Other Resources My Cup of Joe » $2.50 for regular gas Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 3
 
 
2005-08-10 9:52 AM
in reply to: #220275

Extreme Veteran
573
5002525
IL
Subject: RE: $2.50 for regular gas

Now it's gotten out of control.  You can keep it fo rizzle dizzle bizzle, while watching the televizzle in the hizzle.



2005-08-10 10:15 AM
in reply to: #220275

User image

Master
4101
20002000100
Denver
Subject: RE: $2.50 for regular gas
2005-08-10 10:42 AM
in reply to: #220275

User image

Elite
2777
2000500100100252525
In my bunk with new shoes and purple sweats.
Subject: RE: $2.50 for regular gas
Groovy!!
2005-08-10 12:27 PM
in reply to: #220582

User image

Giver
18427
5000500050002000100010010010010025
Subject: RE: $2.50 for regular gas

mnewton - 2005-08-09 11:55 AM  Hydrogen as fuel is a crock.

Except that hydrogen is renewable, assuming you use renewable resources to produce it from water. Because we don't today have an efficient process to produce it is no reason to say it's a crock.

The bottom line is that we WILL run out of oil. Therefore whether we do it now or later, renewable resources are the future. Read Michael Moore's "Dude, Where's my Country." He treats our dependance on oil really well.

2005-08-10 1:18 PM
in reply to: #221713

Master
1315
1000100100100
Shreveport, LA
Subject: RE: $2.50 for regular gas
run4yrlif - 2005-08-10 12:27 PM

mnewton - 2005-08-09 11:55 AM Hydrogen as fuel is a crock.

Except that hydrogen is renewable, assuming you use renewable resources to produce it from water. Because we don't today have an efficient process to produce it is no reason to say it's a crock.

The bottom line is that we WILL run out of oil. Therefore whether we do it now or later, renewable resources are the future. Read Michael Moore's "Dude, Where's my Country." He treats our dependance on oil really well.



Which is why I said:

mnewton - 2005-08-09 11:55 AM
Much research needs to be in the area of alternative energy sources. Nuclear and Solar energy holds great promises if the money is there to research how to recover and store the energy.



To use hydrogen as a fuel, you have to use energy to split the hydrogen and the oxygen. Then you gain energy by recombining it. This is inefficient because you spent energy to split the water molecule and only gain a portion of it back when you recombine the two.

Why not spend the money on research in Nuclear and Solar energy resources and look at ways of incorporating them into our energy systems.
2005-08-10 1:21 PM
in reply to: #221781

User image

Giver
18427
5000500050002000100010010010010025
Subject: RE: $2.50 for regular gas
mnewton - 2005-08-10 1:18 PM
Which is why I said:

mnewton - 2005-08-09 11:55 AM Much research needs to be in the area of alternative energy sources. Nuclear and Solar energy holds great promises if the money is there to research how to recover and store the energy.

To use hydrogen as a fuel, you have to use energy to split the hydrogen and the oxygen. Then you gain energy by recombining it. This is inefficient because you spent energy to split the water molecule and only gain a portion of it back when you recombine the two. Why not spend the money on research in Nuclear and Solar energy resources and look at ways of incorporating them into our energy systems.

So I guess we mostly agree. I was taking issue with the hydrogen-fuel-is-a-crock comment. IMO, it's the only feasible way to operate cars sans oil. I don't see nuclear reactors or solar powered cars as the way to go in the near future. My point is that we need to be working on all of these things. Obviously, burning coal to make hydrogen is dumb. But making it in nuclear-powered plants...not so dumb.



Edited by run4yrlif 2005-08-10 1:24 PM


2005-08-10 2:47 PM
in reply to: #221784

Elite Veteran
1817
1000500100100100
Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Subject: RE: $2.50 for regular gas
Since this seems to be the brain trust on the issue of alternative fuel sources, and since I like to take the shortest route possible from A to B (read: don't want to research myself), can someone tell me in small words and short sentences, what the pros and cons are of this bio diesel?  All  I know (or think I know) is that is is made out of recycled cooking oil? 
2005-08-10 5:48 PM
in reply to: #220275

User image

Elite
2777
2000500100100252525
In my bunk with new shoes and purple sweats.
Subject: RE: $2.50 for regular gas
I can explain bio diesel but first this..
OMG I just saw Lee Iacoca in an ad with Snoop Dogg, fo shizzle y'all
2005-08-10 6:27 PM
in reply to: #221308

Elite
2458
20001001001001002525
Livingston, MT
Subject: RE: $2.50 for regular gas
cerveloP3 - 2005-08-10 2:58 AM

Hey Chucky,
It is fine in an opinion sense that you want to blame teh Pres, or the war on prices, but regardless of if there was a war or not, you would still have the same prices for gas today.


I seriously doubt that. Would we see an increase? You bet. 350% increase, no way. BTW, crude hit $65 a barrel today. DOW down


Do not underestimate the power of supply and demand. China is aggressively trying to acquire rights to energy more than any nation at present. They are the leading purchaser of oil sands in Canada. They tried to purchase Unocal, which all but owns the Gulf of Mexico drilling rights, at least teh majority of them.
Their desire is twofold: To satisfy their own growing thirst, and to strategically deny the US in the event of an impasse.


So China is serving it's own selfish needs. I get that. We are doing the same in IRAQ. Don't dismiss that.


China made mention of using Nukes against the US in the last month. Will you be so quick to condemn Clinton on this? The reason they have that technology is because of his PERSONAL approval in this technology being imported to Chian as well as the computing technology to deliver and guide these things.


China's first nuclear test took place in 1964. I'm not sure why we'd point the finger at Clinton for this one. Do we have to be vigilant of our politicians and who they take their campaign contributions from? Of course...


Does Loral ring a bell. I don't think Bush is all right, but reality dictates looking at all possibilities on why a price is where it is.


Totally agree. There are many factors. But the obvious one is that before war in Iraq oil was under $20 a barrel. Today it hit a new high of $65 a barrel. I see a cause/effect relationship. What other commodity in the last five years has gone up like oil?
2005-08-10 6:42 PM
in reply to: #220275

User image

Elite
2777
2000500100100252525
In my bunk with new shoes and purple sweats.
Subject: RE: $2.50 for regular gas
Yes biodisel is an alternative fuel made from used cooking oil, or raw vegetable oil or any number of "oils". There are specific date palms which yield a lot of oil and they have been studied for their use in making biodiesel. A lot of ag crops will work,ie soy beans, peanuts, but it comes down to the greatest yield and that seems to be certain crops that do well only in tropical climes. I worked up some numbers once where the ag output of fuel crops was based on fallow farm land. The results are staggering, but so is the initial cost and the end product could not compete with regular diesel which at the time was selling for around $1.25/gal. But as I've said the higher the cost of fuel the more competitive these alternatives become. There are some companies currently marketing modular biodiesel refineries and I have and continue to eye this market carefully.
The recipe for biodiesel is pretty simple. We took our deep fryer and emptied its contents into a large glass container. Jacked up the ph with some sodium hydroxide, stirred it around, said the magic words, added ethanol for octane boost and voila, fuel. Now I've drastically oversimplified the real process but we made fuel. We took it to one of our job sites and used it to fuel a small diesel pump which was the only piece of equipment we had at the time that was biodiesel compatible. The drawback to biodiesel is that it breaks down conventional fuel lines and rubber engine parts. Most engines today are compatible. When biodiesel is burned you can smell the cooking oil. Imagine being behind a city bus and smelling french fries.
The next time you're traveling take note when you fuel up and see if the station offers biodiesel or B-20. B-20 is a 80-20 mixture of diesel and biodiesel.
Class dismissed.
2005-08-10 9:56 PM
in reply to: #221362

User image

Expert
783
500100100252525
South Bend, IN
Subject: RE: $2.50 for regular gas
Celeb_ithil - 2005-08-10 9:14 AM
p>China made mention of using Nukes against the US in the last month. Will you be so quick to condemn Clinton on this? The reason they have that technology is because of his PERSONAL approval in this technology being imported to Chian as well as the computing technology to deliver and guide these things. Does Loral ring a bell. I don't think Bush is all right, but reality dictates looking at all possibilities on why a price is where it is.

Oh.. Do you really think China needs "approval" for that?  They can always close their door and do whatever they want. 


Hmmm... acquiring advanced nuclear warhead technology solely employed by the US? Sure. Do some research on th W88 warhead, and the mechanics of delivering one of those from there to here. Prior to 1996, it was impossible for them. The transferring of that sort of technology was ILLEGAL prior to Clinton allowing it to happen. My point was that you can always blame someone for anything. It was also that with people so split on Iraq, but blaming oil prices on it, was incorrect, taht the prices would be the same regardless.


2005-08-10 10:00 PM
in reply to: #222183

User image

Expert
783
500100100252525
South Bend, IN
Subject: RE: $2.50 for regular gas
Hey chucky... .Loral does avionics and weapons guidance systems. Nothing to do with oil...... Loral was a big DNC donor. BIG $ = allowing by administration to sell systems to China. Hence their ability to get one over here.
2005-08-10 10:01 PM
in reply to: #222183

User image

Expert
783
500100100252525
South Bend, IN
Subject: RE: $2.50 for regular gas
Also.. a 350% increase? Hmm.. .tell that to Google share owners. Also when you take 2.5 BILLION consumers against less than 300 million, we are 1 tenth of the population and while our consumption per capita is higher their TOTAL demand dictates the increase on the SPOT market. So yes, I can understand that sort of increase.
2005-08-10 11:30 PM
in reply to: #222183

User image

Veteran
1108
1000100
Perth, Oz
Subject: RE: $2.50 for regular gas

ChuckyFinster - 2005-08-11 7:27 AM  So China is serving it's own selfish needs. I get that. We are doing the same in IRAQ. Don't dismiss that.

Chucky well said!!!



Edited by splerph 2005-08-10 11:31 PM
2005-08-10 11:36 PM
in reply to: #220275

Extreme Veteran
573
5002525
IL
Subject: RE: $2.50 for regular gas

Game over.  Ouch.

2005-08-11 8:40 AM
in reply to: #220275

User image

Master
2136
200010025
A Prairie Home
Subject: RE: $2.50 for regular gas
Paid $2.39 at the pump yesterday. That wasn't the worst part. I got suckered into buying 2 bottles of those "sports water" drink cus' it was 2 for 1. Tastes awful!


2005-08-11 9:01 AM
in reply to: #222183

Master
1315
1000100100100
Shreveport, LA
Subject: RE: $2.50 for regular gas
ChuckyFinster - 2005-08-10 6:27 PM
What other commodity in the last five years has gone up like oil?


Try the price of steel.

The economic boom in China has created near a 3X increase in the price of steel in the past few years.

With the new Ultra Low Sulfur and Gasoline specs being instituted between 2006-2010 depending on the size of the refinery, almost every refinery making fuels is having some kind of capital expansion, which involves new equipment, mainly reactors, which are made of steel.

To remove organic sulfur from fuels, most refineries use some type of hydrotreater, which uses hydrogen to react with the sulfur compounds to form H2S which can be removed by Sulfur Plants.

Because of the increased amount of hydrogen neede to meet the sulfur specs, each refinery has to find more hydrogen than what they are currently making. This will either come from expanding their current catalytic reformer (takes gasoline and converts 80-85% of it in to octane gasoline the other 15-20% becomes hydrogen to use to remove the sulfur in the hydrotreating units), building a hydrogen plant (very expensive, reforms natural gas into hydrogen), or buy the hydrogen from an over the fence hydrogen plant (extremely expensive).

So to meet regulations, there has to be expansions of:
1. Hydrotreating Units
2. Hydrogen producing units
3. Storage/Blending Facilities
4. Sulfur Recovery Units

All of this expansion is paid for by profits from fuel sales. In the mid to late 2006, the price of fuels, mainly diesel, will have another increase.

But we will have cleaner air.
2005-08-11 9:20 AM
in reply to: #220275

User image

Master
2136
200010025
A Prairie Home
Subject: RE: $2.50 for regular gas
Actually, steel came down quite a bit since its peak in late last year. More capacity came on line and China is now a net exporter of steel. Oil though, it's a completely different story.
2005-08-11 9:23 AM
in reply to: #222564

Master
1315
1000100100100
Shreveport, LA
Subject: RE: $2.50 for regular gas
Denise2003 - 2005-08-11 9:20 AM

Actually, steel came down quite a bit since its peak in late last year. More capacity came on line and China is now a net exporter of steel. Oil though, it's a completely different story.



Yes, but with the long wait times in between ordering the reactors, pressure vessels, etc, most refineries had to place their order during the time when steel prices were high so that they would have time to have their units started up by the time the government regulations dictated. This cost is passed on to us the consumer.
2005-08-11 4:28 PM
in reply to: #222188

Elite Veteran
1817
1000500100100100
Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Subject: RE: $2.50 for regular gas

gullahcracker - 2005-08-10 6:42 PM Yes biodisel is an alternative fuel made from used cooking oil, or raw vegetable oil or any number of "oils". There are specific date palms which yield a lot of oil and they have been studied for their use in making biodiesel. A lot of ag crops will work,ie soy beans, peanuts, but it comes down to the greatest yield and that seems to be certain crops that do well only in tropical climes. I worked up some numbers once where the ag output of fuel crops was based on fallow farm land. The results are staggering, but so is the initial cost and the end product could not compete with regular diesel which at the time was selling for around $1.25/gal. But as I've said the higher the cost of fuel the more competitive these alternatives become. There are some companies currently marketing modular biodiesel refineries and I have and continue to eye this market carefully. The recipe for biodiesel is pretty simple. We took our deep fryer and emptied its contents into a large glass container. Jacked up the ph with some sodium hydroxide, stirred it around, said the magic words, added ethanol for octane boost and voila, fuel. Now I've drastically oversimplified the real process but we made fuel. We took it to one of our job sites and used it to fuel a small diesel pump which was the only piece of equipment we had at the time that was biodiesel compatible. The drawback to biodiesel is that it breaks down conventional fuel lines and rubber engine parts. Most engines today are compatible. When biodiesel is burned you can smell the cooking oil. Imagine being behind a city bus and smelling french fries. The next time you're traveling take note when you fuel up and see if the station offers biodiesel or B-20. B-20 is a 80-20 mixture of diesel and biodiesel. Class dismissed.

Thanks, Teach!  Actually I believe there is only one source in my area - I heard there was a Co-op about 20 miles from here.  I was considering a serious look at this, but did not want to contribute to a situation that is even worse (i.e we can only get biodiesel from an oil produced exclusively by a bean that grows in a rain forest in an impoverished third world country and they pay the 5 year old factory workers who produce it in rice).  Doesn't sound too bad - what are the ecological ramifications?



Edited by Tania 2005-08-11 4:29 PM
2005-08-11 7:55 PM
in reply to: #220275

User image

Elite
2777
2000500100100252525
In my bunk with new shoes and purple sweats.
Subject: RE: $2.50 for regular gas
Most biodiesel is made here in the USA with Modular refinery units popular in Calif and Hawaii. No enviromental impacts as long as screenings and soap/wax is either reused or disposed of properly. You know the more important issue here is the production of ethanol. Needed for biodiesel and a great substitute/ additive for gasoline. Anybody remember gasohol?
I have a question regarding OPEC. Since we conquered Iraq, shouldn't we be a leading member of OPEC? What is our standing among that bunch of dubious &^$#%^^$#@#?


2005-08-12 1:03 PM
in reply to: #220275

New user
723
500100100
Subject: RE: $2.50 for regular gas
Who says that we would use electricity to break the water apart. This inefficent process wouldn't be worthwhile but by heating the water to several thousand degrees easily doable with highly efficent Nucelar reactors the hydriogen can be produced at very low and profitable cost.
Here's a link to learn more

http://www.eere.energy.gov/hydrogenandfuelcells/production/technolo...
2005-08-12 2:45 PM
in reply to: #223359

Elite Veteran
1817
1000500100100100
Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Subject: RE: $2.50 for regular gas

gullahcracker - 2005-08-11 7:55 PM Most biodiesel is made here in the USA with Modular refinery units popular in Calif and Hawaii. No enviromental impacts as long as screenings and soap/wax is either reused or disposed of properly. You know the more important issue here is the production of ethanol. Needed for biodiesel and a great substitute/ additive for gasoline. Anybody remember gasohol? I have a question regarding OPEC. Since we conquered Iraq, shouldn't we be a leading member of OPEC? What is our standing among that bunch of dubious &^$#%^^$#@#?[/QUOTE]

Don't know about the "great substitute" part.  Being in Iowa, ethanol is everywhere. We wanted to support it, but it made the truck run like crap.  If you got a new vehicle and ran it on nothing but ethanol (which is not that much cheaper, by the way because it's not that popular) it would probably be OK, but when you try to make the switch from one to the other, after a period of time, not so good.

New Thread
Other Resources My Cup of Joe » $2.50 for regular gas Rss Feed  
 
 
of 3