Subject: RE: Is Amanda Beard setting a bad example?....I'll have to take a look to judge :)Downunderman - 2007-05-14 5:39 PM run4yrlif - 2007-05-15 2:42 AM dibujob - 2007-05-14 11:20 AM I'm not trying to pick a fight but I think it's safe to say she's been noticed long before this. Yes...a couple of years ago she was the most downloaded felmale athlete in the world. Really....I don't see why Well, one possibly reason why is because she's a hell of an athlete. She took home 3 olympic medals in the 1996 olympics at the age of 15 and 1 more at the 2000 games....that's 4 olympic medals before she was even old enough to drink! 4 years later she took home 3 more. 7 olympic medals by the age of 23 ain't too bad. I don't even have to mention that at the age of 22 she set the world record in the 200m breast stroke, not too shabby either. This whole argument about whether or not female athletes only get noticed when they're attractive kind of bothers me. I think one could safely bet that it doesn't hurt when male athletes are attractive either, look at David Beckham or Any Roddick or Tiger Woods. If these people weren't respected as world class athletes first then they'd never be recognizable, male or female. Show me an example of an athlete that is being portrayed as a sex symbol, male or female, who totally sucks at their game. And why limit the argument to athletes? Look at the list that, I think it's People magazine, puts out every year...the top 50 most beautiful people or something like that. I'm willing to bet they have male athletes, female athletes, business people, actors, singers, cooks, whatever. They are all respected for what they've accomplished first, being attractive just helps seal the deal. |