Catholics - Why do you do that? (Page 2)
-
No new posts
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller | Reply |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() | ![]() Left Brain - That's a great way to spend an afternoon. I have found that kids are frequently good shooters right out of the gate.......and then the bad habits creep in as they don't practice (like the rest of us). If he's got the eye, keep him going! He's right handed but left eye dominant, so I have have him shooting breaking clays left handed. Feels very natural for him. Pretty sure my youngest is right handed / left eye dominant as well. (I probably need to go to confession now that I've brought up this subject on this thread |
|
![]() ![]() |
Regular ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() TriRSquared - 2013-04-30 7:33 AM Moving on... what's up with lack of birth control? Reaching back to my HS religion class on this one, but catechism teaches that sex has two purposes - unitive and procreative. And if you use birth control, you are denying the procreative part. That's why some dioceses teach "natural family planning". Seems like a VERY outdated belief. And one that VERY few Catholics follow. I agree So what has the church been so slow to change? No idea. Reaching back again, but Pope Paul (I think?) wrote Humanae Vitae where he condemned contraception, and this was in the late 60s (?) so maybe in a religion that is almost 2000 years old, they think this was "recently" addressed. I have no idea.
|
![]() ![]() |
Pro ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() dontracy - 2013-04-30 10:00 AM Left Brain - That's a great way to spend an afternoon. I have found that kids are frequently good shooters right out of the gate.......and then the bad habits creep in as they don't practice (like the rest of us). If he's got the eye, keep him going! He's right handed but left eye dominant, so I have have him shooting breaking clays left handed. Feels very natural for him. Pretty sure my youngest is right handed / left eye dominant as well. (I probably need to go to confession now that I've brought up this subject on this thread I am the same......man, if you can get him shooting left handed that would be the DEAL! |
![]() ![]() |
Extreme Veteran ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() dontracy - 2013-04-30 9:34 AM TheCrownsOwn - 1)What is it with praying to Saints. The bible specifically says you don't get to God except through his Son. Where is the basis for this? Please don't tell me it's "just tradition." Seriously...praying to dead people? gimme some info. on this one. 2)Whats up with purgatory? Nothing in the bible on this one I could find. The two bible verses that were given to us on this seemed awfully vague and when read with respect to the entire chapter didn't seem to relate.... So...whats up with that? There is one Universal Church, itself comprised of human persons alive in three states:
Human persons in heaven we call saints. Christians ask each other all the time to pray for them. It happens here on BT on a regular basis. So Christians seem to have a universal understanding that it is a good thing to ask for intercession from another or to intercede for them. In the old meaning of the english word, we pray to each other when we do this: "Pray, please beg God on my behalf that I might be healed of this illness." Does that make sense? We know from scripture that the saints in heaven pray. Revelation 5:8: When he took it, the four living creatures and the twenty-four elders fell down Why would the saints pray? They are already enjoying the beatific vision and have no need of anything, yet they intercede in prayer for someone. Yes, we ask each other to pray for us, to intercede on our behalf. That is a good thing. Who better to intercede for us than one who already enjoys the beatific vision of God, the holy ones in heaven? (I know I didn't answer your second question yet. I have tried without success to explain this before. Next time it comes up - I will try your approach. Thank you. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() | ![]() Left Brain - I am the same......man, if you can get him shooting left handed that would be the DEAL! Done deal. He happily bust clays, hits paper targets with a long fire stick, and smacks replica animals with a sharp pointy thingy launched by a string under tension from a bow like thingamabob, all left handed. If he makes the sign of the cross first, he usually has better scores. Of course he does that right handed. |
![]() ![]() |
Pro ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() dontracy - 2013-04-30 10:19 AM Left Brain - I am the same......man, if you can get him shooting left handed that would be the DEAL! Done deal. He happily bust clays, hits paper targets with a long fire stick, and smacks replica animals with a sharp pointy thingy launched by a string under tension from a bow like thingamabob, all left handed. If he makes the sign of the cross first, he usually has better scores. Of course he does that right handed. That is EXCELLENT!!! Nice work, dad! |
|
![]() ![]() |
Extreme Veteran ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() switch - 2013-04-30 9:56 AM msteiner - 2013-04-30 9:54 AM I know that it's been echoed through this thread, but it's really unfortunate that a conversation about the Catholic faith can't happen without someone bring up sexual abuse. It's unfortunate that it happened, but it's something that occurs in all denominations. The systemic, institutional cover-up happens in all denominations? Someone already in this thread posted an example of it happening in a different denomination, but by all means, go on thinking it only happens in the Catholic Church. |
![]() ![]() |
Pro ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() msteiner - 2013-04-30 10:22 AM switch - 2013-04-30 9:56 AM msteiner - 2013-04-30 9:54 AM I know that it's been echoed through this thread, but it's really unfortunate that a conversation about the Catholic faith can't happen without someone bring up sexual abuse. It's unfortunate that it happened, but it's something that occurs in all denominations. The systemic, institutional cover-up happens in all denominations? Someone already in this thread posted an example of it happening in a different denomination, but by all means, go on thinking it only happens in the Catholic Church. That's not what she said. |
![]() ![]() |
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() turtlegirl - 2013-04-30 4:13 AM And these are reasons why I don't like identifying my religion or political beliefs.... And why I'm more moved by spirituality, not the laws of the man made church. Man is flawed, God is not.
True, True, and True.... well said.. |
![]() ![]() |
Regular ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() msteiner - 2013-04-30 10:22 AM switch - 2013-04-30 9:56 AM msteiner - 2013-04-30 9:54 AM I know that it's been echoed through this thread, but it's really unfortunate that a conversation about the Catholic faith can't happen without someone bring up sexual abuse. It's unfortunate that it happened, but it's something that occurs in all denominations. The systemic, institutional cover-up happens in all denominations? Someone already in this thread posted an example of it happening in a different denomination, but by all means, go on thinking it only happens in the Catholic Church. Uh, no, it doesn't happen at the same level it does/did in the Catholic Church. That post specifically discussed that difference, and addressed the ability to hire and fire at the individual church level. |
![]() ![]() |
Extreme Veteran ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() switch - 2013-04-30 10:27 AM msteiner - 2013-04-30 10:22 AM switch - 2013-04-30 9:56 AM msteiner - 2013-04-30 9:54 AM I know that it's been echoed through this thread, but it's really unfortunate that a conversation about the Catholic faith can't happen without someone bring up sexual abuse. It's unfortunate that it happened, but it's something that occurs in all denominations. The systemic, institutional cover-up happens in all denominations? Someone already in this thread posted an example of it happening in a different denomination, but by all means, go on thinking it only happens in the Catholic Church. Uh, no, it doesn't happen at the same level it does/did in the Catholic Church. That post specifically discussed that difference, and addressed the ability to hire and fire at the individual church level. I'll concede that point. However, the intent of my original post was to point out that this conversation derails the point of this thread. I realize adding the last sentence in my post only perpetuated the derailing conversation, which I'll claim fault for. |
|
![]() ![]() |
Master ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Does the Catholic religion still believe they are the only church in which you can get to heaven? |
![]() ![]() |
Master ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() dontracy - 2013-04-30 10:36 AM travljini - Question-I'm confused, are you making these statements as someone who IS a survivor or supporting someone who is a survivor? Supporting a survivor. I wish to keep them confidential. Ok, I was not interested in breaking confidentiality, just whether you were speaking from your own personal experience of being abused. I take exception to your statement(even with the caveat rare exceptions-I don't think it's rare at all to heal): >>I understand now that with rare exceptions, survivors of childhood sexual abuse can never really fully recover from their wounds. They are too deep and they happen at a time when brain development can be organically affected. The best strategy I believe now is for survivors to learn to manage their very real disability.<<
|
![]() ![]() |
Expert ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() switch - 2013-04-30 4:30 AM Left Brain - 2013-04-30 12:26 AM I was Catholic......Irish Catholic by heritage. Since you brought up the other thread, I'll answer a question that was asked there:
In light of the systematic abuse of children at the hands of Catholic priests and other officials, and the institutional denial and cover-up by the Catholic Church, I no longer identify myself, in any way, with the Catholic Church. I cannot, and will never be able to, connect myself or my beliefs with any organization that does not stand up and protect children above and beyond any tenant or benefit of the organization as a whole. As far as I'm concerned, the Catholic Church should no longer exist in any form. I got wet eyes and goosebumps reading your post LB. That's a very powerful statement. Thank you. A good read on this subject is "Losing my religion" by William Lobdell. He was the religion editor for the LA Times and an Ironman triathlete. If you want something more historical, "The swerve" by Stephen Greenblatt is very enlightening as to the church and the "dark ages". |
![]() ![]() |
![]() | ![]() TheCrownsOwn - 2)Whats up with purgatory? Nothing in the bible on this one I could find. The two bible verses that were given to us on this seemed awfully vague and when read with respect to the entire chapter didn't seem to relate.... So...whats up with that? Inscriptions on the catacombs of the earliest Christians from the first few centuries show that they prayed for the dead. Why would those early Christians pray for the dead if at the same time they believed that in Christ those they prayed for were saved? If saved, no one would be in need of prayer. When we die, we are judged instantly and forever; we will either go to heaven or to hell. We also know from scripture that there is at least one more state apart from that of heaven and hell. In 1 Peter 3:19, Jesus said: in which also He went and made proclamation to the spirits now in prison, So we know from scripture that there is at least one other state aside from the states of heaven and hell. We know from history that the early Christians prayed for the dead, knowing at the same time that those dead were saved. What else. Paul tells us that a righteous man who fails the test can still be saved, but only through fire. In teaching about the foundations upon which one is to build, Paul writes in 1 Corinthians 3:15: If any man's work is burned up, he will suffer loss; Think of it this way by analogy. Let's say someone lives a life in which for years they abuse their body with drugs and alcohol. Then one day they hit bottom. They resolve to amend their life and are successful in doing so. They begin to live clean and sober. In this sense, they are saved. Still, they lived all those years abusing themselves. Their bodies are not as fit and healthy as they might have been had they avoided the abuse. They're saved from further harm, but their bodies show some signs of the wear and tear that all of those years of abuse have inflicted on their bodies. The same is true of our souls. Yes, we are saved. Yet sin has a temporal effect on our souls. We know from scripture that nothing unclean can enter heaven. From Revelation 21:27: and nothing unclean, and no one who practices abomination and lying, shall ever come into it, but only those whose names are written in the Lamb's book of life When we die we are judged instantly and forever; we will either go to heaven or to hell. Still, nothing unclean can enter heaven. Even if we are righteous, the temporal remnants of sin may remain on our souls. Therefore, our souls need to be purged of every remaining impurity. We're going to heaven, but we need to put on our best before arriving. In explaining purgatory to my youngest, he came up with this analogy, "Oh, it's like a car wash for the soul!" Edited by dontracy 2013-04-30 11:26 AM |
![]() ![]() |
![]() | ![]() TriRSquared - Moving on... what's up with lack of birth control? Seems like a VERY outdated belief. And one that VERY few Catholics follow. So what has the church been so slow to change? The teaching on birth control is a defined teaching of the Church. It won't change. It was defined by Pope Paul VI in his encyclical Humanae Vitae. Marriage as understood and taught by the Church is a covenant. It is a communion of persons from which may come new life. In the sacrament of marriage, a husband and wife vow to give totally of themselves to the other and to receive the other totally as gift. Nothing may willfully be withheld. That includes fertility. You cannot say: "I love you totally and will give you everything I am and posses, save one thing. I will not give you my fertility". Contraception breaks the meaning of the covenant that is marriage. For Catholics struggling with this teaching, I recommend John Paul II's work The Theology of the Body, either in its primary form or one of several excellent secondary books on the work. With The Theology of the Body, John Paul II builds on Humanae Vitae and shows the beauty of the Catholic understanding of human sexuality. He shows what we ought rightly to strive toward. Pope Paul VI warned of what a contraceptive culture would bring forth. His general warnings were:
All of these have proven to be true. It is a sad fact that many Catholics in the US do not follow this teaching. There are many reasons, the primary one being the lack of clear teaching going back forty years. Regardless, a Catholic who does not follow this teaching is not in full communion with the Church. That's a serious issue. The Catholic Church's teaching on human sexuality is one of her most beautiful teachings. Difficult perhaps, but triathletes if anyone know that things that are worthwhile can often be difficult at times. Married Catholics who do not use birth control have one of the lowest divorce rates of any group and report the highest levels of both frequency of sex and sexual satisfaction. |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() | ![]() TriRSquared - Finally, what's up with the Pope? Why do you need a single person to "rule" the church? What makes this person any more special then you or I. I think by placing him on a pedestal you go against some of the very teachings of the Bible. The very theory of "Papal Infallibility" seems to fly in the face of "For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God" Take a look at an earlier post I put about about the institution of authority. Jesus gave Peter the keys to the kingdom and with this the authority to bind and loose doctrine. The early Church understood that this authority passed down to the successor to the chair of Peter. The chair rested in Rome, since this is where Peter died. Peter is the rock upon which Jesus built his Church. We know now that Peter's bones rest directly under the main altar at St. Peter's in Rome. Pope Francis is the successor to Peter and retains the same authority as Peter. The role of the Pope is clearly spelled out in scripture. The early Church recognized the authority of bishop of Rome as the first among equals. Papal infallibility does not mean that the Pope is sinless or that he can make a judgement about any old thing which then must be followed. It is solely for final definition of doctrine concerning faith and morals, and then only if needed. Think of it this way by analogy. Life for Catholics is like a baseball game; we all know the rules or ought to. We go about life playing the game. Once in a while there is a dispute; there's a question about what a rule is or whether a call went profoundly bad. Enter the head umpire. He makes the final ruling after which everyone goes back to playing the game. In the case of papal infallibility, the Pope is more like a head umpire who is needed in these special situations to make a final determination, rather than like a CEO of a company whose decisions must be followed no matter what. Edited by dontracy 2013-04-30 1:54 PM |
![]() ![]() |
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() dontracy - 2013-04-30 2:19 PM The teaching on birth control is a defined teaching of the Church. It won't change. It was defined by Pope Paul VI in his encyclical Humanae Vitae. Don, I know I've asked you questions about this before, so I apologize in advance if this has been asked and answered. Are defined teachings immutable? That is, if the teaching did not exist prior to being defined by Pope Paul VI, can a later Pope reverse the prior decision, so to speak. Also, do defined teachings go through some sort of committee/group approval process? Or, could a single Pope set forth a defined teaching that could forever alter the Catholic Church without the ability to be overturned? As others have stated, thanks for your willingness to share. |
![]() ![]() |
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() OK, I just learned about papal infallibility. But this quote from Wiki (sorry), seems to leave some wiggle room, "when, in the exercise of his office as shepherd and teacher of all Christians, in virtue of his supreme apostolic authority, he defines a doctrine concerning faith or morals to be held by the whole Church." Could a later Pope find that a prior Pope was not acting consistently with the qualifications in that quote? Since I read a bit, what do you think about Pope Benedict XVI going from infallible one day to fallible the next?
Edited by Goosedog 2013-04-30 2:15 PM |
![]() ![]() |
![]() | ![]() Goosedog - Don, I know I've asked you questions about this before, so I apologize in advance if this has been asked and answered. Are defined teachings immutable? That is, if the teaching did not exist prior to being defined by Pope Paul VI, can a later Pope reverse the prior decision, so to speak. Also, do defined teachings go through some sort of committee/group approval process? Or, could a single Pope set forth a defined teaching that could forever alter the Catholic Church without the ability to be overturned? As others have stated, thanks for your willingness to share. In a real sense, the doctrine did exist before it was defined, even if there was no need to define it. Think of it in this regard: take the dogma of the Trinity. The dogma of the Trinity is no where to be found in scripture. Yet if one is Christian of any sort, you probably believe that the Trinity always existed. The existence of the Trinity was understood by the early Church. Still there was no need to define it until the heresy of Arianism - the idea that Jesus was a creature - and was finally defined at the Council of Nicaea in 325. Most Christians assent to the Nicene Creed that comes from that council. There always was a Trinity. The confusion that resulted from the rise of Arianism required definition of the dogma. The council provided that authoritative definition. It's the same with the teaching on contraception. It's always been true. It's always been understood that marriage contains within it's matrix an aspect of fecundity. Scientific development then brought about confusion about the nature of human sexuality and particularly the nature of the relationship between husband and wife. So a definition on the teaching was needed. Paul VI provided that authoritatively in Humanae Vitae. Edited by dontracy 2013-04-30 2:13 PM |
![]() ![]() |
![]() Left Brain - 2013-04-30 12:26 AM I was Catholic......Irish Catholic by heritage. Since you brought up the other thread, I'll answer a question that was asked there:
In light of the systematic abuse of children at the hands of Catholic priests and other officials, and the institutional denial and cover-up by the Catholic Church, I no longer identify myself, in any way, with the Catholic Church. I cannot, and will never be able to, connect myself or my beliefs with any organization that does not stand up and protect children above and beyond any tenant or benefit of the organization as a whole. As far as I'm concerned, the Catholic Church should no longer exist in any form. I understand why you feel this way and I have had my own personal struggles with this very issue. Especially as my son approaches the age to make his first reconciliation next school year. The reality of our situation is that my children are both adopted, both through Catholic Social Services and we have made commitments to their birth families to raise the children Catholic. I take that commitment seriously. So I have had to find a way to reconcile my disappointments with the hierarchy of the church and honor my faith with my family. Here is the thing about it, when I look around me at church on Sunday, I do not see pedophiles. I see farmers, teachers, nurses, police officers, moms and dads coming together to share their faith, help the poor and do good in our community. When I think of my own history with the Catholic Church my life has been blessed in many ways through my faith and 2 of those blessings are playing outside in my yard right now |
|
![]() ![]() |
Pro ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() trigal38 - 2013-04-30 2:17 PM Left Brain - 2013-04-30 12:26 AM I was Catholic......Irish Catholic by heritage. Since you brought up the other thread, I'll answer a question that was asked there:
In light of the systematic abuse of children at the hands of Catholic priests and other officials, and the institutional denial and cover-up by the Catholic Church, I no longer identify myself, in any way, with the Catholic Church. I cannot, and will never be able to, connect myself or my beliefs with any organization that does not stand up and protect children above and beyond any tenant or benefit of the organization as a whole. As far as I'm concerned, the Catholic Church should no longer exist in any form. I understand why you feel this way and I have had my own personal struggles with this very issue. Especially as my son approaches the age to make his first reconciliation next school year. The reality of our situation is that my children are both adopted, both through Catholic Social Services and we have made commitments to their birth families to raise the children Catholic. I take that commitment seriously. So I have had to find a way to reconcile my disappointments with the hierarchy of the church and honor my faith with my family. Here is the thing about it, when I look around me at church on Sunday, I do not see pedophiles. I see farmers, teachers, nurses, police officers, moms and dads coming together to share their faith, help the poor and do good in our community. When I think of my own history with the Catholic Church my life has been blessed in many ways through my faith and 2 of those blessings are playing outside in my yard right now I don't have a problem with the people of the Church, and I agree with what you wrote. I have a problem with the Institution, which I feel should be dismantled. Just so you know, I don't hate anything, it takes too much energy.....but there are things in my life I want no part of...the Catholic Church is one of them. |
![]() ![]() |
Expert ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Back to the questions... These are a couple that got me in trouble going to church school: 1. What day did god create the dinosaurs? 2. If you are happily and faithfully married and your spouse dies, you go onto remarry and are faithful. Who do you spend eternity with? 3. How do you keep women silent in church? (This didn't go over too well when you tell a nun she's not supposed to be talking in church. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() | ![]() blbriley - Back to the questions... These are a couple that got me in trouble going to church school: 1. What day did god create the dinosaurs? Jurrasic or Cretaceous? |
![]() ![]() |
Pro ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() blbriley - 2013-04-30 2:43 PM Back to the questions... These are a couple that got me in trouble going to church school: 1. What day did god create the dinosaurs? 2. If you are happily and faithfully married and your spouse dies, you go onto remarry and are faithful. Who do you spend eternity with? 3. How do you keep women silent in church? (This didn't go over too well when you tell a nun she's not supposed to be talking in church. You have used up your one paddling for the semester, feel free to move about the plane. |
|