Will and Kate plus a baby... Predictions?
-
No new posts
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller | Reply |
|
![]() |
![]() | ![]() I have to say I'm a bit shocked that people (especially Brits and Commonwealthers) haven't posted this thread already. As an English major, I can't help but be interested in the actions of the English monarchs. I'm excited to see what they name the kid, and I wish them luck throughout the pregnancy. I predict the below: Girl, Elizabeth III. Part of me wishes for a Harry overthrow ala Richard III. A horse a horse! |
|
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() GomesBolt - 2012-12-05 9:46 AM I have to say I'm a bit shocked that people (especially Brits and Commonwealthers) haven't posted this thread already. As an English major, I can't help but be interested in the actions of the English monarchs. I'm excited to see what they name the kid, and I wish them luck throughout the pregnancy. I predict the below: Girl, Elizabeth III. Part of me wishes for a Harry overthrow ala Richard III. A horse a horse! Pretty sure it won't be Charles or Camilla. I vote for Tony. Or Toni. After his/her father. BOOYAH! |
![]() ![]() |
Pro ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Great Britain's Princess Kate and Prince William are expecting a baby. The bad news: Prince Harry is already planning a huge baby shower in Vegas. - Jay Leno |
![]() ![]() |
Pro ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() mr2tony - 2012-12-05 9:49 AM GomesBolt - 2012-12-05 9:46 AM Pretty sure it won't be Charles or Camilla. I vote for Tony. Or Toni. After his/her father. BOOYAH! I have to say I'm a bit shocked that people (especially Brits and Commonwealthers) haven't posted this thread already. As an English major, I can't help but be interested in the actions of the English monarchs. I'm excited to see what they name the kid, and I wish them luck throughout the pregnancy. I predict the below: Girl, Elizabeth III. Part of me wishes for a Harry overthrow ala Richard III. A horse a horse! Tony is a great name |
![]() ![]() |
![]() | ![]() I think it's fascinating - especially the new rule that regardless of the sex the child will be next in line after William. Considering Henry XIII executed a wife for not producing a male heir... (and in reality he had a male child by a mistress way before that - so crazy).... anywho. I predict Diana will be the middle name if a girl - Elizabeth Diana or some such. Edited by lisac957 2012-12-05 10:05 AM |
![]() ![]() |
![]() | ![]() tuwood - 2012-12-05 9:55 AM Great Britain's Princess Kate and Prince William are expecting a baby. The bad news: Prince Harry is already planning a huge baby shower in Vegas. - Jay Leno God love him. He is the direct descendant of Henry V afterall. That guy didn't exactly play by the rules. |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() | ![]() lisac957 - 2012-12-05 10:04 AM I think it's fascinating - especially the new rule that regardless of the sex the child will be next in line after William. Considering Henry XIII executed a wife for not producing a male heir... (and in reality he had a male child by a mistress way before that - so crazy).... anywho. I predict Diana will be the middle name if a girl - Elizabeth Diana or some such. Wasn't that Henry VIII? That's another reason Elizabeth makes sense. Because Elizabeth I was the first woman to be Queen. Victoria and Elizabeth II (current queen) I believe are the only others. Gotta look it up. Looked it up. I guess there were a few along the way: Matilda (Empress), Mary Queen of Scots (technically), Then Elizabeth, Jane, Anne. It's still really interesting.
Edited by GomesBolt 2012-12-05 10:15 AM |
![]() ![]() |
![]() | ![]() GomesBolt - 2012-12-05 10:10 AM lisac957 - 2012-12-05 10:04 AM I think it's fascinating - especially the new rule that regardless of the sex the child will be next in line after William. Considering Henry XIII executed a wife for not producing a male heir... (and in reality he had a male child by a mistress way before that - so crazy).... anywho. I predict Diana will be the middle name if a girl - Elizabeth Diana or some such. Wasn't that Henry VIII? That's another reason Elizabeth makes sense. Because Elizabeth I was the first woman to be Queen. Victoria and Elizabeth II (current queen) I believe are the only others. Gotta look it up. Oops - roman numeral fail! |
![]() ![]() |
Expert ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() I don't get the fascination with the royals. I mean, the only thing they are famous for these days is their money - almost like the Kardashians. They are totally useless and nobody deserves that kind of power/fame for no other reason than existing. |
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() I read that severe morning sickness (which Kate is being treated for) is often an indicator for twins. Hence, one of them shall rule England by a 2 minute margin. |
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() RVachon - 2012-12-05 11:14 AM I don't get the fascination with the royals. I mean, the only thing they are famous for these days is their money - almost like the Kardashians. They are totally useless and nobody deserves that kind of power/fame for no other reason than existing. You Canadians still have the queen on your money. |
|
![]() ![]() |
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() RVachon - 2012-12-05 11:14 AM They are totally useless and nobody deserves that kind of power/fame for no other reason than existing. Hater.
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() | ![]() pitt83 - 2012-12-05 10:15 AM RVachon - 2012-12-05 11:14 AM I don't get the fascination with the royals. I mean, the only thing they are famous for these days is their money - almost like the Kardashians. They are totally useless and nobody deserves that kind of power/fame for no other reason than existing. You Canadians still have the queen on your money.Yeah! I think the monarcy draws more tourism and interest to London than it costs. The telegraph estimates it at 51p per person. The most anti-monarch estimates have it at 200 pounds per taxpayer (lots of freeloaders I guess). But that's before you look at return from tourism. The last two years should put them in the black (wedding tourism, Queen's birthday, Olympic tourism to royal sites) for next year at least. Edited by GomesBolt 2012-12-05 10:29 AM |
![]() ![]() |
Expert ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() pitt83 - 2012-12-05 11:15 AM You Canadians still have the queen on your money. Exactly and it annoys the f*** out of me that we're still connected these dumbazzes - again for no other reason than that's the way it was made 100+ years ago. Edited by RVachon 2012-12-05 10:22 AM |
![]() ![]() |
Expert ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() GomesBolt - 2012-12-05 8:10 AM lisac957 - 2012-12-05 10:04 AM I think it's fascinating - especially the new rule that regardless of the sex the child will be next in line after William. Considering Henry XIII executed a wife for not producing a male heir... (and in reality he had a male child by a mistress way before that - so crazy).... anywho. I predict Diana will be the middle name if a girl - Elizabeth Diana or some such. Wasn't that Henry VIII? That's another reason Elizabeth makes sense. Because Elizabeth I was the first woman to be Queen. Victoria and Elizabeth II (current queen) I believe are the only others. Gotta look it up. Looked it up. I guess there were a few along the way: Matilda (Empress), Mary Queen of Scots (technically), Then Elizabeth, Jane, Anne. It's still really interesting. There also was a real pair of Mary. The first was Elizabeth I's predecessor and half-sister. The 2nd as between James II and Anne. Mary I of Scotland was mother of James I, first king of England, Scotland, and Wales (even though he was king of just Scotland from 1567 to 1603,when Scotland entered the United Kingdom) Thus Mary I of Scotland was only queen of Scotland. Besides taking some English history classes in college, we looked all this up when we decided to name our daughter after a monarch. The only problem, she's got to tell everyone her name ends with an E lol. |
![]() ![]() |
Pro ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() I predict it will be a boy, and if I were King they would name him Kevin O'Conner. |
|
![]() ![]() |
Master ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() I'm predicting wealthy and living a life never having to want for anything.
|
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Bigfuzzydoug - 2012-12-05 1:26 PM I'm predicting wealthy and living a life never having to want for anything.
Except maybe privacy. |
![]() ![]() |
Iron Donkey![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() mr2tony - 2012-12-05 9:49 AM GomesBolt - 2012-12-05 9:46 AM Pretty sure it won't be Charles or Camilla. I vote for Tony. Or Toni. After his/her father. BOOYAH! I have to say I'm a bit shocked that people (especially Brits and Commonwealthers) haven't posted this thread already. As an English major, I can't help but be interested in the actions of the English monarchs. I'm excited to see what they name the kid, and I wish them luck throughout the pregnancy. I predict the below: Girl, Elizabeth III. Part of me wishes for a Harry overthrow ala Richard III. A horse a horse! Or perhaps Tony Toni Tone ("e" with an accent mark)?? Or "2Goggs"?? Or "DB"?? Or "Monica-will-kick-your-azz-up-and-down-to-kingdom-come-for-such-an-insinuation"???? |
![]() ![]() |
Iron Donkey![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() GomesBolt - 2012-12-05 10:10 AM ... I am. I am.lisac957 - 2012-12-05 10:04 AM I think it's fascinating - especially the new rule that regardless of the sex the child will be next in line after William. Considering Henry XIII executed a wife for not producing a male heir... (and in reality he had a male child by a mistress way before that - so crazy).... anywho. I predict Diana will be the middle name if a girl - Elizabeth Diana or some such. Wasn't that Henry VIIIth?... |
![]() ![]() |
Master ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() I wish I was born 11th in line to the English crown. Far enough not to get (media) attention, close enough to partake in the benefits. Prediction? If it's a girl it will be queen, if it's a boy it will be king. Another prediction? If temps hold below 70s, he/she can break 4 hrs in the 2030 New York marathon |
|
![]() ![]() |
Elite ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Funny how interesting folk find this. I'm British living in Australia part of the commonwealth and I really don't care.My seven year old daughter on the other hand made me sit through that wedding!!!! She's gonna be delighted with the news. Little girls often still want to be princesses!!! |
![]() ![]() |
Expert ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Samyg - 2012-12-05 11:11 AM Prediction? If it's a girl it will be queen, if it's a boy it will be king. With the way their great grandma is going (and their great, great grandma), their dad will probably be the next king, and their kid the monarch after that. Those Windsors live forever! Most of them lived well into their 70s, 100 years ago (Elizabeth II is 86 right now, her mom lived to almost 102) |
![]() ![]() |
![]() | ![]() scorpio516 - 2012-12-05 1:42 PM Samyg - 2012-12-05 11:11 AM Prediction? If it's a girl it will be queen, if it's a boy it will be king. With the way their great grandma is going (and their great, great grandma), their dad will probably be the next king, and their kid the monarch after that. Those Windsors live forever! Most of them lived well into their 70s, 100 years ago (Elizabeth II is 86 right now, her mom lived to almost 102) That's why we need some Shakespearean Royal Foul Play... to shake things up a bit. I really wish Charles would abdicate, but I know there's no chance of that happening. |
![]() ![]() |
Master ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() GomesBolt - 2012-12-05 2:58 PM scorpio516 - 2012-12-05 1:42 PM Samyg - 2012-12-05 11:11 AM Prediction? If it's a girl it will be queen, if it's a boy it will be king. With the way their great grandma is going (and their great, great grandma), their dad will probably be the next king, and their kid the monarch after that. Those Windsors live forever! Most of them lived well into their 70s, 100 years ago (Elizabeth II is 86 right now, her mom lived to almost 102) That's why we need some Shakespearean Royal Foul Play... to shake things up a bit. I really wish Charles would abdicate, but I know there's no chance of that happening. Unless we make it happen... Muuuaaaaaahahahahahahahahahaha (Evil laugh while pointing pinkie finger at my mouth and stroking a cat with the other). |
|