General Discussion Triathlon Talk » Training Plan Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller Reply
2009-07-23 6:11 PM

User image

Regular
82
252525
San Diego, CA
Subject: Training Plan
I am putting together my training plan for my first HIM and have a question on the length.  I plan to use the BT Beginner HIM plan which is a 20 week plan.  I've also seen some other plans online that are as long as 27 weeks which is intriguing since I inevitably have issues that come up such as travel, illness and injury that throws a monkey wrench into my plan.  I figure adding some weeks to the plan would give me a little buffer. 

If I want to add weeks to the BT plan,  would it be better to add to the base phase or build phase?

Is adding weeks only going to add to the chance of overtraining?  I figure not since I've hear most IM plans are much longer.


2009-07-24 9:27 AM
in reply to: #2304737

User image

Expert
1070
10002525
Denver Area
Subject: RE: Training Plan

I am not a coach.  I'm on a 20 wk HIM plan, and I've found that 20 is plenty, mostly 'cause of the mental aspect of training for so long.  If an IM is your ultimate goal, then I'm guessing that adding in the base phase would probably be okay.  But it's always best to follow plans as closely as possible to originally written, there's a reasoning behind the order & phases which I only partly understand now (after 2 years).

Welcome to BT!

2009-07-24 9:33 AM
in reply to: #2304737

User image

Not a Coach
11473
5000500010001001001001002525
Media, PA
Subject: RE: Training Plan

A longer plan does not buy you a "buffer".  Any HIM plan is likely to assume that you are already training when you begin it.  So, with that said, you should add to the start of the plan which is likely to be general prep or base.  The build & taper are likely to be more race specific and are therefore better done as you approach your race date.

As far as "overtraining", that will only come if you do too much, too soon and has nothing to do with the length of the plan.  My current IM plan is all of 10 weeks long (it's essentially just a build & taper).  But, I train 52 weeks a year.  It's the type & amount of training that vary.

2009-07-24 9:59 AM
in reply to: #2304737

User image

Elite
3088
20001000252525
Austin, TX
Gold member
Subject: RE: Training Plan
JohnnyKay definitely has it right. Stretching the plan because of anticipated missed workouts defeats the point of the periodization. You can add to the beginning of the plan because the race is further away than the plan calls for and you want to fill the gap but start training right away. You could also add to the beginning because you're not quite yet at the fitness level that the start of the plan assumes.

Missing a workout or two a week isn't the end of the world. If you plan ahead and are disciplined, you can work around travel issues in most cases. Pretty much every hotel has a treadmill. Most have a stationary bike which, while not ideal, is at least a workable substitute. For swimming, go to swimmersguide.com. They've got a massive database of swimming pools that you allows you to find a place to swim in just about any city you're in. I trained for a 1/2 IM while traveling every week.

As for injury, that's a whole other issue. If you're getting injured consistently while training, you need to figure out why. Overtraining has nothing to do with how many weeks in a row you train. It's due to training too many weeks in a row at a level your body isn't accustomed to. I'd wager that most pros train year round at levels that would leave us broken on the floor. They've got the base to do it, though. They kick it up to an even higher level when they start peaking for a race.
New Thread
General Discussion Triathlon Talk » Training Plan Rss Feed