Election 2016 (Page 23)

I have purposely been trying to avoid the 'fact checker' because very things are black and white.  Most are interpretations and opinions.

So I read on one website that there is no evidence that Trump opposed the war therefore that was false.  Then I see this video:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/09/27/2003-clip-backs-up-trump-on-iraq-war-opposition.html

Which clearly has him on record of opposing the war in 2003.

Not that it matters....he was a NYC businessman opining on the Iraq.....Senator Clinton stood in the Senate Chambers and voiced a vote to authorize the war.  Yet Trump get more questions about the war than she does!

SMH

The problem with the fact checkers on this issue is the way they represent it.  Trump was consistently against the war before and leading up to the war and stayed opposed it it long after the war including up to this day.  I'm not sure if there's any public figure who was more anti going into Iraq then him to be honest.  
He did do a radio interview (in 2002 I think) with Stern where they were joking back and forth about going into the war and Trump said something to the effect that if they're going to do it then they need to do it and just make up their mind.  Stern said something to the effect of him being for the war now and then and he said I guess so.  When it's in context it's a lot easier to hear what they were actually saying versus how the media and "fact checkers' try to portray it.
 Hillary and her sidekick Lester flat out lied by saying he said he was for the war when he was staunchly against it long before, during and after the war.  It's just blatantly false and downright embarrassing for them.

However, the "fact checkers" go out and say they found a clip where he said "i guess" and hold it up as factual proof that he was for the war and ignore the context.  ugh 

The good news is that this crap just feeds into Trumps appeal.  He's the inverse of every politician we've ever seen where he's immune to stupid attacks like these.

On a different topic though, check out this article showing real people responding to the debate.  I found it very representative to what many have been saying today.  Trump didn't hurt himself, but Hillary may have:

Presidential debate surprise: Clinton loses ground among some voters in swing state

Uh oh, now come the Hillary cheated pic's.   I thought her long pauses after every question were a little awkward.  I guess she had to be told what memorized line to play next.  haha
btw, Lester really did have an earpiece in as which was a clear violation of debate rules. 

its actually an alien spy implant.  the pauses were transmission times from their starship to her spinal cord to control her movements.

I was going to say that, but didn't want to come across as too far out there.  ;-) 

She cheated.........who would have figured?  Will do or say anything to get elected......she's despicable.  What the hell else would the earphone, which would obviously be attached to the apparatus on her back, be for?   She was wired for the debate.  LMAOOOO  Priceless!! 

http://www.snopes.com/clinton-secret-earpiece-debate/

Transmitter and wire for her lapel mic.

She is a Manchurian candidate. She actually died a few years ago when she fell and hit her head but is kept 'alive' with computers.  Occasionally there will be a glitch in the computer and she will have coughing spells or pass out do to low battery.  There are still a few bugs......

Snopes may not be the most authoritative source out there.  But according to Southpark, alien communications equipment isn't placed higher on a person's back like the shot of Hillary showed.  So there goes that theory, too.  Lower placement could explain her difficulties standing and walking, however.

No, no, no.....she cheated.  You KNOW shew cheated.  It's a family tradition.

Are you kidding me?!  This stuff is completely ridiculous. I get that Trump has his supporters and Hillary has hers and neither is going to admit the other did well in the debate, but the conspiracy theories are insane. Do we really think a woman with Hillary's level of education can't memorize a few lines for a debate, and needs to be fed lines through an earpiece, and that this "must be" the reason she sounded halfway intelligent compared to her component? The woman has shown throughout her life that she can study and compete with the best of them academically - acting as though she wore an earpiece to cheat might possibly be the dumbest criticism I've seen the Trump camp come up with yet. She got into Yale Law school when most women wouldn't even dream of applying - say what you will about her (and I know you will), but I feel like studying for this particular test so she could spout a few memorized lines was not below her intellectual ability. Trump on the other hand???

I'm an independent and I've never been a Hillary fan, but this is the stuff that convinces me more and more that the republicans have gone 100% off the rails.

I live in a swing county in a swing state, and I don't know a single person who is voting for Trump. I have yet to see a Trump sticker on a car in my town. So yeah, I guess I just don't get his appeal, but this sort of stuff is certainly not helping.

They start to seem normal when you spend all your time on breitbart and thegatewaypundit

Yes, this seems plausible.  Hillary has brain damage.

http://allnewspipeline.com/Hillary_Clinton_Severe_Brain_Damage.php

One of the commenters suggested she was the antichrist. 

So I'm thinking what could be worse that then antichrist? The antichrist with brain damage!

Some messed up formatting there. Nevermind.

I finally got your name.  LOL

It seemed fitting for anonymous internet debates. 

LOL  Yes, it is.  Hilarious!

Back off Stacers.....it's a well known fact that Hillary has battery packs in her ankles....no other way to explain the size.

Lol. Well-played.

http://video.foxnews.com/v/5145454305001/dilbert-creator-flip-flops-on-clinton-support-backs-trump/?#sp=show-clips

Dilbert

For the record Stacers we like to have a little fun with the conspiracy stuff.  I admittedly get a little more out there then most of the guys here, but I know when the stuff is goofy like the Clinton pics above.

There's a lot of really interesting stuff out there when you get into the fringe edges of both Clinton and Trump supporters.  

Speaking of interesting stuff...   Somebody cracked Hillary's signals to Lester.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NSGuugyE6tc

Or is this a health thing because she has a very "itchy" face?   ;-) 

Clinton campaign should find this troubling:

Post-Charlotte, Voters Say Obama, Clinton on Side of Protestors, Trump With Police

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/general_politics/september_2016/post_charlotte_voters_say_obama_clinton_on_side_of_protestors_trump_with_police

This is one of those things that could blow up the in the weeks just before an election....when you are sitting at home before the election watching rioting in the streets as they "protest" police.....

Speaking of interesting stuff.  Trump spent money in Cuba when it was illegal?

http://www.newsweek.com/2016/10/14/donald-trump-cuban-embargo-castro-violated-florida-504059.html