Other Resources My Cup of Joe » No More TSA Body Scanners Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 3
 
 
2013-01-22 11:35 AM
in reply to: #4589345

User image

Sneaky Slow
8694
500020001000500100252525
Herndon, VA,
Subject: RE: No More TSA Body Scanners
Sous - 2013-01-22 12:27 PM
spudone - 2013-01-22 12:12 PM
Sous - 2013-01-22 8:08 AM
spudone - 2013-01-21 5:23 PM
Sous - 2013-01-20 4:20 PM
Aarondb4 - 2013-01-18 1:37 PM

Looks like the TSA will be removing all the cancer giving, nude picture taking body scanners currently in the airports. Wonder how many tax payer dollars were wasted on this debacle.

http://www.caintv.com/tsa-gives-up-on-nude-body-scan

You got any facts to support this or is it just your totally incorrect, ignorant, and uninformed opinion?

Backscatter machines (the ones that they removed) use x-rays which are ionizing radiation.

Yes and your point?  Most likely the smoke detectors in your house use ionization for detection.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ionizing_radiation#Biological_effects

The point is that it is a known carcinogen.  I'm not trying to bust your chops or say that it'll instantly give everyone cancer.  The problem is that it builds up - the dosage is cumulative.  I could get a CT scan once a year and probably be ok.  But is it a good idea?  Not really.

Sure I get that, but the fact is that we are exposed to so much more radiation thoughout our lives that to say that this type of a machine that a typical person might use a handful of times a year is a "cancer causer" is simply ludicrous. 

It's not necessarily about the people using the machines. This is also about the TSA agents who work their shift in close proximity to the machines. For example, consider this Johns Hopkins study which said that the radiation levels around these machines could exceed the "General Public Dose Limit."

http://epic.org/privacy/backscatter/radiation_hopkins.pdf

There's not an established link between a machine and cancer, this is true... but... there is one between ionizing radiation and an increased risk of cancer. I don't think referring to Aaron's opinion as "ignorant and uninformed" is fair. Was he engaging in a bit of hyperbole? Perhaps.



Edited by tealeaf 2013-01-22 11:40 AM


2013-01-22 11:41 AM
in reply to: #4589352

User image

Sensei
Sin City
Subject: RE: No More TSA Body Scanners
Sous - 2013-01-22 9:32 AM
Kido - 2013-01-22 12:11 PM
Sous - 2013-01-22 8:10 AM
ChrisM - 2013-01-21 7:15 PM
Sous - 2013-01-20 4:20 PM
Aarondb4 - 2013-01-18 1:37 PM

Looks like the TSA will be removing all the cancer giving, nude picture taking body scanners currently in the airports. Wonder how many tax payer dollars were wasted on this debacle.

http://www.caintv.com/tsa-gives-up-on-nude-body-scan

You got any facts to support this or is it just your totally incorrect, ignorant, and uninformed opinion?

Wow. Your debating skills are stellar

Clearly you must be responding to Aaron, since he is the one who made a fully unsupported statement.  I was merely asking for him to site his reference for his totally incorrect, ignorant, and uninformed opinion.

Of course you did.

I assume if your mom, girlfriend, or boss said something you disagreed with you tell them they are totally incorrect, ignorant and uninformed?

Incorrect = not correct.  I tell people that they (or something they say) are (is) incorrect all the time.

Ignorant = lacking knowledge of a topic.  Again, not an insult.  As a matter of fact I actually used the word ignorant to describe my knowledge of a topic just the other day.  I certainly was not insulting myself.

uninformed = lacking information.  Where is the insult there?  If they think that these machines cause cancer then they are lacking information.

Now, if someone perceives my pointing out their being incorrect, ignorant, or uninformed on a particular topic as an insult, well that's just not my problem.

ETA:  By the way I don't "disagree" with the statement.  The statement is wrong.  There is a difference.

Charming.

2013-01-22 11:43 AM
in reply to: #4589362

Master
5557
50005002525
, California
Subject: RE: No More TSA Body Scanners
tealeaf - 2013-01-22 9:35 AM
Sous - 2013-01-22 12:27 PM
spudone - 2013-01-22 12:12 PM
Sous - 2013-01-22 8:08 AM
spudone - 2013-01-21 5:23 PM
Sous - 2013-01-20 4:20 PM
Aarondb4 - 2013-01-18 1:37 PM

Looks like the TSA will be removing all the cancer giving, nude picture taking body scanners currently in the airports. Wonder how many tax payer dollars were wasted on this debacle.

http://www.caintv.com/tsa-gives-up-on-nude-body-scan

You got any facts to support this or is it just your totally incorrect, ignorant, and uninformed opinion?

Backscatter machines (the ones that they removed) use x-rays which are ionizing radiation.

Yes and your point?  Most likely the smoke detectors in your house use ionization for detection.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ionizing_radiation#Biological_effects

The point is that it is a known carcinogen.  I'm not trying to bust your chops or say that it'll instantly give everyone cancer.  The problem is that it builds up - the dosage is cumulative.  I could get a CT scan once a year and probably be ok.  But is it a good idea?  Not really.

Sure I get that, but the fact is that we are exposed to so much more radiation thoughout our lives that to say that this type of a machine that a typical person might use a handful of times a year is a "cancer causer" is simply ludicrous. 

It's not necessarily about the people using the machines. This is also about the TSA agents who work their shift in close proximity to the machines. For example, consider this Johns Hopkins study which said that the radiation levels around these machines could exceed the "General Public Dose Limit."

http://epic.org/privacy/backscatter/radiation_hopkins.pdf

There's not an established link between a machine and cancer, this is true... but... there is one between ionizing radiation and an increased risk of cancer. I don't think referring to Aaron's opinion as "ignorant and uninformed" is fair. Hyperbole? Perhaps.

There are established dosage limits for occupational workers like those operating nuclear reactors, Navy ship personnel, that sort of thing.  You wear a dosimeter and everything is kept track of.  I would guess it's the same with the TSA folks but I haven't personally seen them wearing one.

The other problem with the TSA is that so much of what they do is kept secret from the public.  There are laws you can break but they won't tell you what the law is.  And I bet if you tried to find out how much radiation is emitted by one of their backscatter machines, you'd have a hard time getting any solid info.

In that sense, Sous using the word "ignorant" is a good description of the public as a whole, because the government and TSA likes it that way.  We really should be allowed to quantify the risk before subjecting everyone to those scans.

2013-01-22 12:22 PM
in reply to: #4589376

User image

Subject: RE: No More TSA Body Scanners
Kido - 2013-01-22 9:41 AM
Sous - 2013-01-22 9:32 AM
Kido - 2013-01-22 12:11 PM
Sous - 2013-01-22 8:10 AM
ChrisM - 2013-01-21 7:15 PM
Sous - 2013-01-20 4:20 PM
Aarondb4 - 2013-01-18 1:37 PM

Looks like the TSA will be removing all the cancer giving, nude picture taking body scanners currently in the airports. Wonder how many tax payer dollars were wasted on this debacle.

http://www.caintv.com/tsa-gives-up-on-nude-body-scan

You got any facts to support this or is it just your totally incorrect, ignorant, and uninformed opinion?

Wow. Your debating skills are stellar

Clearly you must be responding to Aaron, since he is the one who made a fully unsupported statement.  I was merely asking for him to site his reference for his totally incorrect, ignorant, and uninformed opinion.

Of course you did.

I assume if your mom, girlfriend, or boss said something you disagreed with you tell them they are totally incorrect, ignorant and uninformed?

Incorrect = not correct.  I tell people that they (or something they say) are (is) incorrect all the time.

Ignorant = lacking knowledge of a topic.  Again, not an insult.  As a matter of fact I actually used the word ignorant to describe my knowledge of a topic just the other day.  I certainly was not insulting myself.

uninformed = lacking information.  Where is the insult there?  If they think that these machines cause cancer then they are lacking information.

Now, if someone perceives my pointing out their being incorrect, ignorant, or uninformed on a particular topic as an insult, well that's just not my problem.

ETA:  By the way I don't "disagree" with the statement.  The statement is wrong.  There is a difference.

Charming.

\

Yes, as much I would like to continue the.... uh, "dialogue" would be too strong a word for it.... I'll leave it to others to bear that cross.

2013-01-22 12:34 PM
in reply to: #4589489

User image

Expert
3126
2000100010025
Boise, ID
Subject: RE: No More TSA Body Scanners
ChrisM - 2013-01-22 11:22 AM
Kido - 2013-01-22 9:41 AM
Sous - 2013-01-22 9:32 AM
Kido - 2013-01-22 12:11 PM
Sous - 2013-01-22 8:10 AM
ChrisM - 2013-01-21 7:15 PM
Sous - 2013-01-20 4:20 PM
Aarondb4 - 2013-01-18 1:37 PM

Looks like the TSA will be removing all the cancer giving, nude picture taking body scanners currently in the airports. Wonder how many tax payer dollars were wasted on this debacle.

http://www.caintv.com/tsa-gives-up-on-nude-body-scan

You got any facts to support this or is it just your totally incorrect, ignorant, and uninformed opinion?

Wow. Your debating skills are stellar

Clearly you must be responding to Aaron, since he is the one who made a fully unsupported statement.  I was merely asking for him to site his reference for his totally incorrect, ignorant, and uninformed opinion.

Of course you did.

I assume if your mom, girlfriend, or boss said something you disagreed with you tell them they are totally incorrect, ignorant and uninformed?

Incorrect = not correct.  I tell people that they (or something they say) are (is) incorrect all the time.

Ignorant = lacking knowledge of a topic.  Again, not an insult.  As a matter of fact I actually used the word ignorant to describe my knowledge of a topic just the other day.  I certainly was not insulting myself.

uninformed = lacking information.  Where is the insult there?  If they think that these machines cause cancer then they are lacking information.

Now, if someone perceives my pointing out their being incorrect, ignorant, or uninformed on a particular topic as an insult, well that's just not my problem.

ETA:  By the way I don't "disagree" with the statement.  The statement is wrong.  There is a difference.

Charming.

\

Yes, as much I would like to continue the.... uh, "dialogue" would be too strong a word for it.... I'll leave it to others to bear that cross.

Good call.

2013-01-22 1:49 PM
in reply to: #4589313

User image

Champion
6962
500010005001001001001002525
Atlanta, Ga
Subject: RE: No More TSA Body Scanners
Kido - 2013-01-22 12:11 PM

Of course you did.

I assume if your mom, girlfriend, or boss said something you disagreed with you tell them they are totally incorrect, ignorant and uninformed?

Yes, I would if they said something incorrect, ignorant and uninformed.  It doesn't matter the person.  Or is that one of those, how one treats people should be different moments? 

But then again I was the guy that had no problem telling the Regional Administrator he was wrong in the middle of a meeting because...he was.  But I also had the report to prove it.  Someone's status does not preclude them from anything.  IMHO



2013-01-22 1:52 PM
in reply to: #4589347

User image

Champion
6962
500010005001001001001002525
Atlanta, Ga
Subject: RE: No More TSA Body Scanners
spudone - 2013-01-22 12:30 PM

Wonder how fast the TSA would confiscate a dosimeter if I tried to wear one during the scan :P

Bluntly, they would never know what it was most likely.  But it would show up on the scan just like the piece of paper left in your pocket.  They couldn't confiscate it.

Know who would be PO'd?  Dosimitry!  But then again, there would be no noticeable change in it most likely.  We had many people leave theirs on when I was in the Nuke world.  It's just a PITA

2013-01-22 2:45 PM
in reply to: #4584729

User image

Expert
962
5001001001001002525
Subject: RE: No More TSA Body Scanners

My fellow BTers, everyone just take a breath and calm down a moment.  Lets put a moratorium on this bickering and get back to the more pertinent, and interesting discussions like mehaner getting groped by TSA agents who take their job too seriously and what speedknight is or is not wearing under his kilt. 

ETA - sarcastic font didn't think it was needed orginally but you never know.



Edited by dsand97 2013-01-22 2:51 PM
2013-01-22 3:30 PM
in reply to: #4589665

User image

Austin, Texas or Jupiter, Florida
Subject: RE: No More TSA Body Scanners
Marvarnett - 2013-01-22 1:52 PM
spudone - 2013-01-22 12:30 PM

Wonder how fast the TSA would confiscate a dosimeter if I tried to wear one during the scan :P

Bluntly, they would never know what it was most likely.  But it would show up on the scan just like the piece of paper left in your pocket.  They couldn't confiscate it.

Know who would be PO'd?  Dosimitry!  But then again, there would be no noticeable change in it most likely.  We had many people leave theirs on when I was in the Nuke world.  It's just a PITA

Get me a dosimeter and I'll get it done.  I could hold it in my hand over my head as I go through the scanner.  I've held other harmless things in my hands and they don't say a word.  

Of course, when you're mailing the dosimeter, it could get contaminated in transit.  

Then if you do carry one through the machine, the flight itself will show a dose.  Not to mention the time spent right-next-to the xray belt.  

Maybe if you carry a really sensitive geiger counter while you're doing all that stuff it'll give you a better indication of what is causing the issues.  

AHA! Mythbusters! that's who could help us... Send it in! 

2013-01-22 3:31 PM
in reply to: #4589661

User image

Master
2725
200050010010025
Washington, DC Metro
Subject: RE: No More TSA Body Scanners
Marvarnett - 2013-01-22 2:49 PM
Kido - 2013-01-22 12:11 PM

Of course you did.

I assume if your mom, girlfriend, or boss said something you disagreed with you tell them they are totally incorrect, ignorant and uninformed?

Yes, I would if they said something incorrect, ignorant and uninformed.  It doesn't matter the person.  Or is that one of those, how one treats people should be different moments? 

But then again I was the guy that had no problem telling the Regional Administrator he was wrong in the middle of a meeting because...he was.  But I also had the report to prove it.  Someone's status does not preclude them from anything.  IMHO

I'm glad that at least someone else realize that saying a statement is incorrect, ignorant, or uninformed is NOT some type of personal insult or attack.

2013-01-22 4:31 PM
in reply to: #4589661

User image

Sensei
Sin City
Subject: RE: No More TSA Body Scanners
Marvarnett - 2013-01-22 11:49 AM
Kido - 2013-01-22 12:11 PM

Of course you did.

I assume if your mom, girlfriend, or boss said something you disagreed with you tell them they are totally incorrect, ignorant and uninformed?

Yes, I would if they said something incorrect, ignorant and uninformed.  It doesn't matter the person.  Or is that one of those, how one treats people should be different moments? 

But then again I was the guy that had no problem telling the Regional Administrator he was wrong in the middle of a meeting because...he was.  But I also had the report to prove it.  Someone's status does not preclude them from anything.  IMHO

Telling someone they are wrong/incorrect is one thing...  name calling is another.

So, along with telling you regional administrator they were wrong did you call them uninformed and ignorant?

I personally think there are constructive/polite/and non offensive ways to argue an opposing viewpoint - and not so polite ways.



2013-01-26 12:36 AM
in reply to: #4584729


2

Subject: RE: No More TSA Body Scanners
You heard it right folks. TSA is now planning to remove the x-ray body scanner to all airports in the US. Actually, the Transportation Security Administration has been under fire since it chose to put full-body X-ray scanners in the country's airports. Now it claims those devices are being replaced with a less hazardous and revealing technology. Read more here for more details.
2013-01-26 5:33 AM
in reply to: #4595341

User image

Sneaky Slow
8694
500020001000500100252525
Herndon, VA,
Subject: RE: No More TSA Body Scanners

lindabrown - 2013-01-26 1:36 AM You heard it right folks. TSA is now planning to remove the x-ray body scanner to all airports in the US. Actually, the Transportation Security Administration has been under fire since it chose to put full-body X-ray scanners in the country's airports. Now it claims those devices are being replaced with a less hazardous and revealing technology. Read more here for more details.

Hmm, a new user in her first post, putting a link to a website called "personal money manager."

No, this isn't spam at all.

2013-02-01 10:28 PM
in reply to: #4595367


2

Subject: RE: No More TSA Body Scanners
tealeaf - 2013-01-26 5:33 AM

Hmm, a new user in her first post, putting a link to a website called "personal money manager."

No, this isn't spam at all.

 

Hello to you tealeaf!

I'm not a spammer here.. I just wanna share some info's if you don't mind!

Have a nice day

New Thread
Other Resources My Cup of Joe » No More TSA Body Scanners Rss Feed  
 
 
of 3