Other Resources My Cup of Joe » Tookie Williams Rss Feed  
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller Reply
 
 
of 8
 
 
2005-12-13 8:21 AM
in reply to: #304354

User image

Veteran
264
1001002525
Halifax
Subject: RE: Tookie Williams
possum - 2005-12-13 10:10 AM

those of us who are opposed to the death penalty do not necessarily believe reform or rehabilitation are even the point. The point: We think killing another human being is, simply, not morally appropriate regardless of the crime. So it's not about being nicey- nice. It's about being moral. What other developed nations use teh death penalty as either a deterrent or a punishment?


75 other countries use the death penalty..


2005-12-13 8:26 AM
in reply to: #304363

User image

Giver
18427
5000500050002000100010010010010025
Subject: RE: Tookie Williams

rice - 2005-12-13 9:21 AM  It's about being moral. What other developed nations use teh death penalty as either a deterrent or a punishment?
75 other countries use the death penalty..

 

How many of those 75 are developed countries (like Possum said)? 

2005-12-13 8:32 AM
in reply to: #304076

Pro
4040
2000200025
Subject: RE: Tookie Williams
One can be for or against the death penalty, but I'm not sure what it says about somebody when s/he rejoices in an execution.

I think executions should be televised. If it's not too brutal for the state to carry out, it should not be too brutal for the people to watch in the comforts of their own living rooms between the evening news and Letterman.
2005-12-13 8:33 AM
in reply to: #304371

User image

Giver
18427
5000500050002000100010010010010025
Subject: RE: Tookie Williams

Here are the death penalty countries:

AFGHANISTAN, ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA, BAHAMAS, BANGLADESH, BARBADOS, BELARUS, BELIZE, BOTSWANA, BURUNDI, CAMEROON, CHAD, CHINA, COMOROS, CONGO (Democratic Republic), CUBA, DOMINICA, EGYPT, EQUATORIAL GUINEA, ERITREA, ETHIOPIA, GABON, GHANA, GUATEMALA, GUINEA, GUYANA, INDIA, INDONESIA, IRAN, IRAQ, JAMAICA, JAPAN, JORDAN, KAZAKSTAN, KOREA (North), KOREA (South), KUWAIT, KYRGYZSTAN, LAOS, LEBANON, LESOTHO, LIBYA, MALAWI, MALAYSIA, MONGOLIA, NIGERIA, OMAN, PAKISTAN, PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY, PHILIPPINES, QATAR, RWANDA, SAINT CHRISTOPHER & NEVIS, SAINT LUCIA, SAINT VINCENT & GRENADINES, SAUDI ARABIA, SIERRA LEONE, SINGAPORE, SOMALIA, SUDAN, SWAZILAND, SYRIA, TAIWAN, TAJIKISTAN, TANZANIA, THAILAND, TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO, UGANDA, UNITED ARAB EMIRATES, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UZBEKISTAN, VIET NAM, YEMEN, ZAMBIA, ZIMBABWE

2005-12-13 8:39 AM
in reply to: #304076

User image

Veteran
264
1001002525
Halifax
Subject: RE: Tookie Williams
Developed? You mean like the US.. So which ones should know better because there “developed.” And which ones don’t count because there not “developed”. Their just savages let’s not count them, right?.. Got news for ya were all human with human nature, laws and all..
2005-12-13 8:39 AM
in reply to: #304378

User image

Giver
18427
5000500050002000100010010010010025
Subject: RE: Tookie Williams

One thing that has been discussed in this thread is the efficacy of the trial process. Lately, many death penalty convicitions have been overturned based on new (often DNA) evidence being examined. There are also cases of people being executed who are later found not to have committed the crime for which they were convicted.

So that being said, how do you death penalty advocates feel about people being wrongly executed?



2005-12-13 8:43 AM
in reply to: #304381

User image

Champion
5183
5000100252525
Wisconsin
Subject: RE: Tookie Williams
rice - 2005-12-13 8:39 AM

Developed? You mean like the US.. So which ones should know better because there “developed.” And which ones don’t count because there not “developed”. Their just savages let’s not count them, right?.. Got news for ya were all human with human nature, laws and all..


no, you're right, I meant progressive countries, like ours, where we pride ourselves on guarding and maintaining the civil and human rights of our citizens...
2005-12-13 8:43 AM
in reply to: #304076

Subject: ...
This user's post has been ignored.

Edited by Chris Tree 2005-12-13 8:50 AM
2005-12-13 8:46 AM
in reply to: #304076

Subject: ...
This user's post has been ignored.
2005-12-13 8:51 AM
in reply to: #304389

Champion
5183
5000100252525
Wisconsin
Subject: RE: Tookie Williams
courtney_leone - 2005-12-13 8:46 AM
  • I can't help but think that if we cut off the hands of thieves, etc, that they might hestitate to steal again.

    The recidivism rate for most murderers, rapists etc is extremely high.If they can murder, rape and steal couldn't they lie? How do we know that Tookie was truly rehabilitated? We don't.

    <


  • you're right. we don't. and I don't care. Killing him is not moral even if he smirks and laughs and says he's glad he did it.

    and are you really saying that just by looking you can tell if someone is truly rehabilitated, and that the looks those prisoners gave you were indicative of their value?
    2005-12-13 8:55 AM
    in reply to: #304389

    Giver
    18427
    5000500050002000100010010010010025
    Subject: RE: Tookie Williams

    I don't think anyone was talking about letting Tookie go free. Rehab is a problem. If we say one of the goals of the penal system is to rehabilitate, then we should do it. But by and large, we don't. That's a social problem that probably needs to be solved. BUt the fact of the matter is, resources don't exist to incarcerate every criminal for as long as they should be. Parole is a problem, but if we don't parole people, we don't have room for more bodies.

    So what's the answer? Maybe it lies in societal changes that would prevent the crimes from happening in the first place. Take Tookie's example. Why do you think he was so successful in setting up and flourishing the Crips? Was it because kids were just aching to comit crimes? Or is it because they didn't see a viable opportunity to make something of their lives?

    In a capitalist society, there will always be disenfranchised people. By and lagre, the poor aren't criminals, but when you don't see a way out, some of us would choose any possible road available. So kids turn to drugs and gangs, because they don't have the opportunity of education and a straight future they way the middle and upper class does.

     

    courtney_leone - 2005-12-13 9:46 AM

    The recidivism rate for most murderers, rapists etc is extremely high.If they can murder, rape and steal couldn't they lie? How do we know that Tookie was truly rehabilitated? We don't. Here is an example. I took a History of Drugs class in college for my Sociology minor. As a field trip we were required to go to a prision for "rehabilitated" prisioners. Its the kind of place where they send the "well-behaved" prisioners. !!!! Apparently, thousands of them apply for this transfer, because so many are "rehabiliated." So we go, and we walk into this room to hear this presentation and the inmates are sitting among us! WTF. They each stand up and tell us why they are here, how their lives have changed, how they were different men back then. Each one was very persuasive, and very repentant. And very creepy. Then, we got into groups and each group was assigned an inmate to give them a tour of the prision. I remember distinctly walking in front of a cell (the cells here were huge rooms with 20 inmates per room) and every single inmate stopped what they were doing and turned and stared at us, and the looks that they gave us were completely wrong. They looked anything but "rehabilitated." But they swore they were. Easy to say that when you're in a controlled environment with intensive counseling.

    I'm sure there are some prisioners who are wrongly convicted or truly sorry for what they've done. I don't believe Tookie was one of them.



    2005-12-13 9:22 AM
    in reply to: #304076

    Subject: ...
    This user's post has been ignored.
    2005-12-13 9:36 AM
    in reply to: #304076

    Pro
    3883
    20001000500100100100252525
    Woodstock,GA
    Subject: RE: Tookie Williams

    To rebutt the "cost of execution" argument here is an easy solution:

    Winchester 270 30-06-$500.00

    Box of Ammo-$35.00

    Grand Total-$535.00

    This is probably less than it costs to feed one of these scumbags for a week.....

    As for Tookie, I hope he is rotting in Hell!

    Not only do I think capital punishment is right and moral, I think the families of the victims should be able to be the executioner if they so choose. And I agree with Courtney, get rid of this lethal injection stuff, bring back the chair!

    2005-12-13 9:41 AM
    in reply to: #304383

    Elite
    2733
    200050010010025
    Venture Industries,
    Subject: RE: Tookie Williams
    run4yrlif - 2005-12-13 8:39 AM

    One thing that has been discussed in this thread is the efficacy of the trial process. Lately, many death penalty convicitions have been overturned based on new (often DNA) evidence being examined. There are also cases of people being executed who are later found not to have committed the crime for which they were convicted.

    So that being said, how do you death penalty advocates feel about people being wrongly executed?



    Let me address two issues: 1) I'm not sure if your list is an exhaustive list of countries that impose the death penalty. I believe there are other countries that impose the death penatly for acts of terrorism and treason. I believe both Brazil and England. But I understand the point. Certainly the number of Western Countries that utilize the death penalty is small.

    2) Just a cautionary warning regarding numbers of the "wrongfully" convicted on death row. These numbers are often skewed by anti-death penalty proponents. they often include ANY over turning of a death penalty case for ANY reason in their numbers of the 'wrongfully" convicted. A case in point is a case in which the State Supreme Court granted a new trial based, not upon any idea that the wrong person was convicted, but rather that there were improper evidentiary rulings in both the guilt phase and the penalty phase. Due to witnesses being lost and the cost the State declined to seek the death penalty in the second trial. The defendant was convicted of the murder in the second trial and sentenced to life. This case was included in anti-death penalty proponants numbers of the "wrongfully" convicted.
    I'm just issuing you a warning to look closely at the numbers, how they are derived and what exactly is included. Often they are over blown.
    2005-12-13 9:45 AM
    in reply to: #304428

    Champion
    5183
    5000100252525
    Wisconsin
    Subject: RE: Tookie Williams
    courtney_leone - 2005-12-13 9:22 AM

    Possum, I admit I am a very judgmental person. I wasn't saying that I could tell if a person is rehabilitated just by looking at him, of course I can't. My point is that I think its easier to say that you're rehabilitated when you are in a controlled environment, such as prison, with counselors and support available. The same goes for anyone in a rehab program such as alcoholics, drug addicts etc. What happens when you find yourself back out in the real world?


    I don;t expect to find a criminal like Tookie out on the street. As I have said, it's not about rehabilitation- think of the implications of that! If rehabilitation were the goal of our prison system, wow, have we ever failed. Why not just kill all criminals who repeat crimes (thus proving their unrehabilitatedness) Criminals who have done wrong need to be punished, and the world needs protection from them. But killing them? No.
    2005-12-13 10:04 AM
    in reply to: #304435

    Giver
    18427
    5000500050002000100010010010010025
    Subject: RE: Tookie Williams

    The cost of execution isn't in the potassium chloride used to stop the heart. It's the due process.

    Or are you advocating against the criminal justice system as a whole? 

     

    Rocket Man - 2005-12-13 10:36 AM

    To rebutt the "cost of execution" argument here is an easy solution:

    Winchester 270 30-06-$500.00

    Box of Ammo-$35.00

    Grand Total-$535.00

    This is probably less than it costs to feed one of these scumbags for a week.....

    As for Tookie, I hope he is rotting in Hell!

    Not only do I think capital punishment is right and moral, I think the families of the victims should be able to be the executioner if they so choose. And I agree with Courtney, get rid of this lethal injection stuff, bring back the chair!



    2005-12-13 10:07 AM
    in reply to: #304440

    Expert
    666
    5001002525
    St. Thomas, ON
    Subject: RE: Tookie Williams

    So that being said, how do you death penalty advocates feel about people being wrongly executed?

    ... 2) Just a cautionary warning regarding numbers of the "wrongfully" convicted on death row. These numbers are often skewed by anti-death penalty proponents. they often include ANY over turning of a death penalty case for ANY reason in their numbers of the 'wrongfully" convicted. A case in point is a case in which the State Supreme Court granted a new trial based, not upon any idea that the wrong person was convicted, but rather that there were improper evidentiary rulings in both the guilt phase and the penalty phase. Due to witnesses being lost and the cost the State declined to seek the death penalty in the second trial. The defendant was convicted of the murder in the second trial and sentenced to life. This case was included in anti-death penalty proponants numbers of the "wrongfully" convicted. I'm just issuing you a warning to look closely at the numbers, how they are derived and what exactly is included. Often they are over blown.

    This may be a simple thought, but isn't one innocent person wrongly executed reason enough to reconsider the death penalty. (Per my avatar, I belong to a no-death-penalty country, and hope it stays that way).

    2005-12-13 10:08 AM
    in reply to: #304454

    Giver
    18427
    5000500050002000100010010010010025
    Subject: RE: Tookie Williams
    Rennick - 2005-12-13 11:07 AM

    This may be a simple thought, but isn't one innocent person wrongly executed reason enough to reconsider the death penalty. (Per my avatar, I belong to a no-death-penalty country, and hope it stays that way).

    Other issues aside, that's kinda how I feel. 

    2005-12-13 10:18 AM
    in reply to: #304076

    Pro
    3906
    20001000500100100100100
    St Charles, IL
    Subject: RE: Tookie Williams
    If 4 murders is enough to sentance Tookie Williams to death, what penalty should we impose on our government for 4 murders ( open to suggestions as to what else to call the purposeful death of an innocent person )?

    A couple examples:

    Joseph Burrows Illinois Conviction 1989 Released 1994

    No physical evidence linked Burrows to the murder of William Dulin.The prosecution's two chief witnesses recanted their testimony againstMr. Burrows, and one of them confessed to the murder for which Burrowshad been sent to death row. One of the witnesses said he had been coercedby prosecutors and police. Burrows was released in September, 1994, andthe Illinois appellate courts have upheld the overturning of his conviction.

    Rolando Cruz Illinois Conviction 1985 Released1995

    Cruz was sentenced to death for the murder of 10-year-old Jeanine Nicarico.Another man, Brian Dugan, who had already pled guilty to two rapes andmurders, including that of an 8-year-old girl, authorized his lawyer totell the prosecutors that he killed Nicarico. Cruz was convicted at a secondtrial in 1990, at which Dugan did not testify. In July, 1994, the stateSupreme Court overturned Cruz's second conviction. An assistant state attorneygeneral resigned because she thought the evidence showed Cruz was innocentand thought it wrong to pursue the prosecution. Other law enforcement officialsalso protested the continued efforts to prosecute Cruz. Cruz was finallyacquitted at his retrial in November, 1995. The judge did not even waitfor the defense to put on its case before entering a directed verdict ofnot guilty. Three prosecutors and four law enforcement officers involvedwith the prosecution of Cruz and his co-defendant (see below) have beenindicted for obstruction of justice in this case.


    Alejandro Hernandez Illinois Conviction 1985 Released 1995

    Hernandez was sentenced to death along with Rolando Cruz for the murderof Jeanine Nicarico in 1983. Hernandez was re-tried in 1990, but the trialended in a hung jury. A third trial in 1991 resulted in a conviction andan 80 year prison sentence. The conviction was overturned by the IllinoisSupreme Court in January, 1995. Only his own indirect statements, not anydirect physical evidence, linked Hernandez, who is borderline retarded,to the killing. He was released on bond, and charges were subsequentlydropped on Dec. 8, 1995. The man who has confessed to the murder of JeanineNicarico, and whose DNA has been linked to the crime, has not been chargedin the case. The U.S. Dept. of Justice is considering an investigationinto civil rights violations in this case.

    Sabrina Butler Mississippi Conviction 1990 Released 1995

    Butler was sentenced to death for the murder of her nine-month-old child.When she found her baby not breathing, she performed CPR and took him tothe hospital. She was interrogated by the police and then prosecuted. Herconviction was overturned by the Mississippi Supreme Court in 1992. Uponre-trial, she was acquitted on Dec. 17, 1995 after a very brief jury deliberation.It is now believed that the baby may have died either of cystic kidneydisease or from sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS).

    Verneal Jimerson Illinois Conviction 1985 Released 1996

    Jimerson was sentenced to death in 1985 for a murder which occurredin 1978. The chief witness against him was Paula Gray, who has an IQ of57. In her original story to the police, she did not mention Jimerson.Then she added his name to her account, along with three other names, includingDennis Williams (see #64). She later recanted her entire testimony, sayingthe police had forced her to lie. The original charges against Jimersonwere dismissed, but they were resurrected seven years later when the policeoffered to drop some charges against Gray if she would implicate Jimerson.Gray's 50 year sentence was converted to 2 years probation. In 1995, theIllinois Supreme Court unanimously reversed Jimerson's conviction, becauseGray had been allowed to testify falsely about her bargain. Jimerson wasreleased on bond in early 1996, and charges against him were subsequentlydropped.

    Dennis Williams Illinois Conviction 1979 Released 1996

    Williams was convicted, along with three others (including Verneal Jimerson), for the murder of a young couple in 1978. After spending 18 yearsin prison, Williams was released on June 14, 1996 because new evidencepointed to the fact that all four men were wrongly convicted. Much of theinvestigative work which led to the defendants' release was done by threejournalism students. Recent DNA tests indicate that none of the four menwere involved in the crime, and another man has confessed to the murder.Charges against Williams, and two others who received lesser sentencesin the same case, were dropped on July 2, 1996. Cook County State's AttorneyJack O'Malley apologized to the four wrongly convicted defendants, includingVerneal Jimerson, who had also been on death row.

    --

    Our legal system is not perfect.  Until it can be considered perfect ( and IMHO it never will ), and unerring, to impose the irreversible penalty of death is immoral.

    -C
    2005-12-13 10:44 AM
    in reply to: #304076

    Master
    4101
    20002000100
    Denver
    Subject: RE: Tookie Williams
    I agree with Dontracy on this one - it is a question of morality. Namely, is it ok to take a life solely for retribution? I agree with him that the only time it is ok to take a life is when someone elses is in imminent danger. By allowing capital punishment the governement is saying (through its laws) that its not ok to kill, except when we say its ok and it akes me queasy to put that kind of authority in the hands of the government.

    The thing that bothers me about capital punishment is that it seems like you have to have selective morality to be for it. At what point is it ok to kill someone who isn't a threat? Do they have to kill 4 or 10 people to be deserving of capital punishment or is one life sacred enough that to take it the punishment should be death? Why the difference? Why not execute those convicted of manslaugher? They took a life even if it wasn't intentional... Not to mention those who consider euthanasia or abortion to be murder.
    2005-12-13 10:47 AM
    in reply to: #304470

    Elite
    2733
    200050010010025
    Venture Industries,
    Subject: RE: Tookie Williams
    coredump - 2005-12-13 10:18 AM

    If 4 murders is enough to sentance Tookie Williams to death, what penalty should we impose on our government for 4 murders ( open to suggestions as to what else to call the purposeful death of an innocent person )?

    A couple examples:

    Joseph Burrows Illinois Conviction 1989 Released 1994

    No physical evidence linked Burrows to the murder of William Dulin.The prosecution's two chief witnesses recanted their testimony againstMr. Burrows, and one of them confessed to the murder for which Burrowshad been sent to death row. One of the witnesses said he had been coercedby prosecutors and police. Burrows was released in September, 1994, andthe Illinois appellate courts have upheld the overturning of his conviction.

    Rolando Cruz Illinois Conviction 1985 Released1995

    Cruz was sentenced to death for the murder of 10-year-old Jeanine Nicarico.Another man, Brian Dugan, who had already pled guilty to two rapes andmurders, including that of an 8-year-old girl, authorized his lawyer totell the prosecutors that he killed Nicarico. Cruz was convicted at a secondtrial in 1990, at which Dugan did not testify. In July, 1994, the stateSupreme Court overturned Cruz's second conviction. An assistant state attorneygeneral resigned because she thought the evidence showed Cruz was innocentand thought it wrong to pursue the prosecution. Other law enforcement officialsalso protested the continued efforts to prosecute Cruz. Cruz was finallyacquitted at his retrial in November, 1995. The judge did not even waitfor the defense to put on its case before entering a directed verdict ofnot guilty. Three prosecutors and four law enforcement officers involvedwith the prosecution of Cruz and his co-defendant (see below) have beenindicted for obstruction of justice in this case.


    Alejandro Hernandez Illinois Conviction 1985 Released 1995

    Hernandez was sentenced to death along with Rolando Cruz for the murderof Jeanine Nicarico in 1983. Hernandez was re-tried in 1990, but the trialended in a hung jury. A third trial in 1991 resulted in a conviction andan 80 year prison sentence. The conviction was overturned by the IllinoisSupreme Court in January, 1995. Only his own indirect statements, not anydirect physical evidence, linked Hernandez, who is borderline retarded,to the killing. He was released on bond, and charges were subsequentlydropped on Dec. 8, 1995. The man who has confessed to the murder of JeanineNicarico, and whose DNA has been linked to the crime, has not been chargedin the case. The U.S. Dept. of Justice is considering an investigationinto civil rights violations in this case.

    Sabrina Butler Mississippi Conviction 1990 Released 1995

    Butler was sentenced to death for the murder of her nine-month-old child.When she found her baby not breathing, she performed CPR and took him tothe hospital. She was interrogated by the police and then prosecuted. Herconviction was overturned by the Mississippi Supreme Court in 1992. Uponre-trial, she was acquitted on Dec. 17, 1995 after a very brief jury deliberation.It is now believed that the baby may have died either of cystic kidneydisease or from sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS).

    Verneal Jimerson Illinois Conviction 1985 Released 1996

    Jimerson was sentenced to death in 1985 for a murder which occurredin 1978. The chief witness against him was Paula Gray, who has an IQ of57. In her original story to the police, she did not mention Jimerson.Then she added his name to her account, along with three other names, includingDennis Williams (see #64). She later recanted her entire testimony, sayingthe police had forced her to lie. The original charges against Jimersonwere dismissed, but they were resurrected seven years later when the policeoffered to drop some charges against Gray if she would implicate Jimerson.Gray's 50 year sentence was converted to 2 years probation. In 1995, theIllinois Supreme Court unanimously reversed Jimerson's conviction, becauseGray had been allowed to testify falsely about her bargain. Jimerson wasreleased on bond in early 1996, and charges against him were subsequentlydropped.

    Dennis Williams Illinois Conviction 1979 Released 1996

    Williams was convicted, along with three others (including Verneal Jimerson), for the murder of a young couple in 1978. After spending 18 yearsin prison, Williams was released on June 14, 1996 because new evidencepointed to the fact that all four men were wrongly convicted. Much of theinvestigative work which led to the defendants' release was done by threejournalism students. Recent DNA tests indicate that none of the four menwere involved in the crime, and another man has confessed to the murder.Charges against Williams, and two others who received lesser sentencesin the same case, were dropped on July 2, 1996. Cook County State's AttorneyJack O'Malley apologized to the four wrongly convicted defendants, includingVerneal Jimerson, who had also been on death row.

    --

    Our legal system is not perfect.  Until it can be considered perfect ( and IMHO it never will ), and unerring, to impose the irreversible penalty of death is immoral.

    -C


    A very brief description of my experience: Case #1: Defendant is 17 years old, has a long juvenile record, including armed robbery, numerous burgalries. He sneaks into his female neighbors home. She comes home early and cathes him. He beats her in the face causing numerous facial fractures. Once unconscious he stabs her 20 times. then picks up a stereo and drops it on her skull crushing her skull. He then tips a couch on top of her body and cranks up the air conditioning. The victim was survived by her parents, her sister, and two neices.

    Case #2: Sociopath defendant, would stalk the woods and parks cr uising for gay men/boys. Would invite them back to his secluded shack in the woods, would murder them by a conbination of strangulation and eviceration, then would cut of their penises as a trophy.

    Case #3: Defendant, a crack addict, is thrown out of his house by his girlfriend because she can't take his addiction anymore. With no money he decides to go back to the house to steal and pawn items for his drug habbit. His ex-girlfriend interupts his theft/burgalary attempt. She is beaten then decapitated.

    Case#5: A local drug dealer seeks to "roll" another drug dealer of his stash and cash. When he enters the targets home, he meets with resistence from the targets family, whom he didn't wepect to be home. defendant kills the targets 5 family members(3 children and 2 adults( then waits for the target to get home and guns him down in the driveway. So that the target wouldn't come looking for him.

    case#6: defendant a drug addict is PO'ed at his father because his father has kicked him out of the house and has cut him off financially. In a drug induced high he exacts his revenge. he waits for the victim to fall asleep one evening, then makes entry into the house with a deer riffle. While the victim is asleep, the defendent puts the deer riffle in the victims ear and pulls the trigger.

    case#7: Defendant meets female victim and male victim. Victims feel sorry for defendant because he is down on his luck and appears a little slow. The defendant forms an attraction to the female victim and makes a sexual advance at the female victim only to be rebuffed. The victims don't severe ties with the defendant. The defendant invites the couple to a cookout/picinic in a rural area. When the couple arrives the defendant meets them with a riffle. He shoots the male victim. Then shoots the female victim in the back, from long range. A non-fatal shot. the female victim is then raped, and strangled to death. Oh I forgot to mention the victims brought their 2 month old with them. The defendant takes the child out of the car and leaves it in the field still in it's car seat. Then he leaves.

    Is our system perfect. NO. But it's the best legal system in the World. Bar none! Death penalty cases are full of due process protections. Automatic appeals, unlimited post conviction motions.
    I understand your point and it is a good one. One thing I will say is that ANY prosecutor that engages in the type of conduct that occurred in the example you sighted should be prosecuted. It hurts the system. It makes people not trust the vast majority of us that are truely only seeking justice and fairness.



    2005-12-13 10:55 AM
    in reply to: #304509

    Pro
    3906
    20001000500100100100100
    St Charles, IL
    Subject: RE: Tookie Williams
    ASA22 - 2005-12-13 9:47 AM Is our system perfect. NO. But it's the best legal system in the World. Bar none! Death penalty cases are full of due process protections. Automatic appeals, unlimited post conviction motions. I understand your point and it is a good one. One thing I will say is that ANY prosecutor that engages in the type of conduct that occurred in the example you sighted should be prosecuted. It hurts the system. It makes people not trust the vast majority of us that are truely only seeking justice and fairness.


    Until you can guarantee that not one single person has ever been, nor will ever be wrongfully executed, I cannot support the death penalty.

    It has nothing to do with justice and fairness and everything to do with revenge.

    -C
    2005-12-13 11:50 AM
    in reply to: #304282

    Elite
    2458
    20001001001001002525
    Livingston, MT
    Subject: RE: Tookie Williams
    run4yrlif - 2005-12-13 2:51 AM

    Because he is...was working hard to undue what he started. In his time in prison, he was an anti-gang advocate, and now his voice in the matter is lost. Who do you think these kids would listen to when faced with a dilemma involving joining a gang? Arnold or Tookie? I think because he's been executed, some kids are going to make the wrong choice where before they my not have.



    I invite you to come through Compton and tell me how much of an impact Tookie has made. The numbers (150,000 kids) quoted are BS. A local radio show interviewed the person that quoted that number and lets just say that she couldn't back up those numbers - and I'm putting it nicely because she was really made herself look like an idiot. Add to that that the man is guilty and yet maintains he is innocent. He hasn't repented (not that it matters to me).

    As to the costs, compare the cost of Timothy McVeigh to Tookie Williams. Do you think the costs are anywhere near the same? Tookie was convicted in 1979 and we are just now killing him. The reason it costs so much is because we allow it to drag on. 26 years later we are finally removing this virus from our midst. After the first appeal he should have been taken out back and had a bullet in his head like the animal he is.

    Compton and Watts, drive through there and tell me what Tookie has done...


    2005-12-13 11:52 AM
    in reply to: #304076

    Subject: ...
    This user's post has been ignored.
    2005-12-13 11:55 AM
    in reply to: #304571

    Philadelphia, south of New York and north of DC
    Subject: RE: Tookie Williams
    courtney_leone

    I'm all for revenge. If its deserved.


    Why? What is it about revenge?

    This seems to be shared by many people.

    When you experience revenge, what is it that you are feeling?



    Edited by dontracy 2005-12-13 12:01 PM
    New Thread
    Other Resources My Cup of Joe » Tookie Williams Rss Feed  
     
     
    of 8