Your solution to crappy live race coverage
- 
			
No new posts 
| Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller | Reply | 
  2015-03-03  11:04 AM | 
Expert   2355![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()   Madison, Wisconsin |  Subject: Your solution to crappy live race coverageITU has once again raised the bar with their coverage. This year they will be broadcasting all 10 locations, 25 events LIVE (w/ DVR capabilities), in HD, along with having all 25 previous championship races archived for your viewing whenever, and add in the past 3 years of all races archived as well.   This is a far cry from WTC coverage that everyone complains about and the races only last :50-2 hours in total, perfect for a trainer session. Good announcing, good commentary, live splits (accurate), many angles, basically everything you want from Kona but never get. It's also an olympic qualifying year so the racing will be plenty good. Yes, it costs money,….about the same price as a box of gels https://triathlonlive.tv FIrst races are this weekend in Abu Dhabi.  | 
 | 
  2015-03-03  11:11 AM  in reply to: bcagle25 | 
  2015-03-03  11:32 AM  in reply to: bcagle25 | 
 Subject: RE: Your solution to crappy live race coverage70.3 and Ironman racing is fairly boring anyway. Unless it's a stacked field like the WC race for either distance, I have no interest in watching. Most long course races have fairly thin fields and the race gets pretty predictable with with 45-75 minutes still left in the race. There is also only so much non draft biking I can watch before I fall asleep. Even if the WTC matched the ITU's coverage of their events...I still would probably not bother watching all but a few races. So it's probably in their best interest not to invest tons of money into live TV coverage. At least from my selfish perspective.  | 
  2015-03-03  11:52 AM  in reply to: Jason N | 
Expert   2355![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()   Madison, Wisconsin |  Subject: RE: Your solution to crappy live race coverageOriginally posted by Jason N   70.3 and Ironman racing is fairly boring anyway. Unless it's a stacked field like the WC race for either distance, I have no interest in watching. Most long course races have fairly thin fields and the race gets pretty predictable with with 45-75 minutes still left in the race. There is also only so much non draft biking I can watch before I fall asleep. Even if the WTC matched the ITU's coverage of their events...I still would probably not bother watching all but a few races. So it's probably in their best interest not to invest tons of money into live TV coverage. At least from my selfish perspective. Agreed and I don't expect them too. Even if they did it bog for Kona, its a Saturday in October. Awesome bike weather, college football, etc would always be tough to get my attention at their pinnacle event. That said Challenge is doing….better with the coverage and it is still snoozefest. I feel asleep watching both Dubai and Bahrain no more then 5 miles into the bike.  | 
  2015-03-03  4:25 PM  in reply to: bcagle25 | 
Elite   7783![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()   PEI, Canada |  Subject: RE: Your solution to crappy live race coverageYeah, it's a pretty good deal for what you get.  I usually pay it every year expecting to watch it more often and then don't.  This is the year!     | 
  2015-03-03  7:15 PM  in reply to: axteraa | 
Extreme Veteran   1332![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()  |  Subject: RE: Your solution to crappy live race coverageI've been waiting for this to go live, it's a great deal imo, especially since I haven't watched a lot of the archived content either!!  Excellent trainer material ^_^  | 
 | 
  2015-03-04  7:09 AM  in reply to: bcagle25 | 
Master  10208![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()   Northern IL |  Subject: RE: Your solution to crappy live race coverageOriginally posted by bcagle25  Originally posted by Jason N  Agreed and I don't expect them too. Even if they did it bog for Kona, its a Saturday in October. Awesome bike weather, college football, etc would always be tough to get my attention at their pinnacle event. That said Challenge is doing….better with the coverage and it is still snoozefest. I feel asleep watching both Dubai and Bahrain no more then 5 miles into the bike. 70.3 and Ironman racing is fairly boring anyway. Unless it's a stacked field like the WC race for either distance, I have no interest in watching. Most long course races have fairly thin fields and the race gets pretty predictable with with 45-75 minutes still left in the race. There is also only so much non draft biking I can watch before I fall asleep. Even if the WTC matched the ITU's coverage of their events...I still would probably not bother watching all but a few races. So it's probably in their best interest not to invest tons of money into live TV coverage. At least from my selfish perspective. Whereas I had to pull myself away mid-bike as it was getting late for me. Be interesting to see what happens with the various races. Challenge has their new high dollar ones and IM has attempted to get more at least somewhat competitive races with their new structure.  | 
  2015-03-04  10:13 AM  in reply to: brigby1 | 
Expert   2355![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()   Madison, Wisconsin |  Subject: RE: Your solution to crappy live race coverageOriginally posted by brigby1   Originally posted by bcagle25  Originally posted by Jason N  Agreed and I don't expect them too. Even if they did it bog for Kona, its a Saturday in October. Awesome bike weather, college football, etc would always be tough to get my attention at their pinnacle event. That said Challenge is doing….better with the coverage and it is still snoozefest. I feel asleep watching both Dubai and Bahrain no more then 5 miles into the bike. 70.3 and Ironman racing is fairly boring anyway. Unless it's a stacked field like the WC race for either distance, I have no interest in watching. Most long course races have fairly thin fields and the race gets pretty predictable with with 45-75 minutes still left in the race. There is also only so much non draft biking I can watch before I fall asleep. Even if the WTC matched the ITU's coverage of their events...I still would probably not bother watching all but a few races. So it's probably in their best interest not to invest tons of money into live TV coverage. At least from my selfish perspective. Whereas I had to pull myself away mid-bike as it was getting late for me. Be interesting to see what happens with the various races. Challenge has their new high dollar ones and IM has attempted to get more at least somewhat competitive races with their new structure. And the IM Melbourne start list just came out, for a regional championships I think it's lacking the star power in terms of depth as they hoped. Small size field, with a lot of the stars racing last week in Dubai. Curious to see how Frankfurt does in comparison to Roth where the prize money isn't as deep as the middle eastern races but the atmosphere and environment is the richest anywhere.  | 
  2015-03-04  10:58 AM  in reply to: 0 | 
Pro   15655![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()  |  Subject: RE: Your solution to crappy live race coverageI like it and I want to see it become profitable enough for bigger outlets to take notice. Televising IM's is never going to grow the sport. Hell, unless someone is competing near death, ala Julie Moss, the general population isn't going to tune in......and even when they do, to watch that type of spectacle, it does nothing but further ingrain the idea that triathlon is a niche sport for crazy people. There are enough ITU draft legal races in the WTS series to allow people to become a fan of certain racers, and the racing and spectating is exiting to watch.....it's good television. This is the only way to grow the sport outside of participating. And like it or not, draft legal racing is going to become a bigger and bigger part of the sport through all levels. 
 
 Edited by Left Brain 2015-03-04 10:59 AM  | 
  2015-03-04  11:46 AM  in reply to: Left Brain | 
Pro   6191![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()  |  Subject: RE: Your solution to crappy live race coverageOriginally posted by Left Brain I like it and I want to see it become profitable enough for bigger outlets to take notice. Televising IM's is never going to grow the sport. Hell, unless someone is competing near death, ala Julie Moss, the general population isn't going to tune in......and even when they do, to watch that type of spectacle, it does nothing but further ingrain the idea that triathlon is a niche sport for crazy people. There are enough ITU draft legal races in the WTS series to allow people to become a fan of certain racers, and the racing and spectating is exiting to watch.....it's good television. This is the only way to grow the sport outside of participating. And like it or not, draft legal racing is going to become a bigger and bigger part of the sport through all levels. I love it I'm buying the package deal even if I don't end up watching them all. Trying to put my support and $ towards where I think it should go in this sport! (also why I'll likely never do another IM brand race again, but that's another story)  | 
  2015-03-06  12:49 AM  in reply to: Left Brain | 
Veteran   2297![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()   Great White North |  Subject: RE: Your solution to crappy live race coverageGonna buy it too.  Looking forward to DL races in 2016+  | 
 | 
![]()  | |||
![]()  | |||
![]()  | |||
![]()  | |||
![]()  | 
  | 
login




 
 2015-03-03  11:04 AM


 Madison, Wisconsin



 
 View profile
 Add to friends
 Go to training log
 Go to race log
 Send a message
 View album
 CONNECT WITH FACEBOOK