General Discussion Triathlon Talk » Anyone ever ride this old one? And are the younger ones really better rides, or just sexier? Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller Reply
2008-06-16 9:31 AM


50
2525
Subject: Anyone ever ride this old one? And are the younger ones really better rides, or just sexier?

So here's a picture of my 1993 Trek 2200.  It was the first year Shimano put STI on the 105 line.  Everything still OEM except the wheels, which I replaced a few years ago.  It has the old carbon fiber tubes with aluminum for the rest of the frame.

 1993 Trek 2200

Any of you ever ride one of these?  If so, how much difference have you noticed on your newer rides? 

I just started riding her again after leaving her in the garage for a few years.  Used to ride her for thousands of miles a year, but I stopped when the kids came.  Now that I've added triathlon to my running, she will be what I ride this season (my first), but I'd consider getting a newer model after this year if the difference is significant.   Would only be able to spend about $1500, though.

 



Edited by Wolfgate 2008-06-16 9:33 AM


2008-06-16 10:06 AM
in reply to: #1468670

User image

Expert
2555
20005002525
Colorado Springs, Colorado
Subject: RE: Anyone ever ride this old one? And are the younger ones really better rides, or just sexier?
My wife has a similar bike, Trek 1220, only hers has some clipon aerobars. Works just fine. I raced for years on an early 90s Bianchi with downtube shifters. The bike was completely stock except for the clipons, and I changed the cassette. Won my AG a few times using that bike in my late 40s. I just upgraded this year to a QR Kilo that a friend was selling after having barely used it. I haven't raced on it yet, but the QR is definitely lighter and better looking.
2008-06-16 10:16 AM
in reply to: #1468774

User image

Cycling Guru
15134
50005000500010025
Fulton, MD
Subject: RE: Anyone ever ride this old one? And are the younger ones really better rides, or just sexier?

The differences in bike technology and frame advancement even in the last 5 years is night and day.  As the guys who run my old shop say, it is not really worth it to buy an older model bike unless you are totally on a budget and get a great deal.  Because getting a $1,200 bike now versus spending $800-ish on something a few years older (even with better components) is not going to result in you getting a better bike.

I always coveted a 2300 when I first got into cycling back in '91 or so, but before I knew anything about bikes.  The early Trek carbon was like riding a noodle and you could not get power down to save your life.

If it works for you guys, no need to spend money to upgrade to something better.  BUT ...... if you guys did decide to upgrade it would be a world of difference ........

2008-06-16 10:22 AM
in reply to: #1468670

User image

Pro
6767
500010005001001002525
the Alabama part of Pennsylvania
Subject: RE: Anyone ever ride this old one? And are the younger ones really better rides, or just sexier?

I also upgraded this year from a 1991 Bianchi to a 2008 Madone.  The Bianchi was stock, with 105 components, except for clip on bars and the triple I converted about 10 years ago.  The Madone runs the Ultegra SL components and I added clip on bars again.

The biggest differences I found were weight (about 10 pounds different) and having the shifters integrated in the brakes rather than the downtube.  I think the latter made the bigger difference.  I do know that after I got the seat adjusted right, I added about 2 mph to my usual ride.  It's definitely a much prettier ride as well.

Given that your shifters are already integrated, and you have carbon fiber tubing, I don't know how much more you would get from upgrading the bike altogether.  You'll probably get a lot more advice to get a tri-specific bike, so if there is a LBS that carries them, test ride a few to see if it handles differently for you. But I would suggest getting some clip-ons right away and practice riding with them.

2008-06-16 11:21 AM
in reply to: #1468670

User image

Subject: RE: Anyone ever ride this old one? And are the younger ones really better rides, or just sexier?
I bought a 1983 Trek 400 as a budget bike in January. I wasn't sure how into tri I would be so I didn't want to go overboard and regret it. Looking back now, I wish i would've done it different but its been a good bike. I hope to upgrade it over the winter with something faster.

http://www.vintage-trek.com/images/trek/1983/83Trek5.jpg

2008-06-16 11:41 AM
in reply to: #1468670

User image

Pro
4578
20002000500252525
Vancouver, BC
Subject: RE: Anyone ever ride this old one? And are the younger ones really better rides, or just sexier?

Oooh cool. I have a Cannondale that's a bit older and came with 105 indexed downtube shifters. I wanted to bring it up to an 8 speed (from a 6), so it now has the same shifters as yours, except I think they are the Ultegra level. They look exactly the same though. I ride the Cannondale in the winter and like the feel of these levers better than the newer style Shimano levers. I have small hands though.

Anyway, she is really pretty.



New Thread
General Discussion Triathlon Talk » Anyone ever ride this old one? And are the younger ones really better rides, or just sexier? Rss Feed