Other Resources My Cup of Joe » Competing and hormone therapy in men (what does BT think) Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 2
 
 
2013-05-04 1:59 PM
in reply to: #4727206

User image

Elite
6387
50001000100100100252525
Subject: RE: Competing and hormone therapy in men (what does BT think)
coredump - 2013-05-04 11:32 AM

If you have a TUE, then USADA has deemed that you are not gaining an advantage sufficient to warrant your exclusion from racing.  If you do NOT get a TUE when one is required, then yes, you are cheating.

Also, asthma meds ( rescue inhalers/beta-2 agonists ), do NOT require a TUE unless you are a nationally or internationally ranked athlete.

http://www.usada.org/tue/non-national

According to USADA policy, athletes not currently in a registered testing pool are considered Non-National Level Athletes. This group of athletes may include recreational level, Master’s level, or even elite level athletes that do not presently meet the criteria for pool inclusion. Non-National Level Athletes are not required to submit a Therapeutic Use Exemption (TUE) in advance of use in sport for certain prohibited substances. This is limited to the following substances: 

1. Substances that are prohibited only in-competition or certain sports 
2. Diuretics and other masking agents 
3. Beta-2 agonists 
4. Insulin- where the athlete can provide medical files demonstrating insulin-dependent diabetes. 

All other prohibited substances require an approved Therapeutic Use Exemption in advance of competing in order to use the substance in sport without incurring an anti-doping rule violation. 

Yes, I did actually have to look at the rules, and if you are taking beta-2 antagonists... asthma inhalers... and you get tested and pop for them, you do indeed have to show that it is a medical necessity. If it is found to be theraputic, you will them be issueed a TUE, and you will have to maintain it. You just do not need that before racing, and that is only for non-tested pools... which recreational athletes are.

Heart medicines and cold medicines are banned IN competition, which is number one. But if you use a heart medicine, or cold medicine the day of the race... you are cheating. But I'm sure nobody ever does that.



2013-05-04 2:02 PM
in reply to: #4727258

User image

Member
75
252525
Platte City
Subject: RE: Competing and hormone therapy in men (what does BT think)
Then please stay out of Usat sanctioned races. You can rationalize it however you want, its still cheating. There is no ethical gray middle ground, its white and black. I feel like a broken record saying this.I'll join what the above poster said, I'll gladly turn anyone in to officials. I have low hct since I actually train 20 hours per week. I suppose I should use epo to get my number to normal levels. It really hurts my quality of life not being able to train as hard as I should.
2013-05-04 2:06 PM
in reply to: #4727269

User image

Elite
6387
50001000100100100252525
Subject: RE: Competing and hormone therapy in men (what does BT think)

thepaul500 - 2013-05-04 1:02 PM Then please stay out of Usat sanctioned races. You can rationalize it however you want, its still cheating. There is no ethical gray middle ground, its white and black. I feel like a broken record saying this.I'll join what the above poster said, I'll gladly turn anyone in to officials. I have low hct since I actually train 20 hours per week. I suppose I should use epo to get my number to normal levels. It really hurts my quality of life not being able to train as hard as I should.

Do what ever get's you to sleep at night Bud. Sorry I don't take my hobby as seriously as you do.

 

2013-05-04 6:35 PM
in reply to: #4725965

User image

Master
3127
2000100010025
Sunny Southern Cal
Subject: RE: Competing and hormone therapy in men (what does BT think)

Not all cold medications are banned.  I've not used one while racing that I can recall, but in case my allergies were flaring up I did check on Loratidine (antihistamine) which I occasionally use and found that it is permitted in competition.

www.globaldro.com

2013-05-04 7:09 PM
in reply to: #4727495

User image

Elite
6387
50001000100100100252525
Subject: RE: Competing and hormone therapy in men (what does BT think)
SevenZulu - 2013-05-04 5:35 PM

Not all cold medications are banned.  I've not used one while racing that I can recall, but in case my allergies were flaring up I did check on Loratidine (antihistamine) which I occasionally use and found that it is permitted in competition.

www.globaldro.com

It really just depends. You have to look at the list. All the "drins" are... psuedo/ephedrine... and then some only are after a certain limit. Some inhalers are fine, but only up to a limit. It isn't complicated, you just have to look it up. But it is a lot more than anabolics... oh, and weed. You can't smoke weed. Not sure how that is a perfomance enhancer... but it is indeed CHEATING.

2013-05-05 7:28 AM
in reply to: #4727520

User image

Pro
6011
50001000
Camp Hill, Pennsylvania
Subject: RE: Competing and hormone therapy in men (what does BT think)
powerman - 2013-05-04 8:09 PM
SevenZulu - 2013-05-04 5:35 PM

Not all cold medications are banned.  I've not used one while racing that I can recall, but in case my allergies were flaring up I did check on Loratidine (antihistamine) which I occasionally use and found that it is permitted in competition.

www.globaldro.com

It really just depends. You have to look at the list. All the "drins" are... psuedo/ephedrine... and then some only are after a certain limit. Some inhalers are fine, but only up to a limit. It isn't complicated, you just have to look it up. But it is a lot more than anabolics... oh, and weed. You can't smoke weed. Not sure how that is a perfomance enhancer... but it is indeed CHEATING.

Not all of the substances that are banned are on the list because they are PED's. Some are on the list for safety reasons. You say you don't take this sport seriously enough to worry about getting a TUE, and because you're not going to be on the podium anyway. That is a rules violation. It's black and white. Where is it ok for someone who has no chance of getting on the podium and doesn't take it that seriously to knowingly violate the rules? Fins on the swim or drafting on the bike because it's the only way they could make the cutoffs? I know those are both performance benefits, so what about other rules that aren't? No bar end plugs? Headphones during the run? Even though you claim you're not getting a competitive advantage, you are. You're enhancing your performance relative to your unmedicated condition. The rules are black and white about the requirement to utilize the TUE process to determine whether that performance enhancement is unfair to the rest of the field. Not just the people on the podium, but every single participant, down to the last person across the line.


2013-05-05 9:45 AM
in reply to: #4727788

User image

Elite
6387
50001000100100100252525
Subject: RE: Competing and hormone therapy in men (what does BT think)
TriMyBest - 2013-05-05 6:28 AM  Not all of the substances that are banned are on the list because they are PED's. Some are on the list for safety reasons. You say you don't take this sport seriously enough to worry about getting a TUE, and because you're not going to be on the podium anyway. That is a rules violation. It's black and white. Where is it ok for someone who has no chance of getting on the podium and doesn't take it that seriously to knowingly violate the rules? Fins on the swim or drafting on the bike because it's the only way they could make the cutoffs? I know those are both performance benefits, so what about other rules that aren't? No bar end plugs? Headphones during the run? Even though you claim you're not getting a competitive advantage, you are. You're enhancing your performance relative to your unmedicated condition. The rules are black and white about the requirement to utilize the TUE process to determine whether that performance enhancement is unfair to the rest of the field. Not just the people on the podium, but every single participant, down to the last person across the line.

Well, I guess I asked for it.

So I started this 4 years ago. I was in a depression. Could not even put 2 thoughts together. Didn't even want to get out of bed. Go to the doc, and I was LOW. Not below average, LOW. So I started taking T, it was no light switch I assure you. Doc just put me to normal. It did help, and it has been adjusted down. So then I start doing tris. Never even dawned on me... I'm a RECREATIONAL athlete. Paying good money to do an event and give the winner a check. I didn't learn about TUEs until the second year reading a thread here. It never occured to me. I 100% feel it is theraputic, and not enhancment. I am in violation of not filing for a TUE... but the rules state I had to have one in place BEFORE I started using it, and that time is long gone. Sorry if it offends... but I just don't care.

Don't bother lecturing me on living life in a black and white world. There is not a person on this planet that follows every rule, every time, no matter what. Sometimes, when nobody is around, I do not use my turn signal to change lanes. Sometimes... I actually will go in through the out door. And I hope this does not cause a aneurysm... but sometimes, I get in the pool without showering. Surprised

Everyone makes decisions on what they are willing to do, and what level of risk they are willing to live with. Don't get too upset when somebody does not make the same decision as you. I make my choices that I can live with, and I accept the consquences for my actions. I'm not doing any races this year... and who knows, maybe if I want to do one again... I might actually not do one because of this rule... but for now, it just does not rank very high on the list of what keeps me from looking at myself in the mirror.

You know what does bother me... people that do not stay to the right except to pass. Yet pretty much the entire field does not do it. I actually do... but then I have to go further out passing other people that should be over, when there is nobody else there. But it is against the rules to pass on the right... that is an advantage, and it is a disadvantage to me because I have to go further. But do I yell at all of them for breaking the rules? No, I run MY race. That's the course, thats what I do. And the world keeps turning.

What else bothers me is that women have been using homone replacement for decades, to regulate cycles, and make up for what is lost post menopaus. Yet when I guy does it, well it's just for vanity and some sort of PED use.

My best advice to the OP is that if it bothers you, then don't do it.

2013-05-05 10:55 AM
in reply to: #4725965

User image

Elite
3091
20001000252525
Spokane, WA
Subject: RE: Competing and hormone therapy in men (what does BT think)

Thank you powerman for your honest and rational contribution to this discussion. After reading all of the haughty and angry responses you are getting, I must say that I support your position and would support you if you decided to race a USAT-sanctioned event. I think that many, if not most, of the triathlon community would also agree. As you alluded to earlier, I would safely say that most people in the community would be unaware that prescription low-T medications would be banned as PED's. I didn't know it until I opened this thread.  I did several races before I even knew what USAT was, let alone know the details of their doping policies.

In the discussion and study of ethics and morality, there is the well-known concept of Letter vs. Spirit of the Law. I think it's pretty clear that you and the OP, if he decides to take the meds and compete, are clearly within the spirit of the rule. The spirit of the rule, IMHO, is that the USAT wants to forbid participants from taking PED's to gain a competitive advantage. I feel the intention of the rule is mainly focused on the pointy end of the curve--the pro's and the elite AG'ers, those competing for money, podium and Kona spots. Sure, they don't want the MOP and BOP AG'ers to dope, because that would be stupid. There are many reasons why they don't test average AG'ers. Money being a big one, but they probably don't perceive a big problem so don't care enough to test. So I disagree with the poster who so vehemently and repeatedly proclaimed that this is black and white, there is no gray area! There is a gray area and we're staring at it.

As I said, I think that many would agree with me. Not many would post it here because they don't want the self-righteous beat down that I'll probably get--the same one powerman's been getting. But I don't care. I'll choose the side of empathy and compassion. There are those here that will proudly say that they don't care about your personal situation or background. They don't care what your doctor says. Your medical condition and your doctor's treatment plan make you ineligible. Period. Stay home.

Well, that's not me. This is a hobby for most of us, we do it for fun. If some average AG'er needs a medication to help their chances of conceiving, I say go for it and come on and race with us.



Edited by zed707 2013-05-05 11:09 AM
2013-05-05 11:24 AM
in reply to: #4725965

User image

Champion
6999
50001000500100100100100252525
Chicago, Illinois
Subject: RE: Competing and hormone therapy in men (what does BT think)

I found this interesting.

http://www.runnersworld.com/masters-training/performance-boost-or-bust

"George Mathews, former chairman of USATF's Masters Track & Field Committee, has suggested a medications-PED waiver; athletes who sign it could participate without competing for medals or championships."

Maybe part of it I do not understand.  If you use PED to win or atleast try to win you are cheating.  No one I think here would disagree with that.  If you use a PED to gain advantage and come in last then that is just stupid and been better off using the money somewhere else (since I do not think they are that cheap). 

For those who say rules are black and white remember to boycott all MPI events and services because they did not DQ a racer who obvious cheated.  

http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-854041

 

2013-05-05 12:39 PM
in reply to: #4725965

User image

Elite
6387
50001000100100100252525
Subject: RE: Competing and hormone therapy in men (what does BT think)

Thanks guys. Interesting. I would sign a waiver no sweat. I sort of thought it was implied being a RECREATIONAL athlete.

In fact, a recreational athlete should be it's own division. No prizes, no Kona spots. Nothing. If you want to compete for those things, then you have to register in an appropriate pool.

One thing that I like about triathalon is that it is geared towards me against the clock, not me against the field. And it is competition. I'm trying to do the best I can on that day. But it is just me against the clock. Me against me. That's how I see it. And yes, then I see how I did compared to the field and then my AG.... but I do not get anything for coming in 670th over 671st. "The race" itself is not the meat and potatoes, it's just the icing. It's what keeps me off the couch the 9 months prior training. I'm in it for the training and the benefits I get from that, not the 670th.

One interesting note is non-wet suit legal races. Every year my race is right at the exact cutoff... wet suit legal. But when the temp crosses the magic line... those that choose to wear a wet suit are not eligible for prizes... but wearing a wet suit is without a shadow of a doubt an advantage... at least for the crowd that will choose to wear a wet suit above legal temp it is. Some may not even finish the swim without one. Yet their place of 836, is right above 837 that had major bike mechanical problems.... yet no asterisk by their name. And it does not seem to bother anyone.

2013-05-05 2:37 PM
in reply to: #4727876

User image

Champion
6962
500010005001001001001002525
Atlanta, Ga
Subject: RE: Competing and hormone therapy in men (what does BT think)
powerman - 2013-05-05 10:45 AM

Don't bother lecturing me on living life in a black and white world. There is not a person on this planet that follows every rule, every time, no matter what. Sometimes, when nobody is around, I do not use my turn signal to change lanes. Sometimes... I actually will go in through the out door. And I hope this does not cause a aneurysm... but sometimes, I get in the pool without showering. Surprised

What else bothers me is that women have been using homone replacement for decades, to regulate cycles, and make up for what is lost post menopaus. Yet when I guy does it, well it's just for vanity and some sort of PED use.

First off, I truly thank you for your candor.  It's refreshing.  Seriously.

2 things:

The bolded above...that is UNACCEPTABLE!  If I ever see you do that I will call the cops.  Right away.  :P

Actually with female hormone replacement:  I just had to do some research into this and it actually is banned and those women that are doing it (with the typical drugs) are indeed dopers.  You're right that society is not 'willing' to say that, but pretty much every 50+ woman that is going through traditional drug aided hormone replacement therapy cannot participate in sanctioned Triathlons because they are doping.

We actually had an issue with one of the local very competitive women in the area.  She was indeed banned for 2 years.  Goes back to the quality of life vs competition paradigm. I say go with quality of life every time.



2013-05-05 4:41 PM
in reply to: #4728044

User image

Elite
6387
50001000100100100252525
Subject: RE: Competing and hormone therapy in men (what does BT think)
Marvarnett - 2013-05-05 1:37 PM
powerman - 2013-05-05 10:45 AM

Don't bother lecturing me on living life in a black and white world. There is not a person on this planet that follows every rule, every time, no matter what. Sometimes, when nobody is around, I do not use my turn signal to change lanes. Sometimes... I actually will go in through the out door. And I hope this does not cause a aneurysm... but sometimes, I get in the pool without showering. Surprised

What else bothers me is that women have been using homone replacement for decades, to regulate cycles, and make up for what is lost post menopaus. Yet when I guy does it, well it's just for vanity and some sort of PED use.

First off, I truly thank you for your candor.  It's refreshing.  Seriously.

2 things:

The bolded above...that is UNACCEPTABLE!  If I ever see you do that I will call the cops.  Right away.  :P

Actually with female hormone replacement:  I just had to do some research into this and it actually is banned and those women that are doing it (with the typical drugs) are indeed dopers.  You're right that society is not 'willing' to say that, but pretty much every 50+ woman that is going through traditional drug aided hormone replacement therapy cannot participate in sanctioned Triathlons because they are doping.

We actually had an issue with one of the local very competitive women in the area.  She was indeed banned for 2 years.  Goes back to the quality of life vs competition paradigm. I say go with quality of life every time.

You're welcome... and

I live dangerously my friend. Laughing

2013-05-06 2:46 PM
in reply to: #4725965

User image

Extreme Veteran
3177
20001000100252525
Subject: RE: Competing and hormone therapy in men (what does BT think)

So I was absent from this thread all weekend enjoying the sun and 80 degree temps in my neck of the woods. No that I am back I want to follow up a bit. Someone above mentioend how low T is a normal part of the aging process. that is true and if that is why mine was Low I might not care enough to do anything about it. However mine is low for an unknown medical reason. As a 29 year old man, I have the Testosterone level, as my doctor put it, of someone 50 years old than me. I am still not decided on doing any Tri's or not that year but I am taking the medicine for now and will see what the effects are with Monthly blood draws and other lab tests at the 3 month mark. maybe it helps, maybe it wont do anything. I don't even know what the results might be.

Regardless to me it is a big gray area and in all honesty if it was not for the fact that we were trying to start a family I would not even know it was low because this is who I am and how I have always felt. Since we had a reason to get it checked out - well now I have to deal with it and all of its aspects. Also have you looked at the paperwork for a TUE - is it really worth all the extra effort by my doctor?

2013-05-06 3:09 PM
in reply to: #4727876

User image

Master
2477
2000100100100100252525
Oceanside, California
Subject: RE: Competing and hormone therapy in men (what does BT think)
powerman - 2013-05-05 7:45 AM

What else bothers me is that women have been using homone replacement for decades, to regulate cycles, and make up for what is lost post menopaus. Yet when I guy does it, well it's just for vanity and some sort of PED use.

 

We just got the Plan B thread to die, but now it is about to be rekindled....

 

This statement just reminded me of the fact...

 

wait for it...

 

 

I hate to break it to some folks....

 

 

Not all teens on oral contraception are taking it solely for cycle regularity.

2013-05-06 3:14 PM
in reply to: #4725965

User image

Champion
6999
50001000500100100100100252525
Chicago, Illinois
Subject: RE: Competing and hormone therapy in men (what does BT think)

it would be not just for tris but for any road running race too really.  Its all sports.

Then again I probably know only know1 person who gets tested but they race to win like win big city marathons. (well smaller big cities).  Now her big thing is 100k world championships.



Edited by chirunner134 2013-05-06 3:16 PM
New Thread
Other Resources My Cup of Joe » Competing and hormone therapy in men (what does BT think) Rss Feed  
 
 
of 2