Bobby Jindhal for POTUS

New user

900

,

Subject: RE: Bobby Jindhal for POTUS

Well, at least he actually can, Hillary hasn't driven a car since 1996!

Champion

6993

Chicago, Illinois

Subject: RE: Bobby Jindhal for POTUS

my girl (who is 41) never drove a car but if she could be president I think she would do a good job.

Edited by chirunner134 2015-06-25 2:15 PM

My Race Log

Deep in the Heart of Texas

Subject: RE: Bobby Jindhal for POTUS

Our Founding Fathers never would have envisioned a President that can't drive a car.

My Race Log

Official BT Coach

18500

Indianapolis, Indiana

Gold member

Subject: RE: Bobby Jindhal for POTUS

Our founding fathers would hang their heads in sorrow and disgust at what the American political system has become.

Master

2946

Centennial, CO

Subject: RE: Bobby Jindhal for POTUS

I think it is very sad that for every democrat that bashes each and every republican candidate (hot that I am happy with the choices so far), you hear republicans bashing Sanders and Hilary. The fact is they are all clowns. Each and every one of them.

Oh and Hilary is the biggest clown out there. You can't trust her. She's never done anything good. She supports an adulterer, and well, you get the picture, we could go on and on. But the lemmings in the party just march along behind her hoping to pick up the scraps she leaves in her wake.

Again, I'm not saying you have any other options, just that a no vote would be more productive than voting for this train wreck.

My Race Log

Member

465

Subject: RE: Bobby Jindhal for POTUS

Originally posted by velocomp

I think it is very sad that for every democrat that bashes each and every republican candidate (hot that I am happy with the choices so far), you hear republicans bashing Sanders and Hilary. The fact is they are all clowns. Each and every one of them.

Oh and Hilary is the biggest clown out there. You can't trust her. She's never done anything good. She supports an adulterer, and well, you get the picture, we could go on and on. But the lemmings in the party just march along behind her hoping to pick up the scraps she leaves in her wake.

Again, I'm not saying you have any other options, just that a no vote would be more productive than voting for this train wreck.

I couldn't imagine any qualified person wanting the job. I mean, if you actually would want to be President wouldn't that prove your lack of qualifications for that job?

Master

2802

Minnetonka, Minnesota

Bronze member

Subject: RE: Bobby Jindhal for POTUS

Worst. Announcement. Ever.

Another one polling less than 5%. Good luck!

My Training Log My Race Log

Champion

6993

Chicago, Illinois

Subject: RE: Bobby Jindhal for POTUS

Well its the nature of the beast. If its your guy you only ever hear the good things if its his opponent all you hear is how bad that person is. I know we all think and say some stupid things from time to time but when that is all people focus on of course you will look very clownish.

Is Hillary standing behind her man and working out the pinnacle of good marriage? If she would left him wouldn't she be looked at as someone who did not take marriage seriously and it becomes what is wrong with marriage today.

My Race Log

Champion

7821

Brooklyn, NY

Subject: RE: Bobby Jindhal for POTUS

Originally posted by velocomp

I think it is very sad that for every democrat that bashes each and every republican candidate (hot that I am happy with the choices so far), you hear republicans bashing Sanders and Hilary. The fact is they are all clowns. Each and every one of them.

Oh and Hilary is the biggest clown out there. You can't trust her. She's never done anything good. She supports an adulterer, and well, you get the picture, we could go on and on. But the lemmings in the party just march along behind her hoping to pick up the scraps she leaves in her wake.

Again, I'm not saying you have any other options, just that a no vote would be more productive than voting for this train wreck.

It would certainly be more productive for the GOP.

Given the current GOP field, I'd vote for pretty much anyone who I thought could keep any of them out of office. I don't like Hillary much and don't know enough yet about Sanders, but unless one of the GOP candidates surprises me and comes up with a fiscally conservative platform and leaves social issues (same-sex marriage, reproductive rights, etc.) alone, I'll vote Democratic no matter who the candidate is. I'm simply not going to vote for a candidate who thinks that some Americans deserve fewer rights than other Americans just because of their sexual orientation, no matter how promising the candidate's fiscal and diplomatic platform sounds. I can accept that not everyone has the same opportunities, but everyone should have the same rights.

I'm hopeful that we aren't done with candidates entering the race and that someone will emerge who's more inspiring that this depressing bunch.

My Race Log

Pro

9391

Omaha, NE

Subject: RE: Bobby Jindhal for POTUS

Originally posted by jmk-brooklyn

Originally posted by velocomp

I think it is very sad that for every democrat that bashes each and every republican candidate (hot that I am happy with the choices so far), you hear republicans bashing Sanders and Hilary. The fact is they are all clowns. Each and every one of them.

Oh and Hilary is the biggest clown out there. You can't trust her. She's never done anything good. She supports an adulterer, and well, you get the picture, we could go on and on. But the lemmings in the party just march along behind her hoping to pick up the scraps she leaves in her wake.

Again, I'm not saying you have any other options, just that a no vote would be more productive than voting for this train wreck.

It would certainly be more productive for the GOP. Given the current GOP field, I'd vote for pretty much anyone who I thought could keep any of them out of office. I don't like Hillary much and don't know enough yet about Sanders, but unless one of the GOP candidates surprises me and comes up with a fiscally conservative platform and leaves social issues (same-sex marriage, reproductive rights, etc.) alone, I'll vote Democratic no matter who the candidate is. I'm simply not going to vote for a candidate who thinks that some Americans deserve fewer rights than other Americans just because of their sexual orientation, no matter how promising the candidate's fiscal and diplomatic platform sounds. I can accept that not everyone has the same opportunities, but everyone should have the same rights. I'm hopeful that we aren't done with candidates entering the race and that someone will emerge who's more inspiring that this depressing bunch.

Don't forget, these are just the big party clowns on both sides. There's always a chance we could get a third party/independent... I know, wishful thinking, but a guy can dream can't he.

My Race Log

Champion

7821

Brooklyn, NY

Subject: RE: Bobby Jindhal for POTUS

Originally posted by tuwood

Originally posted by jmk-brooklyn

Originally posted by velocomp

I think it is very sad that for every democrat that bashes each and every republican candidate (hot that I am happy with the choices so far), you hear republicans bashing Sanders and Hilary. The fact is they are all clowns. Each and every one of them.

Oh and Hilary is the biggest clown out there. You can't trust her. She's never done anything good. She supports an adulterer, and well, you get the picture, we could go on and on. But the lemmings in the party just march along behind her hoping to pick up the scraps she leaves in her wake.

Again, I'm not saying you have any other options, just that a no vote would be more productive than voting for this train wreck.

It would certainly be more productive for the GOP. Given the current GOP field, I'd vote for pretty much anyone who I thought could keep any of them out of office. I don't like Hillary much and don't know enough yet about Sanders, but unless one of the GOP candidates surprises me and comes up with a fiscally conservative platform and leaves social issues (same-sex marriage, reproductive rights, etc.) alone, I'll vote Democratic no matter who the candidate is. I'm simply not going to vote for a candidate who thinks that some Americans deserve fewer rights than other Americans just because of their sexual orientation, no matter how promising the candidate's fiscal and diplomatic platform sounds. I can accept that not everyone has the same opportunities, but everyone should have the same rights. I'm hopeful that we aren't done with candidates entering the race and that someone will emerge who's more inspiring that this depressing bunch.

Don't forget, these are just the big party clowns on both sides. There's always a chance we could get a third party/independent... I know, wishful thinking, but a guy can dream can't he.

I don't know if you're a Simpsons fan, but whenever I think about independant candidates, I think about that episode where the two aliens, Kang and Kodos have inhabited the bodies of Clinton and Bob Dole, essentially stealing the election for the alien overlords. And when someone suggests that they could just vote for someone other than Kang or Kodos, the aliens laugh and say, "Mwah ha hah! Go ahead-- vote for a third party candidate. Throw your vote away!!"

My Race Log

Champion

6993

Chicago, Illinois

Subject: RE: Bobby Jindhal for POTUS

Originally posted by jmk-brooklyn

I don't know if you're a Simpsons fan, but whenever I think about independant candidates, I think about that episode where the two aliens, Kang and Kodos have inhabited the bodies of Clinton and Bob Dole, essentially stealing the election for the alien overlords. And when someone suggests that they could just vote for someone other than Kang or Kodos, the aliens laugh and say, "Mwah ha hah! Go ahead-- vote for a third party candidate. Throw your vote away!!"

I love the Ross Perot response in that episode because even when you have 2 aliens trying to enslave humanity he could not win.

My Race Log

Pro

9391

Omaha, NE

Subject: RE: Bobby Jindhal for POTUS

Originally posted by jmk-brooklyn

Originally posted by tuwood

Originally posted by jmk-brooklyn

Originally posted by velocomp

I think it is very sad that for every democrat that bashes each and every republican candidate (hot that I am happy with the choices so far), you hear republicans bashing Sanders and Hilary. The fact is they are all clowns. Each and every one of them.

Oh and Hilary is the biggest clown out there. You can't trust her. She's never done anything good. She supports an adulterer, and well, you get the picture, we could go on and on. But the lemmings in the party just march along behind her hoping to pick up the scraps she leaves in her wake.

Again, I'm not saying you have any other options, just that a no vote would be more productive than voting for this train wreck.

It would certainly be more productive for the GOP. Given the current GOP field, I'd vote for pretty much anyone who I thought could keep any of them out of office. I don't like Hillary much and don't know enough yet about Sanders, but unless one of the GOP candidates surprises me and comes up with a fiscally conservative platform and leaves social issues (same-sex marriage, reproductive rights, etc.) alone, I'll vote Democratic no matter who the candidate is. I'm simply not going to vote for a candidate who thinks that some Americans deserve fewer rights than other Americans just because of their sexual orientation, no matter how promising the candidate's fiscal and diplomatic platform sounds. I can accept that not everyone has the same opportunities, but everyone should have the same rights. I'm hopeful that we aren't done with candidates entering the race and that someone will emerge who's more inspiring that this depressing bunch.

Don't forget, these are just the big party clowns on both sides. There's always a chance we could get a third party/independent... I know, wishful thinking, but a guy can dream can't he.

I don't know if you're a Simpsons fan, but whenever I think about independant candidates, I think about that episode where the two aliens, Kang and Kodos have inhabited the bodies of Clinton and Bob Dole, essentially stealing the election for the alien overlords. And when someone suggests that they could just vote for someone other than Kang or Kodos, the aliens laugh and say, "Mwah ha hah! Go ahead-- vote for a third party candidate. Throw your vote away!!"

lol, it's hard for me to think of a third party candidate as well without envisioning Ross Perot. Ironically I think from a fiscal standpoint a business leader like him would do very well, but from a social and global security standpoint it's a straight up craps shoot.

My Race Log

Veteran

275

Algonquin, IL

Subject: RE: Bobby Jindhal for POTUS

I don't know if you're a Simpsons fan, but whenever I think about independant candidates, I think about that episode where the two aliens, Kang and Kodos have inhabited the bodies of Clinton and Bob Dole, essentially stealing the election for the alien overlords. And when someone suggests that they could just vote for someone other than Kang or Kodos, the aliens laugh and say, "Mwah ha hah! Go ahead-- vote for a third party candidate. Throw your vote away!!"

I also remember them giving a campaign speech together and saying "Not matter which of us you vote for, you are doomed". That sums it up right there.

My Race Log

Pro

5761

Bartlett, TN

Subject: RE: Bobby Jindhal for POTUS

I am voting Trump, just to see how it plays out! Could be interesting and fun!

My Race Log

Champion

7821

Brooklyn, NY

Subject: RE: Bobby Jindhal for POTUS

Originally posted by jford2309

I am voting Trump, just to see how it plays out! Could be interesting and fun!

I think the Simpsons episode that most closely paralell's the Trump candidacy is the one where Burns runs for mayor and loses when Marge makes him eat the radioactive three-eyed fish.

My Race Log

Buttercup

14334

Subject: RE: Bobby Jindhal for POTUS

Empirically, it appears his campaign is over before it's started. He won't meet the criteria for being on the stage for the first GOP debate 3 weeks from today. I don't see how anyone's campaign can survive the deafening silence of being ignored.

Personally, and of no importance to anyone but me, I think the guy is a first-class kook.

Pro

9391

Omaha, NE

Subject: RE: Bobby Jindhal for POTUS

Originally posted by jeffnboise

Yaaay! We're saved!

Finally, someone can drive the clown car.

I think we're safe. Jindhal is almost dead last in the latest RCP average.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/2016_republican_presidential_nomination-3823.html

My Race Log

Pro

15655

Subject: RE: Bobby Jindhal for POTUS

I would vote for Trump just to get even with the people who voted for Obama. I'm serious.

Pro

9391

Omaha, NE

Subject: RE: Bobby Jindhal for POTUS

Originally posted by Left Brain

I would vote for Trump just to get even with the people who voted for Obama. I'm serious.

lol, you're so mean

My Race Log

Pro

15655

Subject: RE: Bobby Jindhal for POTUS

Originally posted by tuwood

Originally posted by Left Brain

I would vote for Trump just to get even with the people who voted for Obama. I'm serious.

lol, you're so mean

Nah......it stems from my sense of humor, not meanness. I just want to see the looks on my really liberal friends faces when they wake up on Wed. morning after the election and realize they've got 4 years of that lunatic.

Bobby Jindhal for POTUS

REGISTER TODAY