General Discussion Triathlon Talk » Zone 2 sucks Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 4
 
 
2013-04-26 7:16 PM

User image

Veteran
345
10010010025
Chesapeake, VA
Subject: Zone 2 sucks
So I've spent most of my adult life training by the mantra to "train harder, not smarter". It produced relatively effective results. However, age and injury have caused me to finally give this whole heart rate zone thing a fair shake. Admittedly ive tried this before but figured i was doing it wrong because zone 2 felt so slow and frankly my ego just couldnt handle running so slow in public. But now I'm determined to give this max effort. After all i did spend the money on a bloody book... However, zone 2 still sucks. The books and websites and fortune cookies say this will improve, but I wanted to ask you real people: is this going to get better? Im going to have to buy plaid pants and pull them up to my arm pits if im going to shuffle along at grandpa pace...


2013-04-26 7:20 PM
in reply to: #4716857

User image

Elite
7783
50002000500100100252525
PEI, Canada
Subject: RE: Zone 2 sucks
How did you determine your zones?  Hopefully from a LT test of some sort and not 220 - age...
2013-04-26 7:22 PM
in reply to: #4716857

User image

Master
1858
10005001001001002525
Salt Lake City
Subject: RE: Zone 2 sucks
Zone 2, by definition should not suck. It should actually be quite pleasant.
2013-04-26 7:25 PM
in reply to: #4716857

User image

Subject: RE: Zone 2 sucks

I found myself liking Zone 2 a lot more when I started running more frequently and more volume.

2013-04-26 7:33 PM
in reply to: #4716857

User image

Veteran
345
10010010025
Chesapeake, VA
Subject: RE: Zone 2 sucks
Let me clarify, by "sucks" i mean obnoxiously slow. As for how i determined my zones, i've done half a dozen different methods to include running around a track until i fell down. Each measurement was with 2 point of each other and within 2 of the handy formulas that everyone hates. So im fairly comfortable that the zones are close enough.
2013-04-26 7:38 PM
in reply to: #4716876

User image

Elite
7783
50002000500100100252525
PEI, Canada
Subject: RE: Zone 2 sucks

mikerunkle - 2013-04-26 9:33 PM Let me clarify, by "sucks" i mean obnoxiously slow. As for how i determined my zones, i've done half a dozen different methods to include running around a track until i fell down. Each measurement was with 2 point of each other and within 2 of the handy formulas that everyone hates. So im fairly comfortable that the zones are close enough.

Cool.

I agree with what Jason said above you.  



2013-04-26 8:15 PM
in reply to: #4716857

Expert
836
50010010010025
Subject: RE: Zone 2 sucks
Don't know who said it, but embrace "the suck." I bet you'll improve.
2013-04-26 8:31 PM
in reply to: #4716857


1660
10005001002525
Subject: RE: Zone 2 sucks

The 'slowness' of zone2 is something that comes up a lot here.

 

Honestly, if it's that easy, you're not putting enough volume in training to make it worth it. If you're going to back off intensity in training, you have to put something back in to improve results, and that is significant volume gains.

 

You obviously will not get any faster by doing the same or less volume, with less overall intensity.

 

Hopefully you're on a plan where you are gradually ramping up your volume to new heights - a minimum of 20% over your prior volume is not unusual for this mostly zone2 training approach.

2013-04-26 8:34 PM
in reply to: #4716876

User image

Subject: RE: Zone 2 sucks

mikerunkle - 2013-04-26 2:33 PM Let me clarify, by "sucks" i mean obnoxiously slow.

It's a bit humbling at first to train at paces so much slower than your race pace, but you do get used to it.  My normal Z2 training pace is around 8:30-8:55 depending on how I feel, but I'll do the 10k portion of an Oly around 7:20-7:30 pace.

The saying goes...you don't train fast to race.  You train more to race fast.

2013-04-26 8:34 PM
in reply to: #4716857

Veteran
645
50010025
Tennessee
Subject: RE: Zone 2 sucks
I hated zone 2 at first but now I love it since I have gotten faster. I spent all of last fall Working on my aerobic base and just focused on running. 6 days a week. It was life changing for me. No more injuries and faster at a lesser effort.
2013-04-27 7:57 AM
in reply to: #4716867

User image

Champion
7036
5000200025
Sarasota, FL
Subject: RE: Zone 2 sucks
tri808 - 2013-04-26 8:25 PM

I found myself liking Zone 2 a lot more when I started running more frequently and more volume.

This is essential if heart rate training is going to work.   

Mark



2013-04-27 8:05 AM
in reply to: #4716876

User image

Champion
10471
500050001001001001002525
Dallas, TX
Subject: RE: Zone 2 sucks
mikerunkle - 2013-04-26 7:33 PM

Let me clarify, by "sucks" i mean obnoxiously slow. As for how i determined my zones, i've done half a dozen different methods to include running around a track until i fell down. Each measurement was with 2 point of each other and within 2 of the handy formulas that everyone hates. So im fairly comfortable that the zones are close enough.


It does suck.

Per a post I made in my training log just this week:


If my Veronica reads this, she will love it... I hate zone 2. I hate it because it's just making me slow and sluggish. I did all zone 2 last year, and it didn't do for me. I never got faster in zone 2. I just stayed the same, slow, pace. Blah.

With that said, my coach has me doing mostly zone 2 work. It won't make me faster. It will just give me more endurance. I have endurance. I don't have speed. He's all about the standard formula, x weeks to build, x weeks endurance, x weeks speed, etc. After working with my mentor I have learned that what you do is test to find the person's weakness and train them on that. Why send me through endurance work if I'm an endurance machine?

Anyways, HR is really high because the Garmin freaked out at the start. AND despite all my b@tching, I really didn't have anything but zone 2 in me today. Stayed out till 3:15 AM last night, went to bed at 4:30 AM, slept till 9:30 AM. Ran errands, then took a nap from 2-4:30 PM. Got up and ran. Not a lot of pep in my step. BUT no gut issues. Those fixed themselves mid-Tuesday.


If I only do zone 2 work (like I did in 2012 for IMTX training), I might get slightly faster with a lower HR, but I don't get FAST. My body is an endurance machine. It's hard for me to get out of zone 2 for very long, because all I have done is zone 2 work. There is value in zone 2 work, but I don't think it needs to be done all the time (which some people do).





2013-04-27 9:11 AM
in reply to: #4717085

User image

Regular
5477
5000100100100100252525
LHOTP
Subject: RE: Zone 2 sucks

All I can say is I'm right there with you--it SUCKS.  Not only does it suck, but I find that even when I start a run in zone 2, I am almost incapable of keeping it there.  It is some combo of ego, stride, and muscle memory that eventually overrides the 2 :/

I can look at my Garmin data and see nothing but 4s and 5s for looooong stretches of time.

Naughty. Naughty. Naughty.

And I just had my first bout of "over reaching"...jeez, I wonder why?

I'm really trying to work on it, but it is hard. 

Maybe we should start a Zone 2 group: Hi, my name is Switch, and I have a Zone 2 problem.

2013-04-27 9:41 AM
in reply to: #4716923

User image

Veteran
308
100100100
Subject: RE: Zone 2 sucks

iruptacopula - 2013-04-26 9:34 PM I hated zone 2 at first but now I love it since I have gotten faster. I spent all of last fall Working on my aerobic base and just focused on running. 6 days a week. It was life changing for me. No more injuries and faster at a lesser effort.

 

How soon did start seeing improvements?

2013-04-27 9:48 AM
in reply to: #4716857

User image

Member
17

Subject: RE: Zone 2 sucks

Stick with it.  I'm a believer in it.  But you have to be consistent.  I started heart rate training with the Maffetone Method (180-age, essentially) back in October and I was doing basically the BarryP running plan to build a solid running base along with it.  My first Zone 2 runs were at 10:45-11:45 pace depending on weather temp (still some real hot days in Texas then) and how I felt.  I was running 6 days a week for the first time in my life because the slower paces were letting my body recover better than if I was going hard for 3 miles or more every day.  In December, I hired a tri coach and did some LT testing (field test run/blood test bike) to get a better sense of my zones for both sports.  Turns out the Maffetone Method formula was close, but probably a little low (about 7-9 bpm) for me and below what my true zone 2 really was based off true lactate threshold.  

So I adjusted my zones and started training off that new zone 2.  But the paces stayed the same, a slight speed increase just because i was, by definition, now running slightly harder.  But I was still pretty plodding.  Now they were about 10:30 to 10:15/mi.  Still running very consistently, but now mixing in cycling and swimming during the winter months to build those bases too.  Set a PR for a 5K on December 1 at 28:00 without ever doing any speed work.  I'd never broken 28:30 before, so I was happy and seeing progress over 2 months, even though that is by no means fast...

Still kept up the consistent zone 2 training through Jan/Feb/March.  No speed work.  Paces at Zone 2 gradually fell.  January I was averaging 10:00/mi.  February I was averaging 9:40/mi.  March I was averaging 9:00/mi at Zone 2.  Did the first sprint tri of the season at end of March.  Still no speed work at all.  Weather cancelled the swim and bike so it ended up being a standalone 5K.  I ran it at 22:17 for about 7:20/mi pace, which blew me away.  I've never run that fast in my life.  Never been anywhere near 7 minute miles and certainly not for an entire race.  It's now end of April and my Zone 2 training is still going.  The average pacing probably is around 8:30/mi now at Zone 2.  

My coach is just now starting to introduce some speed work, for example, today I have a 5 mile zone 2 run, but the last mile is on a track with 8x200m zone 4 repeats.  First time any real speedwork (besides some odd strides here and there during the last 2 months) have been introduced.   

I swear by the heart rate training now.  You just have to be very consistent and be patient.  The first two months really sucked for the ego, but I am glad I stuck with it.  Now I have a real running base, I think, for the first time ever and actually enjoy running.  So, yes, zone 2 sucks.  But you should add the words "at first" because it does get better.

Good luck!

2013-04-27 9:53 AM
in reply to: #4717138

User image

Veteran
308
100100100
Subject: RE: Zone 2 sucks
Congratulations on great improvements!! So you have improved a lot in 5months. wow How often did you run? How many  miles per run/ per week?


2013-04-27 9:55 AM
in reply to: #4717138

User image

Veteran
308
100100100
Subject: RE: Zone 2 sucks
I'm curious /. Did you lose any weight when you started running 6 times a week?
2013-04-27 9:59 AM
in reply to: #4716857

User image

Veteran
308
100100100
Subject: RE: Zone 2 sucks
Do not look at your speed. When I run by HR I turn off the GPS . 
2013-04-27 9:59 AM
in reply to: #4716857

User image

Expert
1375
1000100100100252525
McAllen
Subject: RE: Zone 2 sucks

I understand completely the zone 2 sucks feeling. You won't notice gains at first. They'll seem to come at meaningless and imperceptible numbers. Then after a few weeks you start noticing that your 10:15 min/mi in zone 2 very rapidly becomes 9:30 at the exact same effort level And then 9:15. Then 9:00, and 8:45, and so on... And that 45 seconds is very significant, even if you can still run a 6 minute mile. Then the gains just keep coming as long as you keep consistent.

2013-04-27 10:09 AM
in reply to: #4716857

User image

Expert
1480
1000100100100100252525
Somewhere in the Swamps of Philly
Subject: RE: Zone 2 sucks
Completely disagree. Love zone 2 so much that I have to question why I run shorter races that take me into Zone 4/5. The results from multiple years of training in zone 2 surprised me greatly. I have steadily improved my times throughout my 40s in Zone 2 and find that I am injured less from less intensive training. Trust your HRM, it doesn't lie.
2013-04-27 10:14 AM
in reply to: #4717139

User image

Member
17

Subject: RE: Zone 2 sucks

thanks.  i have been super happy with my progress and, like i said, i'm a firm believer in the zone 2 work now!

first two months was almost exclusively running.  i got up to 35 mpw following the BarryP running plan of 3:2:1 all at zone 2.  after i hired my tri coach in december the running volume dropped to about 20 mpw.  it's been hovering there.  some weeks 18 mpw (like this week).  my coach is making me swim a lot right now.  lost significant weight as well.  started at 205.  now at 185.  focused hard on diet in december, which made me a net loser through the holidays for the first time ever (not much then, just a couple of pounds) and lost most in jan/feb.  diet lately has been slack and i've plateaued weight-wise, but that's okay because my training volume has gone up and i'm planning on really focusing on diet again in june/july before my A race in August.   i attribute the weight loss to mainly nutrition and consistency in training.   the zone 2 work has just let me be so much more consistent because it is doable nearly every day.



2013-04-27 11:59 AM
in reply to: #4716857

User image

Member
388
100100100252525
Miami
Subject: RE: Zone 2 sucks
I am a believer too. I was reluctant at first, but after a couple of months running in Z2, my endurance is significantly higher and I got PRs in the two races I did during these past two months. Now I am about to start introducing some speed work once a week, but I will still keep running two or three days in Z2.
2013-04-27 1:49 PM
in reply to: #4716867

User image

Veteran
2842
200050010010010025
Austin, Texas
Subject: RE: Zone 2 sucks
tri808 - 2013-04-26 8:25 PM

I found myself liking Zone 2 a lot more when I started running more frequently and more volume.

This ^^^^

Both because it gets to feel faster with the volume, but also because I start to need the slower days to compensate for intensity in other running or cycling workouts.

One day, you'll look down and see that you're going pretty quick for Zone 2 and smile.

Another day not long thereafter, you'll run a race (whatever zone for the distance) and be shocked at how fast THAT actually is!

Matt

2013-04-27 4:00 PM
in reply to: #4716857

Subject: ...
This user's post has been ignored.
2013-04-27 7:52 PM
in reply to: #4717134

Veteran
645
50010025
Tennessee
Subject: RE: Zone 2 sucks
slonce5 - 2013-04-27 9:41 AM

iruptacopula - 2013-04-26 9:34 PM I hated zone 2 at first but now I love it since I have gotten faster. I spent all of last fall Working on my aerobic base and just focused on running. 6 days a week. It was life changing for me. No more injuries and faster at a lesser effort.

 

How soon did start seeing improvements?

It took about 3 months. I got really frustrated but stuck with it. Then all of a sudden my times just started dropping. 5 seconds here 10 seconds there. Some days are better than others though. Weather plays a big part too. I am going to stick with just zone 2 until this fall and add in a day of speed work and see what happens. Check my logs if you want. I think I started around sept. I am currently two weeks behind though.

Edited by iruptacopula 2013-04-27 7:54 PM
New Thread
General Discussion Triathlon Talk » Zone 2 sucks Rss Feed  
 
 
of 4