Subject: RE: Clydesdale Gripe...I love it! My husband experienced a similar reaction at my last tri. When they handed out the awards and got to the Clydesdales, I explained that one had to weigh 200 lbs. of more to race. He perked up. "Really? I might try one." (Currently, he's 5'10' and about 196. ) But then he saw the three winners--all looking like that Baywatch dude. He hasn't said another word about ir. Shame... I would like for him to "try a tri." His response echoed what an earlier poster wrote: it's about the spirit of the law rather than the letter. My husband felt the weight divisions were about encouraging less fit people to participate in order to *get* fit. I have to feel that carrying around 20 pounds of extra fat on a 5'9" frame is a bit different than being 6'5" and carrying most of that weight in muscle and bone--all of which aids one in all disciplines (tho' least in running ). Last year I weighed 148 lbs--just 2 lbs. shy of the Athena category. I admit there were times when I thought, "If I just gained two pounds I could race in that category." But a couple of things stopped me. First: a lot of the Athenas weren't fat; they were just big--tall, big-boned. Second, it hurts to run with more weight rather than less. So this winter I dropped 15 lbs. so I am no longer tempted to 'cat up.' Have I won anything at the lower weight? Nope! But I do feel better.
Seriously, unless they had a Body Fat monitor and mased it on BMI, this is not a "problem" for which I see a solution. |