login
Marissa Mayer's Vogue Pose (Page 2)
-
No new posts
|
 2013-08-21 2:18 PM in reply to: jford2309 |
Champion  11989      Philly 'burbs |  Subject: RE: Marissa Mayer's Vogue PoseOriginally posted by jford2309 marissa mayer's vogue pose doesn't really do anything for me one way or the other... I like this one better
|
| 2013-08-21 2:18 PM in reply to: switch |
| Seattle | Subject: RE: Marissa Mayer's Vogue Pose Originally posted by switch Originally posted by mr2tony Originally posted by austhokie I made this comment in another thread, but it seems to fit in well here - there just seems to be this mentality that you can't be "girlie" (for lack of a better word) and be successful in a male dominated field. Having just gotten out of the Navy I saw it all the time - and I even did it - the need to prove yourself and lose who you are - in order to succeed. I kind of noticed this (to slightly change topics) in the discussions about the D&B Ironman Purse - I would never buy it personally (not a D&B fan, i'm a Coach girl all the way) - but there were comments about female athletes not being taken seriously because of things like these purses - why can't I be an Ironman (although i'm not yet) and wear high heels, carry cute purses, get mani/pedi's etc...does the need to succeed in a male dominated field mean you have to push that to the side... sorry for the ramblings - phd psychosis...lol! I REALLY wish I had gone into sports psych now...lol! People overthink sh*t. They need to stop doing that. Women are women and men are men. Women shouldn't have to act like men to be successful. Women who look and act like women are more likely to be the object of sexual desires of men. In the last few generations, these same men have been controlling the hiring/firing/promoting COC. It has been, in a way, "easier" for women to side-step the BS if they eschew feminine things. BTW, what's up with the shoe choice for the shoot? I don't pay attention to fashion too much (except I'm now enthralled my the man pouch panties), but those shoes scream bondage to me. Seems like an interesting choice. They do, and I like them |
but I also agree that it's an interesting choice. | 2013-08-21 2:20 PM in reply to: mrbbrad |
Pro 5761 Bartlett, TN | Subject: RE: Marissa Mayer's Vogue Pose Originally posted by mrbbrad Originally posted by jford2309 marissa mayer's vogue pose doesn't really do anything for me one way or the other... I like this one better
I mean she is an attractive lady, and its a good picture, but it doesn't make look twice! |
| 2013-08-21 2:23 PM in reply to: jford2309 |
Champion 11989 Philly 'burbs | Subject: RE: Marissa Mayer's Vogue Pose Originally posted by jford2309 Originally posted by mrbbrad Originally posted by jford2309 marissa mayer's vogue pose doesn't really do anything for me one way or the other... I like this one better
I mean she is an attractive lady, and its a good picture, but it doesn't make look twice!
She looks like that and is smart enough to run Yahoo; I'll look way more than twice. |
| 2013-08-21 2:24 PM in reply to: mrbbrad |
Champion 11989 Philly 'burbs | Subject: RE: Marissa Mayer's Vogue Pose Ok, I just spent some time Googling her. Quite an interesting sense of style. She seems to have a thing for elegant yet funky dresses. I like it!! |
| 2013-08-21 2:59 PM in reply to: Asalzwed |
Regular 5477 LHOTP | Subject: RE: Marissa Mayer's Vogue Pose Originally posted by Asalzwed On further inspection they kinda say "house arrest" or "two timing chips". The bondage idea was better. The square bit is kinda ruining it for me. ..Originally posted by switch Originally posted by mr2tony Originally posted by austhokie I made this comment in another thread, but it seems to fit in well here - there just seems to be this mentality that you can't be "girlie" (for lack of a better word) and be successful in a male dominated field. Having just gotten out of the Navy I saw it all the time - and I even did it - the need to prove yourself and lose who you are - in order to succeed. I kind of noticed this (to slightly change topics) in the discussions about the D&B Ironman Purse - I would never buy it personally (not a D&B fan, i'm a Coach girl all the way) - but there were comments about female athletes not being taken seriously because of things like these purses - why can't I be an Ironman (although i'm not yet) and wear high heels, carry cute purses, get mani/pedi's etc...does the need to succeed in a male dominated field mean you have to push that to the side... sorry for the ramblings - phd psychosis...lol! I REALLY wish I had gone into sports psych now...lol! People overthink sh*t. They need to stop doing that. Women are women and men are men. Women shouldn't have to act like men to be successful. Women who look and act like women are more likely to be the object of sexual desires of men. In the last few generations, these same men have been controlling the hiring/firing/promoting COC. It has been, in a way, "easier" for women to side-step the BS if they eschew feminine things. BTW, what's up with the shoe choice for the shoot? I don't pay attention to fashion too much (except I'm now enthralled my the man pouch panties), but those shoes scream bondage to me. Seems like an interesting choice. They do, and I like them |
| 2013-08-21 3:44 PM in reply to: switch |
| Seattle | Subject: RE: Marissa Mayer's Vogue Pose Originally posted by switch Originally posted by Asalzwed On further inspection they kinda say "house arrest" or "two timing chips". The bondage idea was better. The square bit is kinda ruining it for me. .. Originally posted by switch Originally posted by mr2tony Originally posted by austhokie I made this comment in another thread, but it seems to fit in well here - there just seems to be this mentality that you can't be "girlie" (for lack of a better word) and be successful in a male dominated field. Having just gotten out of the Navy I saw it all the time - and I even did it - the need to prove yourself and lose who you are - in order to succeed. I kind of noticed this (to slightly change topics) in the discussions about the D&B Ironman Purse - I would never buy it personally (not a D&B fan, i'm a Coach girl all the way) - but there were comments about female athletes not being taken seriously because of things like these purses - why can't I be an Ironman (although i'm not yet) and wear high heels, carry cute purses, get mani/pedi's etc...does the need to succeed in a male dominated field mean you have to push that to the side... sorry for the ramblings - phd psychosis...lol! I REALLY wish I had gone into sports psych now...lol! People overthink sh*t. They need to stop doing that. Women are women and men are men. Women shouldn't have to act like men to be successful. Women who look and act like women are more likely to be the object of sexual desires of men. In the last few generations, these same men have been controlling the hiring/firing/promoting COC. It has been, in a way, "easier" for women to side-step the BS if they eschew feminine things. BTW, what's up with the shoe choice for the shoot? I don't pay attention to fashion too much (except I'm now enthralled my the man pouch panties), but those shoes scream bondage to me. Seems like an interesting choice. They do, and I like them Ewwww, two timing chips? She must be a triathlete. Now you've ruined it for ME. |
| 2013-08-21 3:48 PM in reply to: Asalzwed |
Regular 5477 LHOTP | Subject: RE: Marissa Mayer's Vogue Pose Originally posted by Asalzwed Not into triathletes, huh? ;)Originally posted by switch Originally posted by Asalzwed On further inspection they kinda say "house arrest" or "two timing chips". The bondage idea was better. The square bit is kinda ruining it for me. .. Originally posted by switch Originally posted by mr2tony Originally posted by austhokie I made this comment in another thread, but it seems to fit in well here - there just seems to be this mentality that you can't be "girlie" (for lack of a better word) and be successful in a male dominated field. Having just gotten out of the Navy I saw it all the time - and I even did it - the need to prove yourself and lose who you are - in order to succeed. I kind of noticed this (to slightly change topics) in the discussions about the D&B Ironman Purse - I would never buy it personally (not a D&B fan, i'm a Coach girl all the way) - but there were comments about female athletes not being taken seriously because of things like these purses - why can't I be an Ironman (although i'm not yet) and wear high heels, carry cute purses, get mani/pedi's etc...does the need to succeed in a male dominated field mean you have to push that to the side... sorry for the ramblings - phd psychosis...lol! I REALLY wish I had gone into sports psych now...lol! People overthink sh*t. They need to stop doing that. Women are women and men are men. Women shouldn't have to act like men to be successful. Women who look and act like women are more likely to be the object of sexual desires of men. In the last few generations, these same men have been controlling the hiring/firing/promoting COC. It has been, in a way, "easier" for women to side-step the BS if they eschew feminine things. BTW, what's up with the shoe choice for the shoot? I don't pay attention to fashion too much (except I'm now enthralled my the man pouch panties), but those shoes scream bondage to me. Seems like an interesting choice. They do, and I like them Ewwww, two timing chips? She must be a triathlete. Now you've ruined it for ME. |
| 2013-08-21 5:17 PM in reply to: 0 |
| Seattle | Subject: RE: Marissa Mayer's Vogue Pose Originally posted by switch Originally posted by Asalzwed Not into triathletes, huh? Originally posted by switch Originally posted by Asalzwed On further inspection they kinda say "house arrest" or "two timing chips". The bondage idea was better. The square bit is kinda ruining it for me. .. Originally posted by switch Originally posted by mr2tony Originally posted by austhokie I made this comment in another thread, but it seems to fit in well here - there just seems to be this mentality that you can't be "girlie" (for lack of a better word) and be successful in a male dominated field. Having just gotten out of the Navy I saw it all the time - and I even did it - the need to prove yourself and lose who you are - in order to succeed. I kind of noticed this (to slightly change topics) in the discussions about the D&B Ironman Purse - I would never buy it personally (not a D&B fan, i'm a Coach girl all the way) - but there were comments about female athletes not being taken seriously because of things like these purses - why can't I be an Ironman (although i'm not yet) and wear high heels, carry cute purses, get mani/pedi's etc...does the need to succeed in a male dominated field mean you have to push that to the side... sorry for the ramblings - phd psychosis...lol! I REALLY wish I had gone into sports psych now...lol! People overthink sh*t. They need to stop doing that. Women are women and men are men. Women shouldn't have to act like men to be successful. Women who look and act like women are more likely to be the object of sexual desires of men. In the last few generations, these same men have been controlling the hiring/firing/promoting COC. It has been, in a way, "easier" for women to side-step the BS if they eschew feminine things. BTW, what's up with the shoe choice for the shoot? I don't pay attention to fashion too much (except I'm now enthralled my the man pouch panties), but those shoes scream bondage to me. Seems like an interesting choice. They do, and I like them Ewwww, two timing chips? She must be a triathlete. Now you've ruined it for ME.  Welllllll, if they remove their visor, heart rate monitor, gps watch, fuel belt, compression socks and hokas first it's alright I guess Edited by Asalzwed 2013-08-21 5:17 PM |
| 2013-08-21 5:42 PM in reply to: mrbbrad |
Master 1732 Delafield, Wisconsin | Subject: RE: Marissa Mayer's Vogue Pose Originally posted by mrbbrad Ok, I just spent some time Googling her. Quite an interesting sense of style. She seems to have a thing for elegant yet funky dresses. I like it!! Now that she runs Yahoo, she would probably prefer that you 'yahoo search' her. |
| 2013-08-21 5:48 PM in reply to: Asalzwed |
Regular 5477 LHOTP | Subject: RE: Marissa Mayer's Vogue Pose Originally posted by Asalzwed Here, I found one for you: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Do53TQ6OVJ4 Mad skillz 1:38Originally posted by switch Originally posted by Asalzwed Not into triathletes, huh? ;)Originally posted by switch Originally posted by Asalzwed On further inspection they kinda say "house arrest" or "two timing chips". The bondage idea was better. The square bit is kinda ruining it for me. .. Originally posted by switch Originally posted by mr2tony Originally posted by austhokie I made this comment in another thread, but it seems to fit in well here - there just seems to be this mentality that you can't be "girlie" (for lack of a better word) and be successful in a male dominated field. Having just gotten out of the Navy I saw it all the time - and I even did it - the need to prove yourself and lose who you are - in order to succeed. I kind of noticed this (to slightly change topics) in the discussions about the D&B Ironman Purse - I would never buy it personally (not a D&B fan, i'm a Coach girl all the way) - but there were comments about female athletes not being taken seriously because of things like these purses - why can't I be an Ironman (although i'm not yet) and wear high heels, carry cute purses, get mani/pedi's etc...does the need to succeed in a male dominated field mean you have to push that to the side... sorry for the ramblings - phd psychosis...lol! I REALLY wish I had gone into sports psych now...lol! People overthink sh*t. They need to stop doing that. Women are women and men are men. Women shouldn't have to act like men to be successful. Women who look and act like women are more likely to be the object of sexual desires of men. In the last few generations, these same men have been controlling the hiring/firing/promoting COC. It has been, in a way, "easier" for women to side-step the BS if they eschew feminine things. BTW, what's up with the shoe choice for the shoot? I don't pay attention to fashion too much (except I'm now enthralled my the man pouch panties), but those shoes scream bondage to me. Seems like an interesting choice. They do, and I like them Ewwww, two timing chips? She must be a triathlete. Now you've ruined it for ME. Welllllll, if they remove their visor, heart rate monitor, gps watch, fuel belt, compression socks and hokas first it's alright I guess |
| 2013-08-21 8:57 PM in reply to: switch |
| Expert 1233 | Subject: RE: Marissa Mayer's Vogue Pose Interesting that all the talk is on her looks, being a women, and blah, blah, blah. How about the fact that the stock price is now back up to where it was four years ago. |
| 2013-08-21 9:19 PM in reply to: vonschnapps |
Regular 5477 LHOTP | Subject: RE: Marissa Mayer's Vogue Pose Originally posted by vonschnapps Interesting that all the talk is on her looks, being a women, and blah, blah, blah. How about the fact that the stock price is now back up to where it was four years ago. Excellent point. Thanks for keepin it real. |
| 2013-08-22 6:52 AM in reply to: mrbbrad |
| Regular 226 Saint Petersburg, FL | Subject: RE: Marissa Mayer's Vogue Pose Yeaaah, I'm totally looking twice .... and twice again. Originally posted by jford2309 Originally posted by mrbbrad Originally posted by jford2309 marissa mayer's vogue pose doesn't really do anything for me one way or the other... I like this one better
I mean she is an attractive lady, and its a good picture, but it doesn't make look twice!
She looks like that and is smart enough to run Yahoo; I'll look way more than twice. |
| 2013-08-23 6:48 AM in reply to: switch |
Master 6834 Englewood, Florida | Subject: RE: Marissa Mayer's Vogue Pose Originally posted by switch Originally posted by vonschnapps Interesting that all the talk is on her looks, being a women, and blah, blah, blah. How about the fact that the stock price is now back up to where it was four years ago. Excellent point. Thanks for keepin it real. I thought I heard that they stepped back into the top spot for search engines. Even if they haven't, Yahoo is relevant again. |
| 2013-08-24 8:11 PM in reply to: 0 |
| Expert 1233 | Subject: RE: Marissa Mayer's Vogue Pose Originally posted by cdban66 Originally posted by switch Originally posted by vonschnapps Interesting that all the talk is on her looks, being a women, and blah, blah, blah. How about the fact that the stock price is now back up to where it was four years ago. Excellent point. Thanks for keepin it real. I thought I heard that they stepped back into the top spot for search engines. Even if they haven't, Yahoo is relevant again. Definitely better than before, but not quite comfortable that they turned the corner yet. A lot of the stock price movement is based on hope (castles in the air theory). I'm in San Jose on a frequent basis, and there's always a buzz on certain companies e.g., Google, Apple, Tesla, Intel (good and bad). But two companies I never hear anyone talking about anymore are HP and Yahoo. Just thinking maybe the Vogue exposure was calculated to address the 'get the buzz going again' issue. Edited by vonschnapps 2013-08-24 8:15 PM |
|
|
|
|
| |||
| |||
|
| ||||
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
View profile
Add to friends
Go to training log
Go to race log
Send a message
View album
CONNECT WITH FACEBOOK