Sexual abuse charges Rock Penn State University (Page 11)
-
No new posts
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller | Reply |
|
![]() ![]() |
Buttercup ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() I loved the way Jon Stewart addressed the topic of the riots and outrage over Paterno's termination. I don't want to jump to conclusions here, but it appears the street riot is in response to Coach Paterno's firing. See, I get that it's hard for you to believe that this guy is infallible and this program you think is sacred could hide such heinous activities. But there is some precedent for that. And just like with the Catholic Church, no one's trying to take away your religion, in this case football, they're just trying to bring some accountability to a pope and some of his cardinals who ****ed up. So don't worry. On Saturday, you'll still get to go to services against Nebraska. No one's going to take that away because obviously you're young and that would be a traumatic experience. We wouldn't want that memory to scar you for life. |
|
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() maxmattmick - 2011-11-11 2:04 PM Fred D - 2011-11-11 1:53 PM Goosedog - 2011-11-11 1:42 PM maxmattmick - 2011-11-11 1:38 PM I know it's a simple analogy but what if you were fired from your job based on assumptions like this and didn't even get to tell your side of the story? If this was me, and based just on the known facts about Paterno, I would be fired. Similar to Paterno, my position involves trust and confidence. I could not effectively do my job or represent my employer or its customers. It's very simple. ETA: Now, how would I feel? Probably frustrated. I assume I would have somehow rationalized my behavior and would feel that I could validate it to someone. But, that doesn't matter when it comes to the decision my employer would have to make.
Exactly. My work involves a lot of trust and confidence.... and even if it were only allegations against me (for a cover up of sexual abuse) I am 100% sure that I would be fired. My employer (a hospital) could not allow me to work under those conditions as it would undermine not only the confidence of the patients directly under my care, BUT more importantly the confidence of those coming to the institution (hospital). People NEED to have confidence in the adults/professionals that are charged with great responsibility. The need to know that these individuals will do the right things with their positions of authority. I have to disagree Fred... If you had been at this hospital for 60 years as the top surgeon and they had built their reputation and business on your reputation and without you they'd would not be where they were I think you'd be pretty pissed regardless of whatever allegations they used for your firing I wish some of you guys would just admit that the past five days have been a LITTLE bit of overkill as far as covering Paterno And stop saying "if it were me or you" we would have done this... NOBODY can say for sure what they would have done in McQuery's situation, or Paterno's or any of the other culpable parties position. We'd like to hope we'd do what was right, but truth is we don't know how we'd react in the same situations. Everybody's gotta get off the high horse already. I have an 11 year old son, and 7, 9, 10, and 12 year old nephews. I know EXACTLY what I would do if I were in any of their situations. I would protect the kids at any cost. |
![]() ![]() |
Elite ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() On a positive note, I just saw the highlights from Beaver Stadium today. The best highlight was the moment of silence for the victims. Having the 2 teams meet midfield before the game was nice no matter where you stand on the Joe Pa love him or hate him scale. btw, thanks Renee. That Stewart clip hit the nail on the head. I feel bad for Joe Pa...but Joe screwed up and he's paying for it now. I don't think he meant to do any harm, but for God's sake, if he had just done a little more. It's just incredibly unfortunate. My father-in-law and I were talking about this yesterday. He just turned 80 and he didn't agree with Penn State firing him. What made me pause was when he stated stuff like this didn't go on in his day. Personally, I don't buy that for a second. It was a different age surely...but the difference wasn't in actions, it was in people talking about it. ("it" being sexual abuse) |
![]() ![]() |
Iron Donkey![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() ChineseDemocracy - 2011-11-12 5:46 PM On a positive note, I just saw the highlights from Beaver Stadium today. The best highlight was the moment of silence for the victims. Having the 2 teams meet midfield before the game was nice no matter where you stand on the Joe Pa love him or hate him scale. ... That was nice of Nebraska to think of and suggest it to Penn State. |
![]() ![]() |
Elite ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() 1stTimeTri - 2011-11-12 7:54 PM ChineseDemocracy - 2011-11-12 5:46 PM On a positive note, I just saw the highlights from Beaver Stadium today. The best highlight was the moment of silence for the victims. Having the 2 teams meet midfield before the game was nice no matter where you stand on the Joe Pa love him or hate him scale. ... That was nice of Nebraska to think of and suggest it to Penn State. Did they? I just assumed PSU planned that. |
![]() ![]() |
Royal(PITA) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() ChineseDemocracy - 2011-11-12 6:46 PM I was choked up watching the players file in with solidarity as a team in the midst of this. The moment of silence was a good thing, but emotionally hard for me to watch.On a positive note, I just saw the highlights from Beaver Stadium today. The best highlight was the moment of silence for the victims. Having the 2 teams meet midfield before the game was nice no matter where you stand on the Joe Pa love him or hate him scale. btw, thanks Renee. That Stewart clip hit the nail on the head. I feel bad for Joe Pa...but Joe screwed up and he's paying for it now. I don't think he meant to do any harm, but for God's sake, if he had just done a little more. It's just incredibly unfortunate. My father-in-law and I were talking about this yesterday. He just turned 80 and he didn't agree with Penn State firing him. What made me pause was when he stated stuff like this didn't go on in his day. Personally, I don't buy that for a second. It was a different age surely...but the difference wasn't in actions, it was in people talking about it. ("it" being sexual abuse) My feeling bad for Joe Pa has only to do with seeing a brilliant career end in such public disgrace for his sins of omission. He didn't perpetrate those horrendous acts. But his silence allowed them to continue and that is what he's been called to task for. Sandusky retired years ago, while his name is dragged out in the press and on the television reports it's almost a byline to the fact that Joe Pa got fired. That part is wrong to me. Let the alleged perpetrator of these acts be villified for them. He was supposed to be mentoring kids who were already at risk because life had already handed them hard knocks. What he is reported to have done (which I cannot bring myself to read the entire grand jury report of) is beyond heinous. I hope those kids, who are probably adults by now, have gotten help and come forward to put Sandusky where he belongs. |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() This user's post has been ignored. |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() This user's post has been ignored. |
![]() ![]() |
Royal(PITA)![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Fred, that is the height lowest depth of the disgusting don't ask don't tell policy I could imagine. THat makes a big difference in my thinking then....Cannot feel sorry for a man who chose to put on blinders and refused to acknowledge that this was going on in his facility. Might not have been his team, but his team was still implicated by the grad student and others who knew but kept silent. |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() This user's post has been ignored. Edited by Fred D 2011-11-12 8:28 PM |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() This user's post has been ignored. |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() | ![]() By coincidence I was at Penn State today to shoot By coincidence it was for another organization for at risk youth. There's a lot of pain in Happy Valley right now. They all need our prayers. |
![]() ![]() |
Royal(PITA)![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Reading the time line of events presented in my local newspaper today made me physically ill. Seeing in print that Sandusky is still trying to maintain innocence makes me want to do physical harm to him. At least I have the self control and physical distance to know better than act.....but I totally hope he gets the book thrown at him. Joe Pa will be lucky if he isn't named as an accessory to the crime in some suits. He deserves to be listed there. |
![]() ![]() |
Champion![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Fred D - 2011-11-12 9:11 PM My guess is as this story circulates through over the next few days more stuff will come out. How could McQuearry and Paterno see Sandusky work out in their facility every day despite the 2002 incident? Lastly, I also found out that Sandusky gave the effin' commencement speech for the Health and Human Development department in 2007. That was Spaniers old department, and yes that was 5 years after the 2002 incident where Sandusky was banned from bringing children on the University Park campus. Yet he still had an office, still could run overnight football camps on satellite PSU campuses and could still give commencement speeches as late as 2007. I feel like every day becomes a worsening nightmare.... If you remember, PSU had a bad record in 2002 and ma,y people wanted Paterno gone for football reasons. Joe has always been stubborn and everything is HIS way. If the Sandusky incident came out then, Bobby Bowden would have had the winning record and Paterno wouldn't. Pure speculation, but Joe has always had absolute control at PSU and no way he'd allow the scandal to see the light of day. |
![]() ![]() |
Extreme Veteran![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Fred D - 2011-11-12 8:33 PM ChineseDemocracy - 2011-11-12 6:46 PM On a positive note, I just saw the highlights from Beaver Stadium today. The best highlight was the moment of silence for the victims. Having the 2 teams meet midfield before the game was nice no matter where you stand on the Joe Pa love him or hate him scale.
I saw that too. Truthfully the game was really painful for me to watch, but I did watch some of it. I haven't been to a game in 5 years and have absolutely no plans to in the near future. I do hope PSU as a university can recover from this, but I truthfully will have a very, very hard time getting into college football ever again. Again, I haven't been into it for awhile, but my lukewarm feelings about it have gone ice cold. It must have been very painful for a lot of the players as well. Lastly, I will say it again.... the entire football staff (coaches, recruiters and medical staff) will be gone IME at the end of the year. Sadly I agree with this. I turned into the game a few times, but as you said it was painful to watch. Everything felt extremely fake to me, i hardly think the victims where the first thing in anyones mind. It migth very well be the cynic in me, but thats how i felt. Just like you the last 3 to 4 years i have found it very difficult to get into college football like i used to, and this incident has extinguish the last few flames that were there. UM played Florida State this weekend, which is always a big deal if you are a fan of either team, and i couldnt bring myself to watch it or care about it. College football has become a symbol of hypocrisy to me. I also agree with yoru opinion to radically clean house. Im of the opinion that everyone associated with that program were aware of the rumors and allegations to varying degrees, but that the institution was more important than the individual victims.
|
![]() ![]() |
Master![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() What bugs me the most is reading that the university police and the DA's office were involved and aware of Sandusky as early as 1998. There's all kinds of weird stuff in this article: http://www.cnn.com/2011/11/12/us/penn-state-scandal/index.html 1. The 1998 investigation was closed. I don't get why they didn't charge Sandusky with something (unlawful contact with a minor?)
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Champion![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() It keeps getting more bizzare by each twist and turn. sandusky's judge set a minimum bail and unsecured. She is also a volunteer at Second Mile. Shouldn't she recuse herself from the case? You'd think she'd out and out say she volunteered there and had a conflict? Nope. Grant the guy a favor instead. http://abcnews.go.com/US/penn-state-scandal-victim-hires-lawyer-civ... |
![]() ![]() |
Extreme Veteran![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() pitt83 - 2011-11-14 2:37 PM It keeps getting more bizzare by each twist and turn. sandusky's judge set a minimum bail and unsecured. She is also a volunteer at Second Mile. Shouldn't she recuse herself from the case? You'd think she'd out and out say she volunteered there and had a conflict? Nope. Grant the guy a favor instead. http://abcnews.go.com/US/penn-state-scandal-victim-hires-lawyer-civil-case/story?id=14946622[/QUOTE] I read about that this morning, I couldn’t believe it. The opinion from most legal experts is that this information should have been revealed by the judge to give both parties the opportunity to object to this judge presiding over the bail hearing, which is what the prosecution most likely would have done, or at least I hope they would. |
![]() ![]() |
Pro![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() pitt83 - 2011-11-14 1:37 PM It keeps getting more bizzare by each twist and turn. sandusky's judge set a minimum bail and unsecured. She is also a volunteer at Second Mile. Shouldn't she recuse herself from the case? You'd think she'd out and out say she volunteered there and had a conflict? Nope. Grant the guy a favor instead. http://abcnews.go.com/US/penn-state-scandal-victim-hires-lawyer-civil-case/story?id=14946622[/QUOTE] Thats incredible. More favors. These people live in the bizzaro world. The crimes committed are so horrific, yet people there like this judge, just keep turning the other cheek for these people. |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() This user's post has been ignored. |
![]() ![]() |
Champion![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Fred D - 2011-11-14 4:13 PM Cuetoy - 2011-11-14 2:55 PM pitt83 - 2011-11-14 2:37 PM It keeps getting more bizzare by each twist and turn. sandusky's judge set a minimum bail and unsecured. She is also a volunteer at Second Mile. Shouldn't she recuse herself from the case? You'd think she'd out and out say she volunteered there and had a conflict? Nope. Grant the guy a favor instead. http://abcnews.go.com/US/penn-state-scandal-victim-hires-lawyer-civil-case/story?id=14946622[/QUOTE] I read about that this morning, I couldn’t believe it. The opinion from most legal experts is that this information should have been revealed by the judge to give both parties the opportunity to object to this judge presiding over the bail hearing, which is what the prosecution most likely would have done, or at least I hope they would. I don't think the judge is a big deal here. Her invlovement is rather peripheral with the charity. *I* think this one looks worse than it is. Unfortunately for the rest of the scandal, my opinion is that it's even worse than it looks Sadly I think you'll be proven right on this one - I saw just a fraction of a news conference the other day where the statement made was something to the effect of 'we know there are more victims out there, we're waiting and hoping they will have the courage to come forward.' It sounds like it's expected to get even worse than it already is. |
|
![]() ![]() |
Champion![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Fred D - 2011-11-14 5:13 PM Cuetoy - 2011-11-14 2:55 PM pitt83 - 2011-11-14 2:37 PM It keeps getting more bizzare by each twist and turn. sandusky's judge set a minimum bail and unsecured. She is also a volunteer at Second Mile. Shouldn't she recuse herself from the case? You'd think she'd out and out say she volunteered there and had a conflict? Nope. Grant the guy a favor instead. http://abcnews.go.com/US/penn-state-scandal-victim-hires-lawyer-civil-case/story?id=14946622[/QUOTE] I read about that this morning, I couldn’t believe it. The opinion from most legal experts is that this information should have been revealed by the judge to give both parties the opportunity to object to this judge presiding over the bail hearing, which is what the prosecution most likely would have done, or at least I hope they would. I don't think the judge is a big deal here. Her invlovement is rather peripheral with the charity. *I* think this one looks worse than it is. Unfortunately for the rest of the scandal, my opinion is that it's even worse than it looks She also donated between $500 and $1000 in 2009 and has been a volunteer there. Look at it this way: If we had the same ties, we would be excused from jury duty because of the potential bias. She should subject herself to the same standard. |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() This user's post has been ignored. |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() This user's post has been ignored. |
![]() ![]() |
Iron Donkey![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Fred D - 2011-11-14 4:13 PM Cuetoy - 2011-11-14 2:55 PM pitt83 - 2011-11-14 2:37 PM It keeps getting more bizzare by each twist and turn. sandusky's judge set a minimum bail and unsecured. She is also a volunteer at Second Mile. Shouldn't she recuse herself from the case? You'd think she'd out and out say she volunteered there and had a conflict? Nope. Grant the guy a favor instead. http://abcnews.go.com/US/penn-state-scandal-victim-hires-lawyer-civil-case/story?id=14946622[/QUOTE] I read about that this morning, I couldn’t believe it. The opinion from most legal experts is that this information should have been revealed by the judge to give both parties the opportunity to object to this judge presiding over the bail hearing, which is what the prosecution most likely would have done, or at least I hope they would. I don't think the judge is a big deal here. Her invlovement is rather peripheral with the charity. *I* think this one looks worse than it is. Unfortunately for the rest of the scandal, my opinion is that it's even worse than it looks Doesn't matter. She had ties one way or another. She should've excused herself from this. |
|