trump has declared millions of people voted illegally and there's serious voter fraud in Virginia, New Hampshire, and California, clearly we need a full recount. Every state, every county. Shoot, let's just throw out the first election entirely and all vote again. LOL The Democrats really don't want that to happen. I feel pretty confident that there were several million illegals that voted in states like Florida and California. It is becoming pretty obvious what the strategy was with illegal immigration from a DNC standpoint which is to make it so anyone with a pulse can vote (no ID's or verification) and then get as many dependent people as possible into the country. It's pretty disgusting when you really think about it. Before you call me a conspiracy theorist, Obama himself was actively encouraging illegals to vote prior to the election because it makes them "American" and that there would be no legal ramifications. The recent talking point that you mention is pretty funny when it comes to justification for Clinton meddling in the election. I know you're being somewhat tongue in cheek, but the liberal elites are dead serious. The irony of this whole thing IMHO, is that any semblance of leniency Trump had towards Clinton post election is likely gone now and this will ultimately land her in jail. #oops No he didn't. You're buying in to one of the fake news story that you guys spent all Thanksgiving weekend bashing. Only it came from Fox News instead of CNN. Obama did an interview where he was talking about legal Latino voters being scared to vote because they're afraid of retribution for their illegal friends and family. Neil Cavuto cut short the president's answer to make it sound like he was saying illegals should vote. Here's the full interview, with the illegal voting issue staring at 3:30. Here is what Cavuto aired. Conveniently cutting out Obama's very next sentence of "If you have a family member who maybe is undocumented, then you have an even greater reason to vote." He followed that up by saying Latinos need to vote because "You're speaking for family members, friends, classmates of yours in school who may not have a voice. Who can't legally vote." That is not encouraging illegals to vote, it's encouraging Latinos to vote in order to help their illegal friends. But it absolutely was fear-mongering on Cavuto's part.
|
2016-11-28 1:58 PM in reply to: Bob Loblaw |
Pro 9391 Omaha, NE | Subject: RE: Election 2016 Originally posted by Bob Loblaw Originally posted by tuwood Originally posted by Bob Loblaw Originally posted by tuwood So about that "accepting the election results"? I love how the fake news was pumping the hacking of the vote machines narrative leading up to this, even though all of those states use paper ballots... lol Honestly I love that she is doing this because it's just destroying the DNC more and more. Talk about the party of the millennial generation... I was originally opposed to the recounts; you lost, get over it. But now that Trump has declared millions of people voted illegally and there's serious voter fraud in Virginia, New Hampshire, and California, clearly we need a full recount. Every state, every county. Shoot, let's just throw out the first election entirely and all vote again. LOL The Democrats really don't want that to happen. I feel pretty confident that there were several million illegals that voted in states like Florida and California. It is becoming pretty obvious what the strategy was with illegal immigration from a DNC standpoint which is to make it so anyone with a pulse can vote (no ID's or verification) and then get as many dependent people as possible into the country. It's pretty disgusting when you really think about it. Before you call me a conspiracy theorist, Obama himself was actively encouraging illegals to vote prior to the election because it makes them "American" and that there would be no legal ramifications. The recent talking point that you mention is pretty funny when it comes to justification for Clinton meddling in the election. I know you're being somewhat tongue in cheek, but the liberal elites are dead serious. The irony of this whole thing IMHO, is that any semblance of leniency Trump had towards Clinton post election is likely gone now and this will ultimately land her in jail. #oops No he didn't. You're buying in to one of the fake news story that you guys spent all Thanksgiving weekend bashing. Only it came from Fox News instead of CNN. Obama did an interview where he was talking about legal Latino voters being scared to vote because they're afraid of retribution for their illegal friends and family. Neil Cavuto cut short the president's answer to make it sound like he was saying illegals should vote. Here's the full interview, with the illegal voting issue staring at 3:30. Here is what Cavuto aired. Conveniently cutting out Obama's very next sentence of "If you have a family member who maybe is undocumented, then you have an even greater reason to vote." He followed that up by saying Latinos need to vote because "You're speaking for family members, friends, classmates of yours in school who may not have a voice. Who can't legally vote." That is not encouraging illegals to vote, it's encouraging Latinos to vote in order to help their illegal friends. But it absolutely was fear-mongering on Cavuto's part.
you crack me up Bob. Did you watch the video you just linked? Obama's exact response: At the most, you can assert that Obama is an idiot and thought she asked a question about people with illegal family members, but it was quite clear what she asked and what Obama said in response. |
2016-11-28 2:22 PM in reply to: tuwood |
Pro 15655 | Subject: RE: Election 2016 I don't now about voting laws in any state but my own......but I've dealt with quite a few "illegals" from Mexico. They have ID's (usually in a name other than theirs), pay taxes, pay rent , and live among us pretty much minding their own business until/unless they get in trouble with the law. The majority, like all majorities of any race/ethnicity, never get in trouble so it never comes up. I would think it would be relatively easy for them to vote if they wanted to. |
2016-11-28 2:24 PM in reply to: tuwood |
Veteran 1019 St. Louis | Subject: RE: Election 2016 Originally posted by tuwood Originally posted by Bob Loblaw Originally posted by tuwood Originally posted by Bob Loblaw Originally posted by tuwood So about that "accepting the election results"? I love how the fake news was pumping the hacking of the vote machines narrative leading up to this, even though all of those states use paper ballots... lol Honestly I love that she is doing this because it's just destroying the DNC more and more. Talk about the party of the millennial generation... I was originally opposed to the recounts; you lost, get over it. But now that Trump has declared millions of people voted illegally and there's serious voter fraud in Virginia, New Hampshire, and California, clearly we need a full recount. Every state, every county. Shoot, let's just throw out the first election entirely and all vote again. LOL The Democrats really don't want that to happen. I feel pretty confident that there were several million illegals that voted in states like Florida and California. It is becoming pretty obvious what the strategy was with illegal immigration from a DNC standpoint which is to make it so anyone with a pulse can vote (no ID's or verification) and then get as many dependent people as possible into the country. It's pretty disgusting when you really think about it. Before you call me a conspiracy theorist, Obama himself was actively encouraging illegals to vote prior to the election because it makes them "American" and that there would be no legal ramifications. The recent talking point that you mention is pretty funny when it comes to justification for Clinton meddling in the election. I know you're being somewhat tongue in cheek, but the liberal elites are dead serious. The irony of this whole thing IMHO, is that any semblance of leniency Trump had towards Clinton post election is likely gone now and this will ultimately land her in jail. #oops No he didn't. You're buying in to one of the fake news story that you guys spent all Thanksgiving weekend bashing. Only it came from Fox News instead of CNN. Obama did an interview where he was talking about legal Latino voters being scared to vote because they're afraid of retribution for their illegal friends and family. Neil Cavuto cut short the president's answer to make it sound like he was saying illegals should vote. Here's the full interview, with the illegal voting issue staring at 3:30. Here is what Cavuto aired. Conveniently cutting out Obama's very next sentence of "If you have a family member who maybe is undocumented, then you have an even greater reason to vote." He followed that up by saying Latinos need to vote because "You're speaking for family members, friends, classmates of yours in school who may not have a voice. Who can't legally vote." That is not encouraging illegals to vote, it's encouraging Latinos to vote in order to help their illegal friends. But it absolutely was fear-mongering on Cavuto's part.
you crack me up Bob. Did you watch the video you just linked? Obama's exact response: At the most, you can assert that Obama is an idiot and thought she asked a question about people with illegal family members, but it was quite clear what she asked and what Obama said in response. Spin at it's finest. Sigh. Here is his entire answer. "Not true. And the reason is, first of all, when you vote, you are a citizen yourself. And there is not a situation where the voting rolls somehow are transferred over and people start investigating, et cetera. The sanctity of the vote is strictly confidential in terms of who you voted for. If you have a family member who maybe is undocumented, then you have an even greater reason to vote." "And the reason that fear is promoted is because they don't want people voting. People are discouraged from voting and part of what is important for Latino citizens is to make your voice heard, because you're not just speaking for yourself. You're speaking for family members, friends, classmates of yours in school who may not have a voice. Who can't legally vote. But they're counting on you to make sure that you have the courage to make your voice heard." So where in all of that does he tell illegal aliens to go out and vote? The second sentence, which was directed at the interviewer who is also a citizen? If you listen to his entire answer, he twice says go vote and be the voice of people who can't legally vote. Why would people who can't legally vote have to count on you to make your voice heard if they're already voting by the millions? LMAO! |
2016-11-28 2:31 PM in reply to: Left Brain |
Pro 9391 Omaha, NE | Subject: RE: Election 2016 Originally posted by Left Brain I don't now about voting laws in any state but my own......but I've dealt with quite a few "illegals" from Mexico. They have ID's (usually in a name other than theirs), pay taxes, pay rent , and live among us pretty much minding their own business until/unless they get in trouble with the law. The majority, like all majorities of any race/ethnicity, never get in trouble so it never comes up. I would think it would be relatively easy for them to vote if they wanted to. In California you don't have to have an ID or a SSN to register. Here's a screen shot of the registration page. Once registered you can vote all you want in CA no matter if you're a legal citizen or not. In theory you could register multiple times as well, but that's probably less common. |
|
2016-11-28 2:31 PM in reply to: Bob Loblaw |
Pro 15655 | Subject: RE: Election 2016 Originally posted by Bob Loblaw Originally posted by tuwood Originally posted by Bob Loblaw Originally posted by tuwood Originally posted by Bob Loblaw Originally posted by tuwood So about that "accepting the election results"? I love how the fake news was pumping the hacking of the vote machines narrative leading up to this, even though all of those states use paper ballots... lol Honestly I love that she is doing this because it's just destroying the DNC more and more. Talk about the party of the millennial generation... I was originally opposed to the recounts; you lost, get over it. But now that Trump has declared millions of people voted illegally and there's serious voter fraud in Virginia, New Hampshire, and California, clearly we need a full recount. Every state, every county. Shoot, let's just throw out the first election entirely and all vote again. LOL The Democrats really don't want that to happen. I feel pretty confident that there were several million illegals that voted in states like Florida and California. It is becoming pretty obvious what the strategy was with illegal immigration from a DNC standpoint which is to make it so anyone with a pulse can vote (no ID's or verification) and then get as many dependent people as possible into the country. It's pretty disgusting when you really think about it. Before you call me a conspiracy theorist, Obama himself was actively encouraging illegals to vote prior to the election because it makes them "American" and that there would be no legal ramifications. The recent talking point that you mention is pretty funny when it comes to justification for Clinton meddling in the election. I know you're being somewhat tongue in cheek, but the liberal elites are dead serious. The irony of this whole thing IMHO, is that any semblance of leniency Trump had towards Clinton post election is likely gone now and this will ultimately land her in jail. #oops No he didn't. You're buying in to one of the fake news story that you guys spent all Thanksgiving weekend bashing. Only it came from Fox News instead of CNN. Obama did an interview where he was talking about legal Latino voters being scared to vote because they're afraid of retribution for their illegal friends and family. Neil Cavuto cut short the president's answer to make it sound like he was saying illegals should vote. Here's the full interview, with the illegal voting issue staring at 3:30. Here is what Cavuto aired. Conveniently cutting out Obama's very next sentence of "If you have a family member who maybe is undocumented, then you have an even greater reason to vote." He followed that up by saying Latinos need to vote because "You're speaking for family members, friends, classmates of yours in school who may not have a voice. Who can't legally vote." That is not encouraging illegals to vote, it's encouraging Latinos to vote in order to help their illegal friends. But it absolutely was fear-mongering on Cavuto's part.
you crack me up Bob. Did you watch the video you just linked? Obama's exact response: At the most, you can assert that Obama is an idiot and thought she asked a question about people with illegal family members, but it was quite clear what she asked and what Obama said in response. Spin at it's finest. Sigh. Here is his entire answer. "Not true. And the reason is, first of all, when you vote, you are a citizen yourself. And there is not a situation where the voting rolls somehow are transferred over and people start investigating, et cetera. The sanctity of the vote is strictly confidential in terms of who you voted for. If you have a family member who maybe is undocumented, then you have an even greater reason to vote." "And the reason that fear is promoted is because they don't want people voting. People are discouraged from voting and part of what is important for Latino citizens is to make your voice heard, because you're not just speaking for yourself. You're speaking for family members, friends, classmates of yours in school who may not have a voice. Who can't legally vote. But they're counting on you to make sure that you have the courage to make your voice heard." So where in all of that does he tell illegal aliens to go out and vote? The second sentence, which was directed at the interviewer who is also a citizen? If you listen to his entire answer, he twice says go vote and be the voice of people who can't legally vote. Why would people who can't legally vote have to count on you to make your voice heard if they're already voting by the millions? LMAO! I've been told that the number of illegals who voted is really big, like huge, like Megyn Kelly's forehead huge. |
2016-11-28 2:32 PM in reply to: tuwood |
Expert 852 Evergreen, Colorado | Subject: RE: Election 2016 Originally posted by tuwood The irony of this whole thing IMHO, is that any semblance of leniency Trump had towards Clinton post election is likely gone now and this will ultimately land her in jail. #oops So now we jail our political opponents for daring to do something that makes us unhappy? Awesome, That sounds like a great way to make American great again!! |
2016-11-28 2:33 PM in reply to: Bob Loblaw |
Pro 9391 Omaha, NE | Subject: RE: Election 2016 Originally posted by Bob Loblaw Originally posted by tuwood Originally posted by Bob Loblaw Originally posted by tuwood Originally posted by Bob Loblaw Originally posted by tuwood So about that "accepting the election results"? I love how the fake news was pumping the hacking of the vote machines narrative leading up to this, even though all of those states use paper ballots... lol Honestly I love that she is doing this because it's just destroying the DNC more and more. Talk about the party of the millennial generation... I was originally opposed to the recounts; you lost, get over it. But now that Trump has declared millions of people voted illegally and there's serious voter fraud in Virginia, New Hampshire, and California, clearly we need a full recount. Every state, every county. Shoot, let's just throw out the first election entirely and all vote again. LOL The Democrats really don't want that to happen. I feel pretty confident that there were several million illegals that voted in states like Florida and California. It is becoming pretty obvious what the strategy was with illegal immigration from a DNC standpoint which is to make it so anyone with a pulse can vote (no ID's or verification) and then get as many dependent people as possible into the country. It's pretty disgusting when you really think about it. Before you call me a conspiracy theorist, Obama himself was actively encouraging illegals to vote prior to the election because it makes them "American" and that there would be no legal ramifications. The recent talking point that you mention is pretty funny when it comes to justification for Clinton meddling in the election. I know you're being somewhat tongue in cheek, but the liberal elites are dead serious. The irony of this whole thing IMHO, is that any semblance of leniency Trump had towards Clinton post election is likely gone now and this will ultimately land her in jail. #oops No he didn't. You're buying in to one of the fake news story that you guys spent all Thanksgiving weekend bashing. Only it came from Fox News instead of CNN. Obama did an interview where he was talking about legal Latino voters being scared to vote because they're afraid of retribution for their illegal friends and family. Neil Cavuto cut short the president's answer to make it sound like he was saying illegals should vote. Here's the full interview, with the illegal voting issue staring at 3:30. Here is what Cavuto aired. Conveniently cutting out Obama's very next sentence of "If you have a family member who maybe is undocumented, then you have an even greater reason to vote." He followed that up by saying Latinos need to vote because "You're speaking for family members, friends, classmates of yours in school who may not have a voice. Who can't legally vote." That is not encouraging illegals to vote, it's encouraging Latinos to vote in order to help their illegal friends. But it absolutely was fear-mongering on Cavuto's part.
you crack me up Bob. Did you watch the video you just linked? Obama's exact response: At the most, you can assert that Obama is an idiot and thought she asked a question about people with illegal family members, but it was quite clear what she asked and what Obama said in response. Spin at it's finest. Sigh. Here is his entire answer. "Not true. And the reason is, first of all, when you vote, you are a citizen yourself. And there is not a situation where the voting rolls somehow are transferred over and people start investigating, et cetera. The sanctity of the vote is strictly confidential in terms of who you voted for. If you have a family member who maybe is undocumented, then you have an even greater reason to vote." "And the reason that fear is promoted is because they don't want people voting. People are discouraged from voting and part of what is important for Latino citizens is to make your voice heard, because you're not just speaking for yourself. You're speaking for family members, friends, classmates of yours in school who may not have a voice. Who can't legally vote. But they're counting on you to make sure that you have the courage to make your voice heard." So where in all of that does he tell illegal aliens to go out and vote? The second sentence, which was directed at the interviewer who is also a citizen? If you listen to his entire answer, he twice says go vote and be the voice of people who can't legally vote. Why would people who can't legally vote have to count on you to make your voice heard if they're already voting by the millions? LMAO! Why do you keep conveniently omitting the question that was asked to him? Did she ask him about illegals voting or did she ask him about people who have illegal family members? |
2016-11-28 2:37 PM in reply to: Stacers |
Pro 9391 Omaha, NE | Subject: RE: Election 2016 Originally posted by Stacers Originally posted by tuwood The irony of this whole thing IMHO, is that any semblance of leniency Trump had towards Clinton post election is likely gone now and this will ultimately land her in jail. #oops So now we jail our political opponents for daring to do something that makes us unhappy? Awesome, That sounds like a great way to make American great again!! Nope, we jail criminals for breaking the law. Trump came out and stated that he would not pursue charges after the election for the better of the country. Hillary apparently isn't content on keeping her word, so I'm just saying Trump doesn't need to hold his either. If she didn't do anything wrong, then she has nothing to worry about. However, you and I both know that she DID break the law so it's pretty obvious that she will go to jail if Trump decides to not hold back his justice department. This is a far cry from the faux outrage of "jailing political opponents" |
2016-11-28 2:37 PM in reply to: Stacers |
Pro 15655 | Subject: RE: Election 2016 Originally posted by Stacers Originally posted by tuwood The irony of this whole thing IMHO, is that any semblance of leniency Trump had towards Clinton post election is likely gone now and this will ultimately land her in jail. #oops So now we jail our political opponents for daring to do something that makes us unhappy? Awesome, That sounds like a great way to make American great again!! If we do, I want equal rights to jail spouses who make us unhappy......it's only right. |
|
2016-11-28 2:50 PM in reply to: tuwood |
Expert 852 Evergreen, Colorado | Subject: RE: Election 2016 Originally posted by tuwood If she didn't do anything wrong, then she has nothing to worry about. However, you and I both know that she DID break the law so it's pretty obvious that she will go to jail if Trump decides to not hold back his justice department. This is a far cry from the faux outrage of "jailing political opponents" Uh, no. No I don't know (and I've done a lot of digging and reading through wikileaks and everything else, so it's not for lack of research). And neither do any of the people who have investigated her in the past, and failed to put her in jail. To me, this type of witch hunt is a waste - "Hey, let's investigate Hillary Clinton AGAIN for millions and millions of dollars!!!" It's a total waste of time and energy, and our president elect should be putting his energy into being a successful president, and not carrying out some sort of vendetta against his political opponent. I would rather see Donald Trump focusing on filling his cabinet with quality people, and educating himself on intricate foreign policy and environmental issues during this time period. While I understand he was voted in precisely because he is anti-establishment, the fact that he has no political experience does mean that he has a lot to learn to prepare for his imminent inauguration, and I would hope he is taking this seriously instead of assuming he can delegate the entire job to his cabinet and vice president. It's hard to feel positive about the pending presidency when our president-elect insists on tweeting something inane in response to every small thing that offends him. It's embarrassingly unprofessional. Or course, I don't expect you to understand this, since you apparently view him as the greatest thing to ever happen to this country.
|
2016-11-28 2:59 PM in reply to: Stacers |
Pro 15655 | Subject: RE: Election 2016 Originally posted by Stacers Originally posted by tuwood If she didn't do anything wrong, then she has nothing to worry about. However, you and I both know that she DID break the law so it's pretty obvious that she will go to jail if Trump decides to not hold back his justice department. This is a far cry from the faux outrage of "jailing political opponents" Uh, no. No I don't know (and I've done a lot of digging and reading through wikileaks and everything else, so it's not for lack of research). And neither do any of the people who have investigated her in the past, and failed to put her in jail. To me, this type of witch hunt is a waste - "Hey, let's investigate Hillary Clinton AGAIN for millions and millions of dollars!!!" It's a total waste of time and energy, and our president elect should be putting his energy into being a successful president, and not carrying out some sort of vendetta against his political opponent. I would rather see Donald Trump focusing on filling his cabinet with quality people, and educating himself on intricate foreign policy and environmental issues during this time period. While I understand he was voted in precisely because he is anti-establishment, the fact that he has no political experience does mean that he has a lot to learn to prepare for his imminent inauguration, and I would hope he is taking this seriously instead of assuming he can delegate the entire job to his cabinet and vice president. It's hard to feel positive about the pending presidency when our president-elect insists on tweeting something inane in response to every small thing that offends him. It's embarrassingly unprofessional. Or course, I don't expect you to understand this, since you apparently view him as the greatest thing to ever happen to this country.
Well, I don't know about ever.....but being the best in the last 24 years isn't such a tall order. LMAO |
2016-11-28 3:14 PM in reply to: tuwood |
Veteran 1019 St. Louis | Subject: RE: Election 2016 Originally posted by tuwood Originally posted by Bob Loblaw Originally posted by tuwood Originally posted by Bob Loblaw Originally posted by tuwood Originally posted by Bob Loblaw Originally posted by tuwood So about that "accepting the election results"? I love how the fake news was pumping the hacking of the vote machines narrative leading up to this, even though all of those states use paper ballots... lol Honestly I love that she is doing this because it's just destroying the DNC more and more. Talk about the party of the millennial generation... I was originally opposed to the recounts; you lost, get over it. But now that Trump has declared millions of people voted illegally and there's serious voter fraud in Virginia, New Hampshire, and California, clearly we need a full recount. Every state, every county. Shoot, let's just throw out the first election entirely and all vote again. LOL The Democrats really don't want that to happen. I feel pretty confident that there were several million illegals that voted in states like Florida and California. It is becoming pretty obvious what the strategy was with illegal immigration from a DNC standpoint which is to make it so anyone with a pulse can vote (no ID's or verification) and then get as many dependent people as possible into the country. It's pretty disgusting when you really think about it. Before you call me a conspiracy theorist, Obama himself was actively encouraging illegals to vote prior to the election because it makes them "American" and that there would be no legal ramifications. The recent talking point that you mention is pretty funny when it comes to justification for Clinton meddling in the election. I know you're being somewhat tongue in cheek, but the liberal elites are dead serious. The irony of this whole thing IMHO, is that any semblance of leniency Trump had towards Clinton post election is likely gone now and this will ultimately land her in jail. #oops No he didn't. You're buying in to one of the fake news story that you guys spent all Thanksgiving weekend bashing. Only it came from Fox News instead of CNN. Obama did an interview where he was talking about legal Latino voters being scared to vote because they're afraid of retribution for their illegal friends and family. Neil Cavuto cut short the president's answer to make it sound like he was saying illegals should vote. Here's the full interview, with the illegal voting issue staring at 3:30. Here is what Cavuto aired. Conveniently cutting out Obama's very next sentence of "If you have a family member who maybe is undocumented, then you have an even greater reason to vote." He followed that up by saying Latinos need to vote because "You're speaking for family members, friends, classmates of yours in school who may not have a voice. Who can't legally vote." That is not encouraging illegals to vote, it's encouraging Latinos to vote in order to help their illegal friends. But it absolutely was fear-mongering on Cavuto's part.
you crack me up Bob. Did you watch the video you just linked? Obama's exact response: At the most, you can assert that Obama is an idiot and thought she asked a question about people with illegal family members, but it was quite clear what she asked and what Obama said in response. Spin at it's finest. Sigh. Here is his entire answer. "Not true. And the reason is, first of all, when you vote, you are a citizen yourself. And there is not a situation where the voting rolls somehow are transferred over and people start investigating, et cetera. The sanctity of the vote is strictly confidential in terms of who you voted for. If you have a family member who maybe is undocumented, then you have an even greater reason to vote." "And the reason that fear is promoted is because they don't want people voting. People are discouraged from voting and part of what is important for Latino citizens is to make your voice heard, because you're not just speaking for yourself. You're speaking for family members, friends, classmates of yours in school who may not have a voice. Who can't legally vote. But they're counting on you to make sure that you have the courage to make your voice heard." So where in all of that does he tell illegal aliens to go out and vote? The second sentence, which was directed at the interviewer who is also a citizen? If you listen to his entire answer, he twice says go vote and be the voice of people who can't legally vote. Why would people who can't legally vote have to count on you to make your voice heard if they're already voting by the millions? LMAO! Why do you keep conveniently omitting the question that was asked to him? Did she ask him about illegals voting or did she ask him about people who have illegal family members? No, she lead in to a question with some rambling sentence, then asked a question about herself. And Obama directed his answer to her. Because he's a polished politician with a silver tongue. "Many of the millennials, Dreamers, undocumented citizens -- and I call them citizens because they contribute to this country -- are fearful of voting. So if I vote, will immigration know where I live? Will they come for my family and deport us?" "Not true. And the reason is, first of all, when you vote, you are a citizen yourself." See what he did there? That's slick. Smooth as butter. You don't have to like the man or his presidency, but there's no denying that he can rope-a-dope his way through an interview. And yes, I see how conservatives can cherry pick her saying that undocumented citizens are citizens with him saying when you vote you're a citizen, then screaming that he wants illegals to vote. I can also cherry pick a hundred different Trump statements taken out of context. Did Trump really say veterans with PTSD are weak? No, but I can selectively quote him to strongly imply that he did. |
2016-11-28 3:17 PM in reply to: Bob Loblaw |
Pro 15655 | Subject: RE: Election 2016 Originally posted by Bob Loblaw Originally posted by tuwood Originally posted by Bob Loblaw Originally posted by tuwood Originally posted by Bob Loblaw Originally posted by tuwood Originally posted by Bob Loblaw Originally posted by tuwood So about that "accepting the election results"? I love how the fake news was pumping the hacking of the vote machines narrative leading up to this, even though all of those states use paper ballots... lol Honestly I love that she is doing this because it's just destroying the DNC more and more. Talk about the party of the millennial generation... I was originally opposed to the recounts; you lost, get over it. But now that Trump has declared millions of people voted illegally and there's serious voter fraud in Virginia, New Hampshire, and California, clearly we need a full recount. Every state, every county. Shoot, let's just throw out the first election entirely and all vote again. LOL The Democrats really don't want that to happen. I feel pretty confident that there were several million illegals that voted in states like Florida and California. It is becoming pretty obvious what the strategy was with illegal immigration from a DNC standpoint which is to make it so anyone with a pulse can vote (no ID's or verification) and then get as many dependent people as possible into the country. It's pretty disgusting when you really think about it. Before you call me a conspiracy theorist, Obama himself was actively encouraging illegals to vote prior to the election because it makes them "American" and that there would be no legal ramifications. The recent talking point that you mention is pretty funny when it comes to justification for Clinton meddling in the election. I know you're being somewhat tongue in cheek, but the liberal elites are dead serious. The irony of this whole thing IMHO, is that any semblance of leniency Trump had towards Clinton post election is likely gone now and this will ultimately land her in jail. #oops No he didn't. You're buying in to one of the fake news story that you guys spent all Thanksgiving weekend bashing. Only it came from Fox News instead of CNN. Obama did an interview where he was talking about legal Latino voters being scared to vote because they're afraid of retribution for their illegal friends and family. Neil Cavuto cut short the president's answer to make it sound like he was saying illegals should vote. Here's the full interview, with the illegal voting issue staring at 3:30. Here is what Cavuto aired. Conveniently cutting out Obama's very next sentence of "If you have a family member who maybe is undocumented, then you have an even greater reason to vote." He followed that up by saying Latinos need to vote because "You're speaking for family members, friends, classmates of yours in school who may not have a voice. Who can't legally vote." That is not encouraging illegals to vote, it's encouraging Latinos to vote in order to help their illegal friends. But it absolutely was fear-mongering on Cavuto's part.
you crack me up Bob. Did you watch the video you just linked? Obama's exact response: At the most, you can assert that Obama is an idiot and thought she asked a question about people with illegal family members, but it was quite clear what she asked and what Obama said in response. Spin at it's finest. Sigh. Here is his entire answer. "Not true. And the reason is, first of all, when you vote, you are a citizen yourself. And there is not a situation where the voting rolls somehow are transferred over and people start investigating, et cetera. The sanctity of the vote is strictly confidential in terms of who you voted for. If you have a family member who maybe is undocumented, then you have an even greater reason to vote." "And the reason that fear is promoted is because they don't want people voting. People are discouraged from voting and part of what is important for Latino citizens is to make your voice heard, because you're not just speaking for yourself. You're speaking for family members, friends, classmates of yours in school who may not have a voice. Who can't legally vote. But they're counting on you to make sure that you have the courage to make your voice heard." So where in all of that does he tell illegal aliens to go out and vote? The second sentence, which was directed at the interviewer who is also a citizen? If you listen to his entire answer, he twice says go vote and be the voice of people who can't legally vote. Why would people who can't legally vote have to count on you to make your voice heard if they're already voting by the millions? LMAO! Why do you keep conveniently omitting the question that was asked to him? Did she ask him about illegals voting or did she ask him about people who have illegal family members?
See what he did there? That's slick. Smooth as butter. You don't have to like the man or his presidency, but there's no denying that he can rope-a-dope his way through an interview.
And that right there is why I voted for Trump. I've had about all the "slick" I can handle. |
2016-11-28 3:20 PM in reply to: Stacers |
Pro 9391 Omaha, NE | Subject: RE: Election 2016 Originally posted by Stacers Originally posted by tuwood If she didn't do anything wrong, then she has nothing to worry about. However, you and I both know that she DID break the law so it's pretty obvious that she will go to jail if Trump decides to not hold back his justice department. This is a far cry from the faux outrage of "jailing political opponents" Uh, no. No I don't know (and I've done a lot of digging and reading through wikileaks and everything else, so it's not for lack of research). And neither do any of the people who have investigated her in the past, and failed to put her in jail. To me, this type of witch hunt is a waste - "Hey, let's investigate Hillary Clinton AGAIN for millions and millions of dollars!!!" It's a total waste of time and energy, and our president elect should be putting his energy into being a successful president, and not carrying out some sort of vendetta against his political opponent. I would rather see Donald Trump focusing on filling his cabinet with quality people, and educating himself on intricate foreign policy and environmental issues during this time period. While I understand he was voted in precisely because he is anti-establishment, the fact that he has no political experience does mean that he has a lot to learn to prepare for his imminent inauguration, and I would hope he is taking this seriously instead of assuming he can delegate the entire job to his cabinet and vice president. It's hard to feel positive about the pending presidency when our president-elect insists on tweeting something inane in response to every small thing that offends him. It's embarrassingly unprofessional. Or course, I don't expect you to understand this, since you apparently view him as the greatest thing to ever happen to this country.
On the basis of Comey's testimony to congress, it is without a doubt that Hillary violated the law by having classified information on a non-secure server. The excuse of "she didn't mean to break the law" doesn't hold weight in any court of law and was an obvious political statement used to justify not recommending charges. LB could probably give you a list of people a mile long who didn't "intend" to break the law that are sitting in prison. As for Donald Trump focusing on running this and that I respectfully disagree with you. Unlike Obama who did try to "run everything", Trump is not that way. He is focusing on building a team of qualified people to implement his plan. Even with the criminal case against Hillary, it will be fully delegated to the DOJ and Trump will likely not spend any effort at all on it. |
|
2016-11-28 3:23 PM in reply to: Left Brain |
Veteran 1019 St. Louis | Subject: RE: Election 2016 Originally posted by Left Brain And that right there is why I voted for Trump. I've had about all the "slick" I can handle. It's why I voted for Johnson. Hillary danced around the truth with her constant lying. Trump un-apologetically punches you in the face with his constant lies. Gary was a dopey, honest guy. Allepo? WTF is that? Ahh shoot, I should have known that. When do you ever see a politician apologize for not knowing something? |
2016-11-28 3:23 PM in reply to: Bob Loblaw |
Pro 9391 Omaha, NE | Subject: RE: Election 2016 Originally posted by Bob Loblaw Originally posted by tuwood Originally posted by Bob Loblaw Originally posted by tuwood Originally posted by Bob Loblaw Originally posted by tuwood Originally posted by Bob Loblaw Originally posted by tuwood So about that "accepting the election results"? I love how the fake news was pumping the hacking of the vote machines narrative leading up to this, even though all of those states use paper ballots... lol Honestly I love that she is doing this because it's just destroying the DNC more and more. Talk about the party of the millennial generation... I was originally opposed to the recounts; you lost, get over it. But now that Trump has declared millions of people voted illegally and there's serious voter fraud in Virginia, New Hampshire, and California, clearly we need a full recount. Every state, every county. Shoot, let's just throw out the first election entirely and all vote again. LOL The Democrats really don't want that to happen. I feel pretty confident that there were several million illegals that voted in states like Florida and California. It is becoming pretty obvious what the strategy was with illegal immigration from a DNC standpoint which is to make it so anyone with a pulse can vote (no ID's or verification) and then get as many dependent people as possible into the country. It's pretty disgusting when you really think about it. Before you call me a conspiracy theorist, Obama himself was actively encouraging illegals to vote prior to the election because it makes them "American" and that there would be no legal ramifications. The recent talking point that you mention is pretty funny when it comes to justification for Clinton meddling in the election. I know you're being somewhat tongue in cheek, but the liberal elites are dead serious. The irony of this whole thing IMHO, is that any semblance of leniency Trump had towards Clinton post election is likely gone now and this will ultimately land her in jail. #oops No he didn't. You're buying in to one of the fake news story that you guys spent all Thanksgiving weekend bashing. Only it came from Fox News instead of CNN. Obama did an interview where he was talking about legal Latino voters being scared to vote because they're afraid of retribution for their illegal friends and family. Neil Cavuto cut short the president's answer to make it sound like he was saying illegals should vote. Here's the full interview, with the illegal voting issue staring at 3:30. Here is what Cavuto aired. Conveniently cutting out Obama's very next sentence of "If you have a family member who maybe is undocumented, then you have an even greater reason to vote." He followed that up by saying Latinos need to vote because "You're speaking for family members, friends, classmates of yours in school who may not have a voice. Who can't legally vote." That is not encouraging illegals to vote, it's encouraging Latinos to vote in order to help their illegal friends. But it absolutely was fear-mongering on Cavuto's part.
you crack me up Bob. Did you watch the video you just linked? Obama's exact response: At the most, you can assert that Obama is an idiot and thought she asked a question about people with illegal family members, but it was quite clear what she asked and what Obama said in response. Spin at it's finest. Sigh. Here is his entire answer. "Not true. And the reason is, first of all, when you vote, you are a citizen yourself. And there is not a situation where the voting rolls somehow are transferred over and people start investigating, et cetera. The sanctity of the vote is strictly confidential in terms of who you voted for. If you have a family member who maybe is undocumented, then you have an even greater reason to vote." "And the reason that fear is promoted is because they don't want people voting. People are discouraged from voting and part of what is important for Latino citizens is to make your voice heard, because you're not just speaking for yourself. You're speaking for family members, friends, classmates of yours in school who may not have a voice. Who can't legally vote. But they're counting on you to make sure that you have the courage to make your voice heard." So where in all of that does he tell illegal aliens to go out and vote? The second sentence, which was directed at the interviewer who is also a citizen? If you listen to his entire answer, he twice says go vote and be the voice of people who can't legally vote. Why would people who can't legally vote have to count on you to make your voice heard if they're already voting by the millions? LMAO! Why do you keep conveniently omitting the question that was asked to him? Did she ask him about illegals voting or did she ask him about people who have illegal family members? No, she lead in to a question with some rambling sentence, then asked a question about herself. And Obama directed his answer to her. Because he's a polished politician with a silver tongue. "Many of the millennials, Dreamers, undocumented citizens -- and I call them citizens because they contribute to this country -- are fearful of voting. So if I vote, will immigration know where I live? Will they come for my family and deport us?" "Not true. And the reason is, first of all, when you vote, you are a citizen yourself." See what he did there? That's slick. Smooth as butter. You don't have to like the man or his presidency, but there's no denying that he can rope-a-dope his way through an interview. And yes, I see how conservatives can cherry pick her saying that undocumented citizens are citizens with him saying when you vote you're a citizen, then screaming that he wants illegals to vote. I can also cherry pick a hundred different Trump statements taken out of context. Did Trump really say veterans with PTSD are weak? No, but I can selectively quote him to strongly imply that he did. In the sage words of Ron Burgundy we'll just have to agree to disagree. |
2016-11-28 3:25 PM in reply to: Bob Loblaw |
Pro 9391 Omaha, NE | Subject: RE: Election 2016 Originally posted by Bob Loblaw Originally posted by Left Brain And that right there is why I voted for Trump. I've had about all the "slick" I can handle. It's why I voted for Johnson. Hillary danced around the truth with her constant lying. Trump un-apologetically punches you in the face with his constant lies. Gary was a dopey, honest guy. Allepo? WTF is that? Ahh shoot, I should have known that. When do you ever see a politician apologize for not knowing something? I do agree with you that I felt Gary's honesty was an endearing quality. |
2016-11-28 3:28 PM in reply to: Bob Loblaw |
Pro 15655 | Subject: RE: Election 2016 Originally posted by Bob Loblaw Originally posted by Left Brain And that right there is why I voted for Trump. I've had about all the "slick" I can handle. It's why I voted for Johnson. Hillary danced around the truth with her constant lying. Trump un-apologetically punches you in the face with his constant lies. Gary was a dopey, honest guy. Allepo? WTF is that? Ahh shoot, I should have known that. When do you ever see a politician apologize for not knowing something? Well, I do appreciate you helping to get Trump elected over Hillary. And yeah, Johnson is more honest then the 2 boneheads. |
|
2016 - WTF Pages: 1 2 | |||
Election 2014 Pages: 1 2 3 | |||