Tookie Williams (Page 4)
-
No new posts
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller | Reply |
|
![]() ![]() |
Elite![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() possum - 2005-12-13 6:45 AM I don;t expect to find a criminal like Tookie out on the street. There is plenty of them out there, they just aren't hanging around Madison, WI. Watts and Compton, make a field trip out of it. Have you ever driven in the wrong neighborhood where you go down a sidestreet and everyone gets off their porch and starts walking towards the street when you turn down it, start flashing gang signs, have their hands in the small of their back, posturing, all because they don't recognize you and therefore you don't belong on their street? Have you ever seen the movie Colors? To you that's just a movie but for many people here, it's a way of life. Tookie helped create that. |
|
![]() ![]() |
Giver ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() I think what Possum meant was she didn't expect Tookie to be released if he were granted clemency, or others like him who are in prison granted parole.
ChuckyFinster - 2005-12-13 1:04 PM possum - 2005-12-13 6:45 AM I don;t expect to find a criminal like Tookie out on the street. There is plenty of them out there, they just aren't hanging around Madison, WI. Watts and Compton, make a field trip out of it. Have you ever driven in the wrong neighborhood where you go down a sidestreet and everyone gets off their porch and starts walking towards the street when you turn down it, start flashing gang signs, have their hands in the small of their back, posturing, all because they don't recognize you and therefore you don't belong on their street? Have you ever seen the movie Colors? To you that's just a movie but for many people here, it's a way of life. Tookie helped create that. |
![]() ![]() |
Elite![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() And lets not forget that Tookie could have shut down that gang but refused. He knew all the who/what/when/where/how and instead he chose to write children's books. |
![]() ![]() |
Pro![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() ChuckyFinster - 2005-12-13 12:50 PM As to the costs, compare the cost of Timothy McVeigh to Tookie Williams. Do you think the costs are anywhere near the same? Tookie was convicted in 1979 and we are just now killing him. The reason it costs so much is because we allow it to drag on. 26 years later we are finally removing this virus from our midst. To what do you attribute the delay in executing Williams as opposed to McVeigh? After the first appeal he should have been taken out back and had a bullet in his head like the animal he is. Compton and Watts, drive through there and tell me what Tookie has done... What has been accomplished by killing Williams, or for that matter McVeigh? I agree with some of both sides of this debate. For example, if you have a death penalty, I agree that the family of the victim should be allowed to carry it out in any way they see fit. The punishment is not humane, so why dress it up with lethal injections and such? Why pretend it is anything other than what it is - blood revenge, pure and simple? Although I'm the only one who has expressed the opinion that executions should be public, I agree with me on that point. Society should see the results of of its own state-sanctioned killing. OTOH, I believe that the death penalty is a brutal and senseless form of punishment that brutalizes society as a whole. My feeling is that a violent justice system creates a violent society. Not to mention the built-in problems with justice systems everywhere that favour the rich who can buy a good defense over those who must submit to the efforts of an overworked and underpaid public defender... |
![]() ![]() |
Giver ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Well...I seriously doubt that. Once a machine like that is in motion, I don't think one guy can just yell stop. If Bin Laden were to all of a sudden find Christ and ask Al Queda to cut it out, do you think it would just go away?
ChuckyFinster - 2005-12-13 1:09 PM And lets not forget that Tookie could have shut down that gang but refused. He knew all the who/what/when/where/how and instead he chose to write children's books. |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() This user's post has been ignored. |
|
![]() ![]() |
Elite![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() run4yrlif - 2005-12-13 9:11 AM Well...I seriously doubt that. Once a machine like that is in motion, I don't think one guy can just yell stop. If Bin Laden were to all of a sudden find Christ and ask Al Queda to cut it out, do you think it would just go away?
ChuckyFinster - 2005-12-13 1:09 PM And lets not forget that Tookie could have shut down that gang but refused. He knew all the who/what/when/where/how and instead he chose to write children's books. If he'd roll over on the rest of the gang, it would have been the same as a mob boss rolling over on his crew. The FBI has successfully taken out entire mob families, no reason that the same type of damage could not have been done to the Crips. |
![]() ![]() |
Giver![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Remember though, that Tookie's been out 26 years. Anyone in the Crips when he was busted is most likely dead now.
ChuckyFinster - 2005-12-13 1:15 PM run4yrlif - 2005-12-13 9:11 AM If he'd roll over on the rest of the gang, it would have been the same as a mob boss rolling over on his crew. The FBI has successfully taken out entire mob families, no reason that the same type of damage could not have been done to the Crips. Well...I seriously doubt that. Once a machine like that is in motion, I don't think one guy can just yell stop. If Bin Laden were to all of a sudden find Christ and ask Al Queda to cut it out, do you think it would just go away?
ChuckyFinster - 2005-12-13 1:09 PM And lets not forget that Tookie could have shut down that gang but refused. He knew all the who/what/when/where/how and instead he chose to write children's books. |
![]() ![]() |
Elite![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Opus - 2005-12-13 9:10 AM To what do you attribute the delay in executing Williams as opposed to McVeigh? He submitted. He didn't want a life in prison. If I was in McVeigh's situation, I'd have done the same. It is the only honorable thing to do. |
![]() ![]() |
Expert![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() courtney_leone - 2005-12-13 12:52 PM I'm all for revenge. If its deserved. Sigh. How many drive-by shootings have there been because "they did it to us. We're just getting back at them."? Besides, who decides if it is deserved? What if they're wrong? |
![]() ![]() |
Elite![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() run4yrlif - 2005-12-13 9:16 AM Remember though, that Tookie's been out 26 years. Anyone in the Crips when he was busted is most likely dead now.
ChuckyFinster - 2005-12-13 1:15 PM run4yrlif - 2005-12-13 9:11 AM If he'd roll over on the rest of the gang, it would have been the same as a mob boss rolling over on his crew. The FBI has successfully taken out entire mob families, no reason that the same type of damage could not have been done to the Crips. Well...I seriously doubt that. Once a machine like that is in motion, I don't think one guy can just yell stop. If Bin Laden were to all of a sudden find Christ and ask Al Queda to cut it out, do you think it would just go away?
ChuckyFinster - 2005-12-13 1:09 PM And lets not forget that Tookie could have shut down that gang but refused. He knew all the who/what/when/where/how and instead he chose to write children's books. I'm not talking now but while the pit bull was still a puppy. |
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() | ![]() courtney_leone Satisfaction. Its something I struggle with as a Christian. Thanks for your candor. I know I struggle with this as well. |
![]() ![]() |
Buttercup![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() I will keep my comments succinct:
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() This user's post has been ignored. |
![]() ![]() |
Pro![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() ChuckyFinster - 2005-12-13 1:19 PM He submitted. He didn't want a life in prison. If I was in McVeigh's situation, I'd have done the same. It is the only honorable thing to do. Yes, now I remember. Well, anyway, amidst all the celebrating around Williams's execution, the whole thing kinda bums me out. Hey, where are the Christians out there with the "he who is without sin" quote? I would have thought that is appropriate for this case. |
![]() ![]() |
Giver![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Opus - 2005-12-13 1:28 PM Hey, where are the Christians out there with the "he who is without sin" quote? I would have thought that is appropriate for this case.
No one's said that explicitly, but plenty of people have weighed in on the Christian perspective. |
|
![]() ![]() |
Elite![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() coredump - 2005-12-13 10:55 AM ASA22 - 2005-12-13 9:47 AM Is our system perfect. NO. But it's the best legal system in the World. Bar none! Death penalty cases are full of due process protections. Automatic appeals, unlimited post conviction motions. I understand your point and it is a good one. One thing I will say is that ANY prosecutor that engages in the type of conduct that occurred in the example you sighted should be prosecuted. It hurts the system. It makes people not trust the vast majority of us that are truely only seeking justice and fairness. Until you can guarantee that not one single person has ever been, nor will ever be wrongfully executed, I cannot support the death penalty. It has nothing to do with justice and fairness and everything to do with revenge. -C Fair enough, and certainly a very well supportable position. I fully understand and there is a great deal of merit to that argument. The only thing I would urge all of you when reading about the facts of a particular case, please try to remember who is giving you those facts. I have seen the anti-death penalty side really bend the facts of the case. I urge you all, if you are truely interested in a case, to seek out the actual trial transcript. Attempt to get the full picture of what went on at the trial court level. |
![]() ![]() |
Giver![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() ASA22 - 2005-12-13 1:31 PM The only thing I would urge all of you when reading about the facts of a particular case, please try to remember who is giving you those facts. I have seen the anti-death penalty side really bend the facts of the case. I urge you all, if you are truely interested in a case, to seek out the actual trial transcript. Attempt to get the full picture of what went on at the trial court level. So that's always good advice, but I'd be curious to hear what facts you think we're bending? The fact that life in prison isn't an easy one? The fact that it costs a bunch more money to execute a prisoner? The fact that we're morally convicted in our belief? The fact that Tookie did some good behind bars, more good than he's doing now that he's dead? |
![]() ![]() |
![]() possum - 2005-12-13 6:10 AM those of us who are opposed to the death penalty do not necessarily believe reform or rehabilitation are even the point. The point: We think killing another human being is, simply, not morally appropriate regardless of the crime. So it's not about being nicey- nice. It's about being moral. What other developed nations use teh death penalty as either a deterrent or a punishment? Maybe if the opponents of the death penalty spent the time and resources on advocating that prisoners, death row or not were not given the privileges of TV, cable or not, gym rooms, access to the media and the ability to publish books. A number of repeat offenders are repeat offenders so they can go back where they feel comfortable. I think one of the things that the victims and victims’ families find so reprehensible is the life that criminals have in prison. Tookie is a perfect example, why was he afforded the opportunity to become a celebrity author. When you are a convicted criminal, you lose certain right, the ability to interact with the outside world should be one of them. If riding our county of the death penalty is really that important to some of you I would suggest; 1. That you would have an easier time swaying a lot of people if first advocate their loss of privilege, such as TV, Radio, exercise equipment, just to name a few. 2. Limit their ability to clog up the legal system 3. Limit their ability to have access to the media and outside world. If you really are so concerned about the morality of the US please expend your efforts on making prison a better option than the death penalty. Victims of crimes like Tookies shouldn’t be forced to hear about his success and accomplishments. He was in prison for Capital murder, not on an authors training scholarship. You just might have a better chance of getting the death penalty removed, if the victims feel that justice will be more served by them spending their life in total solitude. |
![]() ![]() |
Science Nerd![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() I respect that everyone has their own opinion and a lot of people don't agree with me. My question on the death penalty has always been: How is it okay for the government to tell people that they can't kill other people, but then kill people itself? It doesn't make sense to me. If it's not okay to kill, it's not okay to kill. Self defense is one thing, but killing someone in prison isn't really self defense. They're already in prison. |
![]() ![]() |
Giver![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() One argument is that it's supposed to be a deterrent, but studies have shown that it's not.
Artemis - 2005-12-13 1:45 PM I respect that everyone has their own opinion and a lot of people don't agree with me. My question on the death penalty has always been: How is it okay for the government to tell people that they can't kill other people, but then kill people itself? It doesn't make sense to me. If it's not okay to kill, it's not okay to kill. Self defense is one thing, but killing someone in prison isn't really self defense. They're already in prison. |
|
![]() ![]() |
Master![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() What has been accomplished is that I am no longer paying for these people to be in jail. |
![]() ![]() |
Giver![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() See previous points about relative costs. You pay a lot more money for people in death penalty cases than you do when the death penalty isn't in play. If you worry about your tax dollars, then you should be opposed to capital punishment.
velocomp - 2005-12-13 1:51 PM What has been accomplished is that I am no longer paying for these people to be in jail. |
![]() ![]() |
Pro![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() crusevegas - 2005-12-13 1:45 PM When you are a convicted criminal, you lose certain right, the ability to interact with the outside world should be one of them. So, does that mean there is no such thing as rehabilitation? I'm asking in all seriousness, because it is supposed to be one of the cornerstones of western justice systems. Or do you mean just people convicted of capital crimes? Also, all this talk about how easy life is in prison makes me wonder why there is so much talk on tv and elsewhere about prison rape. It sounds like the rule (if not an implicit part of doing hard time), not the exception, and that doesn't sound to cushy to me. There is a guy up here in Canada, David Milgaard, who was convicted of murder and served around 22 years in prison until his conviction was overturned. He said he was raped incessantly. I wonder if having 3 squares, cable tv and a comfortable bed made that experience tolerable for him. |
![]() ![]() |
Elite![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() run4yrlif - 2005-12-13 9:36 AM ASA22 - 2005-12-13 1:31 PM The only thing I would urge all of you when reading about the facts of a particular case, please try to remember who is giving you those facts. I have seen the anti-death penalty side really bend the facts of the case. I urge you all, if you are truely interested in a case, to seek out the actual trial transcript. Attempt to get the full picture of what went on at the trial court level. So that's always good advice, but I'd be curious to hear what facts you think we're bending? The fact that life in prison isn't an easy one? The fact that it costs a bunch more money to execute a prisoner? The fact that we're morally convicted in our belief? The fact that Tookie did some good behind bars, more good than he's doing now that he's dead? What good has he done? If anything, he just confuses the issue. "Gangs are not your friends!" but "I won't roll over on my gang friends!" or "Gangs and Weapons are Bad!" but "I'm innocent of killing four people executioner style with my shotgun and then laughing about the gurgling sound they made afterwards!" My personal favorite is "I'm giving the proceeds of my book to a couple of non-profit organizations that nobody has heard of that want to benefit from my celebrity status" instead of "I'm going to give the money back to the very people that are clothing, feeding, and housing me while I continue to sell the lie of my innocence." His message would be a bit more palatable if he admitted what he did. |
|