Other Resources My Cup of Joe » Gun Control Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 2
 
 
2006-05-03 10:27 PM
in reply to: #413812

User image

Extreme Veteran
457
1001001001002525
Eagleville,
Subject: RE: Gun Control

Sorry I didn't respond sooner, but I left work just after posting this afternoon, and didn't see the questions till now.  However I see that Max and BodyCheck have answered as the the laws not being enforced.  No mater what laws are on the books, criminals will get guns if they want guns.  We have waiting periods for handguns, but that doesn't seem to stop those with criminal records from getting guns, the background checks don't do anything to stop criminals from getting guns.  As I, and others stated, firearm regulations only seem to effect those of us that obey the laws.  The criminals are so because they have no problem braking laws, so what would make you think they will obey any new laws or regulations passed?

Also, someone mentioned the "wild west."  The idea of the gun slinger's of the wild west is actually a fallacy.  You may have had highway men, and they may have used guns in their crimes.  But the number of these criminals was nowhere near as high as is widely believed.  The reason for this is  that since most people carried guns for protection of natural predators.  Not to mention, if you got caught committing a crime, you were done.  It is a great deterrent to crime knowing that when you are found guilty you would be taken from the court house and hung.  Unlike today when you spend 15 plus years on death row and are likely to die of old age before the eclectic chair after killing a police officer.



2006-05-03 10:51 PM
in reply to: #413889

User image

Pro
4311
20002000100100100
Texas
Subject: RE: Gun Control
kgart - 2006-05-03 3:11 PM

The only gun control needed is too keep one out of Dick Cheneys hands.



Dammit, I wanted to make the first Cheney joke in this thread.
2006-05-03 10:55 PM
in reply to: #414239

User image

Elite
2661
20005001002525
DC Metro, slowly working my way to NC
Subject: RE: Gun Control
egent - 2006-05-03 11:27 PM

However I see that Max and BodyCheck have answered as the the laws not being enforced. No mater what laws are on the books, criminals will get guns if they want guns. We have waiting periods for handguns, but that doesn't seem to stop those with criminal records from getting guns, the background checks don't do anything to stop criminals from getting guns.

Bingo. The gangbanger getting a firearm with a filed off serial number isn't being told, "Hey dude, I need a few minutes to run your stats through the state & fed systems before I can sell you this..."

It goes back to stemming illegal distribution - but I'll readily admit, I don't know exactly how you go about doing that. But, there has to be a way, somehow...

2006-05-03 10:57 PM
in reply to: #413858

User image

Elite
2661
20005001002525
DC Metro, slowly working my way to NC
Subject: RE: Gun Control

marmadaddy - 2006-05-03 3:46 PMHi honey? drew started another one. Yeah, just keep a plate warm for me. Love you too...

Nah, you've got to admit, this one has been pretty even handed - and it's not like anyone has posted pics of naked chicks with firearms...

2006-05-03 10:59 PM
in reply to: #414269

Champion
8903
500020001000500100100100100
Subject: RE: Gun Control
BodyCheck - 2006-05-03 11:57 PM

Nah, you've got to admit, this one has been pretty even handed - and it's not like anyone has posted pics of naked chicks with firearms...

LOL....now you've got me running off to Google! 

 

2006-05-03 11:00 PM
in reply to: #414269

User image

Extreme Veteran
457
1001001001002525
Eagleville,
Subject: RE: Gun Control
BodyCheck - 2006-05-03 11:57 PM

- and it's not like anyone has posted pics of naked chicks with firearms...

I have the camera if you have the gun, and the willingness to pose....



2006-05-03 11:28 PM
in reply to: #413812

User image

Master
2287
2000100100252525
Calgary, Alberta
Subject: RE: Gun Control
I'm not a gun owner and have no desire to be one. Up here in Canada the last government put in Gun Control. I think the last I heard the system was 2 billion dollars over what it was originally forecasted to cost. Has it been effective - I think not. Nor have I had one person explain to me how it makes us any safer. Criminals who want to use a gun will find ways to get a gun.

I'm all for harder, longer sentences as a deterent. Some argue there aren't enough jails or prison guards to house the criminals longer. Hello.... 2 billion dollars can probably build a few jails and give some folks jobs as prison guards. Maybe then a few criminals will think twice about the crime thereby reducing the prison population.

2006-05-04 6:04 AM
in reply to: #413910

User image

Elite
2777
2000500100100252525
In my bunk with new shoes and purple sweats.
Subject: RE: Gun Control
Stake - 2006-05-03 4:28 PM

This is my rifle, this is my gun. 

This is for fighting, this is for fun

Thanks Stake. Folks need to learn that gun control pertains to overcoming certain premature tendencies. Weapons regulation on the other hand, well.....let's see...
all packed for St. A's.
9mm auto for transition bag...check
9mm auto for travel bag and motel room......check
old nasty drop piece....check
Let's race.
2006-05-04 6:14 AM
in reply to: #413995

User image

Elite
2777
2000500100100252525
In my bunk with new shoes and purple sweats.
Subject: RE: Gun Control
oneword - 2006-05-03 5:33 PM
Stake - 2006-05-03 3:28 PM
Gunnery Sergeant Hartman: The deadliest weapon in the world is a marine and his rifle. It is your killer instinct which must be harnessed if you expect to survive in combat. Your rifle is only a tool. It is a hard heart that kills. If your killer instincts are not clean and strong you will hesitate at the moment of truth. You will not kill. You will become dead marines and then you will be in a world of sh!t because marines are not allowed to die without permission. Do you maggots understand?

 

You know as I was reading this I (eyes start to tear up) was reminded of (takes tissue to wipe eyes) (sniffles) I was just reminded of (now actively sobbing, wiping eyes, stops to blow nose) just all the love man, just all the love that we all shared training recruits. (pours self another drink )...
2006-05-04 6:22 AM
in reply to: #414289

User image

Extreme Veteran
441
10010010010025
windsor, ontario
Subject: RE: Gun Control

CalgaryRunner - 2006-05-04 12:28 AM I'm not a gun owner and have no desire to be one. Up here in Canada the last government put in Gun Control. I think the last I heard the system was 2 billion dollars over what it was originally forecasted to cost. Has it been effective - I think not. Nor have I had one person explain to me how it makes us any safer. Criminals who want to use a gun will find ways to get a gun. I'm all for harder, longer sentences as a deterent. Some argue there aren't enough jails or prison guards to house the criminals longer. Hello.... 2 billion dollars can probably build a few jails and give some folks jobs as prison guards. Maybe then a few criminals will think twice about the crime thereby reducing the prison population.

 

Exactly...carry all of the guns you want, but if you utilize them for a purpose not intended by the 2nd amendment, you have forfeited your right to be a free citizen...that should satisfy both ends of the argument, no??

I feel we need to stop thinking about imprisonment as a 'timeout', and start dealing with it as a voluntary relinquishment of your rights as a citizen.  By eliminating recidivism alone, we would decrease crime significantly.  And probably reduce the need for lawyers as their business would dry up almost immediately...sound like a win/win

 

d

 

2006-05-04 7:19 AM
in reply to: #413931

User image

Philadelphia, south of New York and north of DC
Subject: RE: Gun Control

Scout7 -
A gun is a tool. Take away all the guns, but do nothing to address the underlying issues that create the violence, and you merely change gun crimes to knife and other physical crimes.

That's a really good point. There have been several excellent points brought up on this thread that argue that the problem with gun violence rests with criminals and not with law abiding citizens. So what are some of the underlying issues that lead to gun violence?

There are probably many. Here are just two: the breakdown of family and the marginalization of fatherhood.

I think one social ill that can be tied to criminal gun violence is the lack of fathers in the life of many of these criminals, and more specifically, the lack of fathers in the home.

For decades now, we've been building a culture that says that, at best, fathers are optional. They're nice to have around if you can swing it, but not really necessary for the health of children or for society at large.

If the law is teacher, what is it teaching us if it says that a mother and father can divorce without showing reasonable cause. Here in Pennsylvania, a spouse can file for divorce and then have it granted after a period of six months. They do not have to show any reason for the request. It seems to me that a law like this says that the happiness and satisfaction of a parent is more important than the stability of the environment that their child may grow up in.

What message are we sending our young people when we argue that our young should have contraceptives available in school because, "they're going to do it anyway so they may as well be safe". Well of coarse they're going to do it anyway. We keep telling them that sex outside of marriage is ok, and that if you think otherwise you are suspect. So why would they think otherwise?

There are many more examples, but I think that these two can be seen as contributing to the breakdown of family and to the marginalization of fatherhood. And I think that the breakdown of family and the marginalization of fatherhood are two of the factors that contribute to gun violence.

 

 

 

 



2006-05-04 8:56 AM
in reply to: #414078

User image

Elite
2733
200050010010025
Venture Industries,
Subject: RE: Gun Control
max - 2006-05-03 7:24 PM

A number of years ago they passed a law in Massachusetts stating there would be a MANDATORY 1 year jail sentence if you were convicted of illegally possessing a firearm.  No ifs, ands, or buts about it.  In those 20 some odd years, not one single person has ever been jailed under that law.

"First thing we do is kill all the lawyers."

 


Where did you get this statistic from? Do you have something to back this assertion up other than an anicdotal statement. Some statistics from the Department of Corrections, or Law enforcement?
In Florida we have a 10/20/life law, use a gun in the commission of a felony, mandatory 10 years prison, fire a gun in the commission of a felony mandatory 20 years in prison, shoot someone with a gun during the commission of a felony mandatory Life imprisonment. And it's enforced! We also have an 85% law, which means that a defendant who is sentenced to an incarcerative sentence MUST serve a MINIMUM of 85% of his incarcerative sentence before he is even eligible for release. Additionally, there is a 3 year minimum mandatory for felon in possesion of a firearm, in Fla. a minimum mandatory means just that, the defendant must serve AT LEAST 3 years and it's day-for-day, he serves 100% of that 3 years.
Certain crimes are also enhanced one felony degree for the use of a firearm in the commission of that crime, for instance a thrid degree felony would become a second, changing the potential sentence from 5 years to 15 years. We also include victim injury points in the computation of sentneces which can add anywhere from 4 months to 10 years to a sentence depending on the severity of the injury. And having just sentenced someone to 12 1/2 years on an armed kidnapping/armed burglary yesterday, I know it's enforced! Additionally, another prosecutor just convicted an individual yesterday of armed home invasion robbery and the minimum sentence the Court can impose is 14 years with a maximum of madatory Life. So that guy is getting at a minimum 14 years.
2006-05-04 9:41 AM
in reply to: #413812

User image

Master
4101
20002000100
Denver
Subject: RE: Gun Control
So is there any way to keep guns out of the hands of criminals while not hindering legitimate, responsible gun owners? Seems like any attempt at regulation is seen as infringing on the rights of gun seekers. Is there anything that would be acceptable? Background checks? Waiting periods? Licenses?
2006-05-04 9:59 AM
in reply to: #414601

User image

Elite
2733
200050010010025
Venture Industries,
Subject: RE: Gun Control
drewb8 - 2006-05-04 10:41 AM

So is there any way to keep guns out of the hands of criminals while not hindering legitimate, responsible gun owners? Seems like any attempt at regulation is seen as infringing on the rights of gun seekers. Is there anything that would be acceptable? Background checks? Waiting periods? Licenses?


One of the things that is being missed on the issue of a "waiting period" is the purpose of a waiting period. One of the purposes of a waiting period is to help detere "crimes of passion." The reality is the majority of homicides are not as a result of unknown criminals killing some stranger victim, the vast majority of homicides are those in which the victim is known to the killer. Waiting periods are an attempt to prevent the hot headed person who may be under the duress of passion from immediately getting a gun through a purchase, and carrying out an act of violence. The idea is that "cooler heads" will eventually prevail.

What interests me is how the notion that a three day waiting period or a required background check somehow infringes on the rights of law abiding citizens. No right is absolute. If you're a law abiding citizen and you know there is a three day waiting period, what is the issue. I mean really how many "law abiding" citizens walk into work on a Tuesday and say to themselves "You know I'm going to go buy a handgun today." My sense is it is a decision that isn't made spur of the moment.

I do admit that very few of these "cun control" laws will hinder those criminals that wish to possess and use firearms. However, they may be usefull in preventing crime of passion killings.
2006-05-04 9:59 AM
in reply to: #414601

User image

Runner
Subject: RE: Gun Control
drewb8 - 2006-05-04 10:41 AM

So is there any way to keep guns out of the hands of criminals while not hindering legitimate, responsible gun owners? Seems like any attempt at regulation is seen as infringing on the rights of gun seekers. Is there anything that would be acceptable? Background checks? Waiting periods? Licenses?


I would keep the current laws, but increase the level of punishment. Additionally, I would focus on raising the standards of education and employment, with a focus on the city. If we give kids an alternative to a violent lifestyle, they won't have a need to go out and buy guns. If we can give people a way to get their self-respect back and the opportunity to really better themselves, they won't be as likely to turn to gangs, drugs and violence. Plain and simple. More gun laws will do absolutely nothing to deter violent crimes. We need to focus on the real issues.
2006-05-04 10:04 AM
in reply to: #414617

User image

Elite
2733
200050010010025
Venture Industries,
Subject: RE: Gun Control
Scout7 - 2006-05-04 10:59 AM

drewb8 - 2006-05-04 10:41 AM

So is there any way to keep guns out of the hands of criminals while not hindering legitimate, responsible gun owners? Seems like any attempt at regulation is seen as infringing on the rights of gun seekers. Is there anything that would be acceptable? Background checks? Waiting periods? Licenses?


I would keep the current laws, but increase the level of punishment. Additionally, I would focus on raising the standards of education and employment, with a focus on the city. If we give kids an alternative to a violent lifestyle, they won't have a need to go out and buy guns. If we can give people a way to get their self-respect back and the opportunity to really better themselves, they won't be as likely to turn to gangs, drugs and violence. Plain and simple. More gun laws will do absolutely nothing to deter violent crimes. We need to focus on the real issues.


I agree with you, but I find this an obvious statement. It's one of those statements that sound great as a sound bite, but really means nothing. Identifying the problems is the simplest thing to do. Contributors to crime are: poverty, poor education, underemployment, drug abuse, fatherless households, and a miriad of other factors. Whoopie!!!

The real issue is how do you effectuate addressing these issues, it's not enough to simply say we have to "raise the standard of education and employment" Great. How do you actually "raise the standard of education and employment"? What do we actually DO?

The other reality is that there are just mean, evil, lazy people out there, that are going to lie, cheat, steel and murder regardless of what opportunities are afforded to them.


2006-05-04 10:08 AM
in reply to: #413812

User image

Champion
9407
500020002000100100100100
Montague Gold Mines, Nova Scotia
Subject: RE: Gun Control
This is something that has been of great interest to me for many years - as a gun owner (in Canada), a former hunter and someone who still likes to fire on a range from time to time (all long arms) there are somethings that I don't understand about the gun control debate. I will stay out of the American politics involved (I think I've got it but not 100% sure so I'll leave them out) but as Calgaryrunner pointed out, we have gun control here and it's only been a money pit. However, Canadian law has had adequate gun control built in for years (i.e. licensed handgun ownership, no concealed weapon permits, no assult weapons, etc) and yet we still have many firearms across the country. Our murder rate (both in general and with firearms) is low compare to the US. Why is that? Who knows - it definitely isn't an easy answer but it probably has more to do with social safety nets than anything else IMHO.

I don't see a gun registry as a solution, however I have no problem with restrictions on certain weapons and ammunition - there are some firearms that are useless for anything but a combat situation. Everytime I hear opposition to gun control in this form, I think of the guy in "Bowling for Columbine" who said something along the lines of; Well you've gotta have some restrictions - there are crazy people out there you know!

Shane
2006-05-04 10:26 AM
in reply to: #414601

User image

Extreme Veteran
343
10010010025
Centennial, CO
Subject: RE: Gun Control

drewb8 - 2006-05-04 7:41 AM So is there any way to keep guns out of the hands of criminals while not hindering legitimate, responsible gun owners?

Simplest answer:  Nope!

Legitimate, responsible gun owners are those who do abide by the rules and regs and laws of gun-ownership.  That's basically what makes them...well...legitimate and responsible.

Frankly, I find pretty much any argument for gun control a serious exercise in futility.  I rank it right up there with the war on drugs, abortion, etc., as far as arguing goes.  The war on drugs hasn't really done anything but spend a shi*t-load of money.  I have my beliefs on abortion, but that doesn't mean I need to push those beliefs on anyone else for whatever reason.  People are entitled to their beliefs.  Point blank (no pun intended):  Gun control will never succeed.  It will never succeed in the sense of taking illegal guns away from people.  You have to find them first.  Just as in the war on drugs, billions of dollars would be spent trying to curtail illegal activity/guns and it will go nowhere. 

2006-05-04 10:53 AM
in reply to: #414625

User image

Runner
Subject: RE: Gun Control
ASA22 - 2006-05-04 11:04 AM

The real issue is how do you effectuate addressing these issues, it's not enough to simply say we have to "raise the standard of education and employment" Great. How do you actually "raise the standard of education and employment"? What do we actually DO?

The other reality is that there are just mean, evil, lazy people out there, that are going to lie, cheat, steel and murder regardless of what opportunities are afforded to them.


Well, I'll tell ya what I'd do. I'd start by holding parents more accountable for their children's actions. I'd start by eliminating alot of the PC silliness that I hear about from teachers (I mean the parents harassing teachers over children's grades or discipline). I'd also start by taking a long hard look at education reform. As has been discussed on other threads, our education system needs help. And I don't mean by just throwing money at the problem. Standardized tests are not the best yardstick to use. Teachers shouldn't be teaching to such a measure. Additionally, we need to let kids screw up and fail. No coddling them as has been done in recent years.
As for the employment issue, well, it is somewhat related to the education issue. Also, we need to go with a flat tax. Right now, our tax system is so screwed up the people responsible for maintaining it can't even follow it. Flat taxes. Also, we need to invest more in our own infrastructure. I think the government needs to do a serious reevaluation of how it handles contracts. Too many of the same companies are getting too much of the money. We need to look at other alternatives (i.e. small to mid businesses, be more open in terms of handling certain things, outsource more aspects to private companies).
But, one of the biggest things I can think of would be to clean up our cities. And I mean clean up. If there's a building with broken windows, we fix them. If there are abandoned cars, we remove them. Get the trash up. Entropy is alive and well in our cities. It has been studied that a car left on a street won't be touched, until a window gets broken. After that, it's completely wrecked in a matter of days. All it took was a broken window. If we don't maintain what we have, we spiral into chaos (entropy). Besides, if you live in a clean area, you have pride in it. I think we underestimate personal pride way too much. I also think that the final step is to make punishments much more severe. If you have a gun in a crime, BAM!, mandatory 15 years added on to wahtever you get for the original crime, like what they have in Florida. Also, no juvenile stuff for guns. Automatically tried as an adult. Make the punishment hurt, too. I know alot of CO's, from county to Federal, and they all say the same thing: Most of those inmates have more rights than you would think. And they work that system like nobody else. Let's make it more inconvenient for them. I'm not saying beat them, but take away stuff, or force them into other lines of activity.
2006-05-04 3:44 PM
in reply to: #413812

User image

Master
2232
200010010025
Des Moines, Iowa
Subject: RE: Gun Control

I know the thought is that "gun control" will reduce or eliminate violent crime.   But they didn't need guns to annhiliate Gilbert Tuhabonye's tribe and classmates.  They just used machate's, gasoline and matches.

The article below is dated...but there's a great article about him in the June issue of Runner's World... 

http://www.acu.edu/alumni/acu-today/spring99/cover01.html

2006-05-04 3:49 PM
in reply to: #414601

User image

Master
2232
200010010025
Des Moines, Iowa
Subject: RE: Gun Control

 

Most states already have required background checks on all firearms and a waiting period for getting a license to buy handguns....at least they do in Missouri and Iowa...

Most of the folks wanting "additional" gun control are not aware of this.  There are already controls in place...



Edited by shawn barr 2006-05-04 3:50 PM


2006-05-05 2:51 AM
in reply to: #414027

User image

Master
1867
10005001001001002525
The real USC, in the ghetto of LA
Subject: RE: Gun Control
drewb8 - 2006-05-03 5:10 PM

kimj81 - 2006-05-03 2:41 PM

p>However, I love to go shooting and am planning to start hunting birds and deer/elk this season. I would gladly go through classes and wait to get a weapon so that a background check can be done if that means that guns are prevented from getting into the wrong hands in some city.



Seems like a rare attitude among gun owners. Seems like most take any kind of slow down in the time it takes to get a gun as an attempt to completely outlaw guns which I don't think is the case.


seems like a gross generalization. i never fired a gun or rifle until i joined the army. i learned saftey and respect. every serious gf i have had since the army, all wanted to go shoooting, and they had a safety class first, and were taught how to be safe and handle it properly. everyone i know that is an owner or recreational user are all into safety and fallowing the laws.
New Thread
Other Resources My Cup of Joe » Gun Control Rss Feed  
 
 
of 2