Other Resources My Cup of Joe » 2008 to 2012 what has changed? Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 3
 
 
2012-09-04 1:45 PM
in reply to: #4394576

User image

Expert
2122
2000100
Next to a big lake
Subject: RE: 2008 to 2012 what has changed?
PhilipRay - 2012-09-04 1:18 PM
BrianRunsPhilly - 2012-09-04 10:23 AM

I don't believe Obama has fulfilled 10% of his campaign promises, and I doubt Romney would either. Both Congress and the Senate are dysfunctional and place their own political ambitions above the good of the country.

Ive never agreed with you more!!

X2!  This is where the change has been and it is not a good change....for anyone.  What is sad is that the leadership is there on both sides but party interests, and self interests prevent crossing the line for solutions let alone cooperation. 

 



2012-09-04 1:53 PM
in reply to: #4394786

User image

Elite
4564
200020005002525
Boise
Subject: RE: 2008 to 2012 what has changed?
tcarlson78 - 2012-09-04 12:45 PM
PhilipRay - 2012-09-04 1:18 PM
BrianRunsPhilly - 2012-09-04 10:23 AM

I don't believe Obama has fulfilled 10% of his campaign promises, and I doubt Romney would either. Both Congress and the Senate are dysfunctional and place their own political ambitions above the good of the country.

Ive never agreed with you more!!

X2!  This is where the change has been and it is not a good change....for anyone.  What is sad is that the leadership is there on both sides but party interests, and self interests prevent crossing the line for solutions let alone cooperation. 

 

You think so? If anything, I'd say it's the leadership on both sides that is driving us to the point we are at. 

2012-09-04 2:20 PM
in reply to: #4394426

User image

Austin, Texas or Jupiter, Florida
Subject: RE: 2008 to 2012 what has changed?
gearboy - 2012-09-04 12:23 PM

So, if you succeeded, it was on your own hard work, and if you struggled, it was because of the government?

Either it is a joint effort or it's not. I think it would be challenging to defend the financial industry when so much of what caused the problems today was the result of internal policies and choices made by the industry. I'll just ask you to call to mind the whole "too big to fail" mentality, that puts the taxpayers on the hook to bail out certain companies. 

I've built several businesses in several different regions/permitting regimes and I can say government can hurt business or it can get out of the way and allow businesses to thrive. 

Texas is an example of an area where businesses are free to thrive and the recession is almost non-existent in many parts of that state.  Meanwhile, the recession is battering California hard and they continue to hammer business for their "fair share".

If a business succeeds in California, the successful business leader definitely deserves more credit than in Texas.  But we all do better when more businesses are succeeding than struggling.

 

2012-09-04 2:22 PM
in reply to: #4394479

User image

Austin, Texas or Jupiter, Florida
Subject: RE: 2008 to 2012 what has changed?
tuwood - 2012-09-04 12:38 PM

Uh oh, Obama's in trouble now.  I just saw that a picture has been found of Obama with Karl Marx.

i know I know, I need to stay off the conservative blogs.  

Response from a buddy:

"That's the power of the Eastwood Speech...It's the Joke that takes-on a life of its own!"

 

Good one Tuwood.

2012-09-04 2:27 PM
in reply to: #4394871

User image

Extreme Veteran
961
5001001001001002525
Subject: RE: 2008 to 2012 what has changed?
GomesBolt - 2012-09-04 2:20 PM
gearboy - 2012-09-04 12:23 PM

So, if you succeeded, it was on your own hard work, and if you struggled, it was because of the government?

Either it is a joint effort or it's not. I think it would be challenging to defend the financial industry when so much of what caused the problems today was the result of internal policies and choices made by the industry. I'll just ask you to call to mind the whole "too big to fail" mentality, that puts the taxpayers on the hook to bail out certain companies. 

I've built several businesses in several different regions/permitting regimes and I can say government can hurt business or it can get out of the way and allow businesses to thrive. 

Texas is an example of an area where businesses are free to thrive and the recession is almost non-existent in many parts of that state.  Meanwhile, the recession is battering California hard and they continue to hammer business for their "fair share".

If a business succeeds in California, the successful business leader definitely deserves more credit than in Texas.  But we all do better when more businesses are succeeding than struggling.

 

An interesting perspective in relation to the "you didn't build that" debate.

2012-09-04 2:40 PM
in reply to: #4394808

User image

Expert
2122
2000100
Next to a big lake
Subject: RE: 2008 to 2012 what has changed?
JoshR - 2012-09-04 2:53 PM
tcarlson78 - 2012-09-04 12:45 PM
PhilipRay - 2012-09-04 1:18 PM
BrianRunsPhilly - 2012-09-04 10:23 AM

I don't believe Obama has fulfilled 10% of his campaign promises, and I doubt Romney would either. Both Congress and the Senate are dysfunctional and place their own political ambitions above the good of the country.

Ive never agreed with you more!!

X2!  This is where the change has been and it is not a good change....for anyone.  What is sad is that the leadership is there on both sides but party interests, and self interests prevent crossing the line for solutions let alone cooperation. 

 

You think so? If anything, I'd say it's the leadership on both sides that is driving us to the point we are at. 

I would not use leadership to describe the figureheads driving us to the point we are at.  I do see potential on each side to make improvements.  The figureheads now lack the courage to lead.


2012-09-04 5:06 PM
in reply to: #4393996

User image

Pro
5361
50001001001002525
Subject: RE: 2008 to 2012 what has changed?

A LONG List of President Obama's Accomplishments - With Citations

you may not like what he's done, but most of the stuff I just read above was junk.  i.e. either completely incorrect, very misleading, or an irrelevent talking point.  I don't have the time to go through them one-by-one.  Obama has done a lot of what he promised (37% completed, 82% completed or in-process by politifact), but certainly not everything. 

people choose their sides and believe what they want to believe. Add to that having huge expectations of a POTUS to be able to fix all of our problems and many are dissatisfied. 

I'd take the moderate Mitt from 12 years ago maybe, but the GOP today is way too Draconian.  Overall- I prefer the direction that Obama is taking us. 

 

ugh.  Example number 4,322 :  On Fox, Court Ruling Ensuring All Ohioans Have Equal Access To The Polls Described As Obama Attack On Military Voting.



Edited by morey000 2012-09-04 5:07 PM
2012-09-04 5:27 PM
in reply to: #4395200

User image

Elite
6387
50001000100100100252525
Subject: RE: 2008 to 2012 what has changed?
morey000 - 2012-09-04 4:06 PM

A LONG List of President Obama's Accomplishments - With Citations

Link no worky.

EDIT: OK well it works in IE, not on my FF. Sorry.



Edited by powerman 2012-09-04 5:54 PM
2012-09-04 5:30 PM
in reply to: #4395226

User image

Elite
4564
200020005002525
Boise
Subject: RE: 2008 to 2012 what has changed?
powerman - 2012-09-04 4:27 PM
morey000 - 2012-09-04 4:06 PM

A LONG List of President Obama's Accomplishments - With Citations

Link no worky.

 

No verifying info. Just assume it is correct.

2012-09-04 5:33 PM
in reply to: #4393996

User image

Austin, Texas or Jupiter, Florida
Subject: RE: 2008 to 2012 what has changed?
Draconian? How does one go about being Draconian when he has not been in government in 6 years and when he was governor, he was known for being a moderate?

Oh yeah, I forgot, D's are going with the "Extreme Romney" bit.

Extreme and Romney are about as oxymoronic as Moderate and Pelosi.
2012-09-04 6:15 PM
in reply to: #4395200

User image

Elite
6387
50001000100100100252525
Subject: RE: 2008 to 2012 what has changed?
morey000 - 2012-09-04 4:06 PM

A LONG List of President Obama's Accomplishments - With Citations

you may not like what he's done, but most of the stuff I just read above was junk.  i.e. either completely incorrect, very misleading, or an irrelevent talking point.  I don't have the time to go through them one-by-one.  Obama has done a lot of what he promised (37% completed, 82% completed or in-process by politifact), but certainly not everything. 

people choose their sides and believe what they want to believe. Add to that having huge expectations of a POTUS to be able to fix all of our problems and many are dissatisfied. 

I'd take the moderate Mitt from 12 years ago maybe, but the GOP today is way too Draconian.  Overall- I prefer the direction that Obama is taking us. 

 

ugh.  Example number 4,322 :  On Fox, Court Ruling Ensuring All Ohioans Have Equal Access To The Polls Described As Obama Attack On Military Voting.

OK... so there is some time I'll never get back. That was probably the most nonsensical collection of points I have ever seen. Seriously Morey, you can't really be serious about holding that up as truth backed up with fact checks???

Just one example....He provided the troops with better body armor. http://bit.ly/hzSv2h

The article... news story held up as fact.... is about Obama asking for more money to continue the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan early in his Presidency. There is one line that says a whole ton of money is going for body armor... not "Better" body armor... and all the it is a recommendation that was given to him by the DD. So he approves a budget given to him by the DD to continue wars he promised he would end, and somehow he alone gets credit for "Treating our armed forces better" as the title of that section claims.

90% of the LONG list of Obam'a accomplishments are nothing more than line items in bills... not that he wanted or fought or promised them, just signed them. And then the fact checking is done by journalists stating such things like "has improved foreign relations". I mean my goodness, I could go over to FOX news and pull a list of all his failures fact checked by them and it would have about the same amount of truthfulness you just posted.

Not that you are not entitled to your opinion that Obama has performed well, I just thought it was funny that you said every thing is misleading, or just plain wrong in this thread, and then use that link as proof.



2012-09-04 6:22 PM
in reply to: #4393996

User image

Austin, Texas or Jupiter, Florida
Subject: RE: 2008 to 2012 what has changed?
Yikes! Powerman Burn... (sarc font)
2012-09-04 6:25 PM
in reply to: #4395313

User image

Pro
9391
500020002000100100100252525
Omaha, NE
Subject: RE: 2008 to 2012 what has changed?
GomesBolt - 2012-09-04 6:22 PMYikes! Powerman Burn... (sarc font)
I knew a can of something was gonna get whipped out when I saw powerman was clicking on the link.
2012-09-04 6:53 PM
in reply to: #4395200

User image

Champion
7347
5000200010010010025
SRQ, FL
Subject: RE: 2008 to 2012 what has changed?
morey000 - 2012-09-04 6:06 PM

A LONG List of President Obama's Accomplishments - With Citations

you may not like what he's done, but most of the stuff I just read above was junk.  i.e. either completely incorrect, very misleading, or an irrelevent talking point. I don't have the time to go through them one-by-one.
 

Ah, the old... "your argument is invalid but I'm too busy to actually argue my points" tactic...  Gotcha.  I should just believe you because you said so...

people choose their sides and believe what they want to believe. Add to that having huge expectations of a POTUS to be able to fix all of our problems and many are dissatisfied.

You just posted a list of all the things he HAS done for which we're supposed to give him full credit.  Yet when he fails, it's not his fault? 

Also please explain how it's taking sides when I don't feel Romney will be much (if any) better? Just because I criticize Obama does not mean I endorse Romney.


2012-09-04 7:44 PM
in reply to: #4395343

User image

Pro
5361
50001001001002525
Subject: RE: 2008 to 2012 what has changed?
TriRSquared - 2012-09-04 4:53 PM

Ah, the old... "your argument is invalid but I'm too busy to actually argue my points" tactic...  Gotcha.  people choose their sides and believe what they want to believe. 

 

guilty as charged.  maybe I'll have time tomorrow. 

2012-09-05 10:03 AM
in reply to: #4393996

User image

Champion
7347
5000200010010010025
SRQ, FL
Subject: RE: 2008 to 2012 what has changed?

Adding to the "are you better off than 4 years ago" question.

"Just since President Barack Obama was inaugurated on Jan. 20, 2009, the debt has increased by $45,848 per household (to $136,360)—or about 50 percent per household."

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/us-debt-now-136260-household-50-under-obama



2012-09-05 10:10 AM
in reply to: #4393996

User image

Elite
4564
200020005002525
Boise
Subject: RE: 2008 to 2012 what has changed?
2012-09-05 10:17 AM
in reply to: #4393996

Subject: ...
This user's post has been ignored.
2012-09-05 10:24 AM
in reply to: #4396151

Champion
7347
5000200010010010025
SRQ, FL
Subject: RE: 2008 to 2012 what has changed?
AcesFull - 2012-09-05 11:17 AM

Dow Jones on January 20, 2009:  7949.09

Dow Jones on September 4, 2012: 13058.43

Obama has been very bad for business indeed.  

The market and the GDP both grew during the Great Depression (1929-1940).  Not sure many would say those were good times.

2012-09-05 10:26 AM
in reply to: #4396151

Pro
4277
20002000100100252525
Parker, CO
Subject: RE: 2008 to 2012 what has changed?
AcesFull - 2012-09-05 9:17 AM

Dow Jones on January 20, 2009:  7949.09

Dow Jones on September 4, 2012: 13058.43

Obama has been very bad for business indeed.  

No doubt it's been a bull market since Obama took office.  However, he does not get full credit.  We can thank QE - Ben for artificially inflating the market.  And yes, Obama has not fired him so he gets some credit.  Which in my opinion, is another strike against Obama. 

The house of cards will fall. 

2012-09-05 10:30 AM
in reply to: #4396140

Champion
6056
500010002525
Menomonee Falls, WI
Subject: RE: 2008 to 2012 what has changed?


Except, of course, for the polls that show just the opposite:

http://thehill.com/conventions-2012/dem-convention-charlotte/247263...



2012-09-05 10:36 AM
in reply to: #4396189

Elite
4564
200020005002525
Boise
Subject: RE: 2008 to 2012 what has changed?
scoobysdad - 2012-09-05 9:30 AM Except, of course, for the polls that show just the opposite: http://thehill.com/conventions-2012/dem-convention-charlotte/247263...

 

Those are different questions. "Americans feel better off" vs "America is worse off"

2012-09-05 10:43 AM
in reply to: #4396203

Champion
6056
500010002525
Menomonee Falls, WI
Subject: RE: 2008 to 2012 what has changed?
JoshR - 2012-09-05 10:36 AM

scoobysdad - 2012-09-05 9:30 AM Except, of course, for the polls that show just the opposite: http://thehill.com/conventions-2012/dem-convention-charlotte/247263...

 

Those are different questions. "Americans feel better off" vs "America is worse off"



Not sure it matters in the least. They're just two different ways to answer the same question.

2012-09-05 10:58 AM
in reply to: #4396219

Elite
4564
200020005002525
Boise
Subject: RE: 2008 to 2012 what has changed?
scoobysdad - 2012-09-05 9:43 AM
JoshR - 2012-09-05 10:36 AM
scoobysdad - 2012-09-05 9:30 AM Except, of course, for the polls that show just the opposite: http://thehill.com/conventions-2012/dem-convention-charlotte/247263...

 

Those are different questions. "Americans feel better off" vs "America is worse off"

Not sure it matters in the least. They're just two different ways to answer the same question.

I think there is a huge difference. 4 years ago I was working through college making $9/hr at a crappy job and now I'm a salaried professional. I think our country is significantly worse off. Those two answers are 180 degrees apart.

2012-09-05 11:35 AM
in reply to: #4396251

Champion
6056
500010002525
Menomonee Falls, WI
Subject: RE: 2008 to 2012 what has changed?
JoshR - 2012-09-05 10:58 AM

scoobysdad - 2012-09-05 9:43 AM
JoshR - 2012-09-05 10:36 AM
scoobysdad - 2012-09-05 9:30 AM Except, of course, for the polls that show just the opposite: http://thehill.com/conventions-2012/dem-convention-charlotte/247263...

 

Those are different questions. "Americans feel better off" vs "America is worse off"

Not sure it matters in the least. They're just two different ways to answer the same question.

I think there is a huge difference. 4 years ago I was working through college making $9/hr at a crappy job and now I'm a salaried professional. I think our country is significantly worse off. Those two answers are 180 degrees apart.



Correct. But in ultimately weighing their answer to the question "Are you better off than you were four years ago?" voters must take both of those answers into consideration-- how they feel about their personal progress and they feel about the progress of their country economically, socially and otherwise. They are two sides of the same question.

New Thread
Other Resources My Cup of Joe » 2008 to 2012 what has changed? Rss Feed  
 
 
of 3