BT Development Mentor Program Archives » kaburns1214 Mentor Group 2012 - CLOSED Rss Feed  
Moderators: alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 88
 
 
2012-01-03 9:43 AM
in reply to: #3943066

User image

Expert
1121
1000100
Subject: RE: kaburns1214 Mentor Group 2012 - CLOSED

Love the intensity of this group!! it's great when you hear two separate opinions.  it's like UFC fighting with you guys.  Beat the crap out of each other with your opinions, and then hug after the fight!!  Love it!!

 



2012-01-03 9:48 AM
in reply to: #3943066

User image

Expert
1121
1000100
Subject: RE: kaburns1214 Mentor Group 2012 - CLOSED

So after my 40 mile ride on New Years Day, although legs were a little tired, I so badly wanted to run.  My IT band actually felt great. I have not run in almost 3 weeks.  But I've been here before, whereas I though it was healed, only to have it act up again after mile 2.  I am wanting to run at the gym today after ST, but I have to somehow control that urge.  At this point, I am 10 days out from shoulder surgery.  What is running going to do for me in the next 10 days when in reality, I won't be able to run for at least a few weeks post surgery, if not longer.

Someone either tell me "Don't run you idiot" or tell me, "give it a try" 

2012-01-03 9:52 AM
in reply to: #3967884

User image

Pro
4672
200020005001002525
Nutmeg State
Subject: RE: kaburns1214 Mentor Group 2012 - CLOSED
rizer22 - 2012-01-03 10:48 AM

So after my 40 mile ride on New Years Day, although legs were a little tired, I so badly wanted to run.  My IT band actually felt great. I have not run in almost 3 weeks.  But I've been here before, whereas I though it was healed, only to have it act up again after mile 2.  I am wanting to run at the gym today after ST, but I have to somehow control that urge.  At this point, I am 10 days out from shoulder surgery.  What is running going to do for me in the next 10 days when in reality, I won't be able to run for at least a few weeks post surgery, if not longer.

Someone either tell me "Don't run you idiot" or tell me, "give it a try" 

If you want to run, go for it.  If you run and you have an IT flare up, you're going to be on forced rest anyway so it can heal.  Its not going to do anything for you fitness wise but if it makes you feel better to get outside and run, I think you should.

2012-01-03 10:09 AM
in reply to: #3967669

User image

Expert
1121
1000100
Subject: RE: kaburns1214 Mentor Group 2012 - CLOSED

uhcoog - 2012-01-03 9:12 AM Too much math in this thread.  Just to settle the crazy arguement.  We're all crazy, it's just matters of degrees.  Thanks.

Scott,

Just read your latest Blog, 2011 Year in Review.  You had a great year, and put up some good numbers.  As we all know, consistency is the key.  Nice work with that.

So two things.  I see you had 61 hours of Strength training and 15 hours of Yoga.  For ST, is majority of that off season?  I know we have had this discussion in the past, about more ST in the off season, and limited in season.  I can agree with that.  Just curious how it worked for you and what you did during the season for ST. I just ordered the Spnervals Yoga for Athletes 3.0.  Should be here tomorrow and am looking forward to it.

Secondly, in a round about way, Scott sort of committed to IMTX 2013!!!!  Go for it!!!



Edited by rizer22 2012-01-03 10:09 AM
2012-01-03 10:17 AM
in reply to: #3943066

User image

Expert
1121
1000100
Subject: RE: kaburns1214 Mentor Group 2012 - CLOSED

Kelly, also a very cool blog post regarding your numbers.  Check out Kellys blog.  Sick mileage, and she relates it to how far it actually is.  Such as her bike milaege is equal to riding from Connecticut to South Africa.  Crazy!!!  Nice year Kelly.  Wishing you the best at IMTX and getting a KQ!!!!

2012-01-03 10:56 AM
in reply to: #3943066

User image

Pro
4672
200020005001002525
Nutmeg State
Subject: RE: kaburns1214 Mentor Group 2012 - CLOSED

All this bantering with Rudy got me thinking about the V Dot chart (VDOT is an adjusted V02max (which may or may not match a laboratory-generated V02max), which tells you how you might race for other distances (in the row, associated with the same VDOT).  The chart essentially shows what you HIM or IM run time should be based on your VDot number. 

You can use the open 10K or Half Marathon time on the chart or calculate your VDot based on another distance here

The table shows the 75-80% range for the IM Run and 90-95% range for the HIM Run using 10k and HM times from Daniels VDOT Tables:

 

 



2012-01-03 11:21 AM
in reply to: #3967952

User image

Pro
4723
20002000500100100
CyFair
Subject: RE: kaburns1214 Mentor Group 2012 - CLOSED
rizer22 - 2012-01-03 10:09 AM

uhcoog - 2012-01-03 9:12 AM Too much math in this thread.  Just to settle the crazy arguement.  We're all crazy, it's just matters of degrees.  Thanks.

Scott,

Just read your latest Blog, 2011 Year in Review.  You had a great year, and put up some good numbers.  As we all know, consistency is the key.  Nice work with that.

So two things.  I see you had 61 hours of Strength training and 15 hours of Yoga.  For ST, is majority of that off season?  I know we have had this discussion in the past, about more ST in the off season, and limited in season.  I can agree with that.  Just curious how it worked for you and what you did during the season for ST. I just ordered the Spnervals Yoga for Athletes 3.0.  Should be here tomorrow and am looking forward to it.

Secondly, in a round about way, Scott sort of committed to IMTX 2013!!!!  Go for it!!!

A lot of that was in the time I was down with ITBS and in the off season.  I also had a period mid summer where I lifted a bit.  Basically I've found I have a set number of hours that I can workout.  I schedule out my s/b/r to get ready for races and fill in with ST.  It's funny I would get 60 hours of lifting in a little over a month in a fomer life.  In base building and the off season I'd lift heavy for low reps and when I'd lift in the build phases I'd lift more circuited.  I think it worked out fine.  I came out of the season much weaker in my upper body and as strong in my lower as I was going in.  Also felt I never over taxed my system at any point with the ST.

Oh and yeah I kinda did.  Was wondering if anyone would catch that.  You're the first to say something. 

2012-01-03 11:25 AM
in reply to: #3943066

User image

Master
2538
200050025
Albuquerque
Subject: RE: kaburns1214 Mentor Group 2012 - CLOSED
That chart needs more numbers...I can't run a 50 minute 10k! 
2012-01-03 11:36 AM
in reply to: #3943066

User image

Champion
9600
500020002000500100
Fountain Hills, AZ
Subject: RE: kaburns1214 Mentor Group 2012 - CLOSED
I'll settle this bike debate. Specifically as it applies to long course racing.

Initially raw bike volume is key. For the first year or two of long course training, you need a lot of with some variability in intensity, but mostly aerobic in nature. When I first began training for Ironman back in 2006, I was new to cyclsing and my coach made me ride my bike so much I hated to even look at it. But he knew I needed to be able to have enough bike specific endurance to manage 112 miles and still be able to run. So I rode...a lot...a whole lot.

However, once you have established a sufficient bike base, that's when you can continue to improve witrh much less volume and more intensity. That's a bit more how I train now, although my overall bike mileage is still over 6000 per year I could do more. But sometimes more is just more. And when it comes to being competitive at long course racing, the run is KEY. I would gladly give up 5 min on the bike to run 10min faser. To do that, you need to have great run firness and they only way that's going to happen is to run...a lot...a whole lot. So bike volume needs to give as you don't need it and it will have a negative impact on yur run training. trust me when I say Ironman is won, however you qualify that, on the run.
2012-01-03 12:25 PM
in reply to: #3968172

User image

Master
1832
100050010010010025
Elgin, IL
Subject: RE: kaburns1214 Mentor Group 2012 - CLOSED
I caught that ... I kinda though IMTX was a given, just a matter of when.
2012-01-03 12:26 PM
in reply to: #3943066

User image

Master
1832
100050010010010025
Elgin, IL
Subject: RE: kaburns1214 Mentor Group 2012 - CLOSED
So I am brining my foam roller with me to Disney ...  is that weird?  Hopefully they won't think it is some kind of a weapon in the airport, although it is a padded one, LOL


2012-01-03 1:56 PM
in reply to: #3968092

User image

Pro
4528
2000200050025
Norwalk, Connecticut
Subject: RE: kaburns1214 Mentor Group 2012 - CLOSED
kaburns1214 - 2012-01-03 11:56 AM

All this bantering with Rudy got me thinking about the V Dot chart (VDOT is an adjusted V02max (which may or may not match a laboratory-generated V02max), which tells you how you might race for other distances (in the row, associated with the same VDOT).  The chart essentially shows what you HIM or IM run time should be based on your VDot number. 

You can use the open 10K or Half Marathon time on the chart or calculate your VDot based on another distance here

The table shows the 75-80% range for the IM Run and 90-95% range for the HIM Run using 10k and HM times from Daniels VDOT Tables:

 

 

 

well, i will know what my open 10k is this weekend, if i take last years numbers, i must say, that chart is pretty close to accurate for what i did in my HIM

 

2012-01-03 2:20 PM
in reply to: #3968568

User image

Pro
4672
200020005001002525
Nutmeg State
Subject: RE: kaburns1214 Mentor Group 2012 - CLOSED

well, i will know what my open 10k is this weekend, if i take last years numbers, i must say, that chart is pretty close to accurate for what i did in my HIM

 

Your 5K of 22:07 from Christopher Marten gives you a V Dot of 45 (a 1:43 - 1:48 on your HIM run).

2012-01-03 2:30 PM
in reply to: #3968641

User image

Pro
4528
2000200050025
Norwalk, Connecticut
Subject: RE: kaburns1214 Mentor Group 2012 - CLOSED
kaburns1214 - 2012-01-03 3:20 PM

well, i will know what my open 10k is this weekend, if i take last years numbers, i must say, that chart is pretty close to accurate for what i did in my HIM

 

Your 5K of 22:07 from Christopher Marten gives you a V Dot of 45 (a 1:43 - 1:48 on your HIM run).

 

i'll take that 1h48m right now and bank it, thanks.....  and work harder on my bike.....HAHAHAHAHA

 

2012-01-03 2:37 PM
in reply to: #3967625

User image

New Haven, CT
Subject: RE: kaburns1214 Mentor Group 2012 - CLOSED
CubeFarmGopher - 2012-01-03 8:57 AM
Rudedog55 - 2012-01-03 8:01 AM
kaburns1214 - 2012-01-03 7:07 AM
Rudedog55 - 2012-01-02 1:44 PM
jsklarz - 2012-01-02 1:07 PM
kaburns1214 - 2012-01-02 11:42 AM

My friend Mary Eggers wrote this blog post about "making time."  I thought it was really interesting, take a look:

http://ironmomma.com/2012/01/02/on-making-time/

i agree with all of that.  of course its how i live my life so its easy to agree with.

had a nice run this morning, really stiff - hey thats what happen when you actually run 4 days in a row and! plan on biking later.

Plan to get ready for Rev3 HIM in early june is a tweaking of the BT 20 week intermediate HIM plan, that plan call for 14 or so hours a week of training.  In my dreams!  got to whittle it down to 8-10, with maybe a 3 weeks of 12 at the most. 

 

easily doable, i did my training for Patriot last year in the 8-9 area with a few weeks sprinkled over 10 hours.

the key is to make the most of your training, you can have not much lax time.

A lot of plans also have you biking a lot of hours, i do not see the need for that, 1 long ride a week with a couple interval sessions or aggressive road rides between 1-1.5 hours will put you in decent shape for the bike portion.  you can skimp on the swimming hours, but it will cost you a bit on the bike, trust me, my legs were not right for a good 5-10 miles at Patriot before they warmed up and stopped being crampy from my lack of swimming. you know you can do the distance, hell, we would go do it now, but we would feel like crap after the swim and not wanna ride 56 miles, lol

 

I may have posted this before, but this is a good article by Tim Snow as to why bike volume is so important for both the bike and run portions of a race: http://kropelnicki.com/?p=292

 

Here's the jist --

Bike volume!  Bike volume is so effective because it not only builds bike fitness, but it also builds durability.  This bike durability ensures that your running legs are fresher at the outset of the marathon.  Typically there should be no less than a 5:1 bike to run volume ratio, and many times higher for athletes with bike limiters.  Many struggling runners will operate at a smaller ratio, as they increase their running volume, thinking that they have to train more like a runner.  Running actually wreaks havoc on cycling strength.  Too much running volume, relative to cycling, can actually have just opposite of the desired effect.  Cycling, decimated by too much running volume, become less powerful.  Not only does this equate to slower bike times, but it also means that the bike leg becomes significantly more taxing, leaving your running legs in a more vulnerable state.  If in doubt, err on the side of increased bike volume.  Not only will you bike stronger, but you will feel and be fresher, as you set out on the marathon.

 

Yeah...thats all well and good, but Tim Snow and i will have to disagree.

There are many ways to fry a fish, and while QT2 has their way, it is not the end all be all of how someone can train and be successful.

Not everyone has the time to train that you do Kelly, There are other ways to get the job done, and doing a long ride plus intervals with the adequate rest will produce similar results.

Keep in mind, that his article seems to be geared towards Iron Distance races, which i have absolutely no knowledge of the training requirements.  But Jeff is not racing an Ironman, and halfs are a much different race than fulls, regardless if they share the Iron in their name.

not saying you dont need volume, just saying that you can do other things besides endless boring hours EVERY time on the bike.

 

So Kel says to me: go read my thread and tell me if I'm crazy.  After I said "You're crazy" without even reading the thread, I thought I could weigh in because I think there are a couple of different things being said that are getting muddled together.

First off, you have time and you have intensity.  Separating those items is key because it seems that there is a basic premise that Kel focuses only on time with no intensity and Rudy focuses on intensity with no time. 

What I'm hearing is that Rizer has a limited number of hours to train and is looking for how to separate the areas.  Let's call it 10 hours at the peak to keep the numbers easy.

If I'm understanding Kel's general point, she is thinking that you want to target 60%'ish for the bike.  Hearing Rudy's statement of a couple intervals at 1.5 hours and a single long ride, it sounds like you guys are in, roughly, the same ballpark numbers wise.  That would be 3 hours of intensity sprinkled through the week and a single long ride to get your balance.

Leaving 4 hours to train, I believe you can massage that around to give you 3'ish hours to run and an hour in the pool.

I don't know what Rizer's goal is from a race standpoint but, especially on Rev3, the biggest danger area is the ability to push power up the hills and then quickly recover.  In this case, intervals will help you but you need to make sure you are working them correctly and not going all the way to red-line during the interval since, on race day, you will still need to come off the bike and run hills. 

Dude - Why are you blaming Rizer?  I stirred the pot

2012-01-03 2:38 PM
in reply to: #3968343

User image

Extreme Veteran
610
500100
San Francisco CA
Subject: RE: kaburns1214 Mentor Group 2012 - CLOSED

carrie639 - 2012-01-03 10:26 AM So I am brining my foam roller with me to Disney ...  is that weird?  Hopefully they won't think it is some kind of a weapon in the airport, although it is a padded one, LOL

Not weird! I almost always travel with my Stick and that looks even more like a weapon. I got the mini one so it fits in my small roller bag.



2012-01-03 2:43 PM
in reply to: #3968220

User image

New Haven, CT
Subject: RE: kaburns1214 Mentor Group 2012 - CLOSED

bryancd - 2012-01-03 12:36 PM I'll settle this bike debate. Specifically as it applies to long course racing. Initially raw bike volume is key. For the first year or two of long course training, you need a lot of with some variability in intensity, but mostly aerobic in nature. When I first began training for Ironman back in 2006, I was new to cyclsing and my coach made me ride my bike so much I hated to even look at it. But he knew I needed to be able to have enough bike specific endurance to manage 112 miles and still be able to run. So I rode...a lot...a whole lot. However, once you have established a sufficient bike base, that's when you can continue to improve witrh much less volume and more intensity. That's a bit more how I train now, although my overall bike mileage is still over 6000 per year I could do more. But sometimes more is just more. And when it comes to being competitive at long course racing, the run is KEY. I would gladly give up 5 min on the bike to run 10min faser. To do that, you need to have great run firness and they only way that's going to happen is to run...a lot...a whole lot. So bike volume needs to give as you don't need it and it will have a negative impact on yur run training. trust me when I say Ironman is won, however you qualify that, on the run.

So what does that mean for me?  do I go with the Rudy/Kelly plan of about 4-5 h. biking, 3-4 hours running and 1-2 hours swimming? 

2012-01-03 3:38 PM
in reply to: #3968694

User image

Pro
4723
20002000500100100
CyFair
Subject: RE: kaburns1214 Mentor Group 2012 - CLOSED
jsklarz - 2012-01-03 2:37 PM
CubeFarmGopher - 2012-01-03 8:57 AM
Rudedog55 - 2012-01-03 8:01 AM
kaburns1214 - 2012-01-03 7:07 AM
Rudedog55 - 2012-01-02 1:44 PM
jsklarz - 2012-01-02 1:07 PM
kaburns1214 - 2012-01-02 11:42 AM

My friend Mary Eggers wrote this blog post about "making time."  I thought it was really interesting, take a look:

http://ironmomma.com/2012/01/02/on-making-time/

i agree with all of that.  of course its how i live my life so its easy to agree with.

had a nice run this morning, really stiff - hey thats what happen when you actually run 4 days in a row and! plan on biking later.

Plan to get ready for Rev3 HIM in early june is a tweaking of the BT 20 week intermediate HIM plan, that plan call for 14 or so hours a week of training.  In my dreams!  got to whittle it down to 8-10, with maybe a 3 weeks of 12 at the most. 

 

easily doable, i did my training for Patriot last year in the 8-9 area with a few weeks sprinkled over 10 hours.

the key is to make the most of your training, you can have not much lax time.

A lot of plans also have you biking a lot of hours, i do not see the need for that, 1 long ride a week with a couple interval sessions or aggressive road rides between 1-1.5 hours will put you in decent shape for the bike portion.  you can skimp on the swimming hours, but it will cost you a bit on the bike, trust me, my legs were not right for a good 5-10 miles at Patriot before they warmed up and stopped being crampy from my lack of swimming. you know you can do the distance, hell, we would go do it now, but we would feel like crap after the swim and not wanna ride 56 miles, lol

 

I may have posted this before, but this is a good article by Tim Snow as to why bike volume is so important for both the bike and run portions of a race: http://kropelnicki.com/?p=292

 

Here's the jist --

Bike volume!  Bike volume is so effective because it not only builds bike fitness, but it also builds durability.  This bike durability ensures that your running legs are fresher at the outset of the marathon.  Typically there should be no less than a 5:1 bike to run volume ratio, and many times higher for athletes with bike limiters.  Many struggling runners will operate at a smaller ratio, as they increase their running volume, thinking that they have to train more like a runner.  Running actually wreaks havoc on cycling strength.  Too much running volume, relative to cycling, can actually have just opposite of the desired effect.  Cycling, decimated by too much running volume, become less powerful.  Not only does this equate to slower bike times, but it also means that the bike leg becomes significantly more taxing, leaving your running legs in a more vulnerable state.  If in doubt, err on the side of increased bike volume.  Not only will you bike stronger, but you will feel and be fresher, as you set out on the marathon.

 

Yeah...thats all well and good, but Tim Snow and i will have to disagree.

There are many ways to fry a fish, and while QT2 has their way, it is not the end all be all of how someone can train and be successful.

Not everyone has the time to train that you do Kelly, There are other ways to get the job done, and doing a long ride plus intervals with the adequate rest will produce similar results.

Keep in mind, that his article seems to be geared towards Iron Distance races, which i have absolutely no knowledge of the training requirements.  But Jeff is not racing an Ironman, and halfs are a much different race than fulls, regardless if they share the Iron in their name.

not saying you dont need volume, just saying that you can do other things besides endless boring hours EVERY time on the bike.

 

So Kel says to me: go read my thread and tell me if I'm crazy.  After I said "You're crazy" without even reading the thread, I thought I could weigh in because I think there are a couple of different things being said that are getting muddled together.

First off, you have time and you have intensity.  Separating those items is key because it seems that there is a basic premise that Kel focuses only on time with no intensity and Rudy focuses on intensity with no time. 

What I'm hearing is that Rizer has a limited number of hours to train and is looking for how to separate the areas.  Let's call it 10 hours at the peak to keep the numbers easy.

If I'm understanding Kel's general point, she is thinking that you want to target 60%'ish for the bike.  Hearing Rudy's statement of a couple intervals at 1.5 hours and a single long ride, it sounds like you guys are in, roughly, the same ballpark numbers wise.  That would be 3 hours of intensity sprinkled through the week and a single long ride to get your balance.

Leaving 4 hours to train, I believe you can massage that around to give you 3'ish hours to run and an hour in the pool.

I don't know what Rizer's goal is from a race standpoint but, especially on Rev3, the biggest danger area is the ability to push power up the hills and then quickly recover.  In this case, intervals will help you but you need to make sure you are working them correctly and not going all the way to red-line during the interval since, on race day, you will still need to come off the bike and run hills. 

Dude - Why are you blaming Rizer?  I stirred the pot

"Other" Jeff flies under the radar far too much.  It's about time he got called out for something whether he was the culprit or not.  :P

2012-01-03 3:43 PM
in reply to: #3943066

User image

Pro
4723
20002000500100100
CyFair
Subject: RE: kaburns1214 Mentor Group 2012 - CLOSED
Dammit Bryan.  Your post made me get on the trainer for my lunch hour. 
2012-01-03 4:30 PM
in reply to: #3943066

User image

Master
2538
200050025
Albuquerque
Subject: RE: kaburns1214 Mentor Group 2012 - CLOSED

Swam today around lunch time. First swim in over a month. Felt good, although my shoulder has been REALLY bothering me. The muscle beside the shoulder blade has been a knot for about 10-14 days now.

Anyone ever go to those Massage Envy places I see around town? I've never gotten a massage, but I think I need one.

2012-01-03 4:46 PM
in reply to: #3968711

User image

Champion
9600
500020002000500100
Fountain Hills, AZ
Subject: RE: kaburns1214 Mentor Group 2012 - CLOSED
jsklarz - 2012-01-03 1:43 PM
So what does that mean for me?  do I go with the Rudy/Kelly plan of about 4-5 h. biking, 3-4 hours running and 1-2 hours swimming? 



Have you ever considered taking up chess?

If you have an average of 10-12 hours to train that's fine. I would try and swim 2-3 per week for 45-60min. with challenging sets. Run 4 times (one short, easy run off a bike no more then 20min, one where to do a little pace/interval/tempo work and another just at a steady aerobic pace for 45min., and a long run of 8-10 miles), and bike 3 times (twice during the week where one is steady effort a below your Half IM effort and one where to do some work at Half IM and Olympic effort as intervals or tempo that are about 90min., and one long ride where you get up to 60 miles as you near the race).

So that's what, about 12 hours? The key, don't dick around in the pool or on the bike. DO WORK.


2012-01-03 5:24 PM
in reply to: #3943066

User image

Veteran
446
10010010010025
Subject: RE: kaburns1214 Mentor Group 2012 - CLOSED
So, I understand what a long ride is but when you say intervals... is that balls out at/near threshold for reps.  If you are maximizing your time wouldn't that be an interval set??
2012-01-03 5:35 PM
in reply to: #3969046

User image

Pro
4723
20002000500100100
CyFair
Subject: RE: kaburns1214 Mentor Group 2012 - CLOSED
abqtj - 2012-01-03 4:30 PM

Swam today around lunch time. First swim in over a month. Felt good, although my shoulder has been REALLY bothering me. The muscle beside the shoulder blade has been a knot for about 10-14 days now.

Anyone ever go to those Massage Envy places I see around town? I've never gotten a massage, but I think I need one.

Kinda hit or miss around here.  Very much dependent on if you luck into a good masseuse or not.

2012-01-03 5:39 PM
in reply to: #3969183

User image

Champion
9600
500020002000500100
Fountain Hills, AZ
Subject: RE: kaburns1214 Mentor Group 2012 - CLOSED
gabrelsj - 2012-01-03 4:24 PM

So, I understand what a long ride is but when you say intervals... is that balls out at/near threshold for reps.  If you are maximizing your time wouldn't that be an interval set??


Intervals can be at any intensity. From balls out to threshold 40K TT pace to Half IM to IM. The more intense, the shorter the duration of the intervals. An interval is simply applying stress, allowing for a recovery, repeat. Maximizing your time, or to say it better, getting the most physiological bang for the buck while training on the bike, simply means don't be sitting up noodling around in Zone 1 for 90 min and call it training. That's a bike ride.
2012-01-03 6:27 PM
in reply to: #3969093

User image

Extreme Veteran
863
5001001001002525
Subject: RE: kaburns1214 Mentor Group 2012 - CLOSED

bryancd - 2012-01-03 5:46 PM
jsklarz - 2012-01-03 1:43 PM So what does that mean for me?  do I go with the Rudy/Kelly plan of about 4-5 h. biking, 3-4 hours running and 1-2 hours swimming? 
Have you ever considered taking up chess? If you have an average of 10-12 hours to train that's fine. I would try and swim 2-3 per week for 45-60min. with challenging sets. Run 4 times (one short, easy run off a bike no more then 20min, one where to do a little pace/interval/tempo work and another just at a steady aerobic pace for 45min., and a long run of 8-10 miles), and bike 3 times (twice during the week where one is steady effort a below your Half IM effort and one where to do some work at Half IM and Olympic effort as intervals or tempo that are about 90min., and one long ride where you get up to 60 miles as you near the race). So that's what, about 12 hours? The key, don't dick around in the pool or on the bike. DO WORK.

That sounds like a great outline for me too Bryan! Thanks! Now can you put it into an actually weekly training plan to culminate 7/22 in an oly for me? That would be great!!LOL

New Thread
BT Development Mentor Program Archives » kaburns1214 Mentor Group 2012 - CLOSED Rss Feed  
 
 
of 88