Polygamy? (Page 3)
-
No new posts
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller | Reply |
|
2010-10-17 10:00 AM in reply to: #3155273 |
Elite 4235 Spring, TX | Subject: RE: Polygamy? Goosedog - 2010-10-15 8:06 PM AndrewMT - 2010-10-15 4:17 PM Goosedog - 2010-10-15 11:58 AM MNGopher - 2010-10-15 9:49 AM I could not imagine having two. Well, I can imagine it. For a very short period of time... TMI. Only if you choose to interpret it that way! |
|
2010-10-17 4:31 PM in reply to: #3153750 |
New user 433 | Subject: RE: Polygamy? Well.. I've seen a taste of this when my mother n law stays with my wife / kids/myself for long periods of time. Not that I'm even in the smallests micro atomic particle interested in the xxx part of living with another women is who is close to 80, but its crazy having her stay with us awhile. 2x the yelling, 2x the complaining, 2x "feelings", 2x "why can't you do xyz". With one women, my wife, at least from my point of view there is a check and balance with any issue, either she is right or she is wrong or I'm right or I'm wrong. With a third person, its 1 person right, 2 people wrong, or 2 right and 1 wrong, or 3 wrong/right. Also, I notice with two ladies is that they tend to feed off each other emotionally....amplfy any issue...like throwing a tenis ball against a brick wall...it comes back allot faster. Now, I'm curious if a FF relationship would have the same traits...or maybe its just the male component that messes it up..maybe some internal women competition thing. Some this is parent daughter stuff and some of this is two females under the same roof. Also, the majority, based on the thread survey, indicate they can't make two women happy. Maybe that is the wrong way to look at it.. maybe it is better or easier just making one of the two women happy and let the internal women competition thing help by work things out in your favor. If the internal women competition thing is true then the one women who is happy because the other women is not. So, from the male point of view, you would only need to make sure you keep the one who is the most unhappy, at that point in time, to a happy state. Then wait for the other women to get unhappy because she is treated different and repeat process. The problem will be if they both figure it out and then you got 2x a major headache.... too bad you can't jump off a cliff 2x. Lastly, if two women were married to one male, would they be more upset collectivley for the all male stuff that we do..e.g. leaving the toliet seat up. Or would they down play it as a quirk and not show the other women she is upset at a common person. Edited by chenny 2010-10-17 4:34 PM |
2010-10-17 9:18 PM in reply to: #3154695 |
Veteran 155 Pittsburgh, PA | Subject: RE: Polygamy? lkc01234 - 2010-10-15 2:44 PM laundryking - 2010-10-15 1:11 PM I have 2 daugthers, a wife and a female dog -- I have enough women in my life and certainly don't need another PITA love of my life! fixt!! Working at it everyday for 15 yrs. Still a challenge but worth the effort |
2010-10-18 12:45 PM in reply to: #3153750 |
Champion 10471 Dallas, TX | Subject: RE: Polygamy? Hey, my man can have two women (or more)... as long as I can have two men (or more). Turn about is fair play. Not sure why the guy gets to have all the fun. Not on my watch. |
2010-10-18 12:47 PM in reply to: #3155650 |
Champion 10471 Dallas, TX | Subject: RE: Polygamy? tri-mama - 2010-10-16 9:34 AM KeriKadi - 2010-10-15 2:59 PM Either way you look at it I don't get them considering prosecution. All adults, they should be able to decide who they live with and who they have sex with. It's not like they are getting government assistance or anything like that. For me it's what they are exposing those children to. No child should have to lie about their home life. No child should have to live with or be exposed to parents who think they are above the law and can break it to satify their desire. Because polygamy really is about the wants of 1 man who can't control himself. He's like a child in a candy store... he wants what he wants and to hell with the law. And those women.... 1 wants to be a SAHM the other work the other school.... again it's about their wants/desires and not what is best for the kids. I cringed when they sat the kids down and told them another "mom" was coming into the family - the reaction of those kids broke my heart that they thought this was fine but only then to be told to keep it a secret. And the first wife's child - her desire to go to Annapolis.... she can flush that dream away. this show and this "life style" has ruined her chance of receiving an nomination and without a nomination it's next to impossible to get in (hubby and my brother are both WP grads I know the process of applying) Finally what those women do not get is if something happens to the husband only wife #1 is legally entitled to anything. they will be at the mercy of wife #1.... That is not a stable future for those kids. my 2 cents.... moving on. Oh yeah, there is NO WAY that kid will get into Annapolis. Not to mention, she didn't even want to go to public school TO get to Annapolis. |
2010-10-18 3:37 PM in reply to: #3158354 |
Sensei Sin City | Subject: RE: Polygamy? Being a guy, it bothers me they just don't call it for what it is... (just my opininon). They say it's a religious thing, but honestly, I just think it's an "excuse" for a guy to be banging several different women at once. Even the show "sister wives" seems to point to that. After 2-3 years of each new wife, he get's calling/epiphany/message from god that he needs a new wife... I think he just get's bored. Interesting the new wife is a younger/prettier catch... that seems to be the trend, each new wife is younger (to the point it's illegal, as reported) THEN, when he went on the anniversary dinner with his first wife and she asks him what he thought if he had another husband (shoe on the other foot). And he responds that he feels sick to his stomach at the thought of her with another man and the blasphomy in god's eyes... (I paraphrase)... I guess I understand that guess want a haram. I have no problem with that desire. But to say it's god's will and they "have" to do it bothers me. Just call it for what it is, IMO. BTW, I thought polygomy was illegal, but they have it right on TV. Can't they be prosocuted? I mean, wouldn't that be like if they had a reality show of drug pushers confessing they do it and have cameras following them AS they do it? I understand that Utah just doesn't persue it. |
|
2010-10-18 4:20 PM in reply to: #3158788 |
Payson, AZ | Subject: RE: Polygamy? Kido - 2010-10-18 1:37 PM Being a guy, it bothers me they just don't call it for what it is... (just my opininon). They say it's a religious thing, but honestly, I just think it's an "excuse" for a guy to be banging several different women at once. Even the show "sister wives" seems to point to that. After 2-3 years of each new wife, he get's calling/epiphany/message from god that he needs a new wife... I think he just get's bored. Interesting the new wife is a younger/prettier catch... that seems to be the trend, each new wife is younger (to the point it's illegal, as reported) THEN, when he went on the anniversary dinner with his first wife and she asks him what he thought if he had another husband (shoe on the other foot). And he responds that he feels sick to his stomach at the thought of her with another man and the blasphomy in god's eyes... (I paraphrase)... I guess I understand that guess want a haram. I have no problem with that desire. But to say it's god's will and they "have" to do it bothers me. Just call it for what it is, IMO. BTW, I thought polygomy was illegal, but they have it right on TV. Can't they be prosocuted? I mean, wouldn't that be like if they had a reality show of drug pushers confessing they do it and have cameras following them AS they do it? I understand that Utah just doesn't persue it. They can and most likely will be. Your correct in that Utah normally ignores it but when it's shoved at them this way they are left with little choice. |
2010-10-18 6:42 PM in reply to: #3153750 |
New user 433 | Subject: RE: Polygamy? Just curious and more a of techinical question, how can someone be charged with polygamy if the Law only allows being married to one person at a time. Doesn't it take a judge or court to accept the marriage license? Just like with the same sex marriages and how the courts accept or denial their claims. While I understand the church as aspect and how they can have rules that are different then state laws, but how does that cross over to the legal aspect of braking the law. |
2010-10-18 6:50 PM in reply to: #3158348 |
New user 433 | Subject: RE: Polygamy? KSH, Edited by chenny 2010-10-18 6:55 PM |
2010-10-18 6:58 PM in reply to: #3158788 |
Master 2477 Oceanside, California | Subject: RE: Polygamy? Kido - 2010-10-18 1:37 PM They say it's a religious thing, but honestly, I just think it's an "excuse" for a guy to be banging several different women at once. Even the show "sister wives" seems to point to that. After 2-3 years of each new wife, he get's calling/epiphany/message from god that he needs a new wife... I think he just get's bored. Interesting the new wife is a younger/prettier catch... that seems to be the trend, each new wife is younger (to the point it's illegal, as reported) I think that is probably REALLY subjective and relative. What they get... What they describe... (or I envision, I forget...) |
2010-10-18 7:03 PM in reply to: #3153750 |
Elite 4547 | Subject: RE: Polygamy? ^Get Tyra Banks over to that commune pronto! MAKEOVERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (insert screaming female audience here) |
|
2010-10-19 12:09 AM in reply to: #3153750 |
Veteran 698 | Subject: RE: Polygamy? When I lived in London I had two girlfriends at the same time. No conflict, because they knew of each other and this was all agreed with, but I found that splitting time between the two of them left me with zero time for myself. In addition, after being together with my wife for about 9 years, I have zero desire to be with anyone else. She still excites me every time I see her. Polygamy? Thanks, but no thanks. |
2010-10-19 10:47 AM in reply to: #3159114 |
Sensei Sin City | Subject: RE: Polygamy? chenny - 2010-10-18 4:42 PM Just curious and more a of techinical question, how can someone be charged with polygamy if the Law only allows being married to one person at a time. Doesn't it take a judge or court to accept the marriage license? Just like with the same sex marriages and how the courts accept or denial their claims. While I understand the church as aspect and how they can have rules that are different then state laws, but how does that cross over to the legal aspect of braking the law. I could be wrong, buy my understanding is that the first wife is the only "legal" (in terms of the state) marriage. The others, are wives under there religious beliefs? So they are married as far as they are concerned but not the states? One wife, three live in GF's? someone can trump me if they know more. |
2010-10-19 12:27 PM in reply to: #3160183 |
Expert 839 Central Mass | Subject: RE: Polygamy? Kido - 2010-10-19 8:47 AM chenny - 2010-10-18 4:42 PM Just curious and more a of techinical question, how can someone be charged with polygamy if the Law only allows being married to one person at a time. Doesn't it take a judge or court to accept the marriage license? Just like with the same sex marriages and how the courts accept or denial their claims. While I understand the church as aspect and how they can have rules that are different then state laws, but how does that cross over to the legal aspect of braking the law. I could be wrong, buy my understanding is that the first wife is the only "legal" (in terms of the state) marriage. The others, are wives under there religious beliefs? So they are married as far as they are concerned but not the states? One wife, three live in GF's? someone can trump me if they know more. That just about covers it, in the case of that show. However, in many cases, it's more like zero wives, 4+ live in girlfriends. Married by their church, but no legal/civil certificates give by the state. |
2010-10-20 11:30 AM in reply to: #3153750 |
Master 2477 Oceanside, California | Subject: RE: Polygamy? So "Sister-wife" is the Utah equivalent of California's "baby-mama"!? |
|