George Bush, "Live Strong" Bracelet...
-
No new posts
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller | Reply |
|
![]() |
Extreme Veteran ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Anybody ever seen him wear one. Tried to find a photo on google and yahoo with no luck, did find Kerry though. My husband says that if I can find a photo of Bush with one on, then at my race in a couple of weeks he will wear one. My dh is just one of those ultra conservative fuddy duddy's and I would love to have him wear one, if just for a day! |
|
![]() ![]() |
Elite ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() I've seen him on TV with one one...but don't know of any photos off hand. I'm sure they're out there. |
![]() ![]() |
Pro ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() He has worn one in the past....don't know of any photos though. For the record I am a conservative (wearing my Bush/Cheney Tshirt right now) and I have worn one continuously since last June |
![]() ![]() |
Extreme Veteran ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Last time I checked, both Liberals and Conservatives agreed that they were anti-cancer. Did I miss something? |
![]() ![]() |
Extreme Veteran ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Bush and Armstrong are buddies...Dubya called him last year after Lance won. |
![]() ![]() |
Extreme Veteran![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Rocket Man - 2005-07-20 8:11 PM For the record I am a conservative (wearing my Bush/Cheney Tshirt right now) and I have worn one continuously since last June The shirt or the bracelet? ![]() You never know with Bush supporters. ![]() |
|
![]() ![]() |
Elite ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Some of them need to take their LIVE STRONG bracelets and remove the V. That's all I got to say about that. |
![]() ![]() |
Expert ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Amy...better buy hubby a bracelet cuz I found a photo for you! This is a newsletter at laf.org. Scroll down to page 4 of the .pdf and you'll see a photo of Pres. Bush with an survivor's advocate and he's displaying a light colored bracelet. Now, hubby my try to weasel out and say that, because it's a b&w photo, we aren't sure of the color, so be warned. But, hopefully, your dh will own up to his bet and wear the bracelet. Enjoy! |
![]() ![]() |
Master ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Bad timing, bad manners, bad taste, and misplaced. If you want to take a swipe at us Bush supporters who wear the yellow band, then instead of hijacking this thread and inserting your opinion where its clearly not part of the topic, the right and courteous thing to do is to start your own somewhere else. I frankly don't care about your political leanings and they are not being asked of you as part of this thread. I'm now mad at myself for having even spent the time to reply to your unwelcome remarks. There's a wonderful saying that goes, "its better to keep your mouth shut and have people think you're rude than to open your mouth and prove it." gullahcracker - 2005-07-21 6:01 AM Some of them need to take their LIVE STRONG bracelets and remove the V. That's all I got to say about that. |
![]() ![]() |
Pro ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Political party affiliation and supporting cancer survivors are completely orthogonal to each other in any rational mind. -C |
![]() ![]() |
Buttercup ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() I laughed! Since when do threads not get hijacked? |
|
![]() ![]() |
Giver ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Motivated - 2005-07-21 8:05 AM Bad timing, bad manners, bad taste, and misplaced. You're probably right, but anytime someone puts "George Bush" (or for that matter "Liberal" or "Hillary Clinton" or "Karl Rove" or "conservative" or any other devisive person/term/issue) in a subject line, they're just itchin' for a fight. |
![]() ![]() |
Giver ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Renee - 2005-07-21 8:29 AMI laughed! Since when do threads not get hijacked? Heh...exactly. And this is the OT forum...and Hawkeye did settle the issue for the OP. Actually, once a questions asked has been answered, I say hijack away! Edited by run4yrlif 2005-07-21 12:44 PM |
![]() ![]() |
Giver ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() JamGirl - 2005-07-20 9:49 PM Last time I checked, both Liberals and Conservatives agreed that they were anti-cancer. Did I miss something? Well, actually, since the conservative party line is anti-stem cell research, I guess you could argue that maybe they're pro-cancer. And if you think about it, cancer makes the pharma companies a pretty good chunk o' change, and if there were no cancer, I guess there'd be no need for cancer meds, and therefore the pharma companies would lose lotsa potential income. So...therefore...conservatives are naturally pro-cancer! (tounge firmly in cheek) |
![]() ![]() |
![]() | ![]() run4yrlif Well, actually, since the conservative party line is anti-stem cell research, I guess you could argue that maybe they're pro-cancer. Last time I checked, the "conservative party line" was not anti-stem cell reasearch, it was anti-embryonic stem cell reasearch. It is a big difference. Edited by dontracy 2005-07-21 12:59 PM |
![]() ![]() |
Giver ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() dontracy - 2005-07-21 12:58 PM run4yrlif Well, actually, since the conservative party line is anti-stem cell research, I guess you could argue that maybe they're pro-cancer. Last time I checked, the "conservative party line" was not anti-stem cell reasearch, it was anti-embryonic stem cell reasearch. It is a big difference. Thanks for the clarification, but I don't think it hurts my pretend argument. |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() | ![]() I do see the humor in your argument. ![]() Just trying to clear up this common misstatement wherever it occurs. Actually though, I think the pharma industry is anxious to get stem cell technology off the ground. Big, big bucks to be made there. For example, the Biotechnology Industry Organization hired Republican Congressman Jim Greenwood as it's president. He then did not seek reelection. I think the BIO sees the advantage of having a Washington insider as its president. I hope that they are successful with developing stem cell technology. And, I hope they do it without killing human beings in the embryonic stage of life. Edited by dontracy 2005-07-21 1:16 PM |
![]() ![]() |
Pro ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() run4yrlif - 2005-07-21 12:04 PM dontracy - 2005-07-21 12:58 PM run4yrlif Well, actually, since the conservative party line is anti-stem cell research, I guess you could argue that maybe they're pro-cancer. Last time I checked, the "conservative party line" was not anti-stem cell reasearch, it was anti-embryonic stem cell reasearch. It is a big difference. Thanks for the clarification, but I don't think it hurts my pretend argument. While the sitting president's position is such and he is a Republican, I don't think it is fair to cast the entire party with this viewpoint. Nancy Reagan comes to mind as one who is *for* stem-cell research and opposed the current president's policy and I think firmly qualified as a fellow Republican. The polarization caused by party-line rhetorical attacks on *both* sides, royally ( hah! ) pisses me off. Like how both "sides" had pre-prepared platforms and "talking points" for the Supreme Court nomination before the freaking nomiee was known! It would not have mattered one lick who got nominated, as both "sides" were planning on a fight no matter what. And *that* is truely pathetic in my mind. Okay, I'm off my soapbox, back to your regualarly scheduled hijacking. ![]() -C |
![]() ![]() |
Giver ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() coredump - 2005-07-21 1:17 PM [ While the sitting president's position is such and he is a Republican, I don't think it is fair to cast the entire party with this viewpoint. Oh...I completely agree. That's why I said "party line" and not "all conservatives." Naturally, it would be hard to find an issue where every person that identifies with a particular party universally agrees. And it is good to know that all conservatives don't have their heads up thier butts on this issue |
![]() ![]() |
Giver ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() dontracy - 2005-07-21 1:13 PM I do see the humor in your argument. ![]() Actually though, I think the pharma industry is anxious to get stem cell technology off the ground. Big, big bucks to be made there. <snip> And, I hope they do it without killing human beings in the embryonic stage of life. Definitely...it may be the future of the industry (and I work in the biotech industry, so hooray for me!). As you probably know, though, the problem with adult stem cells is they haven't been demonstrated to pluripotent (that is, they haven't been demonstrated in vitro to differentiate into tissues of organs they didn't come from). And of course one of the arguments for embryonic stem cell research is that cell lines would be generated from embryos that would be otherwise discarded in the vitro fertilization process. Those embryos would otherwise be wasted. Man...I really didn't think I'd wake up today and be arguing this topic. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() | ![]() run4yrlif - Naturally, it would be hard to find an issue where every person that identifies with a particular party universally agrees. So true. I'm a Democrat, but I think our party is tragically wrong in supporting embryonic stem cell technology. |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() | ![]() run4yrlif - And of course one of the arguments for embryonic stem cell research is that cell lines would be generated from embryos that would be otherwise discarded in the vitro fertilization process. Those embryos would otherwise be wasted. But that is a false argument. The fact that there is a dilemma with what to do with embryos from IVF does not make the case that using them for stem cell research is ok. (when do we get to Havana?) ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
Giver ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() dontracy - 2005-07-21 1:44 PM But that is a false argument. The fact that there is a dilemma with what to do with embryos from IVF does not make the case that using them for stem cell research is ok. (when do we get to Havana?) ![]() Using them is better them flushing them down the toilet, especially when you consider the amazing good they could do for people with Parkinson's, MS and all manner of cancers. And I'm in for Havana.... |
![]() ![]() |
![]() | ![]() run4yrlif - Using them is better them flushing them down the toilet, especially when you consider the amazing good they could do for people with Parkinson's, MS and all manner of cancers. That's would be true if they were property and not human beings. Why not implant them in surrogate mothers, bring them to term, then harvest their organs? Ah... Havana... (thank goodness for being an American with a Quaker wife and press credentials...) Edited by dontracy 2005-07-21 1:58 PM (dontracyhavana1.jpg) Attachments ---------------- dontracyhavana1.jpg (10KB - 8 downloads) |
![]() ![]() |
Veteran![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() As a long time lurker, I am in awe of the civility of the direction of this thread. Having been a part of other forums such as Runners World, it is refreshing to see a discussion that does NOT have the mentality of "Your a idiot because you don't agree with me". Maybe triathletes are more civil due the intense training and they are just too tired to argue. |
|