login
Size matters
-
No new posts
 2013-10-02 10:35 AM |
Pro  5755    |  Subject: Size matters |
| 2013-10-02 10:39 AM in reply to: BrianRunsPhilly |
Regular 5477 LHOTP | Subject: RE: Size matters Published in PNAS. Awesome. |
| 2013-10-02 10:41 AM in reply to: 0 |
Veteran 2842 Austin, Texas | Subject: RE: Size matters Love that it's in PNAS. Ahem... Could also have been published in The Journal of Duh. Matt ETA: Gawd, Elesa, you're even faster than I online! Edited by mcmanusclan5 2013-10-02 10:42 AM |
| 2013-10-02 10:47 AM in reply to: mcmanusclan5 |
Regular 5477 LHOTP | Subject: RE: Size matters Lol. Some things catch my attention. |
| 2013-10-02 10:53 AM in reply to: BrianRunsPhilly |
Champion 18680 Lost in the Luminiferous Aether | Subject: RE: Size matters Hmmm considering average length is around 6 inches and they studied only up to 5 inches seems like there is a rather large flaw in the experimental design. Additionally they state the benefit diminished at around 3 inches flaccid and most people know flaccid does not always have a bearing on erect status they have another, albeit small, study design flaw. |
| 2013-10-02 10:58 AM in reply to: trinnas |
Pro 5755 | Subject: RE: Size matters Originally posted by trinnas Hmmm considering average length is around 6 inches and they studied only up to 5 inches seems like there is a rather large flaw in the experimental design. Additionally they state the benefit diminished at around 3 inches flaccid and most people know flaccid does not always have a bearing on erect status they have another, albeit small, study design flaw. Perhaps you should conduct your own study |
| 2013-10-02 11:01 AM in reply to: BrianRunsPhilly |
Champion 18680 Lost in the Luminiferous Aether | Subject: RE: Size matters Originally posted by BrianRunsPhilly Originally posted by trinnas Hmmm considering average length is around 6 inches and they studied only up to 5 inches seems like there is a rather large flaw in the experimental design. Additionally they state the benefit diminished at around 3 inches flaccid and most people know flaccid does not always have a bearing on erect status they have another, albeit small, study design flaw. Perhaps you should conduct your own study Are you volunteering as a test subject? |
| 2013-10-02 11:11 AM in reply to: trinnas |
Pro 5755 | Subject: RE: Size matters Originally posted by trinnas Originally posted by BrianRunsPhilly Are you volunteering as a test subject? Originally posted by trinnas Hmmm considering average length is around 6 inches and they studied only up to 5 inches seems like there is a rather large flaw in the experimental design. Additionally they state the benefit diminished at around 3 inches flaccid and most people know flaccid does not always have a bearing on erect status they have another, albeit small, study design flaw. Perhaps you should conduct your own study Anything for science. |
| 2013-10-02 11:23 AM in reply to: BrianRunsPhilly |
Pro 6838 Tejas | Subject: RE: Size matters BT proves once again that science is definitely cool. |
| 2013-10-02 11:54 AM in reply to: trinnas |
| Chicago, IL | Subject: RE: Size matters Originally posted by trinnas Hmmm considering average length is around 6 inches and they studied only up to 5 inches seems like there is a rather large flaw in the experimental design. Additionally they state the benefit diminished at around 3 inches flaccid and most people know flaccid does not always have a bearing on erect status they have another, albeit small, study design flaw. Firstly, I loved reading the comments in this thread. Secondly, I'm guessing that since they talk about 3" flaccid earlier in the paragraph, the 5" is also in a flaccid state. Either way, if I was a test subject, I would NOT be scheduling a swim workout before the measurement. |
| 2013-10-02 12:01 PM in reply to: trinnas |
Expert 3145 Scottsdale, AZ | Subject: RE: Size matters Originally posted by trinnas Hmmm considering average length is around 6 inches and they studied only up to 5 inches seems like there is a rather large flaw in the experimental design. Additionally they state the benefit diminished at around 3 inches flaccid and most people know flaccid does not always have a bearing on erect status they have another, albeit small, study design flaw. I'm a grower not a shower. |
| 2013-10-02 2:15 PM in reply to: BrianRunsPhilly |
Master 2167 Livonia, MI | Subject: RE: Size matters Blocked by work firewall.....damn! |
| 2013-10-02 2:18 PM in reply to: noelle1230 |
Veteran 2842 Austin, Texas | Subject: RE: Size matters Originally posted by noelle1230 Blocked by work firewall.....damn! Phew - I was afraid you say, "Pics or it didn't happen." |
| 2013-10-02 2:31 PM in reply to: Brit Abroad |
| Master 1946 Memphis, TN | Subject: RE: Size matters Originally posted by Brit Abroad Originally posted by trinnas Hmmm considering average length is around 6 inches and they studied only up to 5 inches seems like there is a rather large flaw in the experimental design. Additionally they state the benefit diminished at around 3 inches flaccid and most people know flaccid does not always have a bearing on erect status they have another, albeit small, study design flaw. Firstly, I loved reading the comments in this thread. Secondly, I'm guessing that since they talk about 3" flaccid earlier in the paragraph, the 5" is also in a flaccid state. Either way, if I was a test subject, I would NOT be scheduling a swim workout before the measurement. In my best George Costanza voice "I was in the POOL" |
| 2013-10-02 3:27 PM in reply to: noelle1230 |
Pro 5755 | Subject: RE: Size matters Originally posted by noelle1230 Blocked by work firewall.....damn! See, it pays to be a scientist. This is work |
| 2013-10-03 12:14 PM in reply to: BrianRunsPhilly |
Supersonicus Idioticus 2439 Thunder Bay, ON | Subject: RE: Size matters Lol... my wife wanted to publish her work in PNAS... didn't stop bugging her for two months! |
| 2013-10-03 3:09 PM in reply to: trinnas |
Champion 11989 Philly 'burbs | Subject: RE: Size matters Originally posted by trinnas Originally posted by BrianRunsPhilly Are you volunteering as a test subject? Originally posted by trinnas Hmmm considering average length is around 6 inches and they studied only up to 5 inches seems like there is a rather large flaw in the experimental design. Additionally they state the benefit diminished at around 3 inches flaccid and most people know flaccid does not always have a bearing on erect status they have another, albeit small, study design flaw. Perhaps you should conduct your own study
[raising hand] |
| 2013-10-03 3:14 PM in reply to: BrianRunsPhilly |
Champion 11989 Philly 'burbs | Subject: RE: Size matters Also, having a big penis boosted tall men’s ratings more than it boosted short men’s ratings.
But 8" on a 5''' man looks bigger than 8" on a 6'5" man... |
|
|
|
| |||
| Does size really matter Pages: 1 2 | ||
| |||
| |||
|
|
View profile
Add to friends
Go to training log
Go to race log
Send a message
View album
CONNECT WITH FACEBOOK