What words or phrases are you ready to (Page 2)

OK...Betsy wins. But seriously. There've been plenty of impeachable scandals already. WIth his republican majority in congress, not much chance of it happening.

Oh man...don't make me go into this again. Bill: put his penis where it shouldn't have been. W: sent thousands of Americans to thier death on a lie. Which is worse?

W. won't be impeached because of the Republican-led congress. The only reason Bill was impeached was because he didn't enjoy the congressional majority Bill did.

Uh no it was because he got before the nation and lied or do you not remember "I did not have sexual relations with that woman"?

W did with what info he had to deal with. If you do not think they had WMD's go ask someone who is a Kurd. Ask them about the hundred of thousand of their people that were killed. A WMD doesnt have to be a nuclear weapon or be big as a missle.

As for the thousands that died, the joined up for it and would do it again if they had to/. The number is still lower than the amount of people who died on Sept 11th....

I totally agree. Problem is that pot's been stirred until it bubbled over all frothy. Don't know if anyone's going to be up to biting, but I don't ever tire of debating it.

betsybromley - 2005-12-02 4:31 PM Who thinks sex with an intern is impeach material? Who thinks Lying to the world about WMD's is impeach material? Yes I am trying to stir up the pot!!!

 It was disgraceful what Bill did, but it was more disgraceful that he was made to answer questions about his personal life. Nine out of 10 people, whenasked in front of the nation if they cheated on their spouses would not have admitted it to the camera.

And do you really think W. didn't have access to more intelligence congressional democrats? I think Congress went on the info they had, but have no doubt that W. knew...KNEW...Iraq had no WMDs and was not linked to Bin Laden, and presented patantaly, knowingly false info to Congress and to the American people.

Soldiers sign on to defend the constitution, not to fight wars based on false premises.

Here we go again...

Nice...stir the pot and change the subject. You hijacked the hijack!

Good work. <golf applause>

True most would not if they were questioned but 9 out of 10 would not have been the leader of the free world. I expected a better answer than "uh it wasnt me"....

Oh and while we are talking about Bill..

I can send you the link to the site that will clear it all up for you if you want....

Clinton first linked al Qaeda to Saddam


By Rowan Scarborough
THE WASHINGTON TIMES

The Clinton administration talked about firm evidence linking Saddam Hussein's regime to Osama bin Laden's al Qaeda network years before President Bush made the same statements.
    The issue arose again this month after the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States reported there was no "collaborative relationship" between the old Iraqi regime and bin Laden.
<script language="JavaScript"><script language="JavaScript"><script language="JavaScript" src="http://servedby.advertising.com/site=706776/size=300250/bnum=52652995/optn=1">

In case your sink in bed all week Jim,

http://www.philvalentine.com/newwar.htm

What about my sink in bed?

sorry lol sick in bed is what I meant to say.

The horse died back in the year 2000, lets get back to the subject at hand:

This one will make me yell at the tube every time. 

"Going Forward". 

Pseudo-positive gibberish said in attempts to convince people to act against their own best interests.

As if there was some other direction in time we could be going? Where's Lewis Black when you need him?

"This is Bob."  Followed by the awful whistling in the Enzite commercial.

ChipmunkHeart already played this game under one of the thirty other threads on this subject.

Clearly you are referring to me.  My apologies, though I can't help myself.  Dude is as much a part of my vocabulary as numbers are a part of my username.

You all really want us to stop talking about burritos?

And this isn't really a phrase, but can we also hit people in the face with a shovel if they refer to themselves in the third person?