Oscar Pistorius accidentally shoots and kills GF (Page 5)
-
No new posts
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller | Reply |
|
![]() ![]() |
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() GomesBolt - 2013-02-14 2:20 PM If the vehicle was on-fire and the rounds cooked-off, then it's not a shooting accident, it's rounds cooking-off. Accidents are easy to avoid when you just call them something else.
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() GomesBolt - 2013-02-14 1:16 PM mr2tony - 2013-02-14 12:58 PM I actually agree that there are no accidents when handling a gun, based on those rules. Yet people get shot without the shooter actually intending to shoot them all the time. Which is why I am firmly for more gun control, to keep guns out of the hands of stupid people who can't follow four simple rules. Then the weapon was pointed at something they did not intend to shoot. Therefore, a violation of the 4 safety rules. These rules are virtually infallible. I totally and completely agree. Which affirms my belief that we should better regulate who is and who isn't allowed to own a firearm. Further, I believe that anybody who shoots somebody without intending to is negligent because they were unable to follow four infallible rules and therefore can be held criminally and financially liable. |
![]() ![]() |
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() mr2tony - 2013-02-14 2:25 PM Further, I believe that anybody who shoots somebody without intending to is negligent because they were unable to follow four infallible rules and therefore can be held criminally and financially liable. Alright, four rules guys, this is your doing.
|
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() I only had one accidental discharge but it wasn't in her hair so she didn't mind. |
![]() ![]() |
Elite ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() After extensive research of the data on hand regarding Pistorius' claims, I don't think he's got a leg to stand on. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() | ![]() cgregg - 2013-02-14 1:34 PM After extensive research of the data on hand regarding Pistorius' claims, I don't think he's got a leg to stand on. You've got a one track mind.
|
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() | ![]() Goosedog - 2013-02-14 1:28 PM mr2tony - 2013-02-14 2:25 PM Further, I believe that anybody who shoots somebody without intending to is negligent because they were unable to follow four infallible rules and therefore can be held criminally and financially liable. Alright, four rules guys, this is your doing.
I'll agree with him. I'll say it now and hope like crazy I never break one of the rules and get someone hurt or worse. After years of carrying a rifle, I even pay attention to the direction my umbrella tip is pointing. Good habits are hard to break. |
![]() ![]() |
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Big Appa - 2013-02-14 2:29 PM I only had one accidental discharge but it wasn't in her hair so she didn't mind. Likely violated all four rules. Not an accident.
|
![]() ![]() |
Sensei ![]() | ![]() It's obviously up to everyone what is "reasonable"...
But I find it interesting that you can say "IF" you follow the four rules, no accidents should happen. But when people suggest that IF, there were no guns, no accidents should happen - that's unreasonable. But the four rules are reasonable. And we are discussing "if's". Because both instances won't apply. There will be no guns, and there will be people that don't follow the four rules. I'm just saying, it's easy to justify just about anything when you use "if's". We could all have weapons grade plutonium IF everyone was up to speed on proper containment protocol and had proper containment appurtenances. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() | ![]() Goosedog - 2013-02-14 1:22 PM GomesBolt - 2013-02-14 2:20 PM If the vehicle was on-fire and the rounds cooked-off, then it's not a shooting accident, it's rounds cooking-off. Accidents are easy to avoid when you just call them something else.
Shooting is a mechanical function of a gun, not imposing a condition on a round that was not designed to take that condition. Bullets thrown in a fire aren't shooting someone, the primer burns through and catches fire. That's negligence and stupidity and not covered by the 4 weapons safety rules. |
![]() ![]() |
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Kido - 2013-02-14 2:40 PM But I find it interesting that you can say "IF" you follow the four rules, no accidents should happen. The more I read the more I'm convinced that this is a battle cry, so to speak, for the purpose of supporting gun rights. Not that there's anything wrong with that, but I think it just redefines the common usage of accident.
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Sensei ![]() | ![]() GomesBolt - 2013-02-14 11:42 AM Goosedog - 2013-02-14 1:22 PM GomesBolt - 2013-02-14 2:20 PM If the vehicle was on-fire and the rounds cooked-off, then it's not a shooting accident, it's rounds cooking-off. Accidents are easy to avoid when you just call them something else.
Shooting is a mechanical function of a gun, not imposing a condition on a round that was not designed to take that condition. Bullets thrown in a fire aren't shooting someone, the primer burns through and catches fire. That's negligence and stupidity and not covered by the 4 weapons safety rules. can cooked off rounds kill someone? I think they did something on Mythbusters on that. I'm dubious because the shell casing is lighter so THAT would be the projectile - conservation of energy and all that. That's if it's LOOSE rounds cooking off. Not one in the chamber of a weapon. In that case, I can see that it could easily kill someone. |
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Goosedog - 2013-02-14 11:40 AM Big Appa - 2013-02-14 2:29 PM I only had one accidental discharge but it wasn't in her hair so she didn't mind. Likely violated all four rules. Not an accident.
Rule #4 It wasn't my finger on the trigger |
![]() ![]() |
Veteran ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() cgregg - 2013-02-14 1:34 PM After extensive research of the data on hand regarding Pistorius' claims, I don't think he's got a leg to stand on. His legal defense is not getting off on the right foot. |
![]() ![]() |
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Big Appa - 2013-02-14 2:48 PM It wasn't my finger on the trigger ![]() Different strokes.
|
![]() ![]() |
Sensei ![]() | ![]() Big Appa - 2013-02-14 11:48 AM Goosedog - 2013-02-14 11:40 AM Big Appa - 2013-02-14 2:29 PM I only had one accidental discharge but it wasn't in her hair so she didn't mind. Likely violated all four rules. Not an accident.
Rule #4 It wasn't my finger on the trigger Trigger guards are pretty small. Figures you could pull that off. |
|
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Kido - 2013-02-14 11:50 AM Big Appa - 2013-02-14 11:48 AM Goosedog - 2013-02-14 11:40 AM Big Appa - 2013-02-14 2:29 PM I only had one accidental discharge but it wasn't in her hair so she didn't mind. Likely violated all four rules. Not an accident.
Rule #4 It wasn't my finger on the trigger Trigger guards are pretty small. Figures you could pull that off. I don't care how its pulled off as long is it is. |
![]() ![]() |
Sensei ![]() | ![]() Big Appa - 2013-02-14 11:53 AM Kido - 2013-02-14 11:50 AM Big Appa - 2013-02-14 11:48 AM Goosedog - 2013-02-14 11:40 AM Big Appa - 2013-02-14 2:29 PM I only had one accidental discharge but it wasn't in her hair so she didn't mind. Likely violated all four rules. Not an accident.
Rule #4 It wasn't my finger on the trigger Trigger guards are pretty small. Figures you could pull that off. I don't care how its pulled off as long is it is. true, true |
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Goosedog - 2013-02-14 1:43 PM Kido - 2013-02-14 2:40 PM But I find it interesting that you can say "IF" you follow the four rules, no accidents should happen. The more I read the more I'm convinced that this is a battle cry, so to speak, for the purpose of supporting gun rights. Not that there's anything wrong with that, but I think it just redefines the common usage of accident.
Yes that's how I read it as well. Yet in my opinion it argues for the opposite. |
![]() ![]() |
Master![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Jackemy1 - 2013-02-14 12:18 PM jgaither - 2013-02-14 11:30 AM Jackemy1 - 2013-02-14 7:05 AM There has never been an accidental shooting. It would be very odd if this was the first. I'm pretty sure there have been accidental shootings. http://www.bigclassaction.com/lawsuit/remington-model-700-rifles-lawsuit-remington.php I think there's some cases of negligence that are so minimal as to warrant the "accident" title. Nope not even that. I think the basic gun safety rules been gone over ad nauseum. But if four basic gun safety rules are follow no one would ever be injured/killed by an unplanned discharge of a firearm. I own firearms, actually my 10 year old owns as many firearms as I do. I am a big fan of the 2A and I can comfortably say it is my opinion that anyone who thinks that any shooting death or injury could be the result of accident should not own or handle a firearm.
It boils down to opinion, I suppose. While I think you and I probably have roughly the same opinion regarding gun safety, I would say there is ALMOST never an accidental shooting. I find very few 100% "black or white" instances in real world. But just IMO.
edit: a dropped weapon can discharge at an unintended target, just as an example. Edited by jgaither 2013-02-14 2:30 PM |
![]() ![]() |
Pro ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() GomesBolt - 2013-02-14 1:20 PM Jackemy1 - 2013-02-14 1:10 PM The weapon was either off "safe" or pointed at something he did not intend to shoot (his leg) or both. Left Brain - 2013-02-14 12:39 PM You're friend admitted that?....I hope he has come up with a better story to tell in the bars when he is asked about that limp.Goosedog - 2013-02-14 12:23 PM Jackemy1 - 2013-02-14 1:18 PM I am a big fan of the 2A and I can comfortably say it is my opinion that anyone who thinks that any shooting death or injury could be the result of accident should not own or handle a firearm. Similary, if anyone thinks any injury or death could be the result of a traffic accident, they should not drive a car.
I have a buddy who was in a pretty bad traffic accident. His pistol was under his seat, discharged in the accident, and shot him in the leg. So there. If the car crash caused the weapon to change directions, caused the safety to be set to "fire" and caused the trigger to be pulled, then it would be an "accident". But it's more likely that he didn't have it on "safe" If the vehicle was on-fire and the rounds cooked-off, then it's not a shooting accident, it's rounds cooking-off. Our pistols don't have a safety. They are double action only semi-autos. Actually, you are wrong on every account. The tgrigger guard was smashed in by the impact of the accident (likely on the break pedal bar) and caused the trigger to be depressed. That's the second time in my career I've seen/heard of it happening. The first time was when one bad guy was pistol whipping another bad guy......he cracked him in the forehead with a .38 revolver. It caved in the trigger guard when it hit his forehead and shot him in the shoulder when the weapon discharged. There are lots of ways outside of the "four rules" for a weapon to discharge. My dad was also a cop....he carried a .32 in his shirt pocket as a backup. he bent ove rin our garage one day and the gun fell out and landed on the hammer, barrel pointed straight up when it went off. he figures it missed his head by 1/2 inch....said he was looking down the barrel when it went off. We all ran out when we heard the shot after hearing his car pull in.....he looked like he had seen a ghost. Edited by Left Brain 2013-02-14 2:33 PM |
|
![]() ![]() |
Elite ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Valentines day odeRoses are red violets are gloriousNever sneak up on Oscar PistoriusNow that amused me apologies |
![]() ![]() |
Elite ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() jobaxas - 2013-02-14 3:36 PM Valentines day odeRoses are red violets are gloriousNever sneak up on Oscar PistoriusNow that amused me apologies
Brilliant
|
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Brock Samson - 2013-02-14 8:27 AM Mr. Pstorius may not be the up standing guy that was portrayed this summer. BBC reporting that police had made several visits to the home for domestic disputes. Apparently Mr. Pistorius is about to be arrested for murder. Especially if they take away his legs in jail... |
![]() ![]() |
![]() | ![]() Left Brain - 2013-02-14 2:31 PM Our pistols don't have a safety. They are double action only semi-autos. Actually, you are wrong on every account. The tgrigger guard was smashed in by the impact of the accident (likely on the break pedal bar) and caused the trigger to be depressed. That's the second time in my career I've seen/heard of it happening. The first time was when one bad guy was pistol whipping another bad guy......he cracked him in the forehead with a .38 revolver. It caved in the trigger guard when it hit his forehead and shot him in the shoulder when the weapon discharged. Both of these fall under not treating every weapon like it is loaded (Treat, rule 1). There are lots of ways outside of the "four rules" for a weapon to discharge. My dad was also a cop....he carried a .32 in his shirt pocket as a backup. he bent ove rin our garage one day and the gun fell out and landed on the hammer, barrel pointed straight up when it went off. he figures it missed his head by 1/2 inch....said he was looking down the barrel when it went off. We all ran out when we heard the shot after hearing his car pull in.....he looked like he had seen a ghost. Bold comments are mine. |
|