login
Drugs
-
No new posts
  2011-10-28 4:01 PM |
 Subject: ...This user's post has been ignored. |
| 2011-10-28 4:05 PM in reply to: #3742841 |
Elite 3277     Minnetonka | Subject: RE: Drugs Exactly... Just have a druggie/doper series and a clean series in every sport... |
| 2011-10-28 4:08 PM in reply to: #3742841 |
| Master 2083 Houston, TX | Subject: RE: Drugs I've often argued that the actual rules themselves don't really make a difference as long as everyone plays by the same ones. So I can only disagree on a moral basis. Logically, I can not argue against it. |
| 2011-10-28 4:09 PM in reply to: #3742841 |
Iron Donkey 38643  , Wisconsin | Subject: RE: Drugs I think it should be a new category/class/league/etc. for sports. |
| 2011-10-28 4:14 PM in reply to: #3742841 |
| Champion 16151 Checkin' out the podium girls | Subject: RE: Drugs Yes please... |
| 2011-10-28 4:51 PM in reply to: #3742841 |
| Expert 1416 San Luis Obispo, CA | Subject: RE: Drugs It would be interesting to see which one would be more commercially successful. Would more people watch the SFL (Steroid Football League) or the NFL? Would the "Tour de 'Roid" get more viewers than the Tour de France? |
| 2011-10-28 4:55 PM in reply to: #3742865 |
| Subject: ... This user's post has been ignored. |
| 2011-10-28 5:50 PM in reply to: #3742913 |
| Iron Donkey 38643 , Wisconsin | Subject: RE: Drugs blbriley - 2011-10-28 4:51 PM It would be interesting to see which one would be more commercially successful. Would more people watch the SFL (Steroid Football League) or the NFL? Would the "Tour de 'Roid" get more viewers than the Tour de France? It would be interesting to see who would get the sponsors and the viewing numbers. |
| 2011-10-30 10:55 AM in reply to: #3742913 |
| Regular 525 | Subject: RE: Drugs blbriley - 2011-10-28 5:51 PM It would be interesting to see which one would be more commercially successful. Would more people watch the SFL (Steroid Football League) or the NFL? Would the "Tour de 'Roid" get more viewers than the Tour de France? Wouldn't that be the NFL and the non-steroid league. I think the steroid league would win every time, really we just want to see the biggest, fastest guys around and don't really care how they get that way. I guess I shouldn't make that generalization though and say I know I would lean that way. The steroid era in baseball is the highest attended and rated era. I tend to believe that the field was a lot more level than most people want to believe too though. |
| 2011-10-30 6:43 PM in reply to: #3742841 |
| Master 2264 Sunbury, Pennsylvania | Subject: RE: Drugs Something like this? |
| 2011-10-30 6:48 PM in reply to: #3742841 |
| Regular 94 Miami, FL | Subject: RE: Drugs Wouldn't rampant drug use start causing athletes to drop dead all over the place? |
| 2011-10-30 7:46 PM in reply to: #3742849 |
| Champion 7136 Knoxville area | Subject: RE: Drugs SoberTriGuy - 2011-10-28 5:05 PM Exactly... Just have a druggie/doper series and a clean series in every sport... Bodybuilding already has seperate divisions...
... works great... Big dopers win the doping category. Smart dopers win the non-doping category. |
|
|
|
View profile
Add to friends
Go to training log
Go to race log
Send a message
View album
CONNECT WITH FACEBOOK