Other Resources My Cup of Joe » TAN 45: `TANnihilating Political Threads One by One.' Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller Reply
CLOSED
 
 
of 86
 
 
2008-09-10 2:09 PM
in reply to: #1664810

User image

Champion
7931
5000200050010010010010025
Sequim, Washington
Subject: RE: TAN 45: `TANnihilating Political Threads One by One.'
Buddhabuddha - 2008-09-10 12:04 PM
grdavison - 2008-09-10 2:00 PM
wurkit_gurl - 2008-09-10 11:58 AM
mrbbrad - 2008-09-10 2:57 PM
wurkit_gurl - 2008-09-10 2:54 PM

Boobs are sacs of fat, just as a reminder

 

Sweet, luscious bags of fat

That babies suck on and your mom also has.

aaaannnnnnddddd your point is?

i heart bewbs

 

It's too bad that running is so hard on them.Frown

I want to keep my perky chest. Laughing

 

I'm top-and what a great post for it. 



Edited by mchally 2008-09-10 2:11 PM


2008-09-10 2:10 PM
in reply to: #1664791

User image

Champion
11989
500050001000500100100100100252525
Philly 'burbs
Subject: RE: TAN 45: `TANnihilating Political Threads One by One.'
grdavison - 2008-09-10 3:00 PM
wurkit_gurl - 2008-09-10 11:58 AM
mrbbrad - 2008-09-10 2:57 PM
wurkit_gurl - 2008-09-10 2:54 PM

Boobs are sacs of fat, just as a reminder

 

Sweet, luscious bags of fat

That babies suck on and your mom also has.

aaaannnnnnddddd your point is?

 what he said

2008-09-10 2:13 PM
in reply to: #1664827

User image

Pro
4456
200020001001001001002525
Eureka, Ca
Subject: RE: TAN 45: `TANnihilating Political Threads One by One.'

mchally - 2008-09-10 12:09

I want to keep my perky chest. Laughing

pics are required for these types of statements to be mad...

thanks

The Management

2008-09-10 2:14 PM
in reply to: #1664826

User image

Champion
7931
5000200050010010010010025
Sequim, Washington
Subject: RE: TAN 45: `TANnihilating Political Threads One by One.'
wurkit_gurl - 2008-09-10 12:09 PM

kraut_fan - 2008-09-10 3:06 PM was that suppose to stop us from looking at them? trust us, we know our mom has them but we are not begging to see hers. that like you thinking about your dads package next time you see a man tool... It just never crosses your mind!

Yes, but as Artemis said, they're not really all that attractive, so we don't spend a lot of time ogling random ones. We are generally only concerned with the ones belonging to men with whom we are doing naughty things.

Ditto

I will ogle guys Abs, calves, pecs etc.  not interested in ogling the 'package' (there are a few exceptions...)

2008-09-10 2:15 PM
in reply to: #1664826

User image

Champion
11989
500050001000500100100100100252525
Philly 'burbs
Subject: RE: TAN 45: `TANnihilating Political Threads One by One.'
wurkit_gurl - 2008-09-10 3:09 PM

kraut_fan - 2008-09-10 3:06 PM was that suppose to stop us from looking at them? trust us, we know our mom has them but we are not begging to see hers. that like you thinking about your dads package next time you see a man tool... It just never crosses your mind!

Yes, but as Artemis said, they're not really all that attractive, so we don't spend a lot of time ogling random ones. We are generally only concerned with the ones belonging to men with whom we are doing naughty things.

 

Aha! Maybe this is part of the problem. You see sex (and presumably sex organs) as naughty. While it may be just a commonly used term, there is real meaning behind it packed with all sorts of social and religious influences.

Sex is beautiful, as are human bodies.

2008-09-10 2:17 PM
in reply to: #1664835

User image

Champion
7931
5000200050010010010010025
Sequim, Washington
Subject: RE: TAN 45: `TANnihilating Political Threads One by One.'
grdavison - 2008-09-10 12:13 PM

mchally - 2008-09-10 12:09

I want to keep my perky chest. Laughing

pics are required for these types of statements to be mad...

thanks

The Management

I'm sad to say that I do not have any pics...and I'm bummed that I have spent time runningCry

I also lost about 20 pounds-probably a third from my chest.   I'm so blue...I bet you are too.)

I need to get to Title Nine pronto. 



2008-09-10 2:18 PM
in reply to: #1664843

User image

Science Nerd
28760
50005000500050005000200010005001001002525
Redwood City, California
Subject: RE: TAN 45: `TANnihilating Political Threads One by One.'
mrbbrad - 2008-09-10 3:15 PM
wurkit_gurl - 2008-09-10 3:09 PM

kraut_fan - 2008-09-10 3:06 PM was that suppose to stop us from looking at them? trust us, we know our mom has them but we are not begging to see hers. that like you thinking about your dads package next time you see a man tool... It just never crosses your mind!

Yes, but as Artemis said, they're not really all that attractive, so we don't spend a lot of time ogling random ones. We are generally only concerned with the ones belonging to men with whom we are doing naughty things.

 

Aha! Maybe this is part of the problem. You see sex (and presumably sex organs) as naughty. While it may be just a commonly used term, there is real meaning behind it packed with all sorts of social and religious influences.

Sex is beautiful, as are human bodies.

Naughty does not always mean bad.

2008-09-10 2:18 PM
in reply to: #1650624

User image

Extreme Veteran
928
50010010010010025
Chesapeake, VA
Subject: RE: TAN 45: `TANnihilating Political Threads One by One.'
I ogle at mine all the time and then ask every morning how it was possible that she got in bed and could have not lit the fuse on firework show? but so the saga goes on another day.

Fact is, men for some reason love boobies. all shapes and sizes. there are exceptions but I am 99% sure none of those are on BT.
2008-09-10 2:19 PM
in reply to: #1664843

Subject: RE: TAN 45: `TANnihilating Political Threads One by One.'
mrbbrad - 2008-09-10 3:15 PM
wurkit_gurl - 2008-09-10 3:09 PM

kraut_fan - 2008-09-10 3:06 PM was that suppose to stop us from looking at them? trust us, we know our mom has them but we are not begging to see hers. that like you thinking about your dads package next time you see a man tool... It just never crosses your mind!

Yes, but as Artemis said, they're not really all that attractive, so we don't spend a lot of time ogling random ones. We are generally only concerned with the ones belonging to men with whom we are doing naughty things.

 

Aha! Maybe this is part of the problem. You see sex (and presumably sex organs) as naughty. While it may be just a commonly used term, there is real meaning behind it packed with all sorts of social and religious influences.

Sex is beautiful, as are human bodies.

Actually I don't see it as naughty at all. I wasn't raised in a religious family and even though I attend church now, I'm not conservative (actually if anything I'm way less conservative than I should be) when it comes to that stuff. I was merely using a euphemism. Sex is hawt.



Edited by wurkit_gurl 2008-09-10 2:20 PM
2008-09-10 2:20 PM
in reply to: #1664856

User image

Extreme Veteran
928
50010010010010025
Chesapeake, VA
Subject: RE: TAN 45: `TANnihilating Political Threads One by One.'
wurkit_gurl - 2008-09-10 3:19 PM

Actually I don't see it as naughty at all. I wasn't raised in a religious family and even though I attend church now, I'm not conservative (actually if anything I'm way less conservative than I should be) when it comes to that stuff. I was merely using a euphemism. Sex is hawt.



But if I recall.. isn't that lacking for you right now?
2008-09-10 2:21 PM
in reply to: #1664852

User image

Champion
11989
500050001000500100100100100252525
Philly 'burbs
Subject: RE: TAN 45: `TANnihilating Political Threads One by One.'
Artemis - 2008-09-10 3:18 PM

Naughty does not always mean bad.

 

Word History: The word naughty at one time was an all-purpose word similar to bad. During the 16th century one could use naughty to mean "unhealthy, unpleasant, bad (with respect to weather), vicious (of an animal), inferior, or bad in quality" (one could say "very naughtie figes" or "naughty corrupt water". All of these senses have disappeared, however, and naughty is now used mainly in contexts involving mischief or indecency. This recalls its early days in Middle English (with the form noughti), when the word was restricted to the senses "evil, hostile, ineffectual, and needy." Middle English noughti, first recorded in the last quarter of the 14th century, was derived from nought, which primarily meant "nothing" but was also used as a noun meaning "evil" and as an adjective meaning such things as "immoral, weak, useless." Thus naughty, in a sense, has risen from nothing, but its fortunes used to be better than they are at present.


2008-09-10 2:21 PM
in reply to: #1664843

User image

Champion
7931
5000200050010010010010025
Sequim, Washington
Subject: RE: TAN 45: `TANnihilating Political Threads One by One.'
mrbbrad - 2008-09-10 12:15 PM
wurkit_gurl - 2008-09-10 3:09 PM

kraut_fan - 2008-09-10 3:06 PM was that suppose to stop us from looking at them? trust us, we know our mom has them but we are not begging to see hers. that like you thinking about your dads package next time you see a man tool... It just never crosses your mind!

Yes, but as Artemis said, they're not really all that attractive, so we don't spend a lot of time ogling random ones. We are generally only concerned with the ones belonging to men with whom we are doing naughty things.

 

Aha! Maybe this is part of the problem. You see sex (and presumably sex organs) as naughty. While it may be just a commonly used term, there is real meaning behind it packed with all sorts of social and religious influences.

Sex is beautiful, as are human bodies.

I must admit that I find some more beautiful than others.  Hence only interested it the select few...not that I have followed through on this Undecided.  The focus in on my interest.
2008-09-10 2:22 PM
in reply to: #1664858

Subject: RE: TAN 45: `TANnihilating Political Threads One by One.'
kraut_fan - 2008-09-10 3:20 PM
wurkit_gurl - 2008-09-10 3:19 PM

Actually I don't see it as naughty at all. I wasn't raised in a religious family and even though I attend church now, I'm not conservative (actually if anything I'm way less conservative than I should be) when it comes to that stuff. I was merely using a euphemism. Sex is hawt.

But if I recall.. isn't that lacking for you right now?

Yes, but it's a choice and not because I think it's bad in any way, shape or form.

2008-09-10 2:23 PM
in reply to: #1664863

User image

Slower Than You
9566
5000200020005002525
Cracklantaburbs
Subject: RE: TAN 45: `TANnihilating Political Threads One by One.'
There is no reason for me to be here any longer, aside from all the sessytalk.

I'm out.
2008-09-10 2:23 PM
in reply to: #1664856

User image

Champion
11989
500050001000500100100100100252525
Philly 'burbs
Subject: RE: TAN 45: `TANnihilating Political Threads One by One.'
wurkit_gurl - 2008-09-10 3:19 PM

 


Actually I don't see it as naughty at all. I was merely using a euphemism.

 

I realize that. My point is that it's a negative euphemism that gets used much too often and contributes to negatives ideas about sex.

2008-09-10 2:23 PM
in reply to: #1664863

Subject: RE: TAN 45: `TANnihilating Political Threads One by One.'
mchally - 2008-09-10 3:21 PM
mrbbrad - 2008-09-10 12:15 PM
wurkit_gurl - 2008-09-10 3:09 PM

kraut_fan - 2008-09-10 3:06 PM was that suppose to stop us from looking at them? trust us, we know our mom has them but we are not begging to see hers. that like you thinking about your dads package next time you see a man tool... It just never crosses your mind!

Yes, but as Artemis said, they're not really all that attractive, so we don't spend a lot of time ogling random ones. We are generally only concerned with the ones belonging to men with whom we are doing naughty things.

 

Aha! Maybe this is part of the problem. You see sex (and presumably sex organs) as naughty. While it may be just a commonly used term, there is real meaning behind it packed with all sorts of social and religious influences.

Sex is beautiful, as are human bodies.

I must admit that I find some more beautiful than others.  Hence only interested it the select few...not that I have followed through on this Undecided.  The focus in on my interest.

Haha, true dat. I can think of a few nice bodies. Particularly the US Men's Olympic Swim Team. Yom.



2008-09-10 2:24 PM
in reply to: #1664869

Subject: RE: TAN 45: `TANnihilating Political Threads One by One.'

bcart1991 - 2008-09-10 3:23 PM There is no reason for me to be here any longer, aside from all the sessytalk. I'm out.

You like the sexytalk

2008-09-10 2:24 PM
in reply to: #1650624

User image

Extreme Veteran
928
50010010010010025
Chesapeake, VA
Subject: RE: TAN 45: `TANnihilating Political Threads One by One.'
I am 99% sure no man would ever make that choice.. I will clarify. No man that has ever engaged in the act would return to that.
2008-09-10 2:24 PM
in reply to: #1664859

User image

Science Nerd
28760
50005000500050005000200010005001001002525
Redwood City, California
Subject: RE: TAN 45: `TANnihilating Political Threads One by One.'
mrbbrad - 2008-09-10 3:21 PM
Artemis - 2008-09-10 3:18 PM

Naughty does not always mean bad.

 

Word History: The word naughty at one time was an all-purpose word similar to bad. During the 16th century one could use naughty to mean "unhealthy, unpleasant, bad (with respect to weather), vicious (of an animal), inferior, or bad in quality" (one could say "very naughtie figes" or "naughty corrupt water". All of these senses have disappeared, however, and naughty is now used mainly in contexts involving mischief or indecency. This recalls its early days in Middle English (with the form noughti), when the word was restricted to the senses "evil, hostile, ineffectual, and needy." Middle English noughti, first recorded in the last quarter of the 14th century, was derived from nought, which primarily meant "nothing" but was also used as a noun meaning "evil" and as an adjective meaning such things as "immoral, weak, useless." Thus naughty, in a sense, has risen from nothing, but its fortunes used to be better than they are at present.

Blah blah...how does that counter my point at all?  All I'm saying is now people DON'T always use it to mean you did something wrong.  

2008-09-10 2:25 PM
in reply to: #1664875

Subject: RE: TAN 45: `TANnihilating Political Threads One by One.'

kraut_fan - 2008-09-10 3:24 PM I am 99% sure no man would ever make that choice.. I will clarify. No man that has ever engaged in the act would return to that.

Untrue. On both accounts.

2008-09-10 2:26 PM
in reply to: #1664876

Subject: RE: TAN 45: `TANnihilating Political Threads One by One.'
Artemis - 2008-09-10 3:24 PM
mrbbrad - 2008-09-10 3:21 PM
Artemis - 2008-09-10 3:18 PM

Naughty does not always mean bad.

 

Word History: The word naughty at one time was an all-purpose word similar to bad. During the 16th century one could use naughty to mean "unhealthy, unpleasant, bad (with respect to weather), vicious (of an animal), inferior, or bad in quality" (one could say "very naughtie figes" or "naughty corrupt water". All of these senses have disappeared, however, and naughty is now used mainly in contexts involving mischief or indecency. This recalls its early days in Middle English (with the form noughti), when the word was restricted to the senses "evil, hostile, ineffectual, and needy." Middle English noughti, first recorded in the last quarter of the 14th century, was derived from nought, which primarily meant "nothing" but was also used as a noun meaning "evil" and as an adjective meaning such things as "immoral, weak, useless." Thus naughty, in a sense, has risen from nothing, but its fortunes used to be better than they are at present.

Blah blah...how does that counter my point at all?  All I'm saying is now people DON'T always use it to mean you did something wrong.  

Exactly.



2008-09-10 2:26 PM
in reply to: #1650624

User image

Champion
7931
5000200050010010010010025
Sequim, Washington
Subject: RE: TAN 45: `TANnihilating Political Threads One by One.'
In the horny melon thread, when the subject turns to melons, the guys seem to come out of the woodwork.
2008-09-10 2:26 PM
in reply to: #1650624

User image

Extreme Veteran
928
50010010010010025
Chesapeake, VA
Subject: RE: TAN 45: `TANnihilating Political Threads One by One.'
I know that I am a newb, and I was raised by a sex therapist. call it my build in Dr. Ruth. but this is the first TAN I have been in that I was apart of my favorite topic.
2008-09-10 2:26 PM
in reply to: #1664883

User image

Science Nerd
28760
50005000500050005000200010005001001002525
Redwood City, California
Subject: RE: TAN 45: `TANnihilating Political Threads One by One.'

mchally - 2008-09-10 3:26 PM In the horny melon thread, when the subject turns to melons, the guys seem to come out of the woodwork.

I like cantaloupe, not so much honeydew. 

2008-09-10 2:28 PM
in reply to: #1664880

User image

Extreme Veteran
928
50010010010010025
Chesapeake, VA
Subject: RE: TAN 45: `TANnihilating Political Threads One by One.'
wurkit_gurl - 2008-09-10 3:25 PM

Untrue. On both accounts.



Really. by choice? I know of guys that have but usually not by choice. I did have a friend stop for 6 months ish before getting married.
New Thread
CLOSED
Other Resources My Cup of Joe » TAN 45: `TANnihilating Political Threads One by One.' Rss Feed  
 
 
of 86