Where the GOP got it wrong
-
No new posts
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller | Reply |
![]() ![]() |
![]() This user's post has been ignored. |
|
![]() ![]() |
Champion![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() I agree. |
![]() ![]() |
Champion![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() AcesFull - 2012-11-07 10:33 AM The GOP of 2012 is not the GOP of Ronald Reagan. I was talking to a girlfriend last night that has always been a pretty hardcore republican, and she was telling me how she thought she might really be a Libertarian, she just hated so much about the R campaign this year. I told her "oh, you're just a 1980s Republican, not a 2012 Republican." |
![]() ![]() |
Champion![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() gotta agree... sadly many think he wasn't conservative enough...
also if Romney would have gotten the hispanic vote that mccain did he would have actually won. When Perry jumped into the primary. Romney decided to go further right than Perry and made immigration a big part of his stand. which turned many away. Edited by Gaarryy 2012-11-07 9:47 AM |
![]() ![]() |
Master![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() X2 Not to mention the Tea Party being at fault for losing a couple of Senate seats. For example, Indiana, where the Tea Party decided to replace Senator Luger (r), a respected senator and a Foreign Policy leader, with "one of their own" (Mourdock, he of the "pregnancy from rape something God intended" fame). Results: the republicans lost a seat that wasn't considered up for grabs. Republicans need to push their fiscal conservative agenda without a social platform that basically excludes any minority, be it race, religious, or sexual orientation minority. I know a lot of "economic" republicans", myself included, that will not vote Republican unless they significantly change their social platform. |
![]() ![]() |
Champion![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Where the GOP went wrong is to say we need to fix this and fixing this means it is going to hurt for everyone not just the people we can vilify in the media. As I told a friend of mine, how do the grownups make the children eat their peas when the other side if offering them candy? The politics of envy and the cult of personality have won the day, it appears the gimmes have won. I wonder what it will cost this time.
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Elite![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() trinnas - 2012-11-07 8:48 AM Where the GOP went wrong is to say we need to fix this and fixing this means it is going to hurt for everyone not just the people we can vilify in the media. As I told a friend of mine, how do the grownups make the children eat their peas when the other side if offering them candy? The politics of envy and the cult of personality have won the day, it appears the gimmes have won. I wonder what it will cost this time.
I don't think they said it would hurt for everyone. I think campaigning on the tax cuts was seen as more of a help the rich effort. Removing the estate tax, capital gains tax, corporate income tax, etc. isn't an "everyone suffers", but more of a "the rich get help so they can all help us". I don't think that many centrist types support the trickle down policy's anymore. Edited by JoshR 2012-11-07 9:55 AM |
![]() ![]() |
Champion![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() JoshR - 2012-11-07 10:54 AM trinnas - 2012-11-07 8:48 AM Where the GOP went wrong is to say we need to fix this and fixing this means it is going to hurt for everyone not just the people we can vilify in the media. As I told a friend of mine, how do the grownups make the children eat their peas when the other side if offering them candy? The politics of envy and the cult of personality have won the day, it appears the gimmes have won. I wonder what it will cost this time.
I don't think they said it would hurt for everyone. I think campaigning on the tax cuts was seen as more of a help the rich effort. Removing the estate tax, capital gains tax, corporate income tax, etc. isn't an "everyone suffers", but more of a "the rich get help so they can all help us". I don't think that many centrist types support the trickle down policy's anymore. I was more referring to the SS and Medicare aspect of the platform. As for the tax cuts it is pretty hard to cut federal income taxes on people who don't pay any federal income taxes. Everyone seems to agree the tax code needs to be revamped but what that means to whom is a huge question. |
![]() ![]() |
Elite![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() trinnas - 2012-11-07 9:00 AM JoshR - 2012-11-07 10:54 AM trinnas - 2012-11-07 8:48 AM Where the GOP went wrong is to say we need to fix this and fixing this means it is going to hurt for everyone not just the people we can vilify in the media. As I told a friend of mine, how do the grownups make the children eat their peas when the other side if offering them candy? The politics of envy and the cult of personality have won the day, it appears the gimmes have won. I wonder what it will cost this time.
I don't think they said it would hurt for everyone. I think campaigning on the tax cuts was seen as more of a help the rich effort. Removing the estate tax, capital gains tax, corporate income tax, etc. isn't an "everyone suffers", but more of a "the rich get help so they can all help us". I don't think that many centrist types support the trickle down policy's anymore. I was more referring to the SS and Medicare aspect of the platform. As for the tax cuts it is pretty hard to cut federal income taxes on people who don't pay any federal income taxes. Everyone seems to agree the tax code needs to be revamped but what that means to whom is a huge question. I don't recall seeing any SS aspect to Romney's campaigning. What was it? |
![]() ![]() |
Champion![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() JoshR - 2012-11-07 11:10 AM trinnas - 2012-11-07 9:00 AM JoshR - 2012-11-07 10:54 AM trinnas - 2012-11-07 8:48 AM Where the GOP went wrong is to say we need to fix this and fixing this means it is going to hurt for everyone not just the people we can vilify in the media. As I told a friend of mine, how do the grownups make the children eat their peas when the other side if offering them candy? The politics of envy and the cult of personality have won the day, it appears the gimmes have won. I wonder what it will cost this time.
I don't think they said it would hurt for everyone. I think campaigning on the tax cuts was seen as more of a help the rich effort. Removing the estate tax, capital gains tax, corporate income tax, etc. isn't an "everyone suffers", but more of a "the rich get help so they can all help us". I don't think that many centrist types support the trickle down policy's anymore. I was more referring to the SS and Medicare aspect of the platform. As for the tax cuts it is pretty hard to cut federal income taxes on people who don't pay any federal income taxes. Everyone seems to agree the tax code needs to be revamped but what that means to whom is a huge question. I don't recall seeing any SS aspect to Romney's campaigning. What was it? That is because you don't live in God's Waiting room. Basically nothing changes for people over 55 then premium support for those after. |
![]() ![]() |
New user![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Question: If whites voted for Romney in the same percentages as African Americans and Hispanics voted for Obama, would Romney have won? |
|
![]() ![]() |
Champion![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() ried0428 - 2012-11-07 11:47 AM Likely yes.Question: If whites voted for Romney in the same percentages as African Americans and Hispanics voted for Obama, would Romney have won? http://www.sacbee.com/2012/11/06/4966431/2012-election-exit-poll-shows.html Here you go |
![]() ![]() |
Elite![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() It still blows my mind the TEA party gets the blame. The TEA party was started out of Ron Pauls bid for President. Paul had a huge youth following and the TEA party had nothing to do with big business Republicans.... the Repubican party just assimilated the TEA party so it could re brand itself and give the far a right a new name to oppose the far left. The original TEA party had nothing to do with social conservatives, but now that is where a lot of them dwell. The TEA party is no longer a "party", it is just a part of the GOP. |
![]() ![]() |
Pro![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() ried0428 - 2012-11-07 11:47 AM Question: If whites voted for Romney in the same percentages as African Americans and Hispanics voted for Obama, would Romney have won? Why not ask if Mormons voted for Romney in the same percentages that Protestants voted for Obama? |
![]() ![]() |
Extreme Veteran![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() trinnas - 2012-11-07 11:00 AM ried0428 - 2012-11-07 11:47 AM Likely yes.Question: If whites voted for Romney in the same percentages as African Americans and Hispanics voted for Obama, would Romney have won? http://www.sacbee.com/2012/11/06/4966431/2012-election-exit-poll-shows.html Here you go i agree. i think it's sad that all we hear from hispanic voters is that they didn't vote for Romney becuase of his immigration stance. such a large socially conservative culture not going more red is a shame. i blame Romney for his weak sales pitch (self-deportation), and i blame hispanics for letting only one issue overshadow all the other conservative issues issues they side with. this, coming from a hispanic-italian voter who's family all did't come here so legally. i understand how passionate people are about certain issues, but i can't understand how people can vote with blinders on. |
![]() ![]() |
Champion![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() antlimon166 - 2012-11-07 12:19 PM trinnas - 2012-11-07 11:00 AM ried0428 - 2012-11-07 11:47 AM Likely yes.Question: If whites voted for Romney in the same percentages as African Americans and Hispanics voted for Obama, would Romney have won? http://www.sacbee.com/2012/11/06/4966431/2012-election-exit-poll-shows.html Here you go i agree. i think it's sad that all we hear from hispanic voters is that they didn't vote for Romney becuase of his immigration stance. such a large socially conservative culture not going more red is a shame. i blame Romney for his weak sales pitch (self-deportation), and i blame hispanics for letting only one issue overshadow all the other conservative issues issues they side with. this, coming from a hispanic-italian voter who's family all did't come here so legally. i understand how passionate people are about certain issues, but i can't understand how people can vote with blinders on. I feel the same about the female vote and the supposed "GOP war on women". |
|
![]() ![]() |
Extreme Veteran![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() trinnas - 2012-11-07 11:23 AM antlimon166 - 2012-11-07 12:19 PM trinnas - 2012-11-07 11:00 AM ried0428 - 2012-11-07 11:47 AM Likely yes.Question: If whites voted for Romney in the same percentages as African Americans and Hispanics voted for Obama, would Romney have won? http://www.sacbee.com/2012/11/06/4966431/2012-election-exit-poll-shows.html Here you go i agree. i think it's sad that all we hear from hispanic voters is that they didn't vote for Romney becuase of his immigration stance. such a large socially conservative culture not going more red is a shame. i blame Romney for his weak sales pitch (self-deportation), and i blame hispanics for letting only one issue overshadow all the other conservative issues issues they side with. this, coming from a hispanic-italian voter who's family all did't come here so legally. i understand how passionate people are about certain issues, but i can't understand how people can vote with blinders on. I feel the same about the female vote and the supposed "GOP war on women". and to some extent, the gay/lesbian vote. obviously, we're talking in general here...just to clarify. |
![]() ![]() |
Champion![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() The black/Hispanic vote going overwhelmingly to Obama definitely has a “he looks like me, so I’m voting for him” element, but those two groups hardly have a monopoly on that. I’m sure Mormons voted overwhelmingly for Romney and Evangelicals for Bush. I think what it really underscores is that the demographic of the country is dramatically changing and that it’s no longer possible to win the heartland and carry the white male vote and still expect to win the national election. There were several states that were covered with red, except for the urban population centers that leaned heavily Democratic, which ended up tipping the state to the Dems. An increasingly large part of the population is shifting toward the cities, and unless the GOP can find a way to attract the urban populations, rather than just focusing on Middle America, as has been their strategy in the past, they’re going to have a tough time. It’s going to take more than just putting a brown face out in front, too. |
![]() ![]() |
New user![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() if Mormons voted for Romney in the same percentages that Protestants voted for Obama would Romney have won? No |
![]() ![]() |
Master![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Re: Gays and Hispanics. It comes down to what is more important for them at this time. I have talked to a few gay and lesbians that decided that to strive for equal rights, for their personhood to be as valuable as others as perceived by them, was more important that other factors. Unless you have been discriminated against, you cannot blame them for doing this. Same with Hispanics (I am one, entered this country legally, and now a proud citizen, but I am lucky enough to have the financial means that made the process somewhat painless). If you have family members at risk of deportation and uncertain future, or worse, you will side with the platform that is providing a solution that you find acceptable (not saying the solution is better or worse, just better for them in particular). Everybody does the same. Some people voted republican despite not agreeing with their social platform, because they liked the idea of small government, while some people voted democrat 'cause social issues trumped a possible fiscal conservative government. |