Other Resources My Cup of Joe » CFA part Deux Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 13
 
 
2012-08-03 10:47 AM
in reply to: #4345320

User image

Philadelphia, south of New York and north of DC
Subject: RE: CFA part Deux

gearboy - First, most same sex couples in most of the US ARE denied the right to marry the person they love (I assume you support this, rather than the idea that people should be forced to marry someone they do not love). Saying they are free to marry, meaning they can marry a person of the opposite sex, means they should marry someone they do not love, and either break their vows by engaging in same sex relationships outside of marriage, or not be fully engaged in their marriage, both of which are more destructive to marriage than 2 dudes or 2 chicks marrying their lovers.

No one in the US is denied the basic right to marry.
Also, no one has the unfettered right to marry anyone they want. 

Second, freedom is the ability to make choices, whether good or bad. You are talking about making moral or ethical choices (doing what we ought, even if it is not what we want - I SHOULD feed the baby, rather than stick him outside when he cries). As a psychiatrist, I sometimes have to determine if a person should be forced to accept some sort of treatment against their expressed wishes. The bar is set very high in order to do so (as it should be), because we value the right to make our own choices. That is what freedom is.

Agreed to a point.

The choice to do what we ought not do is not freedom, it is license.

The question then is what ought we do?
Regarding marriage, there is a right answer and a wrong answer. 

For example, we ought not commit adultery. I hope everyone can agree with that one.
Therefore, choosing to commit adultery is not freedom. 

Everything then regarding marriage unpacks from that premise.



2012-08-03 10:49 AM
in reply to: #4345367

User image

Philadelphia, south of New York and north of DC
Subject: RE: CFA part Deux

jgaither - Are you trying to go down the God path here?

Yes, cosmology.

What's the secular humanist answer to why anything exists?

2012-08-03 10:53 AM
in reply to: #4341540

User image

Philadelphia, south of New York and north of DC
Subject: RE: CFA part Deux

I'm going to head out now for a while to get things together for a fishing trip at the St. Lawrence.
We leave first thing in the morning.

St. Lawrence is the 3rd century Christian martyr who was put to death by the emperor
for his answer to the demand of the emperor that he produce the Church's treasures.
Upon which Lawrence produced the poor.

Lawrence was burned to death on a gridiron.
Legend has it that at one point he told his tormentors, "Turn me over, I'm done on this side."

Lawrence would have been right at home with the pleasure of CoJ debates.  

2012-08-03 11:17 AM
in reply to: #4345386

Master
2083
2000252525
Houston, TX
Subject: RE: CFA part Deux

Thank goodness.  I actually do have to work at some point today.........

 Have a great trip Don.

peace out. 

2012-08-03 11:22 AM
in reply to: #4345363

User image

Pro
6767
500010005001001002525
the Alabama part of Pennsylvania
Subject: RE: CFA part Deux

tuwood - 2012-08-03 11:45 AM

...

Not that it matters, but I was a very outspoken Athiest as well up until 2006.

When you say you were an outspoken atheist, I am curious what you believed at that time, and what arguments you heard that persuaded you that not only is there a prime mover, but it is a personalized one, that manifested specifically as a specific individual in a given time and place? 

2012-08-03 11:37 AM
in reply to: #4345471

User image

Pro
9391
500020002000100100100252525
Omaha, NE
Subject: RE: CFA part Deux
gearboy - 2012-08-03 11:22 AM

tuwood - 2012-08-03 11:45 AM

...

Not that it matters, but I was a very outspoken Athiest as well up until 2006.

When you say you were an outspoken atheist, I am curious what you believed at that time, and what arguments you heard that persuaded you that not only is there a prime mover, but it is a personalized one, that manifested specifically as a specific individual in a given time and place? 

As you can imagine, it's a long story.  Probably better suited for a PM so as not to sidetrack the thread too much.



2012-08-03 11:59 AM
in reply to: #4345495

User image

Pro
6767
500010005001001002525
the Alabama part of Pennsylvania
Subject: RE: CFA part Deux
tuwood - 2012-08-03 12:37 PM 

As you can imagine, it's a long story.  Probably better suited for a PM so as not to sidetrack the thread too much.

Fair enough

2012-08-03 11:59 AM
in reply to: #4345495

User image

Champion
14571
50005000200020005002525
the alamo city, Texas
Subject: RE: CFA part Deux
tuwood - 2012-08-03 12:37 PM
gearboy - 2012-08-03 11:22 AM

tuwood - 2012-08-03 11:45 AM

...

Not that it matters, but I was a very outspoken Athiest as well up until 2006.

When you say you were an outspoken atheist, I am curious what you believed at that time, and what arguments you heard that persuaded you that not only is there a prime mover, but it is a personalized one, that manifested specifically as a specific individual in a given time and place? 

As you can imagine, it's a long story.  Probably better suited for a PM so as not to sidetrack the thread too much.

haha are you new here?

2012-08-03 1:44 PM
in reply to: #4345541

User image

Pro
9391
500020002000100100100252525
Omaha, NE
Subject: RE: CFA part Deux
mehaner - 2012-08-03 11:59 AM
tuwood - 2012-08-03 12:37 PM
gearboy - 2012-08-03 11:22 AM

tuwood - 2012-08-03 11:45 AM

...

Not that it matters, but I was a very outspoken Athiest as well up until 2006.

When you say you were an outspoken atheist, I am curious what you believed at that time, and what arguments you heard that persuaded you that not only is there a prime mover, but it is a personalized one, that manifested specifically as a specific individual in a given time and place? 

As you can imagine, it's a long story.  Probably better suited for a PM so as not to sidetrack the thread too much.

haha are you new here?

lol, so true

2012-08-03 1:48 PM
in reply to: #4345808

User image

Champion
17756
50005000500020005001001002525
SoCal
Subject: RE: CFA part Deux

tuwood - 2012-08-03 11:44 AM

____________________

When I see your name it sounds like two wood in my head which is kind of funny given the premise of this thread.

2012-08-03 1:53 PM
in reply to: #4345495

User image

Champion
34263
500050005000500050005000200020001001002525
Chicago
Subject: RE: CFA part Deux
tuwood - 2012-08-03 11:37 AM

gearboy - 2012-08-03 11:22 AM

tuwood - 2012-08-03 11:45 AM

...

Not that it matters, but I was a very outspoken Athiest as well up until 2006.

When you say you were an outspoken atheist, I am curious what you believed at that time, and what arguments you heard that persuaded you that not only is there a prime mover, but it is a personalized one, that manifested specifically as a specific individual in a given time and place? 

As you can imagine, it's a long story.  Probably better suited for a PM so as not to sidetrack the thread too much.



When I worked in Papillion I once had a woman say `Give me two hours and you'll believe in god.' At first I was all `I don't want to know you like that.' but then realized she was trying to, as she put it, `cure' my atheism.

I asked her: `If I talked to you for two hours about why I'm an atheist, would that make you give up your belief in god?'


2012-08-03 2:14 PM
in reply to: #4341540

User image

Master
2477
2000100100100100252525
Oceanside, California
Subject: RE: CFA part Deux

I just found out the reason for all of my conflict and confusion.

I was reviewing my bible to find all the references that I believed showed that folks like Huckabee, Cathy, & other CFA supporters are actually going against Christ's teachings...

I was looking up things like: give unto cesar, judge not, hate the sin - love the sinner, do not be a hypocrite using church for personal agenda like the pharisees, love your enemy, the money and effort spent on politics should be better spend on things like feeding the poor, embracing the outcasts of society, etc.

 

Then it donned on me!

Those parts of the bible look like they are written in sarc font!

2012-08-03 2:19 PM
in reply to: #4345825

User image

Pro
9391
500020002000100100100252525
Omaha, NE
Subject: RE: CFA part Deux
Big Appa - 2012-08-03 1:48 PM

tuwood - 2012-08-03 11:44 AM

____________________

When I see your name it sounds like two wood in my head which is kind of funny given the premise of this thread.

dam, i've been outed...  lol 

2012-08-03 2:35 PM
in reply to: #4345837

User image

Pro
9391
500020002000100100100252525
Omaha, NE
Subject: RE: CFA part Deux
mr2tony - 2012-08-03 1:53 PM
tuwood - 2012-08-03 11:37 AM
gearboy - 2012-08-03 11:22 AM

tuwood - 2012-08-03 11:45 AM

...

Not that it matters, but I was a very outspoken Athiest as well up until 2006.

When you say you were an outspoken atheist, I am curious what you believed at that time, and what arguments you heard that persuaded you that not only is there a prime mover, but it is a personalized one, that manifested specifically as a specific individual in a given time and place? 

As you can imagine, it's a long story.  Probably better suited for a PM so as not to sidetrack the thread too much.

When I worked in Papillion I once had a woman say `Give me two hours and you'll believe in god.' At first I was all `I don't want to know you like that.' but then realized she was trying to, as she put it, `cure' my atheism. I asked her: `If I talked to you for two hours about why I'm an atheist, would that make you give up your belief in god?'

That's funny.  I think that's where a lot of christians go wrong.  They think they can convince you to believe, but I'm pretty sure with a high degree of certainty there is no argument, verse, or example I can give you that would make you say dam, i've been wrong all this time I now believe in God.

Heck, I was the same way, there was nothing anybody on earth could say to me.  I had to be broken down until I was laying in jail and I had nothing left to live for before I went out searching.  I knew who to talk to because there were people in my life who were bearing good fruit and when I was ready I talked to them.  It's for this reason that I try to bear good fruit and live a good biblically moral life so others know they can come to me if they need to.

I also think this is where a lot of churches really screw the pooch on the whole homosexuality issue.  Hate the sin, love the sinner... what the heck is that.  The church I go to is more about preaching the word of god to everyone.  We have plenty of gay people in our congregation and its our position that we all identify with some kind of sin in our lives (biblically speaking here) wether it's drinking, porn, adultery, gambling, sexually imorality, etc...  Jesus walked among the sinners, he didn't cast them out and demonize them.

2012-08-03 3:25 PM
in reply to: #4345386

User image

Champion
7821
50002000500100100100
Brooklyn, NY
Subject: RE: CFA part Deux
dontracy - 2012-08-03 10:53 AM

I'm going to head out now for a while to get things together for a fishing trip at the St. Lawrence.
We leave first thing in the morning.

St. Lawrence is the 3rd century Christian martyr who was put to death by the emperor
for his answer to the demand of the emperor that he produce the Church's treasures.
Upon which Lawrence produced the poor.

Lawrence was burned to death on a gridiron.
Legend has it that at one point he told his tormentors, "Turn me over, I'm done on this side."

Lawrence would have been right at home with the pleasure of CoJ debates.  



I always thought his story was interesting. I read though that the circumstances of his martyrdom are strongly questioned by scholars. When the original account of his death was written, the author wrote "assus est" (he was roasted) giving rise to the legends that he was cooked on a gridiron. It's thought, though, that the author omitted a "p" and meant to write "passus est" (he suffered)' which was commonly how martyrdom was described at the time.


(How's THAT for a hijack? )
2012-08-03 3:53 PM
in reply to: #4345895

User image

Elite
6387
50001000100100100252525
Subject: RE: CFA part Deux
eabeam - 2012-08-03 1:14 PM

I just found out the reason for all of my conflict and confusion.

I was reviewing my bible to find all the references that I believed showed that folks like Huckabee, Cathy, & other CFA supporters are actually going against Christ's teachings...

I was looking up things like: give unto cesar, judge not, hate the sin - love the sinner, do not be a hypocrite using church for personal agenda like the pharisees, love your enemy, the money and effort spent on politics should be better spend on things like feeding the poor, embracing the outcasts of society, etc.

 

Then it donned on me!

Those parts of the bible look like they are written in sarc font!

Maybe go back and read the first chapter...

but then that is the problem with Biblical based argument...lots of cherry picking going on.



2012-08-04 11:15 AM
in reply to: #4345895

User image

Champion
6999
50001000500100100100100252525
Chicago, Illinois
Subject: RE: CFA part Deux
eabeam - 2012-08-03 2:14 PM

I just found out the reason for all of my conflict and confusion.

I was reviewing my bible to find all the references that I believed showed that folks like Huckabee, Cathy, & other CFA supporters are actually going against Christ's teachings...

I was looking up things like: give unto cesar, judge not, hate the sin - love the sinner, do not be a hypocrite using church for personal agenda like the pharisees, love your enemy, the money and effort spent on politics should be better spend on things like feeding the poor, embracing the outcasts of society, etc.

 

Then it donned on me!

Those parts of the bible look like they are written in sarc font!

I basically left the church myself during the 1992 election for many of those same reasons.  I got the vote for person X because they want to lower our taxes which is solely the most important thing.  most people there made more in 1 year that most people will make in 10.  The final straw for me was.  You either with us and what we say or your against us.  I decided if I can not have my own thoughts and views (weather right or wrong) I would have to be against them.  They were happy to see me go I am sure since I worked hard to stop being a hypocrite myself.  I realized before all of the 2 issues before I know I was being one.  I still seek God and try to understand the teachings of Jesus I just will NOT do it in an organized setting.

New Thread
Other Resources My Cup of Joe » CFA part Deux Rss Feed  
 
 
of 13