Rush Limbaugh rips Chevy Volt (Page 3)
-
No new posts
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller | Reply |
|
![]() ![]() |
Pro ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Indiana_Geoff - 2010-07-31 11:23 AM My BMW went from Indiana to the Panhandle of Florida with 1 refill and a 1/3rd of a tank left in 10ish hours about 30ish MPG. What electric can match that? That's not really a valid question as that's not what they're designing these cars for. They're marketing these cars as commuter cars. Your question is akin to asking why a Tesla can't go 4-wheeling or why a SUV can't go up stairs as well as a dirt bike, that's not the purpose it's designed for. |
|
![]() ![]() |
Pro ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() CBarnes - 2010-07-30 11:22 PM I was just talking to my Wife about this today as we were driving home from the casino about 80 miles I guess that would have taken me 8 hours in a volt lol even a poor Biker on a hand me down could have rode it and still had time to make supper. I plan to do this research and post it here on BT but a few things to consider. 1. how much power does it take to charge the Volt? In KWH (kilowatt hours) 2. what is the price of electric power on average per KWH (look at your last electric bill). 3 How many miles per KWH are you getting. 4. what is the cost per mile? Now do the same computations for a compatible car like the Ford Focus. Good questions. The volt only uses 50% of the 16kwH battery capacity until the engine kicks on. Li-Ion batteries have a very high charge efficiency up to 99% and the Volts battery pack will only be fully charged to 80% of its potential (to make sure the battery life is ensured). I've read that it will cost a maximum of $2.00 per day to charge the battery pack in expensive regions of the country. So with say 9 KwH of charging (8 plus 1 for any inefficiency) here in FL that will cost me ~$0.99 a day (~0.11 KwH). Per 40 miles that's something like $0.025 a mile, $0.05 even with a 20 mile total range. Obviously this does not include the cost of the car in the cost per mile equation or cost for gas if the engine kicks on. I like technology and rented a Prius in Seattle in May just to see what its all about. I think the Volts technology is cool. If I was higher up on the income range I wouldn't think twice about getting my hands on one. Just like I have friends that don't think twice about buying $40-60k trucks & SUVs and have the nerve to complain about filling it up every week! If GM would take my +3500 GMCard points on the Volt as the lease down payment I would consider leasing one for 3 years at $350/month. In the meantime I'm driving my 26mpg city Mazda 3 hatchback, riding my 40mpg emission pig HD sportster and MTB into work now and then. |
![]() ![]() |
Pro ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() JBrashear - 2010-07-31 1:45 PM Indiana_Geoff - 2010-07-30 9:04 PM Diesel is not a good choice for cars because it is needed for heavy trucks. If you increase demand for diesel with cars, the price will skyrocket due to no good heavy truck alternatives. Diesel's prices have been much steadier than their unleaded colleague, fwiw. Plus, you have to consider that heavy trucks/semis are starting to pack on batteries to become giant hybrids because they can sustain the weight of the batteries better - in other words, the batteries make up a significantly smaller weight addition percentage-wise - so their fuel efficiency is actually on the upswing. It's also worth noting that the price of diesel in Europe(before taxes) isn't a whole lot different there than here, and they have a much, much higher concentration of diesel vehicles. I haven't even mentioned biodiesel entering the market either. Diesel fuel supply isn't an issue even with a massive switchover from unleaded over the next 20 years, in part because it's the same companies supplying both fuels. If diesel takes off, they simply switch the percentage of oil they're using to make diesel v. unleaded & keep raking in cash. Its 6 of one, half a dozen of the other to them. There's a good article in this months either C&D or MotorTrend (forget which one I get) magazine that talks about using other fuels to assist with or replace a portion of gasoline. Given a 10 year time frame, the cost of revamping refineries to increase diesel production would not be done by the oil companies given today they won't even build new a refinery. Remember production capability in the US is pretty maxed out, no new refineries in a long time (since 1976). We can't just switch ratio on the fuels given that gas consumption in not decreasing. Anything bio was a minuscule dent in the existing per day usage. Also even with the US making 2:1 more gas than diesel oils today (below from here) we still import some refined gasoline and gasoline products. IIRC Europe refines the opposite ratio we do in Diesel vs Gas and gas is taxed much higher than gas the opposite of here.. ![]() "Foreign Sources of U.S. Refined Products. In addition to crude oil, the United States also imports refined petroleum products. While the United States produced the majority (90 percent) of the petroleum products it uses, the U.S. also imported 2.0 million barrels per day of refined products. Motor gasoline blending components, fuel ethanol, and finished motor gasoline top the list of the imports at 52%. Five countries accounted for 71% of net imports of refined petroleum products in 2007" |
![]() ![]() |
Veteran ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() JBrashear - 2010-07-31 12:48 PM That's not really a valid question as that's not what they're designing these cars for. They're marketing these cars as commuter cars. Your question is akin to asking why a Tesla can't go 4-wheeling or why a SUV can't go up stairs as well as a dirt bike, that's not the purpose it's designed for. The BMW will do the daily commute as well as the volt. I was not asking either car to go four wheeling. |
![]() ![]() |
Pro ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Indiana_Geoff - 2010-07-31 4:26 PM JBrashear - 2010-07-31 12:48 PM That's not really a valid question as that's not what they're designing these cars for. They're marketing these cars as commuter cars. Your question is akin to asking why a Tesla can't go 4-wheeling or why a SUV can't go up stairs as well as a dirt bike, that's not the purpose it's designed for. The BMW will do the daily commute as well as the volt. I was not asking either car to go four wheeling. Right, but that wasn't your question, you asked about interstate road trips. The Volt/Leaf weren't built with that purpose in mind. |
![]() ![]() |
Pro ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Donto - 2010-07-31 2:10 PM JBrashear - 2010-07-31 1:45 PM Indiana_Geoff - 2010-07-30 9:04 PM Diesel is not a good choice for cars because it is needed for heavy trucks. If you increase demand for diesel with cars, the price will skyrocket due to no good heavy truck alternatives. Diesel's prices have been much steadier than their unleaded colleague, fwiw. Plus, you have to consider that heavy trucks/semis are starting to pack on batteries to become giant hybrids because they can sustain the weight of the batteries better - in other words, the batteries make up a significantly smaller weight addition percentage-wise - so their fuel efficiency is actually on the upswing. It's also worth noting that the price of diesel in Europe(before taxes) isn't a whole lot different there than here, and they have a much, much higher concentration of diesel vehicles. I haven't even mentioned biodiesel entering the market either. Diesel fuel supply isn't an issue even with a massive switchover from unleaded over the next 20 years, in part because it's the same companies supplying both fuels. If diesel takes off, they simply switch the percentage of oil they're using to make diesel v. unleaded & keep raking in cash. Its 6 of one, half a dozen of the other to them. There's a good article in this months either C&D or MotorTrend (forget which one I get) magazine that talks about using other fuels to assist with or replace a portion of gasoline. Given a 10 year time frame, the cost of revamping refineries to increase diesel production would not be done by the oil companies given today they won't even build new a refinery. Remember production capability in the US is pretty maxed out, no new refineries in a long time (since 1976). We can't just switch ratio on the fuels given that gas consumption in not decreasing. Anything bio was a minuscule dent in the existing per day usage. Also even with the US making 2:1 more gas than diesel oils today (below from here) we still import some refined gasoline and gasoline products. IIRC Europe refines the opposite ratio we do in Diesel vs Gas and gas is taxed much higher than gas the opposite of here.. ![]() "Foreign Sources of U.S. Refined Products. In addition to crude oil, the United States also imports refined petroleum products. While the United States produced the majority (90 percent) of the petroleum products it uses, the U.S. also imported 2.0 million barrels per day of refined products. Motor gasoline blending components, fuel ethanol, and finished motor gasoline top the list of the imports at 52%. Five countries accounted for 71% of net imports of refined petroleum products in 2007" It would stand to reason that if diesel consumption was increasing substantially - let's say +10% of aggregate fuel consumption compared to its current share - then a significant portion of that 10% will be offset by decreased unleaded use as these diesel commuter cars are replacing gas engines. Moreover, with the significantly higher mileage from diesel the aggregate MPG average amongst the US population would increase which would offset more of the consumption. I don't expect it to be a wash obviously, but the increase isn't as staggering as you would make it out to be. You're also underestimating the refinery's ability to change its product; they change their blends multiple times a year to comply with various seasonal blends that are mandated in various states. If anything, they're better able to handle a change in demand ratios than you give them credit for. Your point about importing is well taken & IMO yet another incentive for us to make significant changes to decrease our rate of fuel consumption. |
|
![]() ![]() |
Veteran ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() JBrashear - 2010-07-31 4:31 PM Right, but that wasn't your question, you asked about interstate road trips. The Volt/Leaf weren't built with that purpose in mind. Thus my point that this makes a 41k volt a very expensive, limited used, secondary vehicle for the vast majority of Americans. Edited by Indiana_Geoff 2010-07-31 10:08 PM |
![]() ![]() |
Pro ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Indiana_Geoff - 2010-07-31 10:07 PM JBrashear - 2010-07-31 4:31 PM Right, but that wasn't your question, you asked about interstate road trips. The Volt/Leaf weren't built with that purpose in mind. Thus my point that this makes a 41k volt a very expensive, limited used, secondary vehicle for the vast majority of Americans. I'd dispute your definition of 'vast majority'. It's a commuter car, that's what the use is for. It fulfills that job. |
![]() ![]() |
Pro ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() I bought this lemon squeezer. Does a pretty good job at squeezing lemons. Oranges and grapefruits as well. But the damn thing just won't make coffee. piece of junk. FWIW- the Volt is the only electric car that you can take on a long trip. And- it will get phenomenal mileage when using gas for extended periods. Or, be exceptionally cheap to operate as a plug-in commuter. It's a brilliant engineering design. Problem is, gas is cheap. Perhaps they'll sell them in europe where gas is $7.50/gal. |
![]() ![]() |
Pro ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() morey000 - 2010-08-02 5:38 PM I bought this lemon squeezer. Does a pretty good job at squeezing lemons. Oranges and grapefruits as well. But the damn thing just won't make coffee. piece of junk. FWIW- the Volt is the only electric car that you can take on a long trip. And- it will get phenomenal mileage when using gas for extended periods. Or, be exceptionally cheap to operate as a plug-in commuter. It's a brilliant engineering design. Problem is, gas is cheap. Perhaps they'll sell them in europe where gas is $7.50/gal. From what I've read on a 3rd party site, GM has over 70,000 people on their email list for the vehicle with 70% of those people in the "highly likely" category of purchasing/leasing the vehicle. If half of those "70%" end up purchasing it, the 1st year 10k is gone as well as 1/3rd of the 2nd years recently increased 45k production target. If all "70%" decided to buy 80% of the 2nd years production is sold. The 3 year $350/mo lease will probably pull in a lot of people that were on the fence about it too. Probably pretty safe to say that the first 2 years of production can be considered sold. |
![]() ![]() |
Champion ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() JBrashear - 2010-08-01 3:55 PM Indiana_Geoff - 2010-07-31 10:07 PM JBrashear - 2010-07-31 4:31 PM Right, but that wasn't your question, you asked about interstate road trips. The Volt/Leaf weren't built with that purpose in mind. Thus my point that this makes a 41k volt a very expensive, limited used, secondary vehicle for the vast majority of Americans. I'd dispute your definition of 'vast majority'. It's a commuter car, that's what the use is for. It fulfills that job. I think his point is that a 41k car (any 41k car) is out of the reach of a vast majority of Americans. And I would agree with that. The average price of a new car purchased in 2009 was $28,400. |
|
![]() ![]() |
Veteran ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() TriRSquared - 2010-08-03 9:04 AM I think his point is that a 41k car (any 41k car) is out of the reach of a vast majority of Americans. And I would agree with that. The average price of a new car purchased in 2009 was $28,400. Yes, and it's a 41k car of limited utility making it even more of a niche product. Kind of like a 8k two wheeled electric scooter. |
![]() ![]() |
Master ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | ![]() Indiana_Geoff - 2010-08-03 3:19 PM Yes, and it's a 41k car of limited utility making it even more of a niche product. Kind of like a 8k two wheeled electric scooter. Aside from initial cost, what exactly does the Malibu/Accord/Camry do that the Volt doesn't? That's the point - it's supposed to not limit utility like a Tesla 2 seater or a smart car. |
|