login
Ted
-
No new posts
|
 2012-06-29 1:40 PM |
Veteran  928    Columbus, Ohio |  Subject: TedThe trailers look hilarious. Can't wait to go see it. May have to go by myself. Just not my wifes type of humor. |
| 2012-06-29 1:47 PM in reply to: #4287225 |
Veteran 485 | Subject: RE: Ted Let us know. I heard the Mark Walberg (too lazy to google spell check) interview on Howard the other day. It sounds funny. I am actually a little more apprehensive after seeing the trailer. But no spoilers please!! Mark Wahlberg. okay..not that lazy. |
| 2012-06-29 1:55 PM in reply to: #4287238 |
Champion 6056  Menomonee Falls, WI | Subject: RE: Ted It's running 67% on Rotten Tomatoes... good but not great as their ratings go. http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/ted_2012/ |
| 2012-06-29 2:30 PM in reply to: #4287225 |
Champion 11989 Philly 'burbs | Subject: RE: Ted Just watched the unrated trailer and laughed out loud. May way for On Demand though. |
| 2012-06-29 2:40 PM in reply to: #4287238 |
Expert 1121 Chicago | Subject: RE: Ted stilgarnaib - 2012-06-29 1:47 PM Let us know. I heard the Mark Walberg (too lazy to google spell check) interview on Howard the other day. It sounds funny. I am actually a little more apprehensive after seeing the trailer. But no spoilers please!! Mark Wahlberg. okay..not that lazy. . . . yet just lazy enough not to go back and just correct the spelling in the first place . . . I am fascinated. |
| 2012-06-29 2:59 PM in reply to: #4287332 |
Veteran 485 | Subject: RE: Ted Ershk - 2012-06-29 3:40 PM stilgarnaib - 2012-06-29 1:47 PM Let us know. I heard the Mark Walberg (too lazy to google spell check) interview on Howard the other day. It sounds funny. I am actually a little more apprehensive after seeing the trailer. But no spoilers please!! Mark Wahlberg. okay..not that lazy. . . . yet just lazy enough not to go back and just correct the spelling in the first place . . . I am fascinated. I teeter |
| 2012-06-29 3:05 PM in reply to: #4287376 |
Elite 3277 Minnetonka | Subject: RE: Ted stilgarnaib - 2012-06-29 2:59 PM Ershk - 2012-06-29 3:40 PM stilgarnaib - 2012-06-29 1:47 PM Let us know. I heard the Mark Walberg (too lazy to google spell check) interview on Howard the other day. It sounds funny. I am actually a little more apprehensive after seeing the trailer. But no spoilers please!! Mark Wahlberg. okay..not that lazy. . . . yet just lazy enough not to go back and just correct the spelling in the first place . . . I am fascinated. I teeter I totter.. |
| 2012-06-29 3:10 PM in reply to: #4287380 |
Master 1793 Essex Jct, VT | Subject: RE: Ted SoberTriGuy - 2012-06-29 4:05 PM stilgarnaib - 2012-06-29 2:59 PM Ershk - 2012-06-29 3:40 PM stilgarnaib - 2012-06-29 1:47 PM Let us know. I heard the Mark Walberg (too lazy to google spell check) interview on Howard the other day. It sounds funny. I am actually a little more apprehensive after seeing the trailer. But no spoilers please!! Mark Wahlberg. okay..not that lazy. . . . yet just lazy enough not to go back and just correct the spelling in the first place . . . I am fascinated. I teeter I totter.. ...but I don't fall down. |
| 2012-06-29 3:16 PM in reply to: #4287385 |
Veteran 485 | Subject: RE: Ted rsmoylan - 2012-06-29 4:10 PM SoberTriGuy - 2012-06-29 4:05 PM stilgarnaib - 2012-06-29 2:59 PM Ershk - 2012-06-29 3:40 PM stilgarnaib - 2012-06-29 1:47 PM Let us know. I heard the Mark Walberg (too lazy to google spell check) interview on Howard the other day. It sounds funny. I am actually a little more apprehensive after seeing the trailer. But no spoilers please!! Mark Wahlberg. okay..not that lazy. . . . yet just lazy enough not to go back and just correct the spelling in the first place . . . I am fascinated. I teeter I totter.. ...but I don't fall down. Weeble Wobble? or Ashes to Ashes? |
| 2012-06-29 3:18 PM in reply to: #4287376 |
Expert 1121 Chicago | Subject: RE: Ted stilgarnaib - 2012-06-29 2:59 PM Ershk - 2012-06-29 3:40 PM stilgarnaib - 2012-06-29 1:47 PM Let us know. I heard the Mark Walberg (too lazy to google spell check) interview on Howard the other day. It sounds funny. I am actually a little more apprehensive after seeing the trailer. But no spoilers please!! Mark Wahlberg. okay..not that lazy. . . . yet just lazy enough not to go back and just correct the spelling in the first place . . . I am fascinated. I teeter Lazergy?! (part laziness, part energy . . . or maybe the unique state where one is lazy for anything truly productive but has energy for anything that isn't . . . even better, energy solely for things that divert oneself from being productive - Lazergy!) Edited by Ershk 2012-06-29 3:23 PM |
| 2012-06-29 3:21 PM in reply to: #4287405 |
Veteran 485 | Subject: RE: Ted Ershk - 2012-06-29 4:18 PM stilgarnaib - 2012-06-29 2:59 PM Ershk - 2012-06-29 3:40 PM stilgarnaib - 2012-06-29 1:47 PM Let us know. I heard the Mark Walberg (too lazy to google spell check) interview on Howard the other day. It sounds funny. I am actually a little more apprehensive after seeing the trailer. But no spoilers please!! Mark Wahlberg. okay..not that lazy. . . . yet just lazy enough not to go back and just correct the spelling in the first place . . . I am fascinated. I teeter Lazergy?! (part laziness, part energy . . . or maybe the unique state where one is lazy for anything truly productive but has energy for anything that isn't . . . even better, energy solely for things that diverts oneself from being productive - Lazergy!) I have to say sir, that I like it! |
| 2012-06-29 3:22 PM in reply to: #4287413 |
Veteran 485 | Subject: RE: Ted I am bored...going home...start my weekend...hot bike and run this weekend...yay. Hijack over. Go see ted. |
| 2012-06-29 5:39 PM in reply to: #4287225 |
Pro 6520 Bellingham, WA | Subject: RE: Ted My six year old is really pressing me to take him to see. His favorite show on TV is Family Guy which from what I understand falls into same type of crude humor. Most of it just goes over his head so would I be viewed as a bad pops if I take him? I do not like him to see nudity so if it has any of that it would be a deal breaker. |
| 2012-06-29 5:49 PM in reply to: #4287225 |
Expert 1566 Prattville Insane Asylum San Antonio | Subject: RE: Ted It is rated R, but not sure if there is nudity or just the suggestion of it. I know you can look up on IMDB why the rating was given. They tell you specific scenes from the movie not just generalizations. We did this when we took the kids to see the Avengers. It does look hilarious though, I love Family Guy! |
| 2012-06-29 6:05 PM in reply to: #4287662 |
Pro 6520 Bellingham, WA | Subject: RE: Ted ecozenmama - 2012-06-29 3:49 PM It is rated R, but not sure if there is nudity or just the suggestion of it. I know you can look up on IMDB why the rating was given. They tell you specific scenes from the movie not just generalizations. We did this when we took the kids to see the Avengers. It does look hilarious though, I love Family Guy! Thanks for the IMDB suggestion. I think we'll wait until it comes out on Netflix (shouldn't be too long) so I can fast forward a few of the questionable scenes. |
| 2012-06-29 6:14 PM in reply to: #4287225 |
Veteran 928 Columbus, Ohio | Subject: RE: Ted Is it true that Seth McFarland was supposed to be on one of the 9/11 flights, but missed it due to a hangover? |
| 2012-06-30 9:55 AM in reply to: #4287682 |
Veteran 485 | Subject: RE: Ted jacasa - 2012-06-29 7:14 PMIs it true that Seth McFarland was supposed to be on one of the 9/11 flights, but missed it due to a hangover? I think I heard the same thing (also on Howard) |
| 2012-06-30 10:25 AM in reply to: #4288077 |
Expert 1566 Prattville Insane Asylum San Antonio | Subject: RE: Ted stilgarnaib - 2012-06-30 9:55 AM jacasa - 2012-06-29 7:14 PMIs it true that Seth McFarland was supposed to be on one of the 9/11 flights, but missed it due to a hangover? I think I heard the same thing (also on Howard) I also heard Mark Wahlberg was supposed to be on one of those too. Weird. |
| 2012-06-30 11:48 AM in reply to: #4287648 |
Veteran 1019 St. Louis | Subject: RE: Ted popsracer - 2012-06-29 5:39 PMMy six year old is really pressing me to take him to see. His favorite show on TV is Family Guy which from what I understand falls into same type of crude humor. Most of it just goes over his head so would I be viewed as a bad pops if I take him? I do not like him to see nudity so if it has any of that it would be a deal breaker. There is some topless-ness. But Ted draws on her to make it look like something else if that makes it any better. But really, probably should leave the boy home for this one. |
| 2012-06-30 11:52 AM in reply to: #4288101 |
Veteran 1019 St. Louis | Subject: RE: Ted ecozenmama - 2012-06-30 10:25 AM Seth MacFarlane was supposed to be on flight 11. Mark Wahlberg wasn't, but caught a lot of heat for saying that if he had been on one of the flights, things would have ended differently. He basically said that first class would have been covered in blood, then he would have safely landed the plane. Or something like that. stilgarnaib - 2012-06-30 9:55 AM jacasa - 2012-06-29 7:14 PMIs it true that Seth McFarland was supposed to be on one of the 9/11 flights, but missed it due to a hangover? I think I heard the same thing (also on Howard) I also heard Mark Wahlberg was supposed to be on one of those too. Weird. |
| 2012-06-30 7:23 PM in reply to: #4288176 |
Expert 1566 Prattville Insane Asylum San Antonio | Subject: RE: Ted kevin_trapp - 2012-06-30 11:52 AM ecozenmama - 2012-06-30 10:25 AM Seth MacFarlane was supposed to be on flight 11. Mark Wahlberg wasn't, but caught a lot of heat for saying that if he had been on one of the flights, things would have ended differently. He basically said that first class would have been covered in blood, then he would have safely landed the plane. Or something like that. stilgarnaib - 2012-06-30 9:55 AM jacasa - 2012-06-29 7:14 PMIs it true that Seth McFarland was supposed to be on one of the 9/11 flights, but missed it due to a hangover? I think I heard the same thing (also on Howard) I also heard Mark Wahlberg was supposed to be on one of those too. Weird. Oh, that must be what it was I heard. Thanks for clearing it up! I remember him speaking about it. |
| 2012-06-30 8:33 PM in reply to: #4287225 |
Veteran 928 Columbus, Ohio | Subject: RE: Ted Saw the movie tonight. F-ing hilarious. If you like Family Guy, you will like Ted. Actually need to go again because I was laughing so hard I missed half of the lines. My poor wife was embarrassed by me, but she actually laughed a few times also. |
| 2012-07-01 12:53 PM in reply to: #4287225 |
Got Wahoo? 5423 San Antonio | Subject: RE: Ted I thought this was going to be about Ted talks. |
| 2012-07-01 1:04 PM in reply to: #4289187 |
Elite 3972 Reno | Subject: RE: Ted tmwelshy - 2012-07-01 12:53 PM I thought this was going to be about Ted talks. me too! It reminded me to go watch some..... http://www.ted.com/talks/dan_gilbert_asks_why_are_we_happy.html Edited by bootygirl 2012-07-01 1:07 PM |
| 2012-07-01 3:14 PM in reply to: #4287675 |
Champion 6503 NOVA - Ironic for an Endurance Athlete | Subject: RE: Ted Went to see it with the wife. I haven't heard the F Bomb so many times before in 120 minutes. Funny. My IQ went down by 3 points. Worth it, though! |
|
|
|
|
View profile
Add to friends
Go to training log
Go to race log
Send a message
View album
CONNECT WITH FACEBOOK