Ernesto's group (4th season) - Closed (Page 184)
-
No new posts
Moderators: alicefoeller | Reply |
|
![]() ![]() |
Master ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Updating for a couple of runs and my first swim in a month. Went Sunday to my tri-club swim challenge. The idea was to have 4 people in a lane, and do 100 meter relays two at a time (i.e. 2 people swim 100 mt; the next two swim 100 mt; repeat) with a total goal per lane of 10,000 (or 2,500 per person). Not swimming in a month and first time swimming in a 50 mt pool definitely showed. Today I'm sore, but happy. Mitch Swim 3 - Bike 11 -Run 13 - Rest 3 - Total 27 Time 19:57:15 |
|
![]() ![]() |
Master ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
Master ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Samy, how did you arrive at this 2:20 or 2:15 race time? Does it reflect your ability or just a wishful thinking? I honestly don't see how people could run long distances slower than pace by 30sec and then on race day expected to run much faster. How do you know if you could do that without trying that pace in training? But that's just me.
This morning ran 7k in humid heat and after work swam 1500m in the lake. Mitch Swim 3 - Bike 11 -Run 13 - Rest 3 - Total 27 Time 19:57:15Matthew Swim 7 - Bike 7 - Run 7 - Rest 3 - Total 21 Time 24:27:35 Jackie Swim 0 - Bike 3 - Run 14 - Rest 2 - Total 17 - Time 25:43:19 Mark Swim 3 - Bike 6- Run 7 Rest 6 Total 16 Time 14:47:00 Ernesto Swim 2 - Bike 6 - Run 7 - Rest 3 - Total 15 - Time 19:16'16" Jim Swim 0- Bike 5- Run 10 Rest 4 - Total 15 -Time 12:00:13 Charlotte Swim 0 - Bike 8- Run 5 Rest 3 Total 13 (To Goal: 17) Time 8:24 (To Goal: 11:36) Samy Swim 1 - Bike 0 - Run 9 - Rest 7 - Total 10 Time 7:24:00 Gabe Swim 0 - Bike 5 - Run 4 - Rest 1 - Total 9 - Time 9:35:55 Chris Swim 0 - Bike 0 - Run 8 - Rest 7 - Total 8 Time 7:08:34 Joe Swim 8- Bike 1 - Run 2 - Rest 1 - Total 11Time 7:25:12 Barry Swim 1 - Bike 2 - Run 2 - Rest 7 - Total 5 - Time 2:58:52 Scott Swim 1 Bike 0 - Run 1 - Rest 2 - Total -2 - Time 2:18
Edited by markz 2012-12-18 12:18 AM |
![]() ![]() |
Extreme Veteran ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() bike and swim today. while im on a winner i will keep posting on here. for once i am near the top. Mitch Swim 3 - Bike 11 -Run 13 - Rest 3 - Total 27 Time 19:57:15 Matthew Swim 8 - Bike 8 - Run 7 - Rest 3 - Total 23 Time 26:21:35 Jackie Swim 0 - Bike 3 - Run 14 - Rest 2 - Total 17 - Time 25:43:19 Mark Swim 3 - Bike 6- Run 7 Rest 6 Total 16 Time 14:47:00 Ernesto Swim 2 - Bike 6 - Run 7 - Rest 3 - Total 15 - Time 19:16'16" Jim Swim 0- Bike 5- Run 10 Rest 4 - Total 15 -Time 12:00:13 Charlotte Swim 0 - Bike 8- Run 5 Rest 3 Total 13 (To Goal: 17) Time 8:24 (To Goal: 11:36) Samy Swim 1 - Bike 0 - Run 9 - Rest 7 - Total 10 Time 7:24:00 Gabe Swim 0 - Bike 5 - Run 4 - Rest 1 - Total 9 - Time 9:35:55 Chris Swim 0 - Bike 0 - Run 8 - Rest 7 - Total 8 Time 7:08:34 Joe Swim 8- Bike 1 - Run 2 - Rest 1 - Total 11Time 7:25:12 Barry Swim 1 - Bike 2 - Run 2 - Rest 7 - Total 5 - Time 2:58:52 Scott Swim 1 Bike 0 - Run 1 - Rest 2 - Total -2 - Time 2:18 |
![]() ![]() |
Master ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() 60' on drainer - high rpm intervals; 5 miles on dreadmill Mitch Swim 3 - Bike 12 -Run 14 - Rest 3 - Total 29 Time 21:44:29 |
![]() ![]() |
Master ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Adding two (forced) rest days. Yesterday was a nightmare at work and today I'm flying to San Antonio for the day Mitch Swim 3 - Bike 12 -Run 14 - Rest 3 - Total 29 Time 21:44:29
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Expert ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Mitch, I jinxed myself. Didn't get to my run until after dark last night. Tripped and fell on sidewalk. Pretty scraped up and hit my head, but got up and ran home. Everything appears to be fine, but today I'm resting! Mitch Swim 3 - Bike 12 -Run 14 - Rest 3 - Total 29 Time 21:44:29 |
![]() ![]() |
Master ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() markz - 2012-12-18 1:16 AM Samy, how did you arrive at this 2:20 or 2:15 race time? Does it reflect your ability or just a wishful thinking? I honestly don't see how people could run long distances slower than pace by 30sec and then on race day expected to run much faster. How do you know if you could do that without trying that pace in training? But that's just me.
Mark, My 2:20-2:15 goal is based on a few things, including wishful thinking. Galloway has a calculator based on what he calls the magic mile to assess your potential pace for different distances; I combined that with what I think I can do (I have run 6 miles at 10:00 and finished with something in the tank). Again, my goals will be reassess once I get closer to race day; this is for the time being. However, this is my first HM. Most plans that I have seen call for a long run at slower than pace, with a few shorter pace run or speed based training (my longest long run is 12 miles, pace run is 5 miles). I thought that was the norm. Am I mistaken? Your point of having to race at pace to understand what the body can do make sense, but plans do not call for this, so I am a little confused. |
![]() ![]() |
Master ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() markz - 2012-12-18 1:16 AM Samy, how did you arrive at this 2:20 or 2:15 race time? Does it reflect your ability or just a wishful thinking? I honestly don't see how people could run long distances slower than pace by 30sec and then on race day expected to run much faster. How do you know if you could do that without trying that pace in training? But that's just me. Samy - I think Mark's question is valid. What criteria did you use to arrive at the 2:20 to 2;15 pace? I will suggest that your long runs should be in that 90 sec slower than race pace range. You should feel that you can do more at the end of your long runs. My recommendation would be ensure you have a valid race pace (not a stretch goal - but one based on actual race times for similar or other distances) and then follow the plan's guidelines for training paces. Not apples to apples - but I'm following a Hanson's HM training plan. My projected race pace is 7:42 or a race time of 1:41. My majority of runs (long and easy) are in the 9:41 to 9:02 range. There is speed work that is at race pace or faster. Ernesto and others would be great resources here. |
![]() ![]() |
Master ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Samy, Use this calculator to estimate your finish time (you have to plug in a number from a different race): |
![]() ![]() |
Master ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() I don't want to be a heretic, but for me those calculators (I just checked both of them) are spot on for 5 and 10k distances, after that - very unrealistic times. According to them I should be doing marathons in 3:49... Yeah, I wish. And it's not that I haven't run longer distances in preparation. Again, it's just me. |
|
![]() ![]() |
Master ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() You're right, they tend to be optimistic for the longer distances. But not really that far though, usually when someone fails to apply their speed to a long(er) distance is because of lack of base mileage at race speed. For example, training for marathons requires all sorts of paces and training distances, but the runs with the most impact in fitness are those at race pace for distances that are much shorter than the race itself. Depth is acquired doing LSRs (long slow runs). |
![]() ![]() |
Expert ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Had a good day at PT today and it feels like I am making the turn with my piriformis. Pain is almost non-existent, but working on core and flexibility extensively. Don't know about you guys, but I love PT. Have a great therapy practice who make it easy (lots of athletes with a DPT degrees is a great thing) and they are paid to listen to my complaints and help me improve. Gotta love it. in terms of calculators, I agree that they don't work for me beyond 13 miles. I know the drop off in performance from 5K to 10K to 10 Miles to 13.1 miles, but that comes from experience. The calculators are based on numbers and not experience so they are a statistically invalid assessment tool. According to them my marathon goal should be sub 3:15 - fat chance. Too many variables at longer distances. Hey E: As I ease back into running and the bike, where to start? The adaptations my body went through during the marathon training have been lost and I haven't done honest bike sessions since June. Swimming fitness however is progressing ahead of schedule. Will take things slow and listen to the body, but I could use some thoughtful guidance.
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() | ![]() All. For marathons, those calculators should be thought of as potential for longer distances given perfect conditions and you having run enough miles. Based on my HM PR (1:33:59) the one Ernesto links to says I should be able to run a 3:17:30 marathon, where my PR is a 3:23:12. McMillan says basically the same thing (3:17:49). So I'm still 5 minutes and change off, but that isn't THAT far off. My 42:56 10k PR predicts a 3:21:26 marathon (or less than two minutes off) and actually overpredicts my HM time (it predicts 1:35:43 and my PR is 1:33:59). I have always found the HM from 10k prediction to be within a few minutes. Yesterday 6 miles on dreadmill and today 6.1 miles outside along Mississippi. Mitch Swim 3 - Bike 12 -Run 14 - Rest 3 - Total 29 Time 21:44:29 Matthew Swim 8 - Bike 8 - Run 7 - Rest 3 - Total 23 Time 26:21:35 Jackie Swim 0 - Bike 3 - Run 15 - Rest 3- Total 18 - Time 26:37:27 Mark Swim 3 - Bike 6- Run 7 Rest 6 Total 16 Time 14:47:00 Ernesto Swim 2 - Bike 6 - Run 7 - Rest 5 - Total 15 - Time 19:16'16" Jim Swim 0- Bike 5- Run 10 Rest 4 - Total 15 -Time 12:00:13 Charlotte Swim 0 - Bike 8- Run 5 Rest 3 Total 13 (To Goal: 17) Time 8:24 (To Goal: 11:36) Chris Swim 0 - Bike 0 - Run 10 - Rest 8 - Total 10 Time 9:07:25 Samy Swim 1 - Bike 0 - Run 9 - Rest 7 - Total 10 Time 7:24:00 Gabe Swim 0 - Bike 5 - Run 4 - Rest 1 - Total 9 - Time 9:35:55 Joe Swim 8- Bike 1 - Run 2 - Rest 1 - Total 11Time 7:25:12 Barry Swim 1 - Bike 2 - Run 2 - Rest 7 - Total 5 - Time 2:58:52 Scott Swim 1 Bike 0 - Run 1 - Rest 2 - Total -2 - Time 2:18 Edited by chris2533 2012-12-18 9:38 PM |
![]() ![]() |
Extreme Veteran ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Long run today. 2 hrs with a 45 min section at race pace. Mitch Swim 3 - Bike 12 -Run 14 - Rest 3 - Total 29 Time 21:44:29 Matthew Swim 8 - Bike 8 - Run 8 - Rest 3 - Total 24 Time 28:25:35 Jackie Swim 0 - Bike 3 - Run 15 - Rest 3- Total 18 - Time 26:37:27 Mark Swim 3 - Bike 6- Run 7 Rest 6 Total 16 Time 14:47:00 Ernesto Swim 2 - Bike 6 - Run 7 - Rest 5 - Total 15 - Time 19:16'16" Jim Swim 0- Bike 5- Run 10 Rest 4 - Total 15 -Time 12:00:13 Charlotte Swim 0 - Bike 8- Run 5 Rest 3 Total 13 (To Goal: 17) Time 8:24 (To Goal: 11:36) Chris Swim 0 - Bike 0 - Run 10 - Rest 8 - Total 10 Time 9:07:25 Samy Swim 1 - Bike 0 - Run 9 - Rest 7 - Total 10 Time 7:24:00 Gabe Swim 0 - Bike 5 - Run 4 - Rest 1 - Total 9 - Time 9:35:55 Joe Swim 8- Bike 1 - Run 2 - Rest 1 - Total 11Time 7:25:12 Barry Swim 1 - Bike 2 - Run 2 - Rest 7 - Total 5 - Time 2:58:52 Scott Swim 1 Bike 0 - Run 1 - Rest 2 - Total -2 - Time 2: |
![]() ![]() |
Master ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() ernestov - 2012-12-18 6:04 PM You're right, they tend to be optimistic for the longer distances. But not really that far though, usually when someone fails to apply their speed to a long(er) distance is because of lack of base mileage at race speed. For example, training for marathons requires all sorts of paces and training distances, but the runs with the most impact in fitness are those at race pace for distances that are much shorter than the race itself. Depth is acquired doing LSRs (long slow runs). I'm actually curious about this one. How much shorter are they? 10k or 21k? Say I'm trying to target my potential marathon pace of 3:50. This would mean a 10k in 54-55min, which I do all the time. Long runs would be at much slower pace, which I also do. Still, how am I expected to run a marathon at 10k (55min ) pace when all long runs have been done at slower pace? I am confused. For me the only way to prepare myself for faster marathon would be to run long distances faster. Where am I wrong? |
|
![]() ![]() |
Extreme Veteran ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() i am with you on that one Mark. i have been doing 5 months or so at MAF which means running around 10.5 kph. before then imwas running atnaround 12kph. The last few weeks i have been includinga few runs at around 12kph but it has been hard. i have been struggling tomrebuild my pace again but it is getting back slowly. i am still,happy to have done the MAF running as i no have a good base. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() | ![]() Mark and Matthew, Trust the training plan. Almost all have the same basic formula. Here was mine. First, start with goal Marathon pace: for me that was 7:50. My plan called for six days a week of running. Three of those were just get the miles in. I would run these about 90 seconds per mile slower than marathon pace, or around 9:20. One day was "long run day", which for me maxed out at 18 miles. These I would run about 40 seconds per mile slower than marathon pace, or about 8:30. One day a week was track work, and depending on the week would either be short intervals (say 1/4 mile) at 5k pace, or longer intervals 10k pace. And one day a week would be a pace run. By the end, I would run say, 12 miles, with 2 miles at 9:20, 8 miles at marathon pace (7:50) and then 2 miles at 9:20. So yes, almost all the miles were slower than marathon pace. The only time I was faster was at the track, and the only day I was actually at pace was my Thursday pace run (and then only the middle miles). Some programs do call for throwing a few pace miles into the middle of your long run, but others don't. So my bottom line is you can't run all your miles at MAF. You do have to train your body to run at pace at some point during the week. But MOST of your miles should be run slower than pace. |
![]() ![]() |
Master ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Got a full night's sleep for a change - only got my run in though. Mitch Swim 3 - Bike 12 -Run 15 - Rest 3 - Total 30 Time 22:25:02 |
![]() ![]() |
Master ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() markz - 2012-12-18 11:55 PM I would say up to ten miles at target pace. Longer runs about 30 to 40 seconds slower per mile. Don't forget the intervals too (which in the past you haven't done much of, don't know now).ernestov - 2012-12-18 6:04 PM You're right, they tend to be optimistic for the longer distances. But not really that far though, usually when someone fails to apply their speed to a long(er) distance is because of lack of base mileage at race speed. For example, training for marathons requires all sorts of paces and training distances, but the runs with the most impact in fitness are those at race pace for distances that are much shorter than the race itself. Depth is acquired doing LSRs (long slow runs). I'm actually curious about this one. How much shorter are they? 10k or 21k? Say I'm trying to target my potential marathon pace of 3:50. This would mean a 10k in 54-55min, which I do all the time. Long runs would be at much slower pace, which I also do. Still, how am I expected to run a marathon at 10k (55min ) pace when all long runs have been done at slower pace? I am confused. For me the only way to prepare myself for faster marathon would be to run long distances faster. Where am I wrong? |
![]() ![]() |
Master ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() chris2533 - 2012-12-19 7:22 AM Mark and Matthew, Trust the training plan. Almost all have the same basic formula. Here was mine. First, start with goal Marathon pace: for me that was 7:50. My plan called for six days a week of running. Three of those were just get the miles in. I would run these about 90 seconds per mile slower than marathon pace, or around 9:20. One day was "long run day", which for me maxed out at 18 miles. These I would run about 40 seconds per mile slower than marathon pace, or about 8:30. One day a week was track work, and depending on the week would either be short intervals (say 1/4 mile) at 5k pace, or longer intervals 10k pace. And one day a week would be a pace run. By the end, I would run say, 12 miles, with 2 miles at 9:20, 8 miles at marathon pace (7:50) and then 2 miles at 9:20. So yes, almost all the miles were slower than marathon pace. The only time I was faster was at the track, and the only day I was actually at pace was my Thursday pace run (and then only the middle miles). Some programs do call for throwing a few pace miles into the middle of your long run, but others don't. So my bottom line is you can't run all your miles at MAF. You do have to train your body to run at pace at some point during the week. But MOST of your miles should be run slower than pace. Matthew - I'll second what Chris wrote. I took a quick look at your logs (Mark - your's appear to be similar). The last few months, eyeballing it, it looks like you are running 2.5 times per week and 14 miles per week on average. What I have learned and what I believe is that to be a good longer distance runner you need to be running 5 to 6 days per week - most slow and sometimes fast. Jackie bought the Hanson's Marathon Method and not sure if she finsihed it yet, but the 1st chapter is available to download online and provides a quick overview of the concept of increased frequency, then increased volume and then increased intensity. By running at easier paces you give your body the opportunity to train more frequently and for longer distances/times. You then sprinkle in intensity to teach your body to run fast. I essentially followed this concept for my early spring HM last year and crushed my 4 year old PR. The plan I'm following now will get me to much larger weekly mileage and I know the adaptations it brings to my aerobic system will be great. |
|
![]() ![]() |
Master ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() 4 miles at 10:00 pace Mitch Swim 3 - Bike 12 -Run 15 - Rest 3 - Total 30 Time 22:25:02 |
![]() ![]() |
Master ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Regarding HM training paces...Ok, this is getting complicated I practically agree with everyone. I do believe in the need to train your body to run at pace, but also in combining easy runs to allow for more frequency. Chris, your breakdown of runs/paces sounds logical, and I like logical things. Based on this, can you guys gave me feedback/approval/criticism of my HM plan? Sorry for the long post, but the engineer in me likes numbers. Background: 1st HM. Following Higdon beginners 2 plan. My plan calls for 4 runs/week. 1 long run (max. 12 miles), 1 pace run (max 5 miles), 2 easy runs (3 miles). I like it 'cause it incorporates pace runs, it keeps things simple, but allows me to rest and catch up with sleep. Wanted to accomplish 2 things this offseason - HM training and race, and doing it in a way that allows me to start Tri season refreshed (as 90% of training for me is at 5:00 am) 1st step: Define race pace. Ernesto, I used the calculator you send me. My problem is that I have not done an official race (other than triathlons), so I took my best 5K training run (8:45 pace - actually entered in the calculator at 9:00 pace) and it gave me a 2:10 target HM. Not going to even try that one. Then I entered my longest run at something other than MAF - a 6 mile at slightly under 10:00 pace (not all out, hard but left something in the tank). It came to a 2:17 HM target (10:30 pace). Conclusion: My original 2:20 target (2:15 stretch target) apparently are good. 2nd step: Define training pace. So this is what I am thinking for pace: Easy: MAF (aprox. 12:00 pace for 3 miles) Pace: 10:00 Long Run: This is where I am undecided. 30 to 90 seconds slower than pace puts me in the 10:30 to 11:30 range. Split the difference and do 11:00 pace or be conservative and do a 11:15 pace? Thanks in advance for the help. |
![]() ![]() |
Master ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Samyg - 2012-12-19 11:23 AM Regarding HM training paces...Ok, this is getting complicated I practically agree with everyone. I do believe in the need to train your body to run at pace, but also in combining easy runs to allow for more frequency. Chris, your breakdown of runs/paces sounds logical, and I like logical things. Based on this, can you guys gave me feedback/approval/criticism of my HM plan? Sorry for the long post, but the engineer in me likes numbers. Background: 1st HM. Following Higdon beginners 2 plan. My plan calls for 4 runs/week. 1 long run (max. 12 miles), 1 pace run (max 5 miles), 2 easy runs (3 miles). I like it 'cause it incorporates pace runs, it keeps things simple, but allows me to rest and catch up with sleep. Wanted to accomplish 2 things this offseason - HM training and race, and doing it in a way that allows me to start Tri season refreshed (as 90% of training for me is at 5:00 am) 1st step: Define race pace. Ernesto, I used the calculator you send me. My problem is that I have not done an official race (other than triathlons), so I took my best 5K training run (8:45 pace - actually entered in the calculator at 9:00 pace) and it gave me a 2:10 target HM. Not going to even try that one. Then I entered my longest run at something other than MAF - a 6 mile at slightly under 10:00 pace (not all out, hard but left something in the tank). It came to a 2:17 HM target (10:30 pace). Conclusion: My original 2:20 target (2:15 stretch target) apparently are good. 2nd step: Define training pace. So this is what I am thinking for pace: Easy: MAF (aprox. 12:00 pace for 3 miles) Pace: 10:00 Long Run: This is where I am undecided. 30 to 90 seconds slower than pace puts me in the 10:30 to 11:30 range. Split the difference and do 11:00 pace or be conservative and do a 11:15 pace? Thanks in advance for the help. Samy - you could go to the Macmillan Running Calculator and it will give you training paces based off of race times. Just my two cents! |
![]() ![]() |
Master ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Runch today, feeling flat and bloated... Mitch Swim 3 - Bike 12 -Run 15 - Rest 3 - Total 30 Time 22:25:02
|
|