IMKY Start Protocol...
-
No new posts
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller | Reply |
|
![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Just for the record, I do not like the IMKY individual swim start protocol they use. I understand why they do it but I think they should either do wave starts or move the race location. Having qualified that, I heard on the IM Talk podcast today that IMKY has 3000 entrants. Is that correct? Also that the race cutoff time is still 17 hours. So if they have so many people, how long will it take to get them all started in the swim and will anyone who is concerned about the cutoff need to start more towards the front of the swim in order to make it but where they are likely to be run over by faster people? Sounds like a complete mess. |
|
![]() ![]() |
Expert ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() I agree, it needs to be a mass start. . . It is stupid (yes, stupid) that it is still a Time Trial start. . only reason is the first year the current was so fast that they did it for safety reasons I guess, and just decided to stick with it for 2008 and now into 2009. |
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() I did a sprint tri this morning in the TN river and it was a TT start on 5 second intervals. I have done this race 7 times over the years and love the TT start format. I've also done IMKY twice and had wonderful swim experiences. I've done an Oly tri in Chattanooga a couple of years in the TN river and it too is a TT start. Logistically it's difficult to do a mass start in a river with a current. In Louisville they were going to have barges in the river to jump off of. I'm sure this is not cheap and probably requires special permits from the Corp of Engineer or whomever regulates traffic on the river. I've never done a mass-start IM but from what I've read, it introduces an unecessay risk of getting kicked in the face. I've done a HIM that had AG wave starts and I don't see much differnece in that and a TT start. It certainly reduced the washing machine of bodies all vieing for postion. I'm not worried about getting kicked in the head as I've been in enough fights in my life to know my head can take quite a pounding. But I'm a big guy and have a lot of power in my kick and I worry about kicking some gal right in the face and either knocking her out, breaking her jaw or cheekbone or just ruining her day. I should caveat this with the fact that I do triathlons for fun, not for competition. I love to swim and there is no greater feeling in the world than an OWS in the warm waters of the TN or Ohio river. The idea of spending the frist 15+ minutes of an OWS fighting other swimmers, simming over, under, around etc takes the fun out of swimming. It also introduces an element of 'luck' to the competition. What I mean is, maybe the best swimmer got kicked in the face and it broke his goggles but you were lucky enought to avoid getting kicked. To the OP question about the 17 hrs...I agree this could give a BOPer additonal time to finish the race since the 17 hr cut-off is based on the time the last person enters the water. So if one is concerned about making the 17 hr cut-off, it behooves them to get to the starting line early. Personally, I'd rather them put people in the water per thier race number. This would at least put you close to the AGers you are 'competing' with and maybe mitigate some of the concern that you don't really know where you are in the race relative to others in your AG.
~Mike |
![]() ![]() |
Master ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() bryancd - 2009-08-23 3:23 PM Just for the record, I do not like the IMKY individual swim start protocol they use. I understand why they do it but I think they should either do wave starts or move the race location. Having qualified that, I heard on the IM Talk podcast today that IMKY has 3000 entrants. Is that correct? Also that the race cutoff time is still 17 hours. So if they have so many people, how long will it take to get them all started in the swim and will anyone who is concerned about the cutoff need to start more towards the front of the swim in order to make it but where they are likely to be run over by faster people? Sounds like a complete mess. I agree it should be as mass start as well. However, as for your argument about people getting "run over", I think that has more of a chance to happen in a mass start of 3,000 churning bodies in the water. Finally, anyone who signed up for IMKY shouldn't be surprised by the TT swim start because that is the way it has been in the past. |
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Rogillio - 2009-08-23 4:16 PM I agree this could give a BOPer additonal time to finish the race since the 17 hr cut-off is based on the time the last person enters the water. So if one is concerned about making the 17 hr cut-off, it behooves them to get to the starting line early. Is it, Mike? I thought I heard that it was still 11:59:59pm regardless. In regards to a mass start vs. TT, it's part of the tradition of an Ironman to have the mass start. I do think that if they keep allowing the number of entrants to grow, wave starts will become needed. 3000 athletes?! That's way too many. Edited by bryancd 2009-08-23 5:11 PM |
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() bryancd - 2009-08-23 5:10 PM Rogillio - 2009-08-23 4:16 PM I agree this could give a BOPer additonal time to finish the race since the 17 hr cut-off is based on the time the last person enters the water. So if one is concerned about making the 17 hr cut-off, it behooves them to get to the starting line early. Is it, Mike? I thought I heard that it was still 11:59:59pm regardless. In regards to a mass start vs. TT, it's part of the tradition of an Ironman to have the mass start. I do think that if they keep allowing the number of entrants to grow, wave starts will become needed. 3000 athletes?! That's way too many.
Yes, the 17 hrs is based on when the last person enters the water. The IMKY RD told me last fall that they had increased the number of slots for IMKY based on the large number of DNS's they had in the two previous years. I wondered why IMKY would have a higher % of DNS than other IM events and the only think I could come up with is the heat. Peak training time for IMKY is June, July and August and maybe people decide they really don't want to go for a 100 mile bike training ride when it's 103 degress out? Yeah, I've heard your 'tradition' argument before but I'm just not anxious to risk getting kicked in the teeth (or kicking someone else in the face) for tradition's sake. Besides, tradition only has meaning if one knows the history of IM...I do not...nor do I really car what the history is. To me, it's just a race. Period. ~Mike |
|
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Rogillio - 2009-08-23 5:26 PM Yes, the 17 hrs is based on when the last person enters the water. No, sorry, what I meant was I heard it was based on when the first person enters, so clearly what I heard was incorrect. |
![]() ![]() |
Veteran ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() A further point of contention is a change in the overall cut-off time this year. The cut-off is 17 hours from the time the FIRST person enters the water. ie midnight regardless. They have increased to two entry points to help with this, but it's still possible to be an early starter 16:45 "you're an ironman" and a later starter 16:30 dnf. |
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Jake1008 - 2009-08-23 5:34 PM A further point of contention is a change in the overall cut-off time this year. The cut-off is 17 hours from the time the FIRST person enters the water. ie midnight regardless. They have increased to two entry points to help with this, but it's still possible to be an early starter 16:45 "you're an ironman" and a later starter 16:30 dnf. Oh, well maybe I heard right then. That's what I understood the new rule to be. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() bryancd - 2009-08-23 3:46 PM Jake1008 - 2009-08-23 5:34 PM A further point of contention is a change in the overall cut-off time this year. The cut-off is 17 hours from the time the FIRST person enters the water. ie midnight regardless. They have increased to two entry points to help with this, but it's still possible to be an early starter 16:45 "you're an ironman" and a later starter 16:30 dnf. Oh, well maybe I heard right then. That's what I understood the new rule to be.You are correct. They changed the rules this year. |
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() ChrisM - 2009-08-23 5:51 PM bryancd - 2009-08-23 3:46 PM Jake1008 - 2009-08-23 5:34 PM A further point of contention is a change in the overall cut-off time this year. The cut-off is 17 hours from the time the FIRST person enters the water. ie midnight regardless. They have increased to two entry points to help with this, but it's still possible to be an early starter 16:45 "you're an ironman" and a later starter 16:30 dnf. Oh, well maybe I heard right then. That's what I understood the new rule to be.You are correct. They changed the rules this year. Wow. Regardless of my personal opinion about the TT start, this is FUBAR. This race seriously need to reconsider it's location if they can't facilitate a more equitable start. So now BOP'ers, who have every right to have the full 17 hour time, will have no choice but to start as early as possible, surrounded by faster swimmers. What a mess. ![]() Edited by bryancd 2009-08-23 6:04 PM |
|
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Jake1008 - 2009-08-23 5:34 PM A further point of contention is a change in the overall cut-off time this year. The cut-off is 17 hours from the time the FIRST person enters the water. ie midnight regardless. They have increased to two entry points to help with this, but it's still possible to be an early starter 16:45 "you're an ironman" and a later starter 16:30 dnf.
Yeah, that would suck if you were a 16:30 DNF. Let's see....say you have 2,500 people show up on race day. With 2 lines, 1250 per line. If you put them in at 2 second intervals, it would take 625 seconds to get everyone in. So a little over 10 minutes and everyone is in the water swimming. ~Mike
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() bryancd - 2009-08-23 4:03 PM ChrisM - 2009-08-23 5:51 PM Wow. Regardless of my personal opinion about the TT start, this is FUBAR. This race seriously need to reconsider it's location if they can't facilitate a more equitable start. So now BOP'ers, who have every right to have the full 17 hour time, will have no choice but to start as early as possible, surrounded by faster swimmers. What a mess. bryancd - 2009-08-23 3:46 PM Jake1008 - 2009-08-23 5:34 PM A further point of contention is a change in the overall cut-off time this year. The cut-off is 17 hours from the time the FIRST person enters the water. ie midnight regardless. They have increased to two entry points to help with this, but it's still possible to be an early starter 16:45 "you're an ironman" and a later starter 16:30 dnf. Oh, well maybe I heard right then. That's what I understood the new rule to be.You are correct. They changed the rules this year. ![]() Yup. You know people who will be swimming 2:00 are going to be in line at like 4:30. |
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Rogillio - 2009-08-23 6:08 PM Jake1008 - 2009-08-23 5:34 PM A further point of contention is a change in the overall cut-off time this year. The cut-off is 17 hours from the time the FIRST person enters the water. ie midnight regardless. They have increased to two entry points to help with this, but it's still possible to be an early starter 16:45 "you're an ironman" and a later starter 16:30 dnf.
Yeah, that would suck if you were a 16:30 DNF. Let's see....say you have 2,500 people show up on race day. With 2 lines, 1250 per line. If you put them in at 2 second intervals, it would take 625 seconds to get everyone in. So a little over 10 minutes and everyone is in the water swimming. ~Mike
Is it 2 seconds? I heard it was :30. Do you really think it will happen with that kind of efficiency? |
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() bryancd - 2009-08-23 6:03 PM ChrisM - 2009-08-23 5:51 PM Wow. Regardless of my personal opinion about the TT start, this is FUBAR. This race seriously need to reconsider it's location if they can't facilitate a more equitable start. So now BOP'ers, who have every right to have the full 17 hour time, will have no choice but to start as early as possible, surrounded by faster swimmers. What a mess. bryancd - 2009-08-23 3:46 PM Jake1008 - 2009-08-23 5:34 PM A further point of contention is a change in the overall cut-off time this year. The cut-off is 17 hours from the time the FIRST person enters the water. ie midnight regardless. They have increased to two entry points to help with this, but it's still possible to be an early starter 16:45 "you're an ironman" and a later starter 16:30 dnf. Oh, well maybe I heard right then. That's what I understood the new rule to be.You are correct. They changed the rules this year. ![]()
This about this Bryan, in 10 minutes you have everyone in the water swimming. Compare this to a 2500 cluster f of swimmers with those BOPers having all the fast swimmers swimming right over the top of them. ~Mike |
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() bryancd - 2009-08-23 6:10 PM Rogillio - 2009-08-23 6:08 PM Is it 2 seconds? I heard it was :30. Do you really think it will happen with that kind of efficiency?Jake1008 - 2009-08-23 5:34 PM A further point of contention is a change in the overall cut-off time this year. The cut-off is 17 hours from the time the FIRST person enters the water. ie midnight regardless. They have increased to two entry points to help with this, but it's still possible to be an early starter 16:45 "you're an ironman" and a later starter 16:30 dnf.
Yeah, that would suck if you were a 16:30 DNF. Let's see....say you have 2,500 people show up on race day. With 2 lines, 1250 per line. If you put them in at 2 second intervals, it would take 625 seconds to get everyone in. So a little over 10 minutes and everyone is in the water swimming. ~Mike
In 2007 and 2008 it was either 2 or 3 seconds....can't remeber which now. They had one mat to cross over but two jumping points so it was easy to find a place to jump in.
~Mike |
|
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Rogillio - 2009-08-23 6:14 PM This about this Bryan, in 10 minutes you have everyone in the water swimming. Compare this to a 2500 cluster f of swimmers with those BOPers having all the fast swimmers swimming right over the top of them. ~Mike Honestly, mass starts are NOT that bad. Yes people get banged around a little at first, but the idea that it's this horror of death and mayhem just isn't true. In 4 years of mass or wave starts, I haven't been kicked once and that incudes Kona where it's a mass for the whole 2.4 miles. Within the first 5min of any other race, everyone sorts out. This TT format is very unfair to slower athletes. Edited by bryancd 2009-08-23 6:23 PM |
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() bryancd - 2009-08-23 6:17 PM Rogillio - 2009-08-23 6:14 PM This about this Bryan, in 10 minutes you have everyone in the water swimming. Compare this to a 2500 cluster f of swimmers with those BOPers having all the fast swimmers swimming right over the top of them. Honestly, mass starts are NOT that bad. Yes people get banged around a little at first, but the idea that it's this horror of death and mayhem just isn't true. In 4 years of mass or wave starts, I haven't been kicked once and that incudes Kona where it's a mass for the whole 2.4 miles. Within the first 5min of any other race, everyone sorts out. This TT format is very unfair to slower athletes.~Mike
I am one of the 'slower athletes' and I love the format and don't think it's unfair. Swim times in Louisville are generally faster than other venues becuase of the advantage of the current doing down river for about 2/3rds of the swim. Every IM is different and that is a good thing. LP has some killer hills. AZ has some challanging winds. Some swims allow wetsuits, some don't. Some are in the cool of the fall and some are in the heat of the summer. At any rate, if a 'slow swimmer' is concerned about missing the 17 hr cut off becuase of the TT start, they should have selected a different venue! But in truth, I think a BOPer swim time in Louisville will be faster than almost any other M-dot IM. Of couse, I've never do any other IM than IMKY so what do I know?! I'm gonna do WI next year....I'll get back to you about this TT debate next Sept. ~Mike |
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Somewhere in the IMKY thread (it's currently 90 pages, so no, I'm not going to find it) some authority was quoted as saying that they hope to get everyone in within 30 minutes, even with the 2-at-a-time start. Yes, those who would need the whole 17hrs are not liking this situation, especially as in previous years, apparently the cutoff was measured from the last swimmer rather than the first. I think some were caught off guard by this new rule. I think that's the issue -- after all, other IMs have shorter cutoff times. IMKY should have made this clear from the beginning. I'm not worried about any of the cutoff times (barring some disaster, which of course could happen), but I find the free-for-all start order a bit disconcerting. If they're going to do a TT start, I would really like to see them establish a start time for each athlete from the beginning, or at least narrow it down to a range of times by AG. Just 'showing up and waiting in line' is not sitting well with me right now. There's enough uncertainty with one's first IM (as this is for me) without adding questions about when to show up for the start, how long I'll have to hang out in line, etc. |
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Experior - 2009-08-23 8:27 PM Somewhere in the IMKY thread (it's currently 90 pages, so no, I'm not going to find it) some authority was quoted as saying that they hope to get everyone in within 30 minutes, even with the 2-at-a-time start. Yes, those who would need the whole 17hrs are not liking this situation, especially as in previous years, apparently the cutoff was measured from the last swimmer rather than the first. I think some were caught off guard by this new rule. I think that's the issue -- after all, other IMs have shorter cutoff times. IMKY should have made this clear from the beginning. I'm not worried about any of the cutoff times (barring some disaster, which of course could happen), but I find the free-for-all start order a bit disconcerting. If they're going to do a TT start, I would really like to see them establish a start time for each athlete from the beginning, or at least narrow it down to a range of times by AG. Just 'showing up and waiting in line' is not sitting well with me right now. There's enough uncertainty with one's first IM (as this is for me) without adding questions about when to show up for the start, how long I'll have to hang out in line, etc. Wave starts are the proper answer. |
![]() ![]() |
Expert ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() I would love to see this race go to a mass start, atleast there its busy the 1st few hundred yards as the fast people take off and the slower fall back. With the TT start ( I started about 10th from the back last year 45 mins after 1st racer) and I had traffic the entire way. I am by no means a good swimmer and ran into people the whole race. This year they will have to throw me in the water as I want it to clear out as much as possible before I get in, there is no way I am getting inline at 4:00am as some of my training partners are going to do. I cannot see adding another 3 hrs to an already long day. Also per RD if you start at 9am ( not going to happen just to make a point) you still have until 11:59:59 to finish. Edited by razorxp 2009-08-23 9:28 PM |
|
![]() ![]() |
Master ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() I'm taking advantage. Sleeping in, hitting transition just before it closes. Then jumping in whenever. Nah not really, but I'm not getting there at 0400. I'd like a mass start. |
![]() ![]() |
Bob ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() It is virtually impossible to do a mass start in the Ohio River. Even waves would be a logistical nightmare with the currents. I have to agree with Bryan that a new swim location should be addressed to accommodate a mass start. That being said, IMKY is selling out even with people knowing about the TT start so I doubt that a new location will be looked at. It was frustrating to say the least last year at the start. I got in and out of transition early last year to try and get to the start early only to find out people had family members "hold their spot" at the start. Some got there at 3:30 am!!! That is BS!!! I got down there around 5:30 and had over 500 people in front of me. The dock was soaked in urine from people just peeing while standing in line for fear of losing their spot if they went to the bathroom. (I was one of them but I did move to the grass) When I do this race again I will take my time getting to the start and start toward the end of the line. Once you round the buoy you have the entire Ohio River to spread out to avoid congestion. (remember the fastest current is in the middle, although last year there was almost no current.) It does stink to move the cut-off to when the first person enters the water. Although with 2 entry points they could get people in the water in 15 min or maybe even less. There was no set time between swimmers entering the water. They were entering as fast as you could go across the timing mat. |
![]() ![]() |
Expert ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() The athlete guide says they won't open transition or the line for the swim until 5:00 am. They said they don't want people spending the night at the race start. Ernie |
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Rogillio - 2009-08-23 6:08 PM Jake1008 - 2009-08-23 5:34 PM A further point of contention is a change in the overall cut-off time this year. The cut-off is 17 hours from the time the FIRST person enters the water. ie midnight regardless. They have increased to two entry points to help with this, but it's still possible to be an early starter 16:45 "you're an ironman" and a later starter 16:30 dnf.
Yeah, that would suck if you were a 16:30 DNF. Let's see....say you have 2,500 people show up on race day. With 2 lines, 1250 per line. If you put them in at 2 second intervals, it would take 625 seconds to get everyone in. So a little over 10 minutes and everyone is in the water swimming. ~Mike
Had to correct my math before someone else did. I got to thinking about this and realized something was wrong. With 1250 per line and them going in every 2 seconds, it would take 2500 seconds, not 625 seconds as I stated above. (I divided when I should have multiplied - oopes). So if they did it on 2 second intervales it would take about 50 minutes to get everyone in the water. If they used a 1 second interval, 25 minutes. I gotta agree with Bob, it has sold out 3 years running so they are not likely to change the swim to a lake swim. My thinking is, if you don't like TT start, don't do IMKY. I hate that they changed the rule to make the 17 hrs started with the first person instead of the last person but I guess the city of Louisville wants their streets back at midnight so they can send the volunteers home and send the cops to the donut shop. :-) To me the very best part of an IM is when I finally hit the wate! All the pre-race anxiety just melts away and I'm at peace with just me and the water. It would be a different experience to jump into a churning of bodies. ~Mike |
|