let's give this a try...
-
No new posts
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller | Reply |
2006-02-28 6:25 PM |
molto veloce mama 9311 | Subject: let's give this a try... here are some things i've posted over in the nutrition area, but i wanted feedback from the wise losers over here in tri'ing for weightloss. please let me know what you think of my plan and my attempt at math ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: most books and articles i read say to cut 500 (calories), and then to add more activity, but don't say if you should add additional calories when adding activity. i'm not just adding a walk around the block though - some of workout days i burn up 2000+ calories, so the question of how much of that to replace gets confusing. replacing all of it seems like a LOT of calories. so, 75% 50%? 25%? i've read you should replace all but what you would have burned anyway (for your regular activity level). just using the calculators is also confusing, since it give a general activity level. if i put in 'very active', which i am most days, then the number is much higher than on a moderate activity level day or rest day. so, it seems simpler to me to start with a base (probably 1600-1700), and replace calories according to the workouts for that specific day (and as matt said, replace much of them before, during, and after the workout, which i have been better about lately and it has made a difference in my energy level - especially recovery foods/drinks within 30 minutes of a workout). right now if i calculate my calories by saying i'm in the 'very light to moderate activity' category (which is how i am when NOT workout out - walking, housework, chasing kids, etc.) i should be eating about 2100 calories a day to maintain my weight. a 500 calorie reduction brings me to around 1600 calories a day. this is about what i've been eating the last two months. what you're saying is that i should replace ALL of the calories i burn in workout out? that would put me at about 3100 calories for today (1500 for a run). even if i deduct what i would be burning during that time had i not been running (lets say 350 for some light housework and sitting on my tail reading stories to fi or checking email and bt - so, 1150 calories), the total is 2750. that seems like a LOT to me. today i did what i've been doing - adding 25% back in - so a total intake of about 2000 for the day. SO, lets say every day was like today - assume i should be eating 2100 to maintain my weight 1600 to lose 1 lb a week. i burned 1150 extra calories from working out (1500 from running - 350 what i'd be doing instead), i should loose 2 lbs a week. if i deduct another 500 that would be a deficit of 1650. that same articles that say cut 500, also say don't cut more than 1000. if that applies to both calories in and calories burned from workouts, then i would be burning 650 over that max. hmmmm. okay, so i think i have a plan, and let me know what you think: 1. have a base calorie intake (rest day activity level) of 1600. this is a 500 calorie deficit from my 'maintain weight' daily requirement of 2100. on a rest day, stay around 1600 calories. 2. for workout days, add in the calories burned during the workout (hrm seems high, so maybe get the number from calorie king, which tends to be a lower number - for example, 1500 today) MINUS the calories i'd be buring for the same time on a rest day (caloried burned sitting on my tush or light housework - for example, 350 for today). allow for up to 500 less than that total number (using today as an example - eating between 2250-2750 on a day like today, so a 500-1000 deficit total - but not going below a 1000 total deficit). as much as possible, get these extra calories in before, during, and after a workout, focusing on balanced foods. 3. cut out sugar and as much dairy as i can stand, to help with avoiding future colds (different subject, but a bit related to the above). ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: okay, believe it or not, i think this is going to simplify things for me. i actually wrote out a formula! this is what i've been looking for but have never found in all my looking. here is the formula i am going to try out for the month of march: bmr + (calories burned for workout(s) - (alternative calorie burn(s) + 500)) = total daily intake so, using today as an example... my daily bmr + (calories burned on 9.5 mile run - (calories i would have burned putzing around the house during the time i was running + 500)) = my daily intake OR 1521 + (1631 - (420 + 500)) = 1521 + (1631 - 711) = 1521 + 920 = 2441 today i actually took in an extra 630 calories aimed at my workout - a clif shot right before, electrolyte drink during, and a power bar and recovery drink after (i know, i know, kristi - no REAL food ). i wasn't able to take in all 920 during the run, but at least i took in well over half surrounding the activity itself. SO, this means i should have a 500 calorie deficit on rest days, and up to 1000 calorie deficit on workout days. i'll also allow myself to fluctuate between 500-1000 on workout days, depending on how i feel. of course, then i have to figure out the carb/protein thing too...but the way my nutrition program is set up, i can only set up daily values for my base level of calories. i altered them up a bit, based on the formulas in monique ryan's book (sports nutrition for endurance athletes) so it will look like this (may be hard to meet the carb/protein levels on a rest day, but will hopefully be right on for workout days): 1521 calories, 42.5g fat, 120g protein, 360g carb, 25g fiber :::::::::::::::::::::::: okay, what do you all think of this??? too many calories???? anything over 2000 seems like a lot to me, but i think my body isn't getting what it needs. nothing i've seen so far has really given me a full picture of what i should be doing, so this is my attempt at figuring out the details (and the math) in a way that will adapt to each individual day w/out being such a headache. |
|
2006-02-28 9:02 PM in reply to: #357088 |
Elite 2999 Hattiesburg, Mississippi | Subject: RE: let's give this a try... Ok, I will tell you that I didn't read your entire post because it is just loooonnnggg. But my question would be how did you determine your RMR, you energy expenditure through daily activities, and through exercise. Have you had it professionally measured or are you guessing and using formulas? |
2006-02-28 9:48 PM in reply to: #357207 |
molto veloce mama 9311 | Subject: RE: let's give this a try... sorry its so long. thinking 'outloud' a bit on this one. my rmr is based on using several different calculators (each of which gave me a slightly different nbr). as for the calories burned daily and through exercise - i usually use calorie king, which i use to track my calories and nutrition. it tends to give a lower number than my hrm, which i think tends on the high end. i may go talk to a nutritionist who can really pinpoint my rmr/bmr for me, if this plan doesn't work out. |
2006-03-01 6:49 AM in reply to: #357088 |
Elite 2999 Hattiesburg, Mississippi | Subject: RE: let's give this a try... If you are serious about wanting to follow a plan you should have your RMR tested using a machine. Research shows that the calculations can vary from 200-900 calories. So if you are in "deficit" by 500kcals and your RMR is off by 500kcals, then your deficit is actually 0. I just had my RMR test, the calculations told me i was usually between 1800-2000kcals/d. My actual RMR is a disappointing 1613kcals/day. |
2006-03-01 12:20 PM in reply to: #357088 |
Expert 725 Wilmington, NC | Subject: RE: let's give this a try... I've been watching your thread on the other forum. it made me dizzy I take a slightly different approach. I don't try to make up calories on a specific work-out day, but rather look at the balance for the week. So, I average about 2900 cal/day burn during a week. Get significantly MORE on workout days and quite a bit less on rest days. I do the nutrition thing before during and after workout, but don't specifically target making up the calories on THAT day. I'm now aiming for 2000-2400 cal/day intake. I then look at the average over time and see how the balance is. Some days (like yesterday, a rest day, I eat almost as much as I burn) other days, it is 1000 cal under, but on the average it works. out. As the other poster said, though. Don't trust the burn from various calories counting devices the best of them are only accurate to +/- 10%. That's a significant variation when you're trying to target 500-1000 cal/day deficit. You need to experiment and find the right calorie intake for YOU. Edited by nuke_angel 2006-03-01 12:21 PM |
2006-03-01 12:30 PM in reply to: #357377 |
molto veloce mama 9311 | Subject: RE: let's give this a try... the calculators certainly don't seem to give the best picture, as those can REALLY vary with the same data entered. i will check into it if i am still stuck after this month. thanks for all the feedback. |
|
2006-03-01 12:33 PM in reply to: #357820 |
molto veloce mama 9311 | Subject: RE: let's give this a try... i'm really trying not be anal about this - i just feel like what i've been doing the last couple months isn't working. i have usually have energy for workouts and think i am gaining muscle, both of which are good things, but some days after a hard workout i feel spent before the day even starts and have been waking up hungry in the middle of the night. i hope this new way of looking at my intake helps keep me within the 500-1000 deficit range w/o over or under eating in relation to my workouts. |
2006-03-01 1:28 PM in reply to: #357841 |
Master 2060 Northern California | Subject: RE: let's give this a try... Wow! My head hurts. Here is my $0.02. Your body does not calculate calories in vs. calories at a specific time every day. At midnight, your body doesn't sense that it is 500 cals down for the day and lose 1/7 of a pound of fat -- it is a cumulative effect. I try to maintain my calorie deficit for the WEEK and use off days to help regulate the calorie surplus/deficit. However, off days are muscle building/rebuilding days (and also glycogen storage days) and proper nutrition and rest must be practiced on these days as well. I lost my train of thought. The bottom line is, in a calorie deificit you are always going to be little hungry. The test is can you contain that hunger and not give in to it. Try not dieting to reach a calorie deficit, try exercising more/harder to achieve the deficit and make sure your body is fueled with ALL of the good, clean foods you need to do so. Also, in my experience, it is EXTREMELY difficult to gain muscle and lose fat at the same time (significant amounts). Mostly, people confuse seeing more muscle due to fat loss with gaining muscle. I'd pick one or the other and attack that with all of the dedication you can! Edited by coachese 2006-03-01 1:32 PM |
2006-03-01 6:59 PM in reply to: #357903 |
Member 35 | Subject: RE: let's give this a try... I am not sure I agree that in a calorie deficit you'll always be hungry. It really depends on what you are eating. I can eat an entire lb of frozen broccoli for 120 cals -- I won't be hungry afterwards (stuffed is more like it!). If I ate 120 cals of say-- cheesecake -- I'd still be really starving. It isn't necessarily how many calories you eat, but also what you eat. |
2006-03-01 7:11 PM in reply to: #358322 |
molto veloce mama 9311 | Subject: RE: let's give this a try... i agree. my calories intake an issue on rest days and heavy workout days. on rest days i could eat all day and have a huge calorie surplus and still be hungry. on workout days, i'm busy and exercise decreases my appitite, so i'm not at all hungry, even if i have a huge deficit. |