Other Resources My Cup of Joe » Cable vs. Satellite Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller Reply
2007-09-19 4:57 PM

User image

Expert
1169
10001002525
Sherman Oaks, CA
Subject: Cable vs. Satellite

Currently have Cable.  Pay $150 a month.  Includes Internet, DVR, HBO and Cinemax.

I hate the DVR.  It isn't TiVo-like.  Plus, it seems like we are paying a lot and not even getting Showtime.

 Any reason not to go with Satellite?

Thanks



2007-09-19 5:08 PM
in reply to: #971633

User image

Pro
4909
20002000500100100100100
Hailey, ID
Subject: RE: Cable vs. Satellite

I'm a big fan of Dish Network. I have HD DVR, largest channel package and all HD with 3 tvs for less than $100/month. This includes local networks also. I don't do the HBO, Skinimax or Hoetime, but those you can add on no problem.

 

Edit:  PS, let me know if you want to do dish.  I can get you a coupon that gets you free install and me like 50 bucks for referring you   PM me if you want it  



Edited by bradword 2007-09-19 5:09 PM
2007-09-19 5:48 PM
in reply to: #971633

User image

Champion
5345
500010010010025
Carlsbad, California
Subject: RE: Cable vs. Satellite

Seems like the folks that have dish are pretty darn happy with what they get. Although it does seem like it is less of a bargain than it once was.

I might suggest being careful on the iNet side though. Cable iNet has become pretty reliable and quite speedy. DSL/ISDN and Sat systems are gonna be pretty hard pressed to provide the same "Real" level of service. (At least for my cable provider)

If your iNet sucks with your cable provider, then you don't have much to lose switching it all. You can always go with DSL/ISDN in the future. I am guessing that you work from home and will probably need something more than the typical low end "Broadband" offerings.

2007-09-19 6:13 PM
in reply to: #971633

User image

Master
1914
1000500100100100100
Finally north of the Mason-Dixon Line
Subject: RE: Cable vs. Satellite

we have DISH and over all are happy... one warning is that it is weather sensitive.  storms will interfer with reception.  We have largest channel selection with local channels but also get LA channels so husband can watch his Lakers and Dodgers... plus if we miss a show in our time zone, we can dvr it for the LA time zome.

cathleen



Edited by houston-tri-mama 2007-09-19 6:13 PM
2007-09-19 6:18 PM
in reply to: #971633

User image

Master
1472
10001001001001002525
Subject: RE: Cable vs. Satellite

it is all about the interrnet for me.

Cable internet is like crack cocaine baby! I am addicted, dont you dare take it away!

2007-09-19 6:18 PM
in reply to: #971702

User image

Pro
4909
20002000500100100100100
Hailey, ID
Subject: RE: Cable vs. Satellite
houston-tri-mama - 2007-09-19 5:13 PM

we have DISH and over all are happy... one warning is that it is weather sensitive. storms will interfer with reception. We have largest channel selection with local channels but also get LA channels so husband can watch his Lakers and Dodgers... plus if we miss a show in our time zone, we can dvr it for the LA time zome.

cathleen

 

Personally I have had almost no weather problems, except blowing snow which I just brush off with a broom and all is fine.


Also I would not recommending dropping your internet.  I have cable internet at home and cable/dsl > satalite any day of the week.



2007-09-19 8:06 PM
in reply to: #971633

Subject: ...
This user's post has been ignored.
2007-09-19 8:13 PM
in reply to: #971633

Champion
5575
5000500252525
Butler
Subject: RE: Cable vs. Satellite
I have directtv with tivo and will be getting HD at the end of the year when I am eligible for equipment discount.  I am happy with what I get but have not shopped around for a better deal because I want/need the NFL sunday ticket as my team (steelers) are not local to DFW so if I want to see the games I have to pay so they have me until I can get the games some other way.
2007-09-19 8:23 PM
in reply to: #971633

Elite
3201
20001000100100
South Florida
Subject: RE: Cable vs. Satellite
I'm happy with Direct TV.  We had no cable or dish for about 5 years before we got this though so I don't have much to compare with.  It's pretty cheap and we get lots of channels with a basic package.  I am surprised with how often it goes out because of the weather though.  Not really all the time, but once in a while just a little thunderstorm will make it go out. 
2007-09-19 8:27 PM
in reply to: #971809

Champion
16151
50005000500010001002525
Checkin' out the podium girls
Subject: RE: Cable vs. Satellite
Directv for about 5 years now. 3 tv's, 1xDVR, HD = ~$90/month. The Directv DVR isn't as good as Tivo, but we want HD, so we're stuck. Wish they'd get over their pi$$ing contest and pay TIVO for the experts they are. I dropped Sunday Ticket because I'm racing every Sunday, so why pay for something you're not home to watch. VERY few weather interruptions, maybe 2x/year in the heaviest weather. I have great signal as it's aimed out over open water SSE from here. I have DSL internet; it's OK. That's more weather sensitive than the dish becuase we're sucking hind teet on the phone lines where we live. Make sure you're close to the phone equipment before committing. My sister gets fiber optic Inet and her service is outstanding. Satellite / Hughes net is outrageously expensive and not terrific either. That and Comcast = devil. They're extorsionists and I won't go back.
2007-09-20 12:02 AM
in reply to: #971633

Master
3019
20001000
West Jordan, UT
Subject: RE: Cable vs. Satellite

Do you realize you are paying $1800 a year for Cable?  I dunno about you, but that is a fair chunk of change in my house.   Get DSL for $30 and you are good.   TV sucks no matter how many channels you have.  

 

 



2007-09-20 1:50 AM
in reply to: #971633

Subject: ...
This user's post has been ignored.
2007-09-20 7:56 AM
in reply to: #971633

Sneaky Slow
8694
500020001000500100252525
Herndon, VA,
Subject: RE: Cable vs. Satellite

We had Direct TV for a couple years.  It was fine... although it was irritating when the signal would go out due to the weather.  That probably happened once every couple of weeks, in the summer.

It is not widely available, but we switched to Verizon FiOS for both TV and Internet.  Our only complaint about their TV service is that the selection of PPV movies is pathetic.  The internet service is great... it costs $5 more a month than DSL and is much much quicker.  For example, if I have a big download to do at work, I do it at home... our home connection blows away the shared T1 connection we have at work. 

2007-09-20 7:57 AM
in reply to: #971955

Sneaky Slow
8694
500020001000500100252525
Herndon, VA,
Subject: RE: Cable vs. Satellite
Lara - 2007-09-20 2:50 AM

 NOTHING can hold a candle to cable as far as speed and performance goes...

unless FiOS is available in your area. 

2007-09-20 8:10 AM
in reply to: #971633

Champion
8903
500020001000500100100100100
Subject: RE: Cable vs. Satellite

I started with Dish Network when we built our house cuz there was no cable on the new street.  I switched over to Direct TV a few years later because they had the DVR feature.  I really liked the way it worked, very intuitive.  Now I'm on Comcast cable because Satellite internet sux so bad you cannot imagine, it's barely better than dial up.  We live out in the woods a bit and DSL is not available.  the Comcast DVR is not as easy to use but I've adjusted to it.  But the internet rocks.  You save about $15 per month by combining cable TV and web than if you buy them individually.

 

2007-09-20 11:27 AM
in reply to: #971633

Master
1381
1000100100100252525
Clifton, NJ
Subject: RE: Cable vs. Satellite

it all depends on where you live and the package they're offering, but i just had to say from my experience with directtv is that they suck.

customer service was LOUSY - they charged us to move even though when we signed up we told them we'd be moving in two months and they promised to wave the fee - even though we were already customers they bombarded us with telemarketing calls to sign up to get direct tv on a daily basis AND the service went out in heavy rain and definitely during snow... we have cable now for phone, tv, internet and its all good.



2007-09-20 6:17 PM
in reply to: #972050

Expert
1169
10001002525
Sherman Oaks, CA
Subject: RE: Cable vs. Satellite

Well, like everyone said, Cable Internet is fantastic.  I just don't like the Time Warner DVR and I think the rates are high.  I don't watch that much NFL football.

 Seems like I will stick with cable.  Just don't love it. 

2007-09-20 7:00 PM
in reply to: #973380

Elite
3650
200010005001002525
Laurium, MI
Subject: RE: Cable vs. Satellite

Ditch the DVR....look in to a Home Theater PC (HTPC).

You can buy one or make one for a reasonable price.  Will let you do all the things you enjoy about DVR and more.  You want to record one show and time shift another?  Easy.  You want to automatically record and archive one show while watching (and recording or timeshifting another)?  easy.  Add another TV card and you can do three shows at once. 

You actually should be able to find some with XP media center pretty cheap about now.

2007-09-20 8:29 PM
in reply to: #973416

Pro
4909
20002000500100100100100
Hailey, ID
Subject: RE: Cable vs. Satellite

Vortmax,

 

Unless it has come a LONG way in a short time, HTPC is teh suck.  No HD recording, loud computers fan going on all the time etc.  


Dish network DVR, can record two shows in HD,  built in with the tuner and no getting viruses on your TV

2007-09-20 8:43 PM
in reply to: #973484

Elite
3650
200010005001002525
Laurium, MI
Subject: RE: Cable vs. Satellite

It's getting really close.  There are some PCIE HD tuner cards that work quite well.  The only real current issue (that I've seen) is getting two cards to work together.  In terms of noise, that isn't that big of an issue anymore either.

If the dish box can do it, why couldn't a home brew?  It's not like Dish the forefront of revolutionary technology...they don't have super special encoders or processers the world has never seen before.  The only thing they would have is DRM crap

2007-09-20 9:13 PM
in reply to: #971633

Pro
4909
20002000500100100100100
Hailey, ID
Subject: RE: Cable vs. Satellite
Then why use a crappy Micro$oft product and get a Myth TV instead


2007-09-20 9:20 PM
in reply to: #973527

Elite
3650
200010005001002525
Laurium, MI
Subject: RE: Cable vs. Satellite

Mediacenter is actually not bad....it gets along with most hardware and setup is fairly straight forward.

MythTv on the other hand......it's a royal PITA.  It took me about 4 hours to get it to work with my (non HD) tuner card and to get it to sync with the mysql database......and I'm familiar with both linux and mysql.  Now I have heard there is a version of redhat that is bundled with myth and a boatload of drivers, so it tends to be a one shot install, but I have yet to try that (mainly because I hate redhat).

2007-09-21 11:58 AM
in reply to: #971633

Subject: ...
This user's post has been ignored.
New Thread
Other Resources My Cup of Joe » Cable vs. Satellite Rss Feed