login
Deep State
-
No new posts
 2019-11-03 7:25 AM |
Champion  10157    Alabama |  Subject: Deep State“Vindman Was ‘Deeply Troubled’ By Trump’s Effort To ‘Subvert’ US Foreign Policy. Brit Hume Points Out His ‘Huge Fallacy’” What Brit pointed out was it is the POTUS that sets US Foreign Policy not unelected bureaucrats. Vindman’s thinking is pure deep state thinking. IOWs, “How dare the President of the United States “subvert” the Deep State!” I understand some of the thinking behind deep state. I was commissioned officer in my Army NG unit. There were full time enlisted guardsmen who ran things who would often “overrule” or ignore me because they knew in a couple of years I’d be gone. |
| 2019-11-04 6:57 AM in reply to: Rogillio |
Pro 15655 | Subject: RE: Deep State No, this Jr. Army officer is a hero.....I guess you didn't get the memo. |
| 2019-11-04 8:12 AM in reply to: Left Brain |
Champion 10157 Alabama | Subject: RE: Deep State Originally posted by Left Brain No, this Jr. Army officer is a hero.....I guess you didn't get the memo. Oops, guess I read the General Flynn memo by mistake. |
| 2020-02-08 10:48 AM in reply to: Rogillio |
Champion 10157 Alabama | Subject: RE: Deep State Vindman and Sondland serve at the pleasure of the President - evidently the President is not pleased with them. I also think it is clear Vindman was the source who leaked to the whistleblower. My guess is reassignment is the least of his worries. Senate is going to investigate the whistleblower who will likely drop dime on Vindman to cover his own arse. |
| 2020-02-08 1:56 PM in reply to: Rogillio |
Pro 15655 | Subject: RE: Deep State The Jr. Officer with an ego so big he thought that he had a say in policy.......he's a disgrace. |
| 2020-02-12 9:31 AM in reply to: Rogillio |
| DC | Subject: RE: Deep State Originally posted by Rogillio Vindman and Sondland serve at the pleasure of the President - evidently the President is not pleased with them. I also think it is clear Vindman was the source who leaked to the whistleblower. My guess is reassignment is the least of his worries. Senate is going to investigate the whistleblower who will likely drop dime on Vindman to cover his own arse. These are interesting "issues" to focus on. Trying not to sound sarcastic etc, but how does any of this justifiably detract from the POTUS' attempt to influence a foreign gov't to meddle in U.S. elections? I understand how we go here but how long can we tolerate this? (Rhetorical.) |
| 2020-02-12 4:20 PM in reply to: Porfirio |
Pro 15655 | Subject: RE: Deep State Meh, politics.....this stuff has been going on forever. The President asked for an investigation into corruption by Joe Biden.....and therefore the O'bama administration....seems ok to me. Nobody proved the aid was withheld until there was an investigation. But they tried like hell. LOL |
| 2020-02-12 4:23 PM in reply to: 0 |
Pro 15655 | Subject: RE: Deep State And by the way.....the investigation into Bidens role in that joke of an appointment for his crackhead kid isn't finished....but Joe Biden is. Good riddance. Drain the swamp!! Thank you Nancy Pelosi!! Edited by Left Brain 2020-02-12 4:24 PM |
| 2020-02-12 5:31 PM in reply to: Porfirio |
Champion 7553 Albuquerque, New Mexico | Subject: RE: Deep State Originally posted by Porfirio Originally posted by Rogillio Vindman and Sondland serve at the pleasure of the President - evidently the President is not pleased with them. I also think it is clear Vindman was the source who leaked to the whistleblower. My guess is reassignment is the least of his worries. Senate is going to investigate the whistleblower who will likely drop dime on Vindman to cover his own arse. These are interesting "issues" to focus on. Trying not to sound sarcastic etc, but how does any of this justifiably detract from the POTUS' attempt to influence a foreign gov't to meddle in U.S. elections? I understand how we go here but how long can we tolerate this? (Rhetorical.) So you're advocating that candidates with dirty hands are off limits? Trump asked Ukraine to investigate what happened around the investigation of Biden's son being shut down. He didn't ask for a specific outcome nor did he ask for favorable timing of any release of information so how is he asking for Ukraine to "meddle" in our election? Were Biden not running for President, anything coming out of a Ukraine investigation would be newsworthy, but only 1 column-inch on page 9 newsworthy. For as long as he's still running, it's elevated to page 1 newsworthy (ok...page 3 for the NYTimes & Washington Post...) This is true even if the "news" weren't coming out of Ukraine but rather is domestically sourced speculation. I suspect there will be a lot more dirty hands exposed during a second Trump term.
|
|
|
|
|
View profile
Add to friends
Go to training log
Go to race log
Send a message
View album
CONNECT WITH FACEBOOK