Racism in peanut butter & jelly (Page 2)
-
No new posts
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller | Reply |
|
![]() ![]() |
Expert ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() mehaner - 2012-09-12 1:12 PM white american girl who has never ever had a pb&j checking in. also, i find the thought of eating a pb&j disgusting. give me foreign foods any day! Why do you hate America?? |
|
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() trinnas - 2012-09-12 12:03 PM If you are trying to teach a problem about acceleration are you fundamentally racist or culturally insensitive if you use a Dodge Viper in your question insead of a Datsun Roadster or a Triumph Spitfire?
I don’t think that’s what the argument is. I think the principal’s point is that it’s culturally insensitive, as well as ineffective, if you only use examples/symbols/analogies that are likely to be understood by only one segment of your student population and not by others. Her point was that we think of the PBJ sandwich as being a universal symbol of “lunch” or “food”, but perhaps it only seems that way because of the culture we were raised under. It’s not that we shouldn’t try to integrate students with other cultural backgrounds into our American culture, but you’re not going to be effective as a teacher if you don’t acknowledge that certain things that resonate as examples with “typical” American kids might not mean anything to kids who were brought up differently. There’s nothing wrong with using a Dodge Viper as an example in a physics problem, but if the kids in your class have never seen a Dodge Viper and don’t know that it’s a fast sports car, they aren’t going to understand the example unless you take the time to explain it to them. A teacher who uses a Viper, or anything, really, as a symbol in an example should be conscious of what, if anything, that symbol means to everyone in the class rather than assume that every kid is going to get that Dodge Viper=Fast Car. |
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() jmk-brooklyn - 2012-09-12 3:17 PM trinnas - 2012-09-12 12:03 PM I don’t think that’s what the argument is. I think the principal’s point is that it’s culturally insensitive, as well as ineffective, if you only use examples/symbols/analogies that are likely to be understood by only one segment of your student population and not by others. Her point was that we think of the PBJ sandwich as being a universal symbol of “lunch” or “food”, but perhaps it only seems that way because of the culture we were raised under. It’s not that we shouldn’t try to integrate students with other cultural backgrounds into our American culture, but you’re not going to be effective as a teacher if you don’t acknowledge that certain things that resonate as examples with “typical” American kids might not mean anything to kids who were brought up differently. There’s nothing wrong with using a Dodge Viper as an example in a physics problem, but if the kids in your class have never seen a Dodge Viper and don’t know that it’s a fast sports car, they aren’t going to understand the example unless you take the time to explain it to them. A teacher who uses a Viper, or anything, really, as a symbol in an example should be conscious of what, if anything, that symbol means to everyone in the class rather than assume that every kid is going to get that Dodge Viper=Fast Car. If you are trying to teach a problem about acceleration are you fundamentally racist or culturally insensitive if you use a Dodge Viper in your question insead of a Datsun Roadster or a Triumph Spitfire?
The funny thing is it is likely that every single person who has read this thread knows what a PB&J is regardless or your background or country of origin. I don't have to explain it to you while I am trying to teach you math. I don't have to explain it to you while I am trying to teach you the word. Seems to me that that is pretty universal across subcultures within American culture. Kind of like tacos and burgers and a number of other things that have worked their way into our SHARED popular culture. |
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Aarondb4 - 2012-09-12 3:14 PM mehaner - 2012-09-12 1:12 PM white american girl who has never ever had a pb&j checking in. also, i find the thought of eating a pb&j disgusting. give me foreign foods any day! Why do you hate America?? just feelin' guilty about my white privelege, that's all. |
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Goosedog - 2012-09-12 3:07 PM frnk36 - 2012-09-12 11:49 AM Hard to call it a racist food. Hardly. It seems pretty easy to call just about anything racist.
Racist |
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() trinnas - 2012-09-12 2:25 PM jmk-brooklyn - 2012-09-12 3:17 PM trinnas - 2012-09-12 12:03 PM I don’t think that’s what the argument is. I think the principal’s point is that it’s culturally insensitive, as well as ineffective, if you only use examples/symbols/analogies that are likely to be understood by only one segment of your student population and not by others. Her point was that we think of the PBJ sandwich as being a universal symbol of “lunch” or “food”, but perhaps it only seems that way because of the culture we were raised under. It’s not that we shouldn’t try to integrate students with other cultural backgrounds into our American culture, but you’re not going to be effective as a teacher if you don’t acknowledge that certain things that resonate as examples with “typical” American kids might not mean anything to kids who were brought up differently. There’s nothing wrong with using a Dodge Viper as an example in a physics problem, but if the kids in your class have never seen a Dodge Viper and don’t know that it’s a fast sports car, they aren’t going to understand the example unless you take the time to explain it to them. A teacher who uses a Viper, or anything, really, as a symbol in an example should be conscious of what, if anything, that symbol means to everyone in the class rather than assume that every kid is going to get that Dodge Viper=Fast Car. If you are trying to teach a problem about acceleration are you fundamentally racist or culturally insensitive if you use a Dodge Viper in your question insead of a Datsun Roadster or a Triumph Spitfire?
The funny thing is it is likely that every single person who has read this thread knows what a PB&J is regardless or your background or country of origin. I don't have to explain it to you while I am trying to teach you math. I don't have to explain it to you while I am trying to teach you the word. Seems to me that that is pretty universal across subcultures within American culture. Kind of like tacos and burgers and a number of other things that have worked their way into our SHARED popular culture. True, although I would make the argument that most of the people reading this thread are adults (chronologically, at least ![]() If a teacher is trying to compare the struggle between two characters in a book, and he describes their conflict as being “like Luke Skywalker and Darth Vader”, that reference isn’t going to mean anything to a kid from a different country who may not know what Star Wars is. Her point is that it’s insensitive for a teacher to assume that symbols are universal for all kids regardless of their background. |
|
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() jmk-brooklyn - 2012-09-12 3:43 PM trinnas - 2012-09-12 2:25 PM True, although I would make the argument that most of the people reading this thread are adults (chronologically, at least jmk-brooklyn - 2012-09-12 3:17 PM trinnas - 2012-09-12 12:03 PM I don’t think that’s what the argument is. I think the principal’s point is that it’s culturally insensitive, as well as ineffective, if you only use examples/symbols/analogies that are likely to be understood by only one segment of your student population and not by others. Her point was that we think of the PBJ sandwich as being a universal symbol of “lunch” or “food”, but perhaps it only seems that way because of the culture we were raised under. It’s not that we shouldn’t try to integrate students with other cultural backgrounds into our American culture, but you’re not going to be effective as a teacher if you don’t acknowledge that certain things that resonate as examples with “typical” American kids might not mean anything to kids who were brought up differently. There’s nothing wrong with using a Dodge Viper as an example in a physics problem, but if the kids in your class have never seen a Dodge Viper and don’t know that it’s a fast sports car, they aren’t going to understand the example unless you take the time to explain it to them. A teacher who uses a Viper, or anything, really, as a symbol in an example should be conscious of what, if anything, that symbol means to everyone in the class rather than assume that every kid is going to get that Dodge Viper=Fast Car. If you are trying to teach a problem about acceleration are you fundamentally racist or culturally insensitive if you use a Dodge Viper in your question insead of a Datsun Roadster or a Triumph Spitfire?
The funny thing is it is likely that every single person who has read this thread knows what a PB&J is regardless or your background or country of origin. I don't have to explain it to you while I am trying to teach you math. I don't have to explain it to you while I am trying to teach you the word. Seems to me that that is pretty universal across subcultures within American culture. Kind of like tacos and burgers and a number of other things that have worked their way into our SHARED popular culture. ![]() I don't think using common American cultural references in an American public school is in any way insensitive. It may not be effective, but it's not insensitive. Then again, maybe it is effective in helping those students better adapt to the culture in which they live thereby possibly improving their chances at a successful life within that culture. Was it insensitive for my HS German teacher to speak only in German? I had no idea what she was talking about at first, but I learned because I had to learn. And now, 30+ years later, I know how to say various rude things in German. |
![]() ![]() |
Pro ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() mrbbrad - 2012-09-12 2:50 PM Was it insensitive for my HS German teacher to speak only in German? I had no idea what she was talking about at first, but I learned because I had to learn. And now, 30+ years later, I know how to say various rude things in German. Nah, Ah, Ah......Auf Deutsch, bitte. Edited by bradleyd3 2012-09-12 2:53 PM |
![]() ![]() |
Elite ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() So where is the part of the cirriculum where they teach the kids how to fit in and deal with adversity and that the real world won't cater to how precious, special, and unique you are? |
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() mrbbrad - 2012-09-12 2:50 PM I don't think using common American cultural references in an American public school is in any way insensitive. It may not be effective, but it's not insensitive. Then again, maybe it is effective in helping those students better adapt to the culture in which they live thereby possibly improving their chances at a successful life within that culture. Was it insensitive for my HS German teacher to speak only in German? I had no idea what she was talking about at first, but I learned because I had to learn. And now, 30+ years later, I know how to say various rude things in German. Her point is that it’s insensitive because, (to go back to my Star Wars example) while the other 24 kids in the class get the reference and are easily following along with the part of the lecture that follows it, the one kid who doesn’t get it is falling behind, albeit probably only a little, as he tries to figure out what the teacher is talking about. Imagine if you were a student in a class where every few minutes, the teacher would say a word or a phrase in a foreign language that (unlike your German example) every other kid in the class understood but which you didn’t. Granted you’d probably figure it out and catch back up eventually, but you’d constantly be lagging behind every time the teacher said something that everyone but you understood. |
![]() ![]() |
Elite ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() jmk-brooklyn - 2012-09-12 1:43 PM True, although I would make the argument that most of the people reading this thread are adults (chronologically, at least ![]() When I moved to Australia at 5-10... I had my first Vegimite sandwich. The most God aweful spead ever created... but it was their peanut butter and they ate it as such... in fact, peanut butter was hard to come by there. Nobody catered to my cultural sensitivities when they made fun of my American accent and beat me up for being a Yankee... some how I managed to live through that. Incredibly, I managed to come through with my self identity intact and not scared for life. To this day, PBJs are favorite food group. Sometimes I get fancy and use Honey. I eat a loaf a week of them. God Bless America. Edited by powerman 2012-09-12 3:03 PM |
|
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() powerman - 2012-09-12 2:53 PM So where is the part of the cirriculum where they teach the kids how to fit in and deal with adversity and that the real world won't cater to how precious, special, and unique you are? This isn’t about making kids feel special. It’s about making sure that every kid has an equal chance at education, which is a cornerstone of this country. If a teacher is using methods that, even unintentionally, exclude or disadvantage certain kids based on their backgrounds, it’s not unreasonable to point it out and try to find a better way to teach. |
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() jmk-brooklyn - 2012-09-12 4:00 PM mrbbrad - 2012-09-12 2:50 PM Her point is that it’s insensitive because, (to go back to my Star Wars example) while the other 24 kids in the class get the reference and are easily following along with the part of the lecture that follows it, the one kid who doesn’t get it is falling behind, albeit probably only a little, as he tries to figure out what the teacher is talking about. Imagine if you were a student in a class where every few minutes, the teacher would say a word or a phrase in a foreign language that (unlike your German example) every other kid in the class understood but which you didn’t. Granted you’d probably figure it out and catch back up eventually, but you’d constantly be lagging behind every time the teacher said something that everyone but you understood. I don't think using common American cultural references in an American public school is in any way insensitive. It may not be effective, but it's not insensitive. Then again, maybe it is effective in helping those students better adapt to the culture in which they live thereby possibly improving their chances at a successful life within that culture. Was it insensitive for my HS German teacher to speak only in German? I had no idea what she was talking about at first, but I learned because I had to learn. And now, 30+ years later, I know how to say various rude things in German. You are not really going to use Star Wars as the example here are you???? With it's world wide sales and distribution figures?!?!? |
![]() ![]() |
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() jmk-brooklyn - 2012-09-12 4:05 PM It’s about making sure that every kid has an equal chance at education, which is a cornerstone of this country. If a teacher is using methods that, even unintentionally, exclude or disadvantage certain kids based on their backgrounds, it’s not unreasonable to point it out and try to find a better way to teach. Nah, it's about white privilege and racism.
|
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() jmk-brooklyn - 2012-09-12 4:05 PM powerman - 2012-09-12 2:53 PM So where is the part of the cirriculum where they teach the kids how to fit in and deal with adversity and that the real world won't cater to how precious, special, and unique you are? This isn’t about making kids feel special. It’s about making sure that every kid has an equal chance at education, which is a cornerstone of this country. If a teacher is using methods that, even unintentionally, exclude or disadvantage certain kids based on their backgrounds, it’s not unreasonable to point it out and try to find a better way to teach.
I've read that article a couple of times and you are making a way better point than the Principal, and the author, though I don't fully agree with any of you. |
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() jmk-brooklyn - 2012-09-12 4:05 PM powerman - 2012-09-12 2:53 PM So where is the part of the cirriculum where they teach the kids how to fit in and deal with adversity and that the real world won't cater to how precious, special, and unique you are? This isn’t about making kids feel special. It’s about making sure that every kid has an equal chance at education, which is a cornerstone of this country. If a teacher is using methods that, even unintentionally, exclude or disadvantage certain kids based on their backgrounds, it’s not unreasonable to point it out and try to find a better way to teach. There is no reference anywhere that will encompass everyone so you have to go with what is relevant to the vast majority. American popculture references in an American school has the greatest chance of being meaningful to the greatest # of people. If you refuse to explain to or ridicule the child who does not get the reference when he/she asks then we have a problem. |
|
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Goosedog - 2012-09-12 4:12 PM jmk-brooklyn - 2012-09-12 4:05 PM It’s about making sure that every kid has an equal chance at education, which is a cornerstone of this country. If a teacher is using methods that, even unintentionally, exclude or disadvantage certain kids based on their backgrounds, it’s not unreasonable to point it out and try to find a better way to teach. Nah, it's about white privilege and racism.
I thought it was about white cake with strawberry icing. |
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() powerman - 2012-09-12 3:02 PM jmk-brooklyn - 2012-09-12 1:43 PM True, although I would make the argument that most of the people reading this thread are adults (chronologically, at least ![]() When I moved to Australia at 5-10... I had my first Vegimite sandwich. The most God aweful spead ever created... but it was their peanut butter and they ate it as such... in fact, peanut butter was hard to come by there. Nobody catered to my cultural sensitivities when they made fun of my American accent and beat me up for being a Yankee... some how I managed to live through that. Incredibly, I managed to come through with my self identity intact and not scared for life. To this day, PBJs are favorite food group. Sometimes I get fancy and use Honey. I eat a loaf a week of them. God Bless America. Did you intentionally back what the teacher is saying using your example or was that something you did by mistake? |
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() jmk-brooklyn - 2012-09-12 4:00 PM mrbbrad - 2012-09-12 2:50 PM Her point is that it’s insensitive because, (to go back to my Star Wars example) while the other 24 kids in the class get the reference and are easily following along with the part of the lecture that follows it, the one kid who doesn’t get it is falling behind, albeit probably only a little, as he tries to figure out what the teacher is talking about. Imagine if you were a student in a class where every few minutes, the teacher would say a word or a phrase in a foreign language that (unlike your German example) every other kid in the class understood but which you didn’t. Granted you’d probably figure it out and catch back up eventually, but you’d constantly be lagging behind every time the teacher said something that everyone but you understood. I don't think using common American cultural references in an American public school is in any way insensitive. It may not be effective, but it's not insensitive. Then again, maybe it is effective in helping those students better adapt to the culture in which they live thereby possibly improving their chances at a successful life within that culture. Was it insensitive for my HS German teacher to speak only in German? I had no idea what she was talking about at first, but I learned because I had to learn. And now, 30+ years later, I know how to say various rude things in German. I'll go with ineffective, but not insensitive. Too much sensitivity is not a good thing. |
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() I write for an international news organization. We aren't allowed to use baseball analogies such as `home run' or basketball analogies such as `slam dunk' when describing things that people did because people who've never played baseball, or in some cases have never heard of baseball, wouldn't understand. Yet we're an American company writing for mostly English speakers. So I guess it makes sense to me. Really, why DON'T we use obscure foreign references sometimes when educating American kids? Is there something wrong with American kids learning about the world outside of the U.S.??? |
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() powerman - 2012-09-12 3:02 PM jmk-brooklyn - 2012-09-12 1:43 PM True, although I would make the argument that most of the people reading this thread are adults (chronologically, at least ![]() When I moved to Australia at 5-10... I had my first Vegimite sandwich. The most God aweful spead ever created... but it was their peanut butter and they ate it as such... in fact, peanut butter was hard to come by there. Nobody catered to my cultural sensitivities when they made fun of my American accent and beat me up for being a Yankee... some how I managed to live through that. Incredibly, I managed to come through with my self identity intact and not scared for life. To this day, PBJs are favorite food group. Sometimes I get fancy and use Honey. I eat a loaf a week of them. God Bless America. I went to a French school for kindergarten and the teacher and other kids spoke no English. Zero. I had no idea what anyone was saying for weeks before I eventually figured it out. The kids made fun of me and insulted me to my face because they knew I didn’t understand them. Eventually I learned to speak French and it got better, and I, too, came through with my identity intact. It was a learning experience, certainly, but I would never suggest that it is the ideal experience for a kid to be made to feel like a fish out of water in his adoptive country. Edited by jmk-brooklyn 2012-09-12 3:40 PM |
|
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() trinnas - 2012-09-12 3:14 PM jmk-brooklyn - 2012-09-12 4:05 PM powerman - 2012-09-12 2:53 PM So where is the part of the cirriculum where they teach the kids how to fit in and deal with adversity and that the real world won't cater to how precious, special, and unique you are? This isn’t about making kids feel special. It’s about making sure that every kid has an equal chance at education, which is a cornerstone of this country. If a teacher is using methods that, even unintentionally, exclude or disadvantage certain kids based on their backgrounds, it’s not unreasonable to point it out and try to find a better way to teach. There is no reference anywhere that will encompass everyone so you have to go with what is relevant to the vast majority. American popculture references in an American school has the greatest chance of being meaningful to the greatest # of people. If you refuse to explain to or ridicule the child who does not get the reference when he/she asks then we have a problem. Agree with you 100%, and I don’t think the principal would disagree with you either—her point is just that it’s something that teachers should be mindful of. I don’t think she’s saying, “don’t use PB&J as a reference”, just that teachers need to be aware that certain kids might not get it without an explanation. I think that’s what she’s saying when she says, “Another way would be to say: ‘Americans eat peanut butter and jelly, do you have anything like that?’ let them tell you” |
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() mr2tony - 2012-09-12 4:24 PM I write for an international news organization. We aren't allowed to use baseball analogies such as `home run' or basketball analogies such as `slam dunk' when describing things that people did because people who've never played baseball, or in some cases have never heard of baseball, wouldn't understand. Yet we're an American company writing for mostly English speakers. So I guess it makes sense to me. Really, why DON'T we use obscure foreign references sometimes when educating American kids? Is there something wrong with American kids learning about the world outside of the U.S.??? TOUCHDOWN! |
![]() ![]() |
New user![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() I agree that teachers need to be aware of racial/cultural differences in their students and use the most effective references for a particular class. However: The newspaper provided information about a drum corps that was set up for black and Latino boys. One parent complained that the class discriminated against women, Asians, whites and Native Americans. Guitierrez defended the class and denied it was discriminatory. “When white people do it, it is not a problem,” she told the Tribune. “But if it’s for kids of color, then it’s a problem? Break it down for me. That’s your white privilege, and your whiteness.” Near the end: He said they don’t want to make any student feel unwelcomed – intentionally or unintentionally that might disconnect a child or a family from the educational system. They don't want to make any student feel unwelcome, but they have no problem setting up a group that excludes a portion of the student body for no reason other than their gender and/or race. I just don't understand. |
![]() ![]() |
Pro ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Kind of an offshoot of Goggs' post. Should we ban sports in school because some students don't "get it" and they've never played football or baseball before....and we'd have to explain the rules to them? In PE, should kickball be done away with becuase it would take too long for a kid to "get it"? Should music class be done away with becuase most composers where white and they wrote music that's not heard all over the world? How about A/V or journalism class.....not all people have access to a TV and don't know what "nightly news" is so instead of learning how to produce a school news program we just trash the program. Where does this end? Not everyone is going to get references to everything. Hell, I have to look stuff up every now and again or....when my employement att'y is referencing case law, I have to ask questions. You know what? It makes me smarter when I have to do that. |
|