Other Resources My Cup of Joe » Obama endorses same-sex marriage Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 18
 
 
2012-05-09 4:31 PM

User image

Sneaky Slow
8694
500020001000500100252525
Herndon, VA,
Subject: Obama endorses same-sex marriage

Lost in the arguing and ad hominem stuff going on in the NC thread was the fact that Obama came out today in support of gay marriage; the first sitting President with the guts to do so.  Predictably, religious conservatives were furious and many folks on the left were ecstatic.

Ralph Reed, a top organizer among religious conservatives, said Obama’s announcement was a “gift to the Romney campaign.”

Romney, a Mormon who has evolved to a more conservative position on hot button social issues, has struggled with his party's largely evangelical conservative base in the primaries. But Reed said Obama’s gay marriage support would help Romney in many battleground states.

“The Obama campaign doesn’t have to worry about New York and California,” Reed said. “They have to worry about Ohio, Florida and Virginia and I don’t’ see evidence that it’s a winning issue in those states.”

This might be the only accurate statement that has ever come out of Ralph Reed's piehole. I think, that especially in an election year, this shows some courage on Obama's part, taking a stand on an issue which may well cost him votes come November.

At any rate, the tide is turning. Slowly but surely, gay/lesbian marriage will be allowed everywhere in this country. It's only a matter of time. And there is little that Ralph Reed and his brethren can do to stop it.



2012-05-09 4:38 PM
in reply to: #4200646

User image

Champion
34263
500050005000500050005000200020001001002525
Chicago
Subject: RE: Obama endorses same-sex marriage
Sweet. Pretty soon I'm going to be able to marry DrewB8's dog!
2012-05-09 4:50 PM
in reply to: #4200658

User image

Melon Presser
52116
50005000500050005000500050005000500050002000100
Subject: RE: Obama endorses same-sex marriage

mr2tony - 2012-05-10 5:38 AM Sweet. Pretty soon I'm going to be able to marry DrewB8's dog!

Roll out the carpet and flowers. I wanna marry my cat AND the dog you're married to, too ... and a nice girl or boy or two. And the way things are going, I'll be able to do all that AND get the tax breaks for having a large family!

Kudos to Obama. This is THE civil rights issue of this generation and he stood up.

2012-05-09 4:56 PM
in reply to: #4200646

User image

Pro
4909
20002000500100100100100
Hailey, ID
Subject: RE: Obama endorses same-sex marriage
I'm sorry, but if anyone thinks this is more than a publicity stunt from the President, I have a bridge for sale.

2012-05-09 4:57 PM
in reply to: #4200690

User image

Expert
1566
10005002525
Prattville Insane Asylum San Antonio
Subject: RE: Obama endorses same-sex marriage
TriAya - 2012-05-09 4:50 PM

mr2tony - 2012-05-10 5:38 AM Sweet. Pretty soon I'm going to be able to marry DrewB8's dog!

Roll out the carpet and flowers. I wanna marry my cat AND the dog you're married to, too ... and a nice girl or boy or two. And the way things are going, I'll be able to do all that AND get the tax breaks for having a large family!

Kudos to Obama. This is THE civil rights issue of this generation and he stood up.

Wait what?? We can count our pets as dependents?  I have been missing out all these years! Tongue out

2012-05-09 5:03 PM
in reply to: #4200646

User image

Seattle
Subject: RE: Obama endorses same-sex marriage

Siggggh, hearing the validity of my own PRIVATE LOVE LIFE argued over is exhausting. It feels so archaic. 

Serious Kudos to Obama and all you who support it. Very much appreciated.

 



Edited by Asalzwed 2012-05-09 5:03 PM


2012-05-09 5:09 PM
in reply to: #4200712

User image

Expert
1566
10005002525
Prattville Insane Asylum San Antonio
Subject: RE: Obama endorses same-sex marriage
Asalzwed - 2012-05-09 5:03 PM

Siggggh, hearing the validity of my own PRIVATE LOVE LIFE argued over is exhausting. It feels so archaic. 

Serious Kudos to Obama and all you who support it. Very much appreciated.

 

It is archaic.  I know and love so many people who are affected by all of this on an emotional level.  It is ridiculous that we are even having to debate this as a human right.  

2012-05-09 5:10 PM
in reply to: #4200646

User image

Expert
1146
100010025
Johns Creek, Georgia
Subject: RE: Obama endorses same-sex marriage
When can I marry myself.  Of course I'll have to divorce my job as my current female wife says I'm maried to my job.  At the end of the day I'm married to my bike and love her so very much.  Though, now I think about it, if I were single I would hope all men would marry each other, free's up the buffet for guys like me.  Thinking further on it, that could be complicated.  Who were we talking about?
2012-05-09 5:19 PM
in reply to: #4200701

User image

Elite
4547
2000200050025
Subject: RE: Obama endorses same-sex marriage

bradword - 2012-05-09 5:56 PM I'm sorry, but if anyone thinks this is more than a publicity stunt from the President, I have a bridge for sale.

Really?  Why would he choose an issue that time after time costs politicians votes?  

The minute I heard the news, honestly, I thought two things.  1:  Dang, that's gutsy!  2:  Dang, he just lost the election.    

I hope I am wrong...but I have a strong feeling that May 9th, 2012 may have just pushed Mitt into the Oval Office.  

2012-05-09 5:22 PM
in reply to: #4200646

User image

Extreme Veteran
612
500100
England
Subject: RE: Obama endorses same-sex marriage
tealeaf - 2012-05-10 8:31 AM

At any rate, the tide is turning. Slowly but surely, gay/lesbian marriage will be allowed everywhere in this country. It's only a matter of time. And there is little that Ralph Reed and his brethren can do to stop it.

Agreed.  I feel for the people who are currently being affected by this discrimination but it will definitely be a non-issue within a generation or two.  Speaking as a 26 year old knowing people of all races, religions and political persuasions I do not know anybody under 35 who would actively vote against gay marriage, lots who would vote for.

2012-05-09 5:23 PM
in reply to: #4200646

User image

Pro
4675
20002000500100252525
Wisconsin near the Twin Cities metro
Subject: RE: Obama endorses same-sex marriage

tealeaf - 2012-05-09 4:31 PM

 I think, that especially in an election year, this shows some courage on Obama's part, taking a stand on an issue which may well cost him votes come November.

Hmmmm....I thought he already took a stance a few years ago when he said he was against gay marriage.  Sorry, but I'm not buying his "evolving stance" on the issue just months before an election.  For those that are against his new stance he likely isn't losing their vote because they likely wouldn't have voted for him regardless.  Maybe this gives Romney a free pass on his "evolving stance" on the abortion issue (note...I am not equating the issues of gay marriage and abortion....just the "evolving stance" approach now used by both).



Edited by Birkierunner 2012-05-09 5:25 PM


2012-05-09 5:24 PM
in reply to: #4200739

User image

Pro
6838
5000100050010010010025
Tejas
Subject: RE: Obama endorses same-sex marriage
ChineseDemocracy - 2012-05-09 5:19 PM

bradword - 2012-05-09 5:56 PM I'm sorry, but if anyone thinks this is more than a publicity stunt from the President, I have a bridge for sale.

Really?  Why would he choose an issue that time after time costs politicians votes?  

The minute I heard the news, honestly, I thought two things.  1:  Dang, that's gutsy!  2:  Dang, he just lost the election.    

I hope I am wrong...but I have a strong feeling that May 9th, 2012 may have just pushed Mitt into the Oval Office.  

 I don't see the downside for him on this. Can you elaborate? Who is it that currently supports him will not be behind him after this change of position?

2012-05-09 5:36 PM
in reply to: #4200750

User image

Seattle
Subject: RE: Obama endorses same-sex marriage
mdg2003 - 2012-05-09 5:24 PM
ChineseDemocracy - 2012-05-09 5:19 PM

bradword - 2012-05-09 5:56 PM I'm sorry, but if anyone thinks this is more than a publicity stunt from the President, I have a bridge for sale.

Really?  Why would he choose an issue that time after time costs politicians votes?  

The minute I heard the news, honestly, I thought two things.  1:  Dang, that's gutsy!  2:  Dang, he just lost the election.    

I hope I am wrong...but I have a strong feeling that May 9th, 2012 may have just pushed Mitt into the Oval Office.  

 I don't see the downside for him on this. Can you elaborate? Who is it that currently supports him will not be behind him after this change of position?

Christians. He is the only one running...

But I don't believe he just lost the election.

2012-05-09 5:40 PM
in reply to: #4200646

User image

Seattle
Subject: RE: Obama endorses same-sex marriage
I should elaborate. Christians who don't support gay marriage. I would hate to lump them all into one because I know that is not true.
2012-05-09 5:42 PM
in reply to: #4200750

User image

Expert
839
50010010010025
Central Mass
Subject: RE: Obama endorses same-sex marriage
mdg2003 - 2012-05-09 3:24 PM
ChineseDemocracy - 2012-05-09 5:19 PM

bradword - 2012-05-09 5:56 PM I'm sorry, but if anyone thinks this is more than a publicity stunt from the President, I have a bridge for sale.

Really?  Why would he choose an issue that time after time costs politicians votes?  

The minute I heard the news, honestly, I thought two things.  1:  Dang, that's gutsy!  2:  Dang, he just lost the election.    

I hope I am wrong...but I have a strong feeling that May 9th, 2012 may have just pushed Mitt into the Oval Office.  

 I don't see the downside for him on this. Can you elaborate? Who is it that currently supports him will not be behind him after this change of position?

 

Perhaps Hispanics.  And maybe religious blacks.  But are those two groups really going to vote for Romney?

2012-05-09 5:46 PM
in reply to: #4200646

User image

Champion
16151
50005000500010001002525
Checkin' out the podium girls
Subject: RE: Obama endorses same-sex marriage
Despite you position on the issue, you've got to admire the guts to declare his stance. The timing mattered less to him than the altruistic revelation of what, in his opinion, is a social wrongdoing.

Folks, that's known as leadership!


2012-05-09 5:47 PM
in reply to: #4200770

User image

Pro
6838
5000100050010010010025
Tejas
Subject: RE: Obama endorses same-sex marriage
Asalzwed - 2012-05-09 5:36 PM
mdg2003 - 2012-05-09 5:24 PM
ChineseDemocracy - 2012-05-09 5:19 PM

bradword - 2012-05-09 5:56 PM I'm sorry, but if anyone thinks this is more than a publicity stunt from the President, I have a bridge for sale.

Really?  Why would he choose an issue that time after time costs politicians votes?  

The minute I heard the news, honestly, I thought two things.  1:  Dang, that's gutsy!  2:  Dang, he just lost the election.    

I hope I am wrong...but I have a strong feeling that May 9th, 2012 may have just pushed Mitt into the Oval Office.  

 I don't see the downside for him on this. Can you elaborate? Who is it that currently supports him will not be behind him after this change of position?

Christians. He is the only one running...

But I don't believe he just lost the election.

Hehe, you're pulling my chain right?

2012-05-09 5:48 PM
in reply to: #4200750

User image

Sneaky Slow
8694
500020001000500100252525
Herndon, VA,
Subject: RE: Obama endorses same-sex marriage
mdg2003 - 2012-05-09 6:24 PM
ChineseDemocracy - 2012-05-09 5:19 PM

bradword - 2012-05-09 5:56 PM I'm sorry, but if anyone thinks this is more than a publicity stunt from the President, I have a bridge for sale.

Really?  Why would he choose an issue that time after time costs politicians votes?  

The minute I heard the news, honestly, I thought two things.  1:  Dang, that's gutsy!  2:  Dang, he just lost the election.    

I hope I am wrong...but I have a strong feeling that May 9th, 2012 may have just pushed Mitt into the Oval Office.  

 I don't see the downside for him on this. Can you elaborate? Who is it that currently supports him will not be behind him after this change of position?

African-American people tend to be more religious than whites. It's very possible that he could lose votes in this demographic.

2012-05-09 5:49 PM
in reply to: #4200750

User image

Pro
5361
50001001001002525
Subject: RE: Obama endorses same-sex marriage
mdg2003 - 2012-05-09 3:24 PM

 I don't see the downside for him on this. Can you elaborate? Who is it that currently supports him will not be behind him after this change of position?

Really?  no downside?  62% of blacks are against gay marriage.  An even higher percentage of hispanics.  it will energize the religious right base for Romney in a way that Romney hasn't been able to do.   Swing states are filled with white, working class religious men. States like Ohio could now go Romney.  North Carolina, where Obama won with a very slight margin in 2008- just overwhelmingly passed a constititional amendment banning gay marriage.

this is a huge risk for the president.  Agree or not- but this guy has balls.  I think america respects that in a president.  Someone who stands up for what he believes... although, it took him long enough.  (although- maybe he was really telling us the truth.  maybe he really has been on the fence on this one?  don't know.

sometimes it takes a leader to set the ship sailing in the right direction, even if more than half the crew disagree. 

2012-05-09 5:52 PM
in reply to: #4200799

User image

Champion
18680
50005000500020001000500100252525
Lost in the Luminiferous Aether
Subject: RE: Obama endorses same-sex marriage
tealeaf - 2012-05-09 6:48 PM
mdg2003 - 2012-05-09 6:24 PM
ChineseDemocracy - 2012-05-09 5:19 PM

bradword - 2012-05-09 5:56 PM I'm sorry, but if anyone thinks this is more than a publicity stunt from the President, I have a bridge for sale.

Really?  Why would he choose an issue that time after time costs politicians votes?  

The minute I heard the news, honestly, I thought two things.  1:  Dang, that's gutsy!  2:  Dang, he just lost the election.    

I hope I am wrong...but I have a strong feeling that May 9th, 2012 may have just pushed Mitt into the Oval Office.  

 I don't see the downside for him on this. Can you elaborate? Who is it that currently supports him will not be behind him after this change of position?

African-American people tend to be more religious than whites. It's very possible that he could lose votes in this demographic.

And they will vote overwhelmingly for him any way because race and general political leanings will trump religion

2012-05-09 5:55 PM
in reply to: #4200646

User image

Buttercup
14334
500050002000200010010010025
Subject: RE: Obama endorses same-sex marriage

That is good news, indeed.

Overdue, IMO, but good.



2012-05-09 5:56 PM
in reply to: #4200809

User image

Champion
16151
50005000500010001002525
Checkin' out the podium girls
Subject: RE: Obama endorses same-sex marriage
trinnas - 2012-05-09 6:52 PM

tealeaf - 2012-05-09 6:48 PM
mdg2003 - 2012-05-09 6:24 PM
ChineseDemocracy - 2012-05-09 5:19 PM

bradword - 2012-05-09 5:56 PM I'm sorry, but if anyone thinks this is more than a publicity stunt from the President, I have a bridge for sale.

Really?  Why would he choose an issue that time after time costs politicians votes?  

The minute I heard the news, honestly, I thought two things.  1:  Dang, that's gutsy!  2:  Dang, he just lost the election.    

I hope I am wrong...but I have a strong feeling that May 9th, 2012 may have just pushed Mitt into the Oval Office.  

 I don't see the downside for him on this. Can you elaborate? Who is it that currently supports him will not be behind him after this change of position?

African-American people tend to be more religious than whites. It's very possible that he could lose votes in this demographic.

And they will vote overwhelmingly for him any way because race and general political leanings will trump religion



And now both candidates have a religion problem.
2012-05-09 5:58 PM
in reply to: #4200646

User image

Pro
6838
5000100050010010010025
Tejas
Subject: RE: Obama endorses same-sex marriage
I don't see him losing the black vote because of this. If they are narrow minded enough to be against gay marriage, i think they will be narrow minded enough to vote for him again just because he is black. Maybe with a little less enthusiasm.
2012-05-09 5:58 PM
in reply to: #4200809

User image

Pro
5361
50001001001002525
Subject: RE: Obama endorses same-sex marriage
trinnas - 2012-05-09 3:52 PM

...And they will vote overwhelmingly for him any way because race and general political leanings will trump religion

Really?  So then how did The republican party get a lot of working class religious people to vote against their own best interest?  I believe that Karl Rove proved your statement wrong.  In a big way.

2012-05-09 5:58 PM
in reply to: #4200750

Regular
173
1002525
Subject: RE: Obama endorses same-sex marriage
mdg2003 - 2012-05-09 3:24 PM
ChineseDemocracy - 2012-05-09 5:19 PM

bradword - 2012-05-09 5:56 PM I'm sorry, but if anyone thinks this is more than a publicity stunt from the President, I have a bridge for sale.

Really?  Why would he choose an issue that time after time costs politicians votes?  

The minute I heard the news, honestly, I thought two things.  1:  Dang, that's gutsy!  2:  Dang, he just lost the election.    

I hope I am wrong...but I have a strong feeling that May 9th, 2012 may have just pushed Mitt into the Oval Office.  

 I don't see the downside for him on this. Can you elaborate? Who is it that currently supports him will not be behind him after this change of position?

Me.  Voted for Obama... will vote for Romney.

New Thread
Other Resources My Cup of Joe » Obama endorses same-sex marriage Rss Feed  
 
 
of 18