Under Armour colder runs (Page 2)
-
No new posts
| Moderators: k9car363, alicefoeller | Reply |
|
2008-10-27 4:05 PM in reply to: #1768541 |
Champion 10021![]() ![]() , Minnesota | Subject: RE: Under Armour colder runsI wear a variety of pants for cold weather running. That matters to me less than tops, where I will sweat and then freeze. Nearly everything at Target (except mesh) will work. However, I did just get a pair of Reebok running tights that are truly awesome. I tried them, a UA pair and I think Nike. Reebok was the best and cheapest ($45) and I wore them in 30 degree sleet and was great. I have a fleece lined pair, that are really cycling tights from Pearl Izumi, I will wear from the 0-20 range. Tops are more important to me. I recommend a wicking layer on your skin and they ahve a number of great choices at Target. I can't stand going to Walmart, but the Target stuff (Champion) is a happy medium. I usually wear fleece over the wicking shirt unless it's very wet out, then I wear a fancier but heavier running jackets with pockets, vents, etc. ETA: I love all of the Under Armour items, though. They have all been worth the money. I have summer running tops that I love in particular. Edited by BikerGrrrl 2008-10-27 4:10 PM |
|
2008-10-27 4:14 PM in reply to: #1768424 |
Extreme Veteran 450![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Upstate, SC | Subject: RE: Under Armour colder runsSuzanneS - 2008-10-27 4:11 PM katybug34 - 2008-10-27 11:29 AM moabrunner - 2008-10-26 10:11 PM I have heard from reputable sources that the Walmart brand is actually the exact same thing as Under Armor. Walmart basically buys the shirts from UA and has them forgo the label. It is the way Walmart does almost everything. They are so big they can push companies into selling their products for peanuts. This is not true. I am not here to tell you what to wear, but they are completely different products. My brother-in-law works for UA and they do not offer their products as knock off brands. The champion brand is comparable to the UA brand. It only gets cold enough around here to wear the tights on the bike in the dead of winter. I also know this to be the case. And underarmour is made from AMERICAN MADE FABRIC. And it is soooo worth the money. I've had my underarmour shirt and tights for 2 years and washed it daily in the winter and it's still held up. Had to get new pants this year only because the other ones are too big. You can find it on Ebay for cheaper and also at TJ Maxx and Marshalls. Katybug34, what are you talking about? I wear my UA all the time in the winter here in SC!!! Looking at your avatar and your signature line, you are a confused individual! Leave the dark side and come home to the garnet and black!! I couldn't help it, you made it too easy! Seriously, I burn up when running in my coldgear tights! Granted, I don't ride if it is below freezing. |
2008-10-27 4:50 PM in reply to: #1768596 |
Subject: RE: Under Armour colder runsThanks for all the answers. I tried on a few different pairs yesterday at Sports Authority. I will hit Target in the next few days and then make up my mind. I did not care for the Nike stuff, did not like the fit. Hoepfully the local Target has something. I live in the most depressed econemy in the country, so pickings are slim. As far as how cold will I run in, not sure. As long as I can leave my house run past the Coffee place and back (13.5m) in under 2 hours by March. I will be happy, given my current running level,it's going to be a long winter. Joe |
2008-10-27 6:08 PM in reply to: #1766405 |
Expert 1183![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Fort Wayne, IN | Subject: RE: Under Armour colder runsIf you're around Kalamazoo, Grand Rapids, or Holland, check out Gazelle Sports. They've got good stuff, including advice. |
2008-10-27 7:07 PM in reply to: #1766405 |
Extreme Veteran 555![]() ![]() ![]() | Subject: RE: Under Armour colder runsI refuse to buy UA simply because it's a rip-off! You can get very close to comparable for much cheaper. Don't cave in to the marketing! |
2008-10-27 7:59 PM in reply to: #1766405 |
Regular 78![]() ![]() ![]() Atlanta | Subject: RE: Under Armour colder runsI have some UA cold gear & I have some of the 'knock-off' stuff (Walmart, Target). As far as keeping warm, I can't tell much difference. Fit and fluidity with movement is different for me though. UA, Nike both 'fit' better and are more likely to stay where they're supposed to for me - especially with tops. I know it doesn't help now, but check sporting goods stores at the end of season. They usually need to move the previous season's stuff. I have a pair of cold gear compression tights that retailed for $80-ish, that I picked up for, oh $8-ish. If you're in this for the long haul, building up your training gear over a few years is cheaper than trying to buy it all at once. I also have phenomenal luck at TJ Maxx, Ross, Marshalls, etc. (Women, be sure to check the mens and boys sections for tops too, if you're not top-heavy, like me!)
|
|
2008-10-27 9:11 PM in reply to: #1769093 |
Extreme Veteran 450![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Upstate, SC | Subject: RE: Under Armour colder runsnewbie13 - 2008-10-27 8:07 PM I refuse to buy UA simply because it's a rip-off! You can get very close to comparable for much cheaper. Don't cave in to the marketing! Totally unsubstantiated claim. Very frustrating when statements like this are made. There are distinct differences in the qualities of the materials used. The closest cheap brand is made by champion and you can find at target, but you get what you pay for. If the utility of the product is worth the dime, buy it, if you don't demand a specific quality don't buy it. But don't throw statements like this out there because you have bad feelings for a particular company. What product is comparable to UA in quality, function, fit for "much cheaper"? What particular products are you referring to? Have you used these different products that you refer to to be able to make a comparison over time? I have tried the "cheaper" brands and have found them to be exactly that - cheap. Adidas has comparable technical wear but it is just as expensive. Nike has the same. I am not beating you up, just think before you throw something like this out there. |
2008-10-28 2:15 AM in reply to: #1766405 |
Master 2665![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() The Whites, New Hampshire | Subject: RE: Under Armour colder runsI think the point is that, while UA is better quality, the better quality is not necessary for most mere mortals. They have sold the hype that you need the top of the line stuff, when really, you don't. Kinda like telling a newbie that they MUST have Hed 3s if they are going to be competitive - doesn't make Hed 3s any less spiffy, they just aren't needed at most people's level. |
2008-10-28 4:53 AM in reply to: #1766405 |
Member 297![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Subject: RE: Under Armour colder runsI have a set of UA that has made all the difference for me. My winter training is now tolerable without overdressing. My advice is go with it. Matt Cazalas
|
2008-10-28 7:57 AM in reply to: #1769786 |
Pro 3906![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Libertyville, IL | Subject: RE: Under Armour colder runsSlugger - 2008-10-28 2:15 AM I think the point is that, while UA is better quality, the better quality is not necessary for most mere mortals. They have sold the hype that you need the top of the line stuff, when really, you don't. Kinda like telling a newbie that they MUST have Hed 3s if they are going to be competitive - doesn't make Hed 3s any less spiffy, they just aren't needed at most people's level. This is kind of why I asked how cold the OPer will be running in and how frequent. I get heavy use out of my UA top in stuff most folks dont run in. I could care less that it is UA from a brand standpoint, but it has worked for me from a quality standpoint. Maybe there is stuff out there that is as good, but this is what I bought three years ago and it has given me no other reason to look elsewhere. You can applaud the quality without it being brand lust. |
2008-10-28 9:40 AM in reply to: #1766405 |
Veteran 379![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() NYC | Subject: RE: Under Armour colder runsI have a few of the cold weather shirts. Keep in mind that while UA holds heat and breathes, it doesn't protect against wind. You'll want to wear a wind jacket, or at least a wind vest, over it on really cold/windy days. That sometimes leads to overheating, but in my experience, the UA shirt alone feels like it is made of mesh in the really cold wind. |
|
2008-10-28 9:52 AM in reply to: #1766405 |
Champion 10471![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Dallas, TX | Subject: RE: Under Armour colder runsMy UA Cold Weather gear is amazing. The top is awesome. I own two. And trust me, I'm cheap. It hurts me to not buy workout gear at Target or something. I buy all my jerseys on deep discount at www.primalwear.com. I don't spend money on stuff like this, unless it's marked down. But WOW! The top I have is awesome. I can wear it alone, for RIDING in temperatures around 50 degrees and I stay toaty warm. And I get cold easily. Until your body starts heating up some, you don't really know how it holds your body heat in. Boy does it. Well worth the money in my boook. I don't know about the Metal stuff, but I bet the Cold Weather Gear leggings will work great for you. Puppetmaster - 2008-10-26 10:34 AM So I am new to this running outside in the colder weather. I was at Cabela's last weekend looking at the UA colder weather gear. I have to admit I am a bit unsure what I want or need. I went though my closet and all my stuff is cotton sweat pants, which I know is bad. So I live in Michigan, I don't want to buy a bunch of different outfits, plus ths cost involved. My top concern is keeping my legs warm and dry. This is when the confusion starts, do I need some cold gear compression to wear under aforementioned sweat pants? Do I want some UA Metal or the UA cold weather leggings? At the cost I really can't buy one of each. Or am I just caving to market hype and should look at another brand that serves the purpose for a smaller price? Joe |
2008-10-28 10:34 AM in reply to: #1769786 |
Extreme Veteran 450![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Upstate, SC | Subject: RE: Under Armour colder runsSlugger - 2008-10-28 3:15 AM I think the point is that, while UA is better quality, the better quality is not necessary for most mere mortals. They have sold the hype that you need the top of the line stuff, when really, you don't. Kinda like telling a newbie that they MUST have Hed 3s if they are going to be competitive - doesn't make Hed 3s any less spiffy, they just aren't needed at most people's level. Two different things completely. The item UA produces is to protect from cold. This is something everyone needs if they plan to train outside when temps are low. It is not necessarily a performance issue as it is a comfort issue. I don't think it is a logical comparison to compare components to clothing. I don't think the OP was asking what is going to make me faster, but rather what is going to allow me to train best in cold weather. |
2008-10-28 10:39 AM in reply to: #1766405 |
Runner | Subject: RE: Under Armour colder runsI don't get it. Is there really that much thought that goes into clothing? Wear whatever you have. Do you need to spend $40 on a shirt? No. Would it be nice? Yeah, probably. |
2008-10-28 1:03 PM in reply to: #1766405 |
Veteran 156![]() ![]() ![]() | Subject: RE: Under Armour colder runsThis thread is almost as out of hand as the "potty mouth"thread. 1st I like Under Armour and I do own a few t-shirts, a vest, and a 1/4 zip pullover. I love em. I hated paying for them. I initially bought the t-shirts to wear under my body armor while working on the ambulance. Well, it gets pretty hot an humid in South Carolina even at 3am when the air temp is 88 degrees during the months of June-August. Yes, the shirts did their job, they kept me RELATIVELY cool while at work by transporting moisture away from my body. I also had a Walmart brand undershirt as well. The only difference was that after a 12 hour tour the Walmart shirt smelled like cat pee when the sweat evaporated and the UA shirt didn't. Do your research. There are different types of moisture wicking fabrics out there. Most are comparable in the job that they do. Yes UA is somewhat more durable and probably won't smell like cat pee due to the antimicrobial treatment they use on the fabric. The reason UA is more comfortable and moves more fluidly with the wearer is because of the weaving process. You are paying for this in the end even though 1/2 of Under Armour's products are made in "Honduras, Mexico and other countries in the Caribbean basin." The US military clamored for this stuff until docs in the sandbox were racking their brains trying to figure out how to get melted polyester fabrics off the skin of tank and other tracked vehicle crewman who had been burned in fires. Yeah, they wear Nomex coveralls and Nomex doesn't melt but polyester does. There are several units now where UA type undershirts are banned from wear. Mr. Plank saw a need and we all know necessity is the mother of invention. Let's remember that his first shorts were made from "lingerie fabric" and we all want to wear it now. Polypropylene was great for years as was silk as a base layer. All of us gear-queers out there are looking for the next whizz bang thing to use to give us an edge. All I'm saying is do your research first and then look for the best deals on this stuff. I know it sounds like I'm ranting but I assure I am not, I just want to offer a little counterpoint and maybe another point of view. I understand that we have some people in the textile business here as well as someone who is close to the Under Armour brand as well. I don't even remember the OP's question at this point. All I know id that my UA stuff as kept me cool in the summer on the ambulance and toasty in the winter in the tree-stand while hunting. Do your research, make you own informed decision. Then again, where whatever, run faster, and get back home to your nice warm house. -Chris |
2008-10-28 4:56 PM in reply to: #1766405 |
Master 2491![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Subject: RE: Under Armour colder runsI have one of the thick UA shirts, and it's too much to wear on a winter run. Down into the teens, I'll wear a technical short-sleeve shirt with a technical long sleeve over it, and mittens. The brand name doesn't seem to matter. I save the UA for when I'll be out doing less taxing things. My metabolism runs hot, though, so UA might be good for the cold-blooded sort. |
|
|
login




2008-10-27 4:05 PM
, Minnesota






View profile
Add to friends
Go to training log
Go to race log
Send a message
View album
CONNECT WITH FACEBOOK