Trump (Page 34)
-
No new posts
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller | Reply |
|
2016-04-12 2:58 PM in reply to: Hook'em |
Veteran 1019 St. Louis | Subject: RE: Trump Originally posted by Hook'em The Libertarian Party Convention is in the end of May and the presumptive nominee is Gary Johnson ("Feel the Johnson!"). Trump's head isn't schedules to explode until the middle of July with the GOP Convention. IMHO, there is no way Trump is going to be on the Libertarian Party ticket. First off, Feel the Johnson is the best campaign slogan ever. I didn't look at when convention dates, didn't realize the Libertarians were so much earlier. So you're right, that really doesn't work out well for Trump. On the other hand, it's getting pretty clear that the GOP are headed towards a contested convention and I don't see Trump coming out on top of that. He's already started his meltdown with the way Colorado and Louisiana played out. If he's going to want revenge for getting screwed out of the nomination, he can't wait around. Maybe he needs to get proactive and jump ship now. Unless (like I thought all through the fall until he actually started racking up delegates) he never wanted to be president and losing a contested convention is his ticket out while still saving face. |
|
2016-04-12 3:18 PM in reply to: Bob Loblaw |
Pro 9391 Omaha, NE | Subject: RE: Trump Originally posted by Bob Loblaw Originally posted by Hook'em The Libertarian Party Convention is in the end of May and the presumptive nominee is Gary Johnson ("Feel the Johnson!"). Trump's head isn't schedules to explode until the middle of July with the GOP Convention. IMHO, there is no way Trump is going to be on the Libertarian Party ticket. First off, Feel the Johnson is the best campaign slogan ever. I didn't look at when convention dates, didn't realize the Libertarians were so much earlier. So you're right, that really doesn't work out well for Trump. On the other hand, it's getting pretty clear that the GOP are headed towards a contested convention and I don't see Trump coming out on top of that. He's already started his meltdown with the way Colorado and Louisiana played out. If he's going to want revenge for getting screwed out of the nomination, he can't wait around. Maybe he needs to get proactive and jump ship now. Unless (like I thought all through the fall until he actually started racking up delegates) he never wanted to be president and losing a contested convention is his ticket out while still saving face. Maybe we've had it wrong all along. He wasn't a Hillary plant, he was a Cruz plant. Let Trump beat all the establishment folks to a pulp and then Cruz (who never would have gotten any traction) comes in and saves the day as the "at least he isn't Trump" candidate. lol |
2016-04-12 3:33 PM in reply to: Bob Loblaw |
Deep in the Heart of Texas | Subject: RE: Trump Originally posted by Bob Loblaw Originally posted by Hook'em The Libertarian Party Convention is in the end of May and the presumptive nominee is Gary Johnson ("Feel the Johnson!"). Trump's head isn't schedules to explode until the middle of July with the GOP Convention. IMHO, there is no way Trump is going to be on the Libertarian Party ticket. First off, Feel the Johnson is the best campaign slogan ever. Johnson actually said it in an interview the other day - cracked me up. |
2016-04-12 6:53 PM in reply to: Bob Loblaw |
Champion 7821 Brooklyn, NY | Subject: RE: Trump Originally posted by Bob Loblaw Originally posted by Hook'em Originally posted by jmk-brooklyn Originally posted by Bob Loblaw Not that it matters much, since I think the definition of a Libertarian has gotten pretty muddy lately, and because, as you described, it would just be a tactical move to bring legitimacy to the party, but, ideologically, does Trump qualify as Libertarian? Originally posted by tuwood Originally posted by marysia83 Originally posted by jmk-brooklyn If, hypothetically, Cruz ends up with the nomination, whether via contested convention or by (somehow) ending up with the majority of delegates, and, hypothetically, if Trump then decides to go independent, how many of Trump's supporters do you think will stick with the GOP and support Cruz? Can you guys shed some lights for me here on the process? because I was under the impression that it would be too late to anyone to go as independent. Mostly because of some states' rules where there was a deadline for independent voter (and the deadline has passed). I may be wrong, therefore I'm asking It's state by state, and would be quite complex for anyone to pull off at the last minute. I did a quick google and found this site: https://ballotpedia.org/Ballot_access_for_presidential_candidates It describes all the dates for independents to file which are mostly mid year 2016. The dates that have passed were primarily in the context of the primaries for the Democratic and Republican parties. I think I read somewhere that 35 states allow write in ballots as well, so even if you don't officially get on the ballot you can instruct supporters to write you in. I don't know if he has any interest in running as a Libertarian, but that would get him on the ballet of all 50 states. They have a couple primaries, they're all completely non-binding and a nominee is elected by unpledged delegates at their convention. If he wanted to go that route, they'd be foolish not to take him. If Trump could pull 5% of the popular vote in the general election, Libertarians would earn a piece of the presidential election campaign fund in 2020. If he could somehow manage to get 25% of the popular vote, then the Libertarian party would be declared a major party and get a full equal share of the pot. As much as I hate the thought of President Trump, I would absolutely vote for him on a Libertarian ticket. He wouldn't have a chance to win it all, but it could be a big step in the right direction towards breaking up the two party system. No. Yeah, he's definitely not Libertarian. Then again, he's not really a Repulican or Democrat either. But he clearly doesn't mind flip-flopping on pretty much any issue, so he can just evolve his stance to match up with the Libertarian platform. As long as he doesn't waiver on building a wall, his supporters will follow. If he ends up getting screwed by the GOP and wants revenge, running on the Libertarian ticket is a much better opportunity for him than trying to run as a pure independant. And if the party thinks he could get 20-30 million votes, then they'll be able to cash in in 2020. I would never vote for Trump on the GOP ticket because I think he'll be a truly horrible president, but I wouldn't hesitate to vote for him on the Libertarian ticket where I know he has no chance to win but a big chance to get the party future funding. On a side note, here's a candidate that JMK and Tony can finally agree on.
If by "agree on" you mean, agree to BURN IT!! BURN IT WITH FIRE!!, then yes, we agree. |
2016-04-13 8:00 PM in reply to: jmk-brooklyn |
Pro 9391 Omaha, NE | Subject: RE: Trump This article is applicable to both Bernie and Trump, but I'll throw it here: 2016: The Year Americans Found Out Their Elections Are Rigged No matter what happens, I truly appreciate what Trump and Bernie have managed to do. The first step of recovery is realizing there's a problem in the first place and I believe America is slowly waking up. I swear Trump/Sanders should go independent if they both get knocked out. I'd vote for that ticket in a heartbeat. :-) |
2016-04-18 6:27 PM in reply to: tuwood |
Buttercup 14334 | Subject: RE: Trump Just want to pop into the thread to say that you were right, Tony, about Trump's staying power. I really thought that when the voting started he would wash out and go away. I have no idea what his supporters see in him or what appeals to them. I find him odious. Different strokes ... |
|
2016-04-18 6:40 PM in reply to: Renee |
Pro 9391 Omaha, NE | Subject: RE: Trump Originally posted by Renee Just want to pop into the thread to say that you were right, Tony, about Trump's staying power. I really thought that when the voting started he would wash out and go away. I have no idea what his supporters see in him or what appeals to them. I find him odious. Different strokes ... I honestly think it's more of a broad, but somewhat shallow appeal. Meaning, he appeals to me because he's an outsider and self financed. He appeals to a blue collar worker because of his opposition to outsourcing jobs. He appeals to others because of his wall, etc. There's no question he'll go into the convention as the majority delegate holder, but I don't think he'll get the magic number so there will be a vote. I honestly have no idea how that will turn out because it's a first for me and it's a very unique situation. |
2016-04-19 8:24 AM in reply to: Renee |
Master 2946 Centennial, CO | Subject: RE: Trump Originally posted by Renee Just want to pop into the thread to say that you were right, Tony, about Trump's staying power. I really thought that when the voting started he would wash out and go away. I have no idea what his supporters see in him or what appeals to them. I find him odious. Different strokes ... This is the year of the bad candidates. You look and you have a Religious Zealot who no one likes, a tv personality who people don't like, a no name Gov. who no one can get excited about, a socialist who is actually an independent running as a Dem, and a lying crook who can't tell the truth even when it is good news. Gotta love elections. So with those 5 being the options, it's easy to see why some people stand by Trump, some by Cruz, some by Sanders and some by Hillary. Each group is electing who they think is the least evil. Sad but true. I think for a lot of people, as Tony said, at least Trump doesn't appear to be bought off by the establishment. Same with Sanders. so they each have something going for them... |
2016-04-19 9:47 AM in reply to: velocomp |
Pro 6838 Tejas | Subject: RE: Trump Best case scenario for this country is to have both parties install their choice at convention. Bernie and Trump could then splinter off and run as something other than D or R. I think both guys have the cojones to do it and the support of the people to pull it off. It's going to take something that drastic to get Washington unfkd and in the business of doing the bidding of the people, not squabbling amongst themselves in search of power and retribution. Unfortunately, I also believe that bernie would be discovered on a park bench with a suicide note pinned to his lapel, a multiple gunshot wound suicide. |
2016-04-19 9:56 AM in reply to: velocomp |
Champion 7821 Brooklyn, NY | Subject: RE: Trump Originally posted by velocomp Originally posted by Renee Just want to pop into the thread to say that you were right, Tony, about Trump's staying power. I really thought that when the voting started he would wash out and go away. I have no idea what his supporters see in him or what appeals to them. I find him odious. Different strokes ... This is the year of the bad candidates. You look and you have a Religious Zealot who no one likes, a tv personality who people don't like, a no name Gov. who no one can get excited about, a socialist who is actually an independent running as a Dem, and a lying crook who can't tell the truth even when it is good news. Gotta love elections. So with those 5 being the options, it's easy to see why some people stand by Trump, some by Cruz, some by Sanders and some by Hillary. Each group is electing who they think is the least evil. Sad but true. I think for a lot of people, as Tony said, at least Trump doesn't appear to be bought off by the establishment. Same with Sanders. so they each have something going for them... It is definitely the year of the "lesser of two evils" candidates. I voted for Hillary today not because I'm thrilled with her as a candidate, but because I think she'll be more effective than Sanders who, even if he somehow got elected, would be completely ignored by Congress and would accomplish nothing. I'd like to think that this election will mark the beginning of a new way of thinking among voters and that they'll be more likely to consider an independent candidate in the future-- someone with a sound fiscal and foreign policy strategy, but with a position on social issues that the majority of people can live with. Unfortunately, since the general is looking more and more like it's going to be "Democratic Establishment Candidate" vs "GOP Establishment Candidate", I'm afraid that it might be like the US Soccer Team in the World Cup (stay with me on this analogy). Every World Cup, soccer fans and the soccer media proclaim that "this is going to be the year that soccer as a spectator sport finally is elevated to the level of football/baseball/basketball in the US. Team USA will have a big win, or do something cool in the early rounds, and it looks, for all the world, as though they are poised for a breakthrough. Then, they inevitably and ignominiously lose early in the second round, the tournament goes on for three more weeks without them, and by the time the tournament 's over, no one's even talking about soccer anymore. And then, four years later, soccer in the US is back to square one. In this election cycle, everyone's all excited about the "anti-establishment candidates" who are making unprecedented runs at the nomination. In the end, though, both will fall short, the establishment candidates will end up running against each other, again, and in four years, we'll be back where we are-- with two firmly entrenched parties a million miles apart and no one in the middle with enough support to get any traction. |
2016-04-19 10:22 AM in reply to: jmk-brooklyn |
Champion 6993 Chicago, Illinois | Subject: RE: Trump Originally posted by jmk-brooklyn In this election cycle, everyone's all excited about the "anti-establishment candidates" who are making unprecedented runs at the nomination. In the end, though, both will fall short, the establishment candidates will end up running against each other, again, and in four years, we'll be back where we are-- with two firmly entrenched parties a million miles apart and no one in the middle with enough support to get any traction. Well I somewhat agree if Sanders gets into office he will become the next Jimmy Carter. At the same time if he gets in you better believe GOP will beg Obama for a supreme court justice. If sanders gets in and can nominate a justice first day we will have Citizen United over turned and that would be a HUGE blow to the establishment. 1/3 of a congressmen time is to spend time on the phone trying to bring in campaign money. Our country is beyond being bought out. If that is all he gets done he will be a very successfully president in my books. |
|
2016-04-20 1:16 PM in reply to: Renee |
Pro 9391 Omaha, NE | Subject: RE: Trump Thought you'd find this interesting Renee, I was surprised there wasn't a bigger percentage of lower income folks http://www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2016/04/daily-chart-14
|
2016-04-25 9:24 AM in reply to: tuwood |
Master 2802 Minnetonka, Minnesota | Subject: RE: Trump Two candidates openly teaming up to beat a third: Another unprecedented step in this (crazy?) Republican primary... Team Cruz + Team Kasich > Team Trump? They hope to deny him the nomination and battle it out at the convention. https://gma.yahoo.com/ted-cruz-john-kasich-campaigns-agree-coordinat... |
2016-04-25 9:53 AM in reply to: ejshowers |
Pro 9391 Omaha, NE | Subject: RE: Trump Originally posted by ejshowers Two candidates openly teaming up to beat a third: Another unprecedented step in this (crazy?) Republican primary... Team Cruz + Team Kasich > Team Trump? They hope to deny him the nomination and battle it out at the convention. https://gma.yahoo.com/ted-cruz-john-kasich-campaigns-agree-coordinat... It's pretty interesting to say the least. I was reading a few threads on some ultra conservative (big pro Ted) sites and they weren't responding very kindly. Time will tell, but it "seems" as though Ted's desperation tactics of the past several weeks have really soured a big part of his base towards him. Evangelicals can be crazy people, but they are for the most part very moral and fair people so when they see what appears as unfair tactics they don't respond kindly. The mantra on most of the threads is not that Cruz is doing the #NeverTrump hashtag, it's that he's picked up #NeverVoters. Cruz is doing everything he can to suppress the voters and manipulate the delegates and the process to win in a brokered convention. |
2016-04-25 10:57 AM in reply to: tuwood |
Champion 6993 Chicago, Illinois | Subject: RE: Trump Originally posted by tuwood Originally posted by ejshowers Two candidates openly teaming up to beat a third: Another unprecedented step in this (crazy?) Republican primary... Team Cruz + Team Kasich > Team Trump? They hope to deny him the nomination and battle it out at the convention. https://gma.yahoo.com/ted-cruz-john-kasich-campaigns-agree-coordinat... It's pretty interesting to say the least. I was reading a few threads on some ultra conservative (big pro Ted) sites and they weren't responding very kindly. Time will tell, but it "seems" as though Ted's desperation tactics of the past several weeks have really soured a big part of his base towards him. Evangelicals can be crazy people, but they are for the most part very moral and fair people so when they see what appears as unfair tactics they don't respond kindly. The mantra on most of the threads is not that Cruz is doing the #NeverTrump hashtag, it's that he's picked up #NeverVoters. Cruz is doing everything he can to suppress the voters and manipulate the delegates and the process to win in a brokered convention. I know there are people out there that are anti trump at all cost. (Most I know will vote democrat anyways). Remember Cruz also had the whole I am an outsider that tried to stop Obamacare by reading green eggs and ham. This totally ruins his street cred and probably lose a few votes. |
2016-04-25 11:28 AM in reply to: ejshowers |
Master 2946 Centennial, CO | Subject: RE: Trump Originally posted by ejshowers Two candidates openly teaming up to beat a third: Another unprecedented step in this (crazy?) Republican primary... Team Cruz + Team Kasich > Team Trump? They hope to deny him the nomination and battle it out at the convention. https://gma.yahoo.com/ted-cruz-john-kasich-campaigns-agree-coordinat...
Again a perfect example of not listening to the voters. If it takes manipulation to win then you don't deserve to win. And of course there are those who will say, it's within the rules. Yes it is, but that doesn't make it right. Bad form. I fear soon I will be a man without a party. At least then I can bag on both sides. |
|
2016-04-25 11:48 AM in reply to: velocomp |
Pro 9391 Omaha, NE | Subject: RE: Trump I thought this was a decent article about the potential problems with the Cruz/Kasich strategy. Why the Kasich-Cruz alliance could backfire (from the article) ...it’s not a sure thing that all of Kasich’s voters in Indiana will support Cruz. According to a Fox poll released over the weekend – which showed Trump leading Cruz in the Hoosier State by eight points, 41%-33% – 53% of Kasich voters said Cruz would be their second choice, while 22% said it would be Trump. So without Kasich in the equation, the Indiana contest becomes much closer. But it doesn’t guarantee a win for Cruz. What’s more, Kasich is STILL on the ballot, and he hasn’t instructed his supporters in Indiana to vote for Cruz; instead, he just said he won’t actively campaign in the state. And Indiana voters have been voting absentee since April 5, which means some Kasich supporters have already voted for the Ohio governor. In fact, that same Fox poll (conducted April 18-21) found that 4% of Indiana Republicans had already voted in the primary, and that sliver of the electorate could matter in a close contest. |
2016-04-25 12:01 PM in reply to: tuwood |
Master 2802 Minnetonka, Minnesota | Subject: RE: Trump Neither can win outright, so my guess is their and/or the DNC's internal polling lead them to conclude that this was their best chance of limiting Trump's delegate count, even down to the district by district races. Also, I just read that Cruz again bested Trump in Maine in rounding up the actual delegates that go to the convention and is carrying like 19 out of 20 delegates, even though he only beat Trump 12 to 9 in the caucus back on Mar 5. These delegates are "bound" on a first ballot, but can then switch on a 2nd or subsequent ballot making their affiliation important in the grand scheme. The devil is in the details sometimes, and Trump is just not that detail oriented it appears. |
2016-04-25 12:16 PM in reply to: ejshowers |
Pro 9391 Omaha, NE | Subject: RE: Trump Originally posted by ejshowers Neither can win outright, so my guess is their and/or the DNC's internal polling lead them to conclude that this was their best chance of limiting Trump's delegate count, even down to the district by district races. Also, I just read that Cruz again bested Trump in Maine in rounding up the actual delegates that go to the convention and is carrying like 19 out of 20 delegates, even though he only beat Trump 12 to 9 in the caucus back on Mar 5. These delegates are "bound" on a first ballot, but can then switch on a 2nd or subsequent ballot making their affiliation important in the grand scheme. The devil is in the details sometimes, and Trump is just not that detail oriented it appears. I was expecting this to go to the convention, but with the developments of the past few weeks there seems to be quite a surge in Trumps favor in the polls (and results). You're exactly right that Cruz is playing the "behind the scenes" game better than Trump, but unfortunately for him it's playing right into Trumps hand that Cruz is nothing more than a back room schmoozing establishment Republican. I follow FreeRepublic which is one of the top conservative blogs and it was about 60/40 (my guess) in support of Cruz with a lot of Trump bashers. If you look at it the past week it's hard to find any Cruz supporters, they've been falling off like crazy due to his new underhanded approach. Obviously this is all just anecdotal and time will tell, so I'm not calling it by any means.
|
2016-04-25 12:37 PM in reply to: tuwood |
Master 2802 Minnetonka, Minnesota | Subject: RE: Trump You love your anecdotes for sure Tony! Being an engineer, those things tend to not even register with me. Polling hasn't shifted much in the NE - Trump was and still is winning big there. Indiana is probably super critical to him as he is behind or tied at best state-wide with Cruz. Oregon also is a toss up, but with very limited public polling, very hard to have a clue. CA (where I grew up!) is no man's land for Rs as there are so few of them and they tend to be grouped in hot-spots. Almost impossible to tell who, for instance, will win in the Hispanic areas in LA or in the Bay Area, which is critical to understand, as most delegates are divvied up by congressional district. The overall state polling number is not that meaningful there. Trump wants to "pivot" to being more presidential (ha!), but really can't do that too much and/or too soon, as he can't afford to lose his rabid non-establishment supporters until he clinches the nomination. Will be interesting as it come down to the wire for sure! |
2016-04-25 4:32 PM in reply to: ejshowers |
Pro 9391 Omaha, NE | Subject: RE: Trump Originally posted by ejshowers You love your anecdotes for sure Tony! Being an engineer, those things tend to not even register with me. Polling hasn't shifted much in the NE - Trump was and still is winning big there. Indiana is probably super critical to him as he is behind or tied at best state-wide with Cruz. Oregon also is a toss up, but with very limited public polling, very hard to have a clue. CA (where I grew up!) is no man's land for Rs as there are so few of them and they tend to be grouped in hot-spots. Almost impossible to tell who, for instance, will win in the Hispanic areas in LA or in the Bay Area, which is critical to understand, as most delegates are divvied up by congressional district. The overall state polling number is not that meaningful there. Trump wants to "pivot" to being more presidential (ha!), but really can't do that too much and/or too soon, as he can't afford to lose his rabid non-establishment supporters until he clinches the nomination. Will be interesting as it come down to the wire for sure! At least I admit my anecdotes, don't I get some credit for that? I read somewhere that California is like 50 different state elections due to the district makeup. Should be interesting for sure. |
|
2016-04-26 7:59 AM in reply to: ejshowers |
Pro 9391 Omaha, NE | Subject: RE: Trump Kind of funny how the media has been trying to show Trump as "fading" and losing support. Yet his support has done nothing but grown throughout the campaign. New all time high nationally in the NBC poll. Should be a fun day watching the returns come in. (well, fun for those that find politics interesting) |
2016-04-26 8:29 AM in reply to: tuwood |
Master 2802 Minnetonka, Minnesota | Subject: RE: Trump Originally posted by tuwood Kind of funny how the media has been trying to show Trump as "fading" and losing support. Yet his support has done nothing but grown throughout the campaign. New all time high nationally in the NBC poll. Should be a fun day watching the returns come in. (well, fun for those that find politics interesting) FYI for anyone who doesn't click on the link, the 50% number is from an online poll (traditionally not as accurate) and is among Republicans and those leaning Republican. He is not anywhere close to that among of all voters. |
2016-04-26 8:36 AM in reply to: ejshowers |
Master 2802 Minnetonka, Minnesota | Subject: RE: Trump And for some not-so-good news for Trump: A new poll suggests that a race for president between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton could yield the lowest support for a Republican candidate among young voters in decades. The survey, conducted by the Harvard University Institute of Politics, finds that in a hypothetical matchup, 61% of likely voters age 18-29 say they would vote for Clinton, while just 25% would vote for Trump. That's worse than most other recent Republican candidates for president. I'll say again - If nominated, he stands virtually no chance in the general election. I have seen no polling or other hard data, demographic information, or analyst report lay out a likely scenario where he wins. |
2016-04-26 9:18 AM in reply to: ejshowers |
Pro 9391 Omaha, NE | Subject: RE: Trump Originally posted by ejshowers And for some not-so-good news for Trump: A new poll suggests that a race for president between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton could yield the lowest support for a Republican candidate among young voters in decades. The survey, conducted by the Harvard University Institute of Politics, finds that in a hypothetical matchup, 61% of likely voters age 18-29 say they would vote for Clinton, while just 25% would vote for Trump. That's worse than most other recent Republican candidates for president. I'll say again - If nominated, he stands virtually no chance in the general election. I have seen no polling or other hard data, demographic information, or analyst report lay out a likely scenario where he wins. lol, aren't 18-29 year olds the lowest percentage of voters that actually vote? This is a stupid poll. Here's a better representation of head to head between Trump & Clinton (you'll notice the Harvard poll isn't on there) Clinton still has the edge, but the trend is in Trumps favor. The GWU/Battleground poll even had him within 3% (oops).
|
|