General Discussion Triathlon Talk » Improving swimming efficiency Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller Reply
2011-10-11 11:09 AM

User image

Pro
9391
500020002000100100100252525
Omaha, NE
Subject: Improving swimming efficiency

My number one goal this winter is to improve my swim time.  It's not horrible, but it could use some improving for sure.
Being a gadget guy, I bought a swimovate poolmate watch so I could count laps easier and better track my workouts.  

One thing I've always noticed is that when I start out swimming I just fly through the water with very little effort and my lap times are incredible (for me).  Then after just a few short laps I slow down and my effort seems to be far greater, but my pace is easily 20 seconds a lap slower.

So, this morning I noticed on my new watch that it tracks swimming efficiency through an efficiency index.

(from their website):
THE EFFICIENCY INDEX is  the average number of strokes per 25 meters plus the average time taken to swim 25 meters. This index decreases as your efficiency increases.

less than 30          Excellent 
30-40                  Very Good 
40-50                  Above average
50-70                  Average
more than 70       Below average

On my swim this morning I did a 100m warmup at a very easy effort level.  My time was 1:37 and my efficiency score (on my watch) was a 37.  Then after several short intervals 100-200m with my efficiency score in the low 40's I did a longer swim of 500m.  The 500m, I gradually slowed like normal and my overall efficiency score was a 47 and my time was 10:26 (2:04 per 100m).

So, after all this blabbing my question is does this seem like a normal efficiency drop off due to fatigue.  Also, what is the best way to improve my "efficiency/stroke count"?  I am doing a lot of fast intervals in my training and am ramping up my swim volume this winter, but I want to make sure I'm training as efficient (pun intended) as possible.

Sorry for the long post.



2011-10-11 11:13 AM
in reply to: #3719275

User image

Veteran
820
500100100100
Omaha, NE
Subject: RE: Improving swimming efficiency

I can't answer your question, but I'm in the same boat as you. I can start and seem very efficient in the water, but the longer I swim the slower/less efficient I get and I can tell.

2011-10-11 11:21 AM
in reply to: #3719275

User image

Veteran
290
100100252525
Subject: RE: Improving swimming efficiency

I really want to be a better swimmer. Curious, do you find that your pace drops off and then evens out, or does it continue to drop through the course of the trial?

I did a 700MM TT yesterday and my splits by 50m were as follows:

55 sec, 1:01, 1:01, 1:03, 1:04, 1:02, 1:03, 1:04, 1:03 1:03 1:01 1:02 1:04 57.

I seem to fall off in pace over the first 200M but then I even out.

2011-10-11 11:43 AM
in reply to: #3719275

User image

Master
2158
20001002525
Subject: RE: Improving swimming efficiency

Interested to hear what you hear about this.

I would think that some of the inefficiency/slowdown would have to do with core strength and body placement in the water.

I know that at the end of my longer swims, I often find that I don't feel like I am "gliding" in the water as much, even though my stroke count seems about the same.

2011-10-11 11:47 AM
in reply to: #3719275

User image

Not a Coach
11473
5000500010001001001001002525
Media, PA
Subject: RE: Improving swimming efficiency
Based on that "efficiency" index, it would seem your best bet to show improvement would be to not slow down.  So, your plan for the winter sounds good.  I would try to focus on 'form' (good body position/rotation, solid catch and pull-through, etc.) especially as you move to the latter part of your intervals.  It's pretty clear that your form is breaking down given your spread from 100 to 500.  Some of that is simply endurance (form breaks down as you physically tire).  But some may be 'focus' (form breaks down as you mentally tire).  Both can be worked on by swimming more/harder.
2011-10-11 11:51 AM
in reply to: #3719346

Veteran
597
500252525
Subject: RE: Improving swimming efficiency
eliwashere - 2011-10-11 12:43 PM

Interested to hear what you hear about this.

I would think that some of the inefficiency/slowdown would have to do with core strength and body placement in the water.

I know that at the end of my longer swims, I often find that I don't feel like I am "gliding" in the water as much, even though my stroke count seems about the same.

I am no expert either but I would think this is a big part of it. If you see such a dramatic drop in efficiency something is wrong. A little ok but you seem to be losing a fair amount so you would need to look at your stroke, body position or strength. The last one can affect all 3. Try it again with the leg buoy thingy and see if it changes as this will help to keep you gliding. If efficiency stay constant then it might be core that you need to improve as during fatigue you let your body drop and therefore lose your aero water form. Something to start on anyways. Let us know how it turns out as I am curious to see what works for you



2011-10-11 12:00 PM
in reply to: #3719275

User image

Expert
898
500100100100252525
Plano, National Capital Region
Subject: RE: Improving swimming efficiency

I have a similar situation with drop off due to fatigue. Like the other 3 sports - I attribute it to lack of endurance. 

The way I'm trying to fix it is to get more volume in (especially within the same workout time).  I've also been trying to adhere to my rest periods between sets.  It's amazing how fast 15 sec rest goes by...and then you let it linger to 20 or 30 secs. 

2011-10-11 1:15 PM
in reply to: #3719275

Master
5557
50005002525
, California
Subject: RE: Improving swimming efficiency

I would think that some of the inefficiency/slowdown would have to do with core strength and body placement in the water.

This a feedback cycle.

If you drag a rope in the water, it'll stay near the surface.  Slow down and the end starts to sink.

Same thing happens to your feet.  As your arms get tired, you lose momentum and your feet are more prone to dropping lower in the water.  Which causes more drag and makes you slower... you get the idea.  This is especially true for people trying to learn a 2-beat kick.

Edit:

Both can be worked on by swimming more/harder.

x2



Edited by spudone 2011-10-11 1:16 PM
2011-10-11 4:15 PM
in reply to: #3719291

User image

Pro
9391
500020002000100100100252525
Omaha, NE
Subject: RE: Improving swimming efficiency
jimmy3993 - 2011-10-11 11:21 AM

I really want to be a better swimmer. Curious, do you find that your pace drops off and then evens out, or does it continue to drop through the course of the trial?

I did a 700MM TT yesterday and my splits by 50m were as follows:

55 sec, 1:01, 1:01, 1:03, 1:04, 1:02, 1:03, 1:04, 1:03 1:03 1:01 1:02 1:04 57.

I seem to fall off in pace over the first 200M but then I even out.

That's almost exactly what I do.  I start out at around 45-50 seconds the first two or three 50's and then gradually drop a few seconds each fifty and then level out around 1:00 - 1:05 per fifty forever.  When I'm doing long swims I shoot to stay under 1:00 and just push it hard for 25m now and again to catch back up.

2011-10-11 4:18 PM
in reply to: #3719513

User image

Pro
9391
500020002000100100100252525
Omaha, NE
Subject: RE: Improving swimming efficiency
spudone - 2011-10-11 1:15 PM

I would think that some of the inefficiency/slowdown would have to do with core strength and body placement in the water.

This a feedback cycle.

If you drag a rope in the water, it'll stay near the surface.  Slow down and the end starts to sink.

Same thing happens to your feet.  As your arms get tired, you lose momentum and your feet are more prone to dropping lower in the water.  Which causes more drag and makes you slower... you get the idea.  This is especially true for people trying to learn a 2-beat kick.

Edit:

Both can be worked on by swimming more/harder.

x2

Very good point, I hadn't thought of my feet dropping slightly causing even more resistance. 

2011-10-11 5:29 PM
in reply to: #3719275

User image

Extreme Veteran
534
50025
Herriman, Utah
Subject: RE: Improving swimming efficiency

Don't mean to hijack the thread but it's along the same topic. 

What is a "normal" stroke count per 25m? When I'm concentrating on a minimal stroke count I can only get to 17, but most times it is up to 21.  My average 100m is around 1:45 ish.



2011-10-11 7:04 PM
in reply to: #3719900


35
25
Subject: RE: Improving swimming efficiency
xatefrogg - 2011-10-11 5:29 PM

Don't mean to hijack the thread but it's along the same topic. 

What is a "normal" stroke count per 25m? When I'm concentrating on a minimal stroke count I can only get to 17, but most times it is up to 21.  My average 100m is around 1:45 ish.

That's a pretty decent stroke count... generally you want to be under 20.  Basically you should feel like you're gliding in the water, and taking the next stroke right before you slow down.  It varies based on height and other factors.

2011-10-11 7:20 PM
in reply to: #3720009

User image

Extreme Veteran
845
50010010010025
Springfield, OH
Subject: RE: Improving swimming efficiency
cartwrij - 2011-10-11 8:04 PM
xatefrogg - 2011-10-11 5:29 PM

Don't mean to hijack the thread but it's along the same topic. 

What is a "normal" stroke count per 25m? When I'm concentrating on a minimal stroke count I can only get to 17, but most times it is up to 21.  My average 100m is around 1:45 ish.

That's a pretty decent stroke count... generally you want to be under 20.  Basically you should feel like you're gliding in the water, and taking the next stroke right before you slow down.  It varies based on height and other factors.

I'll continue to maintain that true "gliding" in the water is a horrible idea.  See above regarding what happens when you slow down.  The moment you stop producing forward propulsion, you begin to slow down.  Then you have to accelerate again to get back up to the speed you were moving at before.  A very inefficient approach to swimming.  Now, if by "gliding" you mean "stretching out your stroke" and "reaching forward as far as possible before starting your pull," that's one thing, but you really should not be using the word "gliding" to describe that.  As soon as your pulling arm finishes its stroke, it should break the water surface, and at the same time your other arm should have reached it maximum forward position and begin the pull.

Gliders do not produce forward propulsion of any kind.  They glide.  Gliding isn't going to get you anywhere fast, and it's going to take you more energy to move the same distance in the same speed if you glide, versus have a continuous force pushing you forward.

2011-10-11 8:07 PM
in reply to: #3720024


35
25
Subject: RE: Improving swimming efficiency
apicek - 2011-10-11 7:20 PM

I'll continue to maintain that true "gliding" in the water is a horrible idea.  See above regarding what happens when you slow down.  The moment you stop producing forward propulsion, you begin to slow down.  Then you have to accelerate again to get back up to the speed you were moving at before.  A very inefficient approach to swimming.  Now, if by "gliding" you mean "stretching out your stroke" and "reaching forward as far as possible before starting your pull," that's one thing, but you really should not be using the word "gliding" to describe that.  As soon as your pulling arm finishes its stroke, it should break the water surface, and at the same time your other arm should have reached it maximum forward position and begin the pull.

Gliders do not produce forward propulsion of any kind.  They glide.  Gliding isn't going to get you anywhere fast, and it's going to take you more energy to move the same distance in the same speed if you glide, versus have a continuous force pushing you forward.

I guess it depends on what kind of imagery you're going for, it's always been described as gliding for me, and keeping that in mind has always helped me -- you should feel like you're not fighting the water - the sensation really should feel like a glide.  Obviously you're not taking a stroke, waiting until you stop and then taking another -- but that's also not likely going to happen for most swimmers.  Most people I've run into have the opposite problem, they're fighting the water, starting their next stroke before maximizing the utility of the previous stroke.

A drill I started doing when I got back into swimming this summer was the "catch up drill" - keep your non-pulling arm in front of you while the other arm takes a stroke and don't take the next stroke until the other arm catchs up -- wow, what a horrible description, I don't have a career as a swimming coach or author.  But basically the idea is to exaggerate maximizing the most distance out of each stroke.  This helped me a lot... also just trying to think about myself gliding through the water has helped a lot as well...

Anyway, I'm not a swim coach or even that great of a swimmer -- just what's been working for me.

2011-10-11 8:14 PM
in reply to: #3720070

User image

Extreme Veteran
845
50010010010025
Springfield, OH
Subject: RE: Improving swimming efficiency
cartwrij - 2011-10-11 9:07 PM
apicek - 2011-10-11 7:20 PM

I'll continue to maintain that true "gliding" in the water is a horrible idea.  See above regarding what happens when you slow down.  The moment you stop producing forward propulsion, you begin to slow down.  Then you have to accelerate again to get back up to the speed you were moving at before.  A very inefficient approach to swimming.  Now, if by "gliding" you mean "stretching out your stroke" and "reaching forward as far as possible before starting your pull," that's one thing, but you really should not be using the word "gliding" to describe that.  As soon as your pulling arm finishes its stroke, it should break the water surface, and at the same time your other arm should have reached it maximum forward position and begin the pull.

Gliders do not produce forward propulsion of any kind.  They glide.  Gliding isn't going to get you anywhere fast, and it's going to take you more energy to move the same distance in the same speed if you glide, versus have a continuous force pushing you forward.

I guess it depends on what kind of imagery you're going for, it's always been described as gliding for me, and keeping that in mind has always helped me -- you should feel like you're not fighting the water - the sensation really should feel like a glide.  Obviously you're not taking a stroke, waiting until you stop and then taking another -- but that's also not likely going to happen for most swimmers.  Most people I've run into have the opposite problem, they're fighting the water, starting their next stroke before maximizing the utility of the previous stroke.

A drill I started doing when I got back into swimming this summer was the "catch up drill" - keep your non-pulling arm in front of you while the other arm takes a stroke and don't take the next stroke until the other arm catchs up -- wow, what a horrible description, I don't have a career as a swimming coach or author.  But basically the idea is to exaggerate maximizing the most distance out of each stroke.  This helped me a lot... also just trying to think about myself gliding through the water has helped a lot as well...

Anyway, I'm not a swim coach or even that great of a swimmer -- just what's been working for me.

I think we're on the same page here.  I've just seen a lot of newer swimmers eager for advice hear that they need to glide more, and take it to the extreme, which results in horribly inefficient swimming.

Good video on the subject that I would generally agree with: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KILRRbCzwUE

2011-10-11 8:18 PM
in reply to: #3719275

User image

Expert
2547
200050025
The Woodlands, TX
Subject: RE: Improving swimming efficiency
tuwood - 2011-10-11 11:09 AM

My number one goal this winter is to improve my swim time.  It's not horrible, but it could use some improving for sure.
One thing I've always noticed is that when I start out swimming I just fly through the water with very little effort and my lap times are incredible (for me).  Then after just a few short laps I slow down and my effort seems to be far greater, but my pace is easily 20 seconds a lap slower.

So, this morning I noticed on my new watch that it tracks swimming efficiency through an efficiency index.

(from their website):.........snip

On my swim this morning I did a 100m warmup at a very easy effort level.  My time was 1:37 and my efficiency score (on my watch) was a 37.  Then after several short intervals 100-200m with my efficiency score in the low 40's I did a longer swim of 500m.  The 500m, I gradually slowed like normal and my overall efficiency score was a 47 and my time was 10:26 (2:04 per 100m).

So, after all this blabbing my question is does this seem like a normal efficiency drop off due to fatigue.  Also, what is the best way to improve my "efficiency/stroke count"?  I am doing a lot of fast intervals in my training and am ramping up my swim volume this winter, but I want to make sure I'm training as efficient (pun intended) as possible.

Sorry for the long post.

What is happening to you is very common. Pretty much everyone experiences it. Same thing happens to me. If you are starting out efficient and losing it, then the problem isn't form (as much), it's strength/conditioning. You showed you have the form, you just can't maintain it. if you aren't swimming big volume then those little supporting muscles fall apart pretty quickly. So go the little muscles, so go the form. The solution is painful but obvious. Swim more to get stronger. Weights also help a ton (dare I say that on this site) as long as you are specific to those supporting muscles and not just hitting bench press and other vanity machines. As they get stronger they last longer, and you efficiency holds out for longer and longer distances. The other thing that is great to do (and is actually another thread out there now) is mix up the strokes. Want to work the delts in a hurry? try some fly. Want to get chest and biceps (along with gobs of legs muscles we don't use) swim some breast. you get the idea. the #1 fastest way for me to get in shape is IM (individual medley) sets. good luck!



2011-10-11 8:47 PM
in reply to: #3720082

User image

Pro
9391
500020002000100100100252525
Omaha, NE
Subject: RE: Improving swimming efficiency
tjfry - 2011-10-11 8:18 PM
tuwood - 2011-10-11 11:09 AM

My number one goal this winter is to improve my swim time.  It's not horrible, but it could use some improving for sure.
One thing I've always noticed is that when I start out swimming I just fly through the water with very little effort and my lap times are incredible (for me).  Then after just a few short laps I slow down and my effort seems to be far greater, but my pace is easily 20 seconds a lap slower.

So, this morning I noticed on my new watch that it tracks swimming efficiency through an efficiency index.

(from their website):.........snip

On my swim this morning I did a 100m warmup at a very easy effort level.  My time was 1:37 and my efficiency score (on my watch) was a 37.  Then after several short intervals 100-200m with my efficiency score in the low 40's I did a longer swim of 500m.  The 500m, I gradually slowed like normal and my overall efficiency score was a 47 and my time was 10:26 (2:04 per 100m).

So, after all this blabbing my question is does this seem like a normal efficiency drop off due to fatigue.  Also, what is the best way to improve my "efficiency/stroke count"?  I am doing a lot of fast intervals in my training and am ramping up my swim volume this winter, but I want to make sure I'm training as efficient (pun intended) as possible.

Sorry for the long post.

What is happening to you is very common. Pretty much everyone experiences it. Same thing happens to me. If you are starting out efficient and losing it, then the problem isn't form (as much), it's strength/conditioning. You showed you have the form, you just can't maintain it. if you aren't swimming big volume then those little supporting muscles fall apart pretty quickly. So go the little muscles, so go the form. The solution is painful but obvious. Swim more to get stronger. Weights also help a ton (dare I say that on this site) as long as you are specific to those supporting muscles and not just hitting bench press and other vanity machines. As they get stronger they last longer, and you efficiency holds out for longer and longer distances. The other thing that is great to do (and is actually another thread out there now) is mix up the strokes. Want to work the delts in a hurry? try some fly. Want to get chest and biceps (along with gobs of legs muscles we don't use) swim some breast. you get the idea. the #1 fastest way for me to get in shape is IM (individual medley) sets. good luck!

Thanks TJ, that's exactly what I was looking for.

I am a huge fan of getting it right and then doing it a lot versus doing it a lot and then try to do it right.

(PS, I'm a closet ST guy, so I get the weights part.  Please don't tell)

2012-11-15 2:09 PM
in reply to: #3720082

User image

Elite
5145
500010025
Cleveland
Subject: RE: Improving swimming efficiency
tjfry - 2011-10-11 9:18 PM
tuwood - 2011-10-11 11:09 AM

My number one goal this winter is to improve my swim time.  It's not horrible, but it could use some improving for sure.
One thing I've always noticed is that when I start out swimming I just fly through the water with very little effort and my lap times are incredible (for me).  Then after just a few short laps I slow down and my effort seems to be far greater, but my pace is easily 20 seconds a lap slower.

So, this morning I noticed on my new watch that it tracks swimming efficiency through an efficiency index.

(from their website):.........snip

On my swim this morning I did a 100m warmup at a very easy effort level.  My time was 1:37 and my efficiency score (on my watch) was a 37.  Then after several short intervals 100-200m with my efficiency score in the low 40's I did a longer swim of 500m.  The 500m, I gradually slowed like normal and my overall efficiency score was a 47 and my time was 10:26 (2:04 per 100m).

So, after all this blabbing my question is does this seem like a normal efficiency drop off due to fatigue.  Also, what is the best way to improve my "efficiency/stroke count"?  I am doing a lot of fast intervals in my training and am ramping up my swim volume this winter, but I want to make sure I'm training as efficient (pun intended) as possible.

Sorry for the long post.

What is happening to you is very common. Pretty much everyone experiences it. Same thing happens to me. If you are starting out efficient and losing it, then the problem isn't form (as much), it's strength/conditioning. You showed you have the form, you just can't maintain it. if you aren't swimming big volume then those little supporting muscles fall apart pretty quickly. So go the little muscles, so go the form. The solution is painful but obvious. Swim more to get stronger. Weights also help a ton (dare I say that on this site) as long as you are specific to those supporting muscles and not just hitting bench press and other vanity machines. As they get stronger they last longer, and you efficiency holds out for longer and longer distances. The other thing that is great to do (and is actually another thread out there now) is mix up the strokes. Want to work the delts in a hurry? try some fly. Want to get chest and biceps (along with gobs of legs muscles we don't use) swim some breast. you get the idea. the #1 fastest way for me to get in shape is IM (individual medley) sets. good luck!

 

Zombeh thread lives?  Stumbled on this thread searching for info on swim efficiency scores.

 

Serious question for tjfry (or anyone else in the know) - what specific weight exercises would you recommend to improve all those little muscles?

I'm looking at revamping my weights routine in the very near future from being something that was more for body building, and am looking to tailor it to being all core + things that purely benefit all those little neglected muscle groups that support SBR.  Obviously, just swimming more will help me, but if I can hit the weights twice a week to strengthen my core and also do a little work to help the swim, then so much the better!

2012-11-15 9:59 PM
in reply to: #3720024

User image

Coach
9167
5000200020001002525
Stairway to Seven
Subject: RE: Improving swimming efficiency
The moment you stop producing forward propulsion, you begin to slow down.  Then you have to accelerate again to get back up to the speed you were moving at before.  A very inefficient approach to swimming. 
  • ..

  • As soon as your pulling arm finishes its stroke, it should break the water surface, and at the same time your other arm should have reached it maximum forward position and begin the pull.


    All swimmers speedup and slowdown during their swim, regardless of their skill level.

    Question for you that can help you decide when to time the stroke for the least differential in speed...

    Do you know when the fastest part of the freestyle stroke is? (hint, it's not when you start stroking)
    Do you know when the slowest part of the freestyle stroke is? (hint, it's not when you stop stroking)

    Yes, you begin to slow as soon as you stop creating forward acceleration...but...at what point in your stroke does the forward accelleration begin and how does this knowledge help you decide when to start the stroke and what the other arm should be doing?

    To the OP, the watch is basically doing swim golf for you, equating 1 stroke and 1 second as having equal value.

    A good or bad score will therefore depend on your height as well as your RPE for that count/speed combination. The watch cant really do that analyisis for you.

    What's a good count for your height?
    Can you achieve that count at any speed? (fast or slow)
    Can you Choose to swim that count anytime you like?
    As your skill at choosing and holding a stroke count improves, can you then manipulate your speed at that count or at a count of +1 or +2?

    The goal of full stroke swimming & efficiency is not to get the lowest stroke count, but to convert the highest percentage of your energy into forward movement.

    Humans are inherently inefficient in the water, and the biggest improvements in efficiency come from streamlining and reducing drag...hence the emphasis on SPL in some cases. If I am able to get from one end to the other in 11 strokes with a 2 beat kick at ANY speed..., even if it's very slow, I'm converting a lot of my energy into forward movement. It's a test or a drill of how well you move in the water.

    Adding speed, fluency, smoothness, rhythm and strokes to that is what creates whole stroke swimming...playing with the combinations of SPL, effort and the resultant pace is what helps you excel as a swimmer, not having a good golf score.


    Edited by AdventureBear 2012-11-15 10:01 PM
    2012-11-16 4:51 AM
    in reply to: #4499611

    User image

    Pro
    6011
    50001000
    Camp Hill, Pennsylvania
    Subject: RE: Improving swimming efficiency
    TRX suspension training is a good option, because it's time efficient (can do a full body session in about 30 minutes ),really works the smaller stability muscles, strengthens core muscles, and improves balance.
    2012-11-16 3:22 PM
    in reply to: #3719275


    1055
    10002525
    Subject: RE: Improving swimming efficiency

    That's a huge swing in times, definately a fitness issue.  As your fitness improves, you'll start to find that you will hit the wall within a couple seconds on each 100 (assuming same effort).

    Its a fun number to track, and take a mental note of it and check the trend over long periods of time, ie. weeks and months.   It will come down if you do the volume.  In the short run, just swim swim swim.  Volume is your friend.

     



    New Thread
    General Discussion Triathlon Talk » Improving swimming efficiency Rss Feed