Subject: RE: kaburns1214 Mentor Group 2012 Part 2 - CLOSED Ok, well after a couple of weeks rest and recovery its time for me to get back into some proper work. I've got 30 weeks until my next target race, so with that much time available I want to give HR training (especially the run) a try. I understand the principle of doing most workouts in Zone 2, but my question is what should I use for my zones. Last week I re did my LT test on the bike, (My LT raised from 152 -160, so I guess that means I'm getting fitter) But I don't want to do an all out 30 minute run. (I've been struggling with a calf injury for a long time, it seems to be right, but dont want to risk re injuring it) So what should I use as my zones for running? 220-age gives: HR/Pace label | Range data label | | 50% - 60% | 97 - 116 | | 60% - 70% | 116 - 135 | | 70% - 80% | 135 - 154 | | 80% - 90% | 154 - 174 | | 90% - 100% | 174 - 193 | |
But that gives a Z2 lower than what my LT test says it s for cycling: HR/Pace label | Range data label | | 1 - Recovery | 104 - 132 | | 2 - Extensive Endurance | 132 - 142 | | 3 - Intensive Endurance | 143 - 149 | | 4 - Sub-Threshold | 150 - 159 | | 5a - SuperThreshold | 160 - 163 | | 5b - Anaerobic Endurance | 164 - 168 | | 5c - Power | 170 - 175 | |
From what I know the run zones should be about 10-15bmp higher than the bike ones? Should I just use the bike zones for both now? |