Subject: RE: Breivik gets 21 yearsWhat puzzles me is that though they have what appears from a US perspective to be a light maximum sentence on the books, the other side of the coin is their law allowing indefinite lockup if a person is deemed to still be a threat. I am not clear on who makes that determination. Seems to be a odd juxtaposition, and both concepts rase my eyebrows. I would be interested in seeing how the ACLU would address a similar policy in the US. |