Subject: RE: Job hunting tips from the gainfully employedjgaither - 2012-05-22 9:59 AM ... Healthcare is a secondary concern, but since our healthcare is privately funded, it should probably be a primary concern. I don't really care what they do, to be honest, but that doesn't mean that I have to work with them. Ironically every one that works here (me included) is a former smoker. I think the healthcare issue is really a very slippery slope. Yes, statistically smokers have more healthcare problems. So do overweight people, and their weight is obvious walking in the door. But I myself am carrying a few more pounds than I should, yet remain very active, with no significant health issues; I never take time off for health issues (except for my kids surgeries when they needed them, and last year for my mother's surgery); but I have only taken off one day for medical problems in the last decade at least, when I had pneumonia - unrelated to any sort of lifestyle issues. One of the young guys I work with, who appears very healthy and fit, has familial hypertension. So, in his 20's, he has more health risks than I do, at nearly double his age. If a company starts to exclude smokers due to the health care concerns, then they would soon start to exclude the obese, then the overweight, then the older workers (increasing risks of age related issues like hypertension and high cholesterol, increased rates of stroke and heart disease, etc; not to mention the need to take time off for normal age related screenings like colonoscopies and mammograms); then workers with genetic/familial hypertension and high cholesterol, then people with families (who might themselves become sick or need time from workers). At some point, you only would hire orphaned single workers who are uberhealthy but not engaged in athletics (sports related injuries take away from working and cost more for healthcare). |