Other Resources My Cup of Joe » Social conservatives, what's the end game? Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 8
 
 
2012-11-08 2:56 PM
in reply to: #4490333

User image

Elite
6387
50001000100100100252525
Subject: RE: Social conservatives, what's the end game?
jasonatkins - 2012-11-08 1:52 PM

Personally, I don't give a rats a$$ who or what you choose as  you life partner, spouse, or whatever you would like to call them.  The issue I have is that it opens doors to other problems that I don't see being any of the government's business.

For example, gay marriage is legalized.  Two men (or women) decide to "marry."  Both are religious and believe their religion is part of who they are, important enough to want to marry in the church.  Said church denies them on the basis that they don't believe men/women should marry.  The couple sues and now we require the state make a decision about the actions of a church.  This is where my problem is. 

Same type of issue goes with the government funded healthcare.  Effectively, the government is forcing me to pay taxes which can be used to fund birth control, abortions, etc which I do not believe in.  Why is my belief "invalid?"

As for what the country would look like if I got my way, probably very similar to how it looks today.  How will it look since you got your way, probably very similar to how it looks today.  I just don't like the idea of the government having their nose in issues that I believe are very personal.  Regulating business, overall welfare of the country, national security, that is where they should be focusing their time and effort.

In that respect though, you are no different than the pacifist that has to pay for defense spending. The government is not forcing YOU to take birth control. The state executes prisoners and I have to pay for that, and I think it is murder no matter how you slice it, but it is what it is. I do not get a refund. But they are not forcing ME to execute anyone.



2012-11-08 2:57 PM
in reply to: #4490325

User image

Champion
18680
50005000500020001000500100252525
Lost in the Luminiferous Aether
Subject: RE: Social conservatives, what's the end game?
powerman - 2012-11-08 3:49 PM

bluebike - 2012-11-08 1:27 PM Flip this back to you..... what is the secularists end game??  A total removal of religion from the country?  A completely secular nation where God is in the shadows and religious practicitioners are marginilized?  Where we pray in secret in our closets but can't mention our beliefs in public settings?  Thats what it seems is the end game for the liberals.  I am a Christian and had to leave the democratic party this year because it became aparent that for liberals there is no quarter for religion in their agenda...none.  So the role of a social conservative then is to stop or hold back the secularization of our nation...its not just one or two items, but the prevention of the total erosion and elimination of religious values from mainstream society.

Ya... that is the other end of the spectrum. I see atheists no different that evangelicals... I'm not down with their dogma. And I think they are fringe.

Um excuse me but to which atheists are you referring, and what exactly is "our" dogma?

2012-11-08 2:57 PM
in reply to: #4490324

User image

Elite
4564
200020005002525
Boise
Subject: RE: Social conservatives, what's the end game?
bluebike - 2012-11-08 1:49 PM
BrianRunsPhilly - 2012-11-08 12:39 PM

bluebike - 2012-11-08 3:27 PM Flip this back to you..... what is the secularists end game??  A total removal of religion from the country?  A completely secular nation where God is in the shadows and religious practicitioners are marginilized?  Where we pray in secret in our closets but can't mention our beliefs in public settings?  Thats what it seems is the end game for the liberals.  I am a Christian and had to leave the democratic party this year because it became aparent that for liberals there is no quarter for religion in their agenda...none.  So the role of a social conservative then is to stop or hold back the secularization of our nation...its not just one or two items, but the prevention of the total erosion and elimination of religious values from mainstream society.

In your post you didn't say you were religious, you said you were Christian. It's not that there is no quarter for religion, it's that we are a country made up of many religions. There are apparently many people who have a strong faith who left the Republican party because the current platform goes against their morals and their faith. I would bet many of them also identify as Christian.

But in the democratic party, any thing short of total secularism is unacceptable.  Bill Maher is the perfect example of the derision and contempt that librals show for religion.  Yes I am Christian, but secularists don't want ANY God to interfere with their agenda...not a Christian God, or any other.

I think you're mistaken. I'm an atheist so take this for what it's worth. I don't think the specific issue is Christianity. I think it's because many people who want their religion in the public sphere, only want Their own religion there and no one else's. Some people want the 10 commandments on government property. I'm okay with that as long as a Koran, or a Torah or whatever else someone could want is allowed as well. Too often, I see Christians complaining about being attacked when the reason their position is being attacked is because they only want to allow their Christian beliefs in public and not Muslim/Jewish/Wiccan/whatever.

2012-11-08 2:57 PM
in reply to: #4490339

User image

Elite
6387
50001000100100100252525
Subject: RE: Social conservatives, what's the end game?
dontracy - 2012-11-08 1:54 PM

powerman - How so... how are you not free to practice your religion as guaranteed by the Constitution? For religious organizations, that gets tricky. I'm not sure what the answer is. They have to go by serving the public, but I understand the conflicts. But at the end of the day, the Catholic Church was FREE to practice how they saw fit and stopped providing adoption services since it conflicted with doctrines. As unfortunate as that might be to the rest of the folks.

Think about that for a minute.

The Catholic Church developed the hospital system to begin with way back when.
Being called to heal the sick is a core belief of the Church.

It's now being attacked by the secularist state
to the point it may need to withdraw from that mission
in order to not violate its conscience.

Practicing my faith is more than praying in private or with the doors shut at Mass.
It's about being leaven in the world.
It's about building up institutions such as the hospital system
and social service systems. 

So yes, religious liberty is under direct attack.
 

Hummm... OK, I'll have to think on that a bit.

2012-11-08 2:58 PM
in reply to: #4490333

User image

Member
5452
50001001001001002525
NC
Subject: RE: Social conservatives, what's the end game?
jasonatkins - 2012-11-08 3:52 PM

For example, gay marriage is legalized.  Two men (or women) decide to "marry."  Both are religious and believe their religion is part of who they are, important enough to want to marry in the church.  Said church denies them on the basis that they don't believe men/women should marry.  The couple sues and now we require the state make a decision about the actions of a church.  This is where my problem is. 

Could this very thing not happen with a straight couple wanting to be married in a Catholic church, despite the fact that neither is Catholic?

 

 

 

2012-11-08 3:03 PM
in reply to: #4490339

Regular
173
1002525
Subject: RE: Social conservatives, what's the end game?
dontracy - 2012-11-08 12:54 PM

powerman - How so... how are you not free to practice your religion as guaranteed by the Constitution? For religious organizations, that gets tricky. I'm not sure what the answer is. They have to go by serving the public, but I understand the conflicts. But at the end of the day, the Catholic Church was FREE to practice how they saw fit and stopped providing adoption services since it conflicted with doctrines. As unfortunate as that might be to the rest of the folks.

Think about that for a minute.

The Catholic Church developed the hospital system to begin with way back when.
Being called to heal the sick is a core belief of the Church.

It's now being attacked by the secularist state
to the point it may need to withdraw from that mission
in order to not violate its conscience.

Practicing my faith is more than praying in private or with the doors shut at Mass.
It's about being leaven in the world.
It's about building up institutions such as the hospital system
and social service systems. 

So yes, religious liberty is under direct attack.
 

Well Said.



2012-11-08 3:03 PM
in reply to: #4490348

User image

Elite
6387
50001000100100100252525
Subject: RE: Social conservatives, what's the end game?
trinnas - 2012-11-08 1:57 PM
powerman - 2012-11-08 3:49 PM

bluebike - 2012-11-08 1:27 PM Flip this back to you..... what is the secularists end game??  A total removal of religion from the country?  A completely secular nation where God is in the shadows and religious practicitioners are marginilized?  Where we pray in secret in our closets but can't mention our beliefs in public settings?  Thats what it seems is the end game for the liberals.  I am a Christian and had to leave the democratic party this year because it became aparent that for liberals there is no quarter for religion in their agenda...none.  So the role of a social conservative then is to stop or hold back the secularization of our nation...its not just one or two items, but the prevention of the total erosion and elimination of religious values from mainstream society.

Ya... that is the other end of the spectrum. I see atheists no different that evangelicals... I'm not down with their dogma. And I think they are fringe.

Um excuse me but to which atheists are you referring, and what exactly is "our" dogma?

I'm referring to the atheist I used to be. Atheists do not believe in God... as in anti God. I'm sort of agnostic now.. I just don't know and there probably is "something" rather than nothing.

There are those that believe in God, and then there are those that are fundamental evangelical radicals... same goes for atheists. There are some rather extreme atheists out there that are absolutely no different than their counter part.... they are completely self righteous in their beliefs and there is NO room for anything else. And there most certainly is a "dogma" no different than their counterparts. Listen to Bill Maher for about 5 minutes and you should have it down.

If you are not any of the above, then I was not referring to you.

2012-11-08 3:04 PM
in reply to: #4490339

User image

Sensei
Sin City
Subject: RE: Social conservatives, what's the end game?
dontracy - 2012-11-08 12:54 PM

Think about that for a minute.

The Catholic Church developed the hospital system to begin with way back when.
Being called to heal the sick is a core belief of the Church.

It's now being attacked by the secularist state
to the point it may need to withdraw from that mission
in order to not violate its conscience.

Practicing my faith is more than praying in private or with the doors shut at Mass.
It's about being leaven in the world.
It's about building up institutions such as the hospital system
and social service systems. 

So yes, religious liberty is under direct attack.
 

May I ask a couple questions?

I assume you believe your faith is "the way" or the "the right one"?  If that makes sense.

Would you want to grant other faiths the same freedoms, even if they are in contradiction to yours?  What if there intentions are not as noble as yours (hospital and social programs)?

Granted, it's a speculative question and just curious of your thoughts.

 

2012-11-08 3:14 PM
in reply to: #4490349

Regular
173
1002525
Subject: RE: Social conservatives, what's the end game?
JoshR - 2012-11-08 12:57 PM
bluebike - 2012-11-08 1:49 PM
BrianRunsPhilly - 2012-11-08 12:39 PM

bluebike - 2012-11-08 3:27 PM Flip this back to you..... what is the secularists end game??  A total removal of religion from the country?  A completely secular nation where God is in the shadows and religious practicitioners are marginilized?  Where we pray in secret in our closets but can't mention our beliefs in public settings?  Thats what it seems is the end game for the liberals.  I am a Christian and had to leave the democratic party this year because it became aparent that for liberals there is no quarter for religion in their agenda...none.  So the role of a social conservative then is to stop or hold back the secularization of our nation...its not just one or two items, but the prevention of the total erosion and elimination of religious values from mainstream society.

In your post you didn't say you were religious, you said you were Christian. It's not that there is no quarter for religion, it's that we are a country made up of many religions. There are apparently many people who have a strong faith who left the Republican party because the current platform goes against their morals and their faith. I would bet many of them also identify as Christian.

But in the democratic party, any thing short of total secularism is unacceptable.  Bill Maher is the perfect example of the derision and contempt that librals show for religion.  Yes I am Christian, but secularists don't want ANY God to interfere with their agenda...not a Christian God, or any other.

I think you're mistaken. I'm an atheist so take this for what it's worth. I don't think the specific issue is Christianity. I think it's because many people who want their religion in the public sphere, only want Their own religion there and no one else's. Some people want the 10 commandments on government property. I'm okay with that as long as a Koran, or a Torah or whatever else someone could want is allowed as well. Too often, I see Christians complaining about being attacked when the reason their position is being attacked is because they only want to allow their Christian beliefs in public and not Muslim/Jewish/Wiccan/whatever.

No... there is a broad range of issues that religious practicioners share regardless of their specific denomination.  My observations from my time as a democrat is that ANY religion is suspect.  Liberals are fine with Christian/Muslim/Jewish/Wiccan/whatever as long as we keep in private and in our homes.  They say the support "Freedom to Worship" to borrow a phrase from Obama.  Unfortunately, the constitution guarentees the free excercise of religion, not the freedom to worship, and the free excercise of religion means that religious beliefs can come out of our houses and into our society.   

2012-11-08 3:17 PM
in reply to: #4490365

User image

Champion
18680
50005000500020001000500100252525
Lost in the Luminiferous Aether
Subject: RE: Social conservatives, what's the end game?
powerman - 2012-11-08 4:03 PM
trinnas - 2012-11-08 1:57 PM
powerman - 2012-11-08 3:49 PM

bluebike - 2012-11-08 1:27 PM Flip this back to you..... what is the secularists end game??  A total removal of religion from the country?  A completely secular nation where God is in the shadows and religious practicitioners are marginilized?  Where we pray in secret in our closets but can't mention our beliefs in public settings?  Thats what it seems is the end game for the liberals.  I am a Christian and had to leave the democratic party this year because it became aparent that for liberals there is no quarter for religion in their agenda...none.  So the role of a social conservative then is to stop or hold back the secularization of our nation...its not just one or two items, but the prevention of the total erosion and elimination of religious values from mainstream society.

Ya... that is the other end of the spectrum. I see atheists no different that evangelicals... I'm not down with their dogma. And I think they are fringe.

Um excuse me but to which atheists are you referring, and what exactly is "our" dogma?

I'm referring to the atheist I used to be. Atheists do not believe in God... as in anti God. I'm sort of agnostic now.. I just don't know and there probably is "something" rather than nothing.

There are those that believe in God, and then there are those that are fundamental evangelical radicals... same goes for atheists. There are some rather extreme atheists out there that are absolutely no different than their counter part.... they are completely self righteous in their beliefs and there is NO room for anything else. And there most certainly is a "dogma" no different than their counterparts. Listen to Bill Maher for about 5 minutes and you should have it down.

If you are not any of the above, then I was not referring to you.

So you are referring only to a small portion of athiests then, not athiests.  Thank you I appreciate that  I do not see being an athiest as being anti god.  Not believing in something is different than being against something.

I don't listen to Bill Maher and I don't plan to start now. 

 

2012-11-08 3:19 PM
in reply to: #4490384

User image

Elite
4564
200020005002525
Boise
Subject: RE: Social conservatives, what's the end game?
bluebike - 2012-11-08 2:14 PM
JoshR - 2012-11-08 12:57 PM
bluebike - 2012-11-08 1:49 PM
BrianRunsPhilly - 2012-11-08 12:39 PM

bluebike - 2012-11-08 3:27 PM Flip this back to you..... what is the secularists end game??  A total removal of religion from the country?  A completely secular nation where God is in the shadows and religious practicitioners are marginilized?  Where we pray in secret in our closets but can't mention our beliefs in public settings?  Thats what it seems is the end game for the liberals.  I am a Christian and had to leave the democratic party this year because it became aparent that for liberals there is no quarter for religion in their agenda...none.  So the role of a social conservative then is to stop or hold back the secularization of our nation...its not just one or two items, but the prevention of the total erosion and elimination of religious values from mainstream society.

In your post you didn't say you were religious, you said you were Christian. It's not that there is no quarter for religion, it's that we are a country made up of many religions. There are apparently many people who have a strong faith who left the Republican party because the current platform goes against their morals and their faith. I would bet many of them also identify as Christian.

But in the democratic party, any thing short of total secularism is unacceptable.  Bill Maher is the perfect example of the derision and contempt that librals show for religion.  Yes I am Christian, but secularists don't want ANY God to interfere with their agenda...not a Christian God, or any other.

I think you're mistaken. I'm an atheist so take this for what it's worth. I don't think the specific issue is Christianity. I think it's because many people who want their religion in the public sphere, only want Their own religion there and no one else's. Some people want the 10 commandments on government property. I'm okay with that as long as a Koran, or a Torah or whatever else someone could want is allowed as well. Too often, I see Christians complaining about being attacked when the reason their position is being attacked is because they only want to allow their Christian beliefs in public and not Muslim/Jewish/Wiccan/whatever.

No... there is a broad range of issues that religious practicioners share regardless of their specific denomination.  My observations from my time as a democrat is that ANY religion is suspect.  Liberals are fine with Christian/Muslim/Jewish/Wiccan/whatever as long as we keep in private and in our homes.  They say the support "Freedom to Worship" to borrow a phrase from Obama.  Unfortunately, the constitution guarentees the free excercise of religion, not the freedom to worship, and the free excercise of religion means that religious beliefs can come out of our houses and into our society.   

Would you be okay with the public expression of religion if it wasn't your religion? Say if it was Islam? 



2012-11-08 3:25 PM
in reply to: #4490393

User image

Elite
6387
50001000100100100252525
Subject: RE: Social conservatives, what's the end game?
trinnas - 2012-11-08 2:17 PM
powerman - 2012-11-08 4:03 PM
trinnas - 2012-11-08 1:57 PM
powerman - 2012-11-08 3:49 PM

bluebike - 2012-11-08 1:27 PM Flip this back to you..... what is the secularists end game??  A total removal of religion from the country?  A completely secular nation where God is in the shadows and religious practicitioners are marginilized?  Where we pray in secret in our closets but can't mention our beliefs in public settings?  Thats what it seems is the end game for the liberals.  I am a Christian and had to leave the democratic party this year because it became aparent that for liberals there is no quarter for religion in their agenda...none.  So the role of a social conservative then is to stop or hold back the secularization of our nation...its not just one or two items, but the prevention of the total erosion and elimination of religious values from mainstream society.

Ya... that is the other end of the spectrum. I see atheists no different that evangelicals... I'm not down with their dogma. And I think they are fringe.

Um excuse me but to which atheists are you referring, and what exactly is "our" dogma?

I'm referring to the atheist I used to be. Atheists do not believe in God... as in anti God. I'm sort of agnostic now.. I just don't know and there probably is "something" rather than nothing.

There are those that believe in God, and then there are those that are fundamental evangelical radicals... same goes for atheists. There are some rather extreme atheists out there that are absolutely no different than their counter part.... they are completely self righteous in their beliefs and there is NO room for anything else. And there most certainly is a "dogma" no different than their counterparts. Listen to Bill Maher for about 5 minutes and you should have it down.

If you are not any of the above, then I was not referring to you.

So you are referring only to a small portion of athiests then, not athiests.  Thank you I appreciate that  I do not see being an athiest as being anti god.  Not believing in something is different than being against something.

I don't listen to Bill Maher and I don't plan to start now. 

 

If you do not believe in a God, and someone does, that automatically means you are against what they believe. That is how most atheists take it... at least the ones I have known. Seems not believing in something is pretty cut and dried.. I don't believe, nothing left to talk about... yet the debates go on and on and on about why those that do believe are wrong.. that is something else.

2012-11-08 3:30 PM
in reply to: #4490419

User image

Member
5452
50001001001001002525
NC
Subject: RE: Social conservatives, what's the end game?
powerman - 2012-11-08 4:25 PM

If you do not believe in a God, and someone does, that automatically means you are against what they believe. That is how most atheists take it... at least the ones I have known.

So, the atheists are like the vegans?

 

 

2012-11-08 3:30 PM
in reply to: #4489036

User image

Veteran
334
10010010025
Tacoma, Washington
Subject: RE: Social conservatives, what's the end game?

Good debate... keep it up.

 

powerman - 2012-11-08 3:25 PM
trinnas - 2012-11-08 2:17 PM
powerman - 2012-11-08 4:03 PM
trinnas - 2012-11-08 1:57 PM
powerman - 2012-11-08 3:49 PM

bluebike - 2012-11-08 1:27 PM Flip this back to you..... what is the secularists end game??  A total removal of religion from the country?  A completely secular nation where God is in the shadows and religious practicitioners are marginilized?  Where we pray in secret in our closets but can't mention our beliefs in public settings?  Thats what it seems is the end game for the liberals.  I am a Christian and had to leave the democratic party this year because it became aparent that for liberals there is no quarter for religion in their agenda...none.  So the role of a social conservative then is to stop or hold back the secularization of our nation...its not just one or two items, but the prevention of the total erosion and elimination of religious values from mainstream society.

Ya... that is the other end of the spectrum. I see atheists no different that evangelicals... I'm not down with their dogma. And I think they are fringe.

Um excuse me but to which atheists are you referring, and what exactly is "our" dogma?

I'm referring to the atheist I used to be. Atheists do not believe in God... as in anti God. I'm sort of agnostic now.. I just don't know and there probably is "something" rather than nothing.

There are those that believe in God, and then there are those that are fundamental evangelical radicals... same goes for atheists. There are some rather extreme atheists out there that are absolutely no different than their counter part.... they are completely self righteous in their beliefs and there is NO room for anything else. And there most certainly is a "dogma" no different than their counterparts. Listen to Bill Maher for about 5 minutes and you should have it down.

If you are not any of the above, then I was not referring to you.

So you are referring only to a small portion of athiests then, not athiests.  Thank you I appreciate that  I do not see being an athiest as being anti god.  Not believing in something is different than being against something.

I don't listen to Bill Maher and I don't plan to start now. 

 

If you do not believe in a God, and someone does, that automatically means you are against what they believe. That is how most atheists take it... at least the ones I have known. Seems not believing in something is pretty cut and dried.. I don't believe, nothing left to talk about... yet the debates go on and on and on about why those that do believe are wrong.. that is something else.

I'm going to disagree with you there...  There are some atheists that are hardcore and fringe in their beliefs but the overwhelming majority of my atheist friends are live and let live.



Edited by mn_av8or 2012-11-08 3:33 PM
2012-11-08 3:31 PM
in reply to: #4490398

Regular
173
1002525
Subject: RE: Social conservatives, what's the end game?
JoshR - 2012-11-08 1:19 PM
bluebike - 2012-11-08 2:14 PM
JoshR - 2012-11-08 12:57 PM
bluebike - 2012-11-08 1:49 PM
BrianRunsPhilly - 2012-11-08 12:39 PM

bluebike - 2012-11-08 3:27 PM Flip this back to you..... what is the secularists end game??  A total removal of religion from the country?  A completely secular nation where God is in the shadows and religious practicitioners are marginilized?  Where we pray in secret in our closets but can't mention our beliefs in public settings?  Thats what it seems is the end game for the liberals.  I am a Christian and had to leave the democratic party this year because it became aparent that for liberals there is no quarter for religion in their agenda...none.  So the role of a social conservative then is to stop or hold back the secularization of our nation...its not just one or two items, but the prevention of the total erosion and elimination of religious values from mainstream society.

In your post you didn't say you were religious, you said you were Christian. It's not that there is no quarter for religion, it's that we are a country made up of many religions. There are apparently many people who have a strong faith who left the Republican party because the current platform goes against their morals and their faith. I would bet many of them also identify as Christian.

But in the democratic party, any thing short of total secularism is unacceptable.  Bill Maher is the perfect example of the derision and contempt that librals show for religion.  Yes I am Christian, but secularists don't want ANY God to interfere with their agenda...not a Christian God, or any other.

I think you're mistaken. I'm an atheist so take this for what it's worth. I don't think the specific issue is Christianity. I think it's because many people who want their religion in the public sphere, only want Their own religion there and no one else's. Some people want the 10 commandments on government property. I'm okay with that as long as a Koran, or a Torah or whatever else someone could want is allowed as well. Too often, I see Christians complaining about being attacked when the reason their position is being attacked is because they only want to allow their Christian beliefs in public and not Muslim/Jewish/Wiccan/whatever.

No... there is a broad range of issues that religious practicioners share regardless of their specific denomination.  My observations from my time as a democrat is that ANY religion is suspect.  Liberals are fine with Christian/Muslim/Jewish/Wiccan/whatever as long as we keep in private and in our homes.  They say the support "Freedom to Worship" to borrow a phrase from Obama.  Unfortunately, the constitution guarentees the free excercise of religion, not the freedom to worship, and the free excercise of religion means that religious beliefs can come out of our houses and into our society.   

Would you be okay with the public expression of religion if it wasn't your religion? Say if it was Islam? 

Of course and without reservation. 

2012-11-08 3:32 PM
in reply to: #4490419

User image

Champion
18680
50005000500020001000500100252525
Lost in the Luminiferous Aether
Subject: RE: Social conservatives, what's the end game?
powerman - 2012-11-08 4:25 PM
trinnas - 2012-11-08 2:17 PM
powerman - 2012-11-08 4:03 PM
trinnas - 2012-11-08 1:57 PM
powerman - 2012-11-08 3:49 PM

bluebike - 2012-11-08 1:27 PM Flip this back to you..... what is the secularists end game??  A total removal of religion from the country?  A completely secular nation where God is in the shadows and religious practicitioners are marginilized?  Where we pray in secret in our closets but can't mention our beliefs in public settings?  Thats what it seems is the end game for the liberals.  I am a Christian and had to leave the democratic party this year because it became aparent that for liberals there is no quarter for religion in their agenda...none.  So the role of a social conservative then is to stop or hold back the secularization of our nation...its not just one or two items, but the prevention of the total erosion and elimination of religious values from mainstream society.

Ya... that is the other end of the spectrum. I see atheists no different that evangelicals... I'm not down with their dogma. And I think they are fringe.

Um excuse me but to which atheists are you referring, and what exactly is "our" dogma?

I'm referring to the atheist I used to be. Atheists do not believe in God... as in anti God. I'm sort of agnostic now.. I just don't know and there probably is "something" rather than nothing.

There are those that believe in God, and then there are those that are fundamental evangelical radicals... same goes for atheists. There are some rather extreme atheists out there that are absolutely no different than their counter part.... they are completely self righteous in their beliefs and there is NO room for anything else. And there most certainly is a "dogma" no different than their counterparts. Listen to Bill Maher for about 5 minutes and you should have it down.

If you are not any of the above, then I was not referring to you.

So you are referring only to a small portion of athiests then, not athiests.  Thank you I appreciate that  I do not see being an athiest as being anti god.  Not believing in something is different than being against something.

I don't listen to Bill Maher and I don't plan to start now. 

 

If you do not believe in a God, and someone does, that automatically means you are against what they believe. That is how most atheists take it... at least the ones I have known. Seems not believing in something is pretty cut and dried.. I don't believe, nothing left to talk about... yet the debates go on and on and on about why those that do believe are wrong.. that is something else.

No it means I believe something different it does not mean I am against what they believe.

I actually find religon fascinating.

 



2012-11-08 3:33 PM
in reply to: #4490350

User image

Elite
6387
50001000100100100252525
Subject: RE: Social conservatives, what's the end game?
powerman - 2012-11-08 1:57 PM
dontracy - 2012-11-08 1:54 PM

powerman - How so... how are you not free to practice your religion as guaranteed by the Constitution? For religious organizations, that gets tricky. I'm not sure what the answer is. They have to go by serving the public, but I understand the conflicts. But at the end of the day, the Catholic Church was FREE to practice how they saw fit and stopped providing adoption services since it conflicted with doctrines. As unfortunate as that might be to the rest of the folks.

Think about that for a minute.

The Catholic Church developed the hospital system to begin with way back when.
Being called to heal the sick is a core belief of the Church.

It's now being attacked by the secularist state
to the point it may need to withdraw from that mission
in order to not violate its conscience.

Practicing my faith is more than praying in private or with the doors shut at Mass.
It's about being leaven in the world.
It's about building up institutions such as the hospital system
and social service systems. 

So yes, religious liberty is under direct attack.
 

Hummm... OK, I'll have to think on that a bit.

Yet the way the Constitution is written, that means all religions. Obviously the founders of this country came from Judeo/Christian belief system, so we have expressions of those beliefs seen in our society. Yet if you want your system expressed openly in society, then that means any other system should have the same freedom of expression everywhere too. So instead of the Commandments displayed at the Court house, you should have every other set of rules everyone else wants as well... it is just easier to take down the Commandments... yet that is not an "attack".

I'm sure there are a lot of other religious laws out there you an American would have a hard time with. And there are other services that you would be denied if you went somewhere that did not believe in that. And while Catholic hospitals are cool and all, and I'm certainly not against all the good will, when the doors are open to the public, then the public has rights, and the institution has the right to not provide those services.  As a legal matter, I don't really see a problem.

2012-11-08 3:33 PM
in reply to: #4490446

User image

Member
5452
50001001001001002525
NC
Subject: RE: Social conservatives, what's the end game?
bluebike - 2012-11-08 4:31 PM

Of course and without reservation. 

Can you help me understand with an example?  Say a expression of your religion that is frowned upon by the liberals, and a similar expression of Islam that you have no problem with.

 

 



Edited by Goosedog 2012-11-08 3:34 PM
2012-11-08 3:36 PM
in reply to: #4490451

User image

Elite
6387
50001000100100100252525
Subject: RE: Social conservatives, what's the end game?
trinnas - 2012-11-08 2:32 PM
powerman - 2012-11-08 4:25 PM
trinnas - 2012-11-08 2:17 PM
powerman - 2012-11-08 4:03 PM
trinnas - 2012-11-08 1:57 PM
powerman - 2012-11-08 3:49 PM

bluebike - 2012-11-08 1:27 PM Flip this back to you..... what is the secularists end game??  A total removal of religion from the country?  A completely secular nation where God is in the shadows and religious practicitioners are marginilized?  Where we pray in secret in our closets but can't mention our beliefs in public settings?  Thats what it seems is the end game for the liberals.  I am a Christian and had to leave the democratic party this year because it became aparent that for liberals there is no quarter for religion in their agenda...none.  So the role of a social conservative then is to stop or hold back the secularization of our nation...its not just one or two items, but the prevention of the total erosion and elimination of religious values from mainstream society.

Ya... that is the other end of the spectrum. I see atheists no different that evangelicals... I'm not down with their dogma. And I think they are fringe.

Um excuse me but to which atheists are you referring, and what exactly is "our" dogma?

I'm referring to the atheist I used to be. Atheists do not believe in God... as in anti God. I'm sort of agnostic now.. I just don't know and there probably is "something" rather than nothing.

There are those that believe in God, and then there are those that are fundamental evangelical radicals... same goes for atheists. There are some rather extreme atheists out there that are absolutely no different than their counter part.... they are completely self righteous in their beliefs and there is NO room for anything else. And there most certainly is a "dogma" no different than their counterparts. Listen to Bill Maher for about 5 minutes and you should have it down.

If you are not any of the above, then I was not referring to you.

So you are referring only to a small portion of athiests then, not athiests.  Thank you I appreciate that  I do not see being an athiest as being anti god.  Not believing in something is different than being against something.

I don't listen to Bill Maher and I don't plan to start now. 

 

If you do not believe in a God, and someone does, that automatically means you are against what they believe. That is how most atheists take it... at least the ones I have known. Seems not believing in something is pretty cut and dried.. I don't believe, nothing left to talk about... yet the debates go on and on and on about why those that do believe are wrong.. that is something else.

No it means I believe something different it does not mean I am against what they believe.

I actually find religon fascinating.

 

Then that is fine... not that you need my approval... that is just not the experience I have had. I find it fascinating too as well as those that practice what ever they practice. There is a spectrum... but in regards to any belief, those that get the most attention are those ranting about it... those in the middle just go about their day and we never know what they do or don't believe.

2012-11-08 3:42 PM
in reply to: #4489036

User image

Elite
6387
50001000100100100252525
Subject: RE: Social conservatives, what's the end game?

... and I never mind any conversation going where it goes, and knew it would bring up a whole host of issues, but back to the point...

Where does a legislative agenda fit in?

How is it possible to have small government and a social conservative platform?

How do you take a personal belief, and turn it into a national "mandate"?

How do we "legislate morality"? Not justice, and property rights and individual rights... "a particular brand of "morality"?

2012-11-08 3:42 PM
in reply to: #4490339

User image

Champion
11989
500050001000500100100100100252525
Philly 'burbs
Subject: RE: Social conservatives, what's the end game?
dontracy - 2012-11-08 3:54 PM

powerman - How so... how are you not free to practice your religion as guaranteed by the Constitution? For religious organizations, that gets tricky. I'm not sure what the answer is. They have to go by serving the public, but I understand the conflicts. But at the end of the day, the Catholic Church was FREE to practice how they saw fit and stopped providing adoption services since it conflicted with doctrines. As unfortunate as that might be to the rest of the folks.

Think about that for a minute.

The Catholic Church developed the hospital system to begin with way back when.
Being called to heal the sick is a core belief of the Church.

It's now being attacked by the secularist state
to the point it may need to withdraw from that mission
in order to not violate its conscience.

 

 

"Withdraw from that mission." So the Church would walk away from a core belief because another core belief was being challenged? That means on some level it's ok to turn away from a core belief. Then why not stick with the core belief that does the most good for the most people and walk away from the other?



2012-11-08 3:42 PM
in reply to: #4490463

User image

Champion
18680
50005000500020001000500100252525
Lost in the Luminiferous Aether
Subject: RE: Social conservatives, what's the end game?
powerman - 2012-11-08 4:36 PM
trinnas - 2012-11-08 2:32 PM
powerman - 2012-11-08 4:25 PM
trinnas - 2012-11-08 2:17 PM
powerman - 2012-11-08 4:03 PM
trinnas - 2012-11-08 1:57 PM
powerman - 2012-11-08 3:49 PM

bluebike - 2012-11-08 1:27 PM Flip this back to you..... what is the secularists end game??  A total removal of religion from the country?  A completely secular nation where God is in the shadows and religious practicitioners are marginilized?  Where we pray in secret in our closets but can't mention our beliefs in public settings?  Thats what it seems is the end game for the liberals.  I am a Christian and had to leave the democratic party this year because it became aparent that for liberals there is no quarter for religion in their agenda...none.  So the role of a social conservative then is to stop or hold back the secularization of our nation...its not just one or two items, but the prevention of the total erosion and elimination of religious values from mainstream society.

Ya... that is the other end of the spectrum. I see atheists no different that evangelicals... I'm not down with their dogma. And I think they are fringe.

Um excuse me but to which atheists are you referring, and what exactly is "our" dogma?

I'm referring to the atheist I used to be. Atheists do not believe in God... as in anti God. I'm sort of agnostic now.. I just don't know and there probably is "something" rather than nothing.

There are those that believe in God, and then there are those that are fundamental evangelical radicals... same goes for atheists. There are some rather extreme atheists out there that are absolutely no different than their counter part.... they are completely self righteous in their beliefs and there is NO room for anything else. And there most certainly is a "dogma" no different than their counterparts. Listen to Bill Maher for about 5 minutes and you should have it down.

If you are not any of the above, then I was not referring to you.

So you are referring only to a small portion of athiests then, not athiests.  Thank you I appreciate that  I do not see being an athiest as being anti god.  Not believing in something is different than being against something.

I don't listen to Bill Maher and I don't plan to start now. 

 

If you do not believe in a God, and someone does, that automatically means you are against what they believe. That is how most atheists take it... at least the ones I have known. Seems not believing in something is pretty cut and dried.. I don't believe, nothing left to talk about... yet the debates go on and on and on about why those that do believe are wrong.. that is something else.

No it means I believe something different it does not mean I am against what they believe.

I actually find religon fascinating.

 

Then that is fine... not that you need my approval... that is just not the experience I have had. I find it fascinating too as well as those that practice what ever they practice. There is a spectrum... but in regards to any belief, those that get the most attention are those ranting about it... those in the middle just go about their day and we never know what they do or don't believe.

Is that not the same for any belief system?

I gave up on needing approval around here so not to worry.  There are those I like and respect and those I don't and those in between.  You I actually respect.... even when you are wrong. 

2012-11-08 3:46 PM
in reply to: #4490454

Regular
173
1002525
Subject: RE: Social conservatives, what's the end game?
Goosedog - 2012-11-08 1:33 PM
bluebike - 2012-11-08 4:31 PM

Of course and without reservation. 

Can you help me understand with an example?  Say a expression of your religion that is frowned upon by the liberals, and a similar expression of Islam that you have no problem with.

 Sure.  Prayer at the beginning of a public high school football game.   One week the prayer is offered by christian... great.  The next week the Mulsim player gets the opportunity and prays to Muhammad... wonderful.   In both cases liberals are beside themselves with contempt... NO PRAYING in public schools PERIOD. 



Edited by bluebike 2012-11-08 3:48 PM
2012-11-08 3:52 PM
in reply to: #4489036

User image

Elite
4547
2000200050025
Subject: RE: Social conservatives, what's the end game?

Don (and the others claiming religion is "under attack" in the United States)...you do realize religious organizations in this country are tax-exempt, correct?  One would think that if organized religions were truly "under attack," those godless heathens would be working 24/7 to cut the free ride, eh?  

If the tax exempt status of religious institutions in the U.S. was taken away...the U.S. government would be collecting more than $70 billion more per year.

Hey, there's some tax relief, right?  

2012-11-08 3:56 PM
in reply to: #4490491

User image

Elite
4547
2000200050025
Subject: RE: Social conservatives, what's the end game?
bluebike - 2012-11-08 4:46 PM
Goosedog - 2012-11-08 1:33 PM
bluebike - 2012-11-08 4:31 PM

Of course and without reservation. 

Can you help me understand with an example?  Say a expression of your religion that is frowned upon by the liberals, and a similar expression of Islam that you have no problem with.

 Sure.  Prayer at the beginning of a public high school football game.   One week the prayer is offered by christian... great.  The next week the Mulsim player gets the opportunity and prays to Muhammad... wonderful.   In both cases liberals are beside themselves with contempt... NO PRAYING in public schools PERIOD. 

Nobody is preventing anyone from praying in school.  Last time I checked, you can fold your hands, close your eyes at your desk, and pray.  You can fold your hands, close your eyes, prior to eating lunch.  You can fold your hands, close your eyes, and pray prior to a football game.  Do you really need to pray out loud, proclaiming your beliefs so everyone can hear you?  Does it have to be over a loudspeaker directed at everyone?  Even those that don't agree with it?  Save the evangelizing for home. (in my opinion of course)

New Thread
Other Resources My Cup of Joe » Social conservatives, what's the end game? Rss Feed  
 
 
of 8