login
Over or under
-
No new posts
|
 2013-06-17 6:03 PM |
Regular  5477    LHOTP |  Subject: Over or underThanks for the inspiration Teejay :)
Just because the "poll" function is working again. *giddy* TP--over or under? I feel compelled to give an "I don't care" option, but to those of you who really don't care, you're weirdos. ETA--sort of working Edited by switch 2013-06-17 6:03 PM |
| 2013-06-17 6:16 PM in reply to: 0 |
Veteran 622 Roll Tide!! | Subject: RE: Over or under OK -so I am a weirdo. Edited by Meljoypip 2013-06-17 6:16 PM |
Makes no difference to me! Dont sweat the small stuff!! | 2013-06-17 6:18 PM in reply to: Guest |
Queen BTich 12411 , | Subject: RE: Over or under Eeew. The formatting is terrible.
There was an old thread about this. Let's see if I can find it. |
| 2013-06-17 7:55 PM in reply to: Guest |
Master 2380 Beijing | Subject: RE: Over or under Over is clearly the correct and proper form.
Temporary permits for "under" are granted in houses with: 1. Cats 2. Toddlers. |
| 2013-06-17 8:09 PM in reply to: moondawg14 |
Pro 6520 Bellingham, WA | Subject: RE: Over or under I'm glad to see that we are finely getting to the bottom of something. |
| 2013-06-17 8:20 PM in reply to: Comet |
Regular 5477 LHOTP | Subject: RE: Over or under Originally posted by Comet Yeah the formatting is no good. And apologies for a repeat--search function didn't give me anything:)Eeew. The formatting is terrible.
There was an old thread about this. Let's see if I can find it. |
| 2013-06-17 8:47 PM in reply to: switch |
Queen BTich 12411 , | Subject: RE: Over or under Originally posted by switch Originally posted by Comet Yeah the formatting is no good. And apologies for a repeat--search function didn't give me anythingEeew. The formatting is terrible.
There was an old thread about this. Let's see if I can find it. 
I couldn't find it either. No problem, I just remember it being really funny so I wanted to find it. To no luck obviously. I liked the old search function better where we could filter. Sigh... |
| 2013-06-17 8:56 PM in reply to: Comet |
Elite 4435 | Subject: RE: Over or under so long as someone puts a new one on when the old is finished I don't care if it's over under or both. |
| 2013-06-17 8:58 PM in reply to: Comet |
Regular 5477 LHOTP | Subject: RE: Over or under Originally posted by Comet Originally posted by switch Originally posted by Comet Yeah the formatting is no good. And apologies for a repeat--search function didn't give me anything:) Eeew. The formatting is terrible.
There was an old thread about this. Let's see if I can find it.
I couldn't find it either. No problem, I just remember it being really funny so I wanted to find it. To no luck obviously. I liked the old search function better where we could filter. Sigh... We will persevere ;)
Sidenote: 74 views and 11 votes. You people are LAME! You're gonna click on the link and then not vote--it's just one more little click. It's not like you don't have experience with this, and I gave you the "I don't care" option. Triathletes--man, the laziest group of people I know;) |
| 2013-06-17 9:16 PM in reply to: switch |
Elite 6387 | Subject: RE: Over or under If you have to put it on, then it might as well be right. Over. |
| 2013-06-17 9:27 PM in reply to: jobaxas |
Regular 5477 LHOTP | Subject: RE: Over or under Originally posted by jobaxas so long as someone puts a new one on when the old is finished I don't care if it's over under or both. Jo! Meljoy! You're women--this is supposed to MATTER to you;P I'm envious of your TP blasé. Strong work. |
| 2013-06-17 10:50 PM in reply to: switch |
Member 5452 NC | Subject: RE: Over or under What the hell is the upside to under? The answer is over, obviously. The problem is these idiots that live under my (fine, our) roof that make it some sort of sport to never EVER change the roll. Screw these people. I cuss a lot in the house. |
| 2013-06-18 12:15 AM in reply to: switch |
Elite 4435 | Subject: RE: Over or under Originally posted by switch Originally posted by jobaxas so long as someone puts a new one on when the old is finished I don't care if it's over under or both. Jo! Meljoy! You're women--this is supposed to MATTER to you;P I'm envious of your TP blasé. Strong work. Australian TP manufacturers are fond of an embossed pattern (weird I know) and to have that aesthetically pleasing it has to be over. Did you listen to the Eddie Vedder yet? |
| 2013-06-18 8:34 AM in reply to: Meljoypip |
Champion 11989 Philly 'burbs | Subject: RE: Over or under Originally posted by Meljoypip Dont sweat the small stuff!! Agreed, but this is not small stuff. |
| 2013-06-18 9:18 AM in reply to: Goosedog |
Regular 5477 LHOTP | Subject: RE: Over or under Originally posted by Goosedog What the hell is the upside to under? The answer is over, obviously. The problem is these idiots that live under my (fine, our) roof that make it some sort of sport to never EVER change the roll. Screw these people. I cuss a lot in the house. We're here for you, man. ____________________ Look, who the hell are these "under" people. I want to know. C'mon--just own it. I just want to know why. Why? Why under? As the votes were coming in last night, I was thinking "Yes. Triathletes know. We're particular. We're OCD. Over is obviously more aero, more efficient. These are my people." And then this morning there are two unders. WTH? Show yourselves :) |
| 2013-06-18 9:25 AM in reply to: Guest |
| Iron Donkey 38643 , Wisconsin | Subject: RE: Over or under What? No option for "free form and off the dispenser"? |
| 2013-06-18 9:36 AM in reply to: 1stTimeTri |
Regular 5477 LHOTP | Subject: RE: Over or under Originally posted by 1stTimeTri What? No option for "free form and off the dispenser"? sicko |
| 2013-06-18 10:06 AM in reply to: switch |
| Iron Donkey 38643 , Wisconsin | Subject: RE: Over or under Originally posted by switch Originally posted by 1stTimeTri What? No option for "free form and off the dispenser"? sicko Conformist.  |
| 2013-06-18 10:14 AM in reply to: 1stTimeTri |
Expert 3126 Boise, ID | Subject: RE: Over or under |
| 2013-06-18 10:24 AM in reply to: Goosedog |
| Alpharetta, Georgia | Subject: RE: Over or under Originally posted by Goosedog What the hell is the upside to under? Leverage. Ease of tearing. Efficiency and time savings. I guess you are against all of that. |
| 2013-06-18 10:32 AM in reply to: 1stTimeTri |
Regular 5477 LHOTP | Subject: RE: Over or under Originally posted by 1stTimeTri Ouch.Originally posted by switch Conformist. ;)Originally posted by 1stTimeTri What? No option for "free form and off the dispenser"? sicko |
| 2013-06-18 10:35 AM in reply to: 0 |
Regular 5477 LHOTP | Subject: RE: Over or under Originally posted by 1stTimeTri DP on the TP.Originally posted by switch Conformist. ;)Originally posted by 1stTimeTri What? No option for "free form and off the dispenser"? sicko Edited by switch 2013-06-18 10:36 AM |
| 2013-06-18 10:46 AM in reply to: Aarondb4 |
Expert 1951 | Subject: RE: Over or under Originally posted by Aarondb4
Where's the Bidet and towel option???
You got that right. My husband is from Iran. His brother came to stay with us for a while and thought that overall TP use is disgusting. They use something like a watering can and think it's a whole lot cleaner. I had to go out and buy one. |
| 2013-06-18 10:51 AM in reply to: lisac957 |
Champion 11989 Philly 'burbs | Subject: RE: Over or under Originally posted by lisac957 Leverage. Ease of tearing. Efficiency and time savings. Another vote for "over." Thanks Lisa! |
| 2013-06-18 11:22 AM in reply to: Guest |
Master 6834 Englewood, Florida | Subject: RE: Over or under Where is the option for "Off the back of the tank"? Because there are at least 3 guys in this office who have not yet grasped how to replace the roll. |
|
|
|
|
View profile
Add to friends
Go to training log
Go to race log
Send a message
View album
CONNECT WITH FACEBOOK