Joe Paterno (Page 3)
-
No new posts
Moderators: k9car363, the bear, DerekL, alicefoeller | Reply |
|
2012-01-24 6:40 AM in reply to: #4006861 |
Master 1699 Malvern, PA | Subject: RE: Joe Paterno deboerkj - 2012-01-23 6:35 PM What courtesy did he show for the young boys lives that were ruined? Too soon? Also, he has known issues with Sandusky were going on since AT LEAST 1998. you can keep bringing up the victims all you want and what he knew or did not know... bottom line is the guy just passed away if you don't have anything nice to say about him don't say anything... again... common courtesy and respect for a human being |
|
2012-01-24 6:58 AM in reply to: #4007420 |
Resident Curmudgeon 25290 The Road Back | Subject: RE: Joe Paterno maxmattmick - 2012-01-24 6:40 AM deboerkj - 2012-01-23 6:35 PM What courtesy did he show for the young boys lives that were ruined? Too soon? Also, he has known issues with Sandusky were going on since AT LEAST 1998. you can keep bringing up the victims all you want and what he knew or did not know... bottom line is the guy just passed away if you don't have anything nice to say about him don't say anything... again... common courtesy and respect for a human being Not to directly compare the two, but if this is a general hard-and-fast rule with you, would/did you feel the same way when Bin Laden died? That "common courtesy and respect" for him as a human being prevented you from saying anything bad about him? |
2012-01-24 7:02 AM in reply to: #4007420 |
Champion 9407 Montague Gold Mines, Nova Scotia | Subject: RE: Joe Paterno maxmattmick - 2012-01-24 8:40 AM you can keep bringing up the victims all you want and what he knew or did not know... bottom line is the guy just passed away if you don't have anything nice to say about him don't say anything... again... common courtesy and respect for a human being While I believe that this is an admirable position (don't say anything at this time unless you have something nice to say) I think that it is only reasonable that with all the hero worship that is going on, there will be reaction from those who think that his actions in the face of child abuse need to be weighed alongside the good that he did for a sports program. I do hope that you are consistent with this application and avoid ever commenting on someone's misdeeds or transgressions immediately following their death. Shane |
2012-01-24 7:11 AM in reply to: #4007443 |
Master 1699 Malvern, PA | Subject: RE: Joe Paterno the bear - 2012-01-24 7:58 AM maxmattmick - 2012-01-24 6:40 AM deboerkj - 2012-01-23 6:35 PM What courtesy did he show for the young boys lives that were ruined? Too soon? Also, he has known issues with Sandusky were going on since AT LEAST 1998. you can keep bringing up the victims all you want and what he knew or did not know... bottom line is the guy just passed away if you don't have anything nice to say about him don't say anything... again... common courtesy and respect for a human being Not to directly compare the two, but if this is a general hard-and-fast rule with you, would/did you feel the same way when Bin Laden died? That "common courtesy and respect" for him as a human being prevented you from saying anything bad about him? honestly bear, I didn't bring that up exactly but I did bring up the question to several friends and family, "what went through Obama's head that night when he gave the orders to "kill" another human being?? What did he say to his wife when he asked her what she thought? You're really comparing Joe Paterno and Bin laden? |
2012-01-24 7:15 AM in reply to: #4007459 |
Resident Curmudgeon 25290 The Road Back | Subject: RE: Joe Paterno maxmattmick - 2012-01-24 7:11 AM the bear - 2012-01-24 7:58 AM maxmattmick - 2012-01-24 6:40 AM deboerkj - 2012-01-23 6:35 PM What courtesy did he show for the young boys lives that were ruined? Too soon? Also, he has known issues with Sandusky were going on since AT LEAST 1998. you can keep bringing up the victims all you want and what he knew or did not know... bottom line is the guy just passed away if you don't have anything nice to say about him don't say anything... again... common courtesy and respect for a human being Not to directly compare the two, but if this is a general hard-and-fast rule with you, would/did you feel the same way when Bin Laden died? That "common courtesy and respect" for him as a human being prevented you from saying anything bad about him? honestly bear, I didn't bring that up exactly but I did bring up the question to several friends and family, "what went through Obama's head that night when he gave the orders to "kill" another human being?? What did he say to his wife when he asked her what she thought? You're really comparing Joe Paterno and Bin laden? What part of "Not to directly compare the two" didn't you comprehend? Just trying to see if your rule applied to everyone or just the departed you admired. There are many out there who feel that Paterno's actions (inactions) are heinous enough to negate any normal respect and courtesy. Just because your opinion differs doesn't mean they're not allowed theirs. |
2012-01-24 7:15 AM in reply to: #4007449 |
Master 1699 Malvern, PA | Subject: RE: Joe Paterno gsmacleod - 2012-01-24 8:02 AM maxmattmick - 2012-01-24 8:40 AM you can keep bringing up the victims all you want and what he knew or did not know... While I believe that this is an admirable position (don't say anything at this time unless you have something nice to say) I think that it is only reasonable that with all the hero worship that is going on, there will be reaction from those who think that his actions in the face of child abuse need to be weighed alongside the good that he did for a sports program. I do hope that you are consistent with this application and avoid ever commenting on someone's misdeeds or transgressions immediately following their death. Shanebottom line is the guy just passed away if you don't have anything nice to say about him don't say anything... again... common courtesy and respect for a human being is this really that hard to understand?? it's really as simple as the golden rule... regardless of what you may think his misdeeds were why not be the better person and just find something good to say about somebody in death? I would think that being admirable is what you would be shooting for? I wouldn't want to set that example for my kids... I'd want to tell them, yeah, the guy mad e a bad mistake here but let's remember the good he did at this sad time |
|
2012-01-24 7:17 AM in reply to: #4007466 |
Master 1699 Malvern, PA | Subject: RE: Joe Paterno the bear - 2012-01-24 8:15 AM maxmattmick - 2012-01-24 7:11 AM the bear - 2012-01-24 7:58 AM maxmattmick - 2012-01-24 6:40 AM deboerkj - 2012-01-23 6:35 PM What courtesy did he show for the young boys lives that were ruined? Too soon? Also, he has known issues with Sandusky were going on since AT LEAST 1998. you can keep bringing up the victims all you want and what he knew or did not know... bottom line is the guy just passed away if you don't have anything nice to say about him don't say anything... again... common courtesy and respect for a human being Not to directly compare the two, but if this is a general hard-and-fast rule with you, would/did you feel the same way when Bin Laden died? That "common courtesy and respect" for him as a human being prevented you from saying anything bad about him? honestly bear, I didn't bring that up exactly but I did bring up the question to several friends and family, "what went through Obama's head that night when he gave the orders to "kill" another human being?? What did he say to his wife when he asked her what she thought? You're really comparing Joe Paterno and Bin laden? What part of "Not to directly compare the two" didn't you comprehend? Just trying to see if your rule applied to everyone or just the departed you admired. There are many out there who feel that Paternos actions (inactions) are heinous enough to negate any normal respect and courtesy. "not to compare the two" but you were and yeah, I'd show the same compassion for the two... I guess it comes form my Catholic upbringing? I don't know? Maybe I'm an idealist? |
2012-01-24 7:20 AM in reply to: #4007466 |
Master 1699 Malvern, PA | Subject: RE: Joe Paterno the bear - 2012-01-24 8:15 AM maxmattmick - 2012-01-24 7:11 AM the bear - 2012-01-24 7:58 AM maxmattmick - 2012-01-24 6:40 AM deboerkj - 2012-01-23 6:35 PM What courtesy did he show for the young boys lives that were ruined? Too soon? Also, he has known issues with Sandusky were going on since AT LEAST 1998. you can keep bringing up the victims all you want and what he knew or did not know... bottom line is the guy just passed away if you don't have anything nice to say about him don't say anything... again... common courtesy and respect for a human being Not to directly compare the two, but if this is a general hard-and-fast rule with you, would/did you feel the same way when Bin Laden died? That "common courtesy and respect" for him as a human being prevented you from saying anything bad about him? honestly bear, I didn't bring that up exactly but I did bring up the question to several friends and family, "what went through Obama's head that night when he gave the orders to "kill" another human being?? What did he say to his wife when he asked her what she thought? You're really comparing Joe Paterno and Bin laden? What part of "Not to directly compare the two" didn't you comprehend? Just trying to see if your rule applied to everyone or just the departed you admired. There are many out there who feel that Paterno's actions (inactions) are heinous enough to negate any normal respect and courtesy. Just because your opinion differs doesn't mean they're not allowed theirs. I'm not saying they're not entitled to their opinions, I'm sure they expressed them three months ago... a person died here and some respect should be shown again it's just common courtesy |
2012-01-24 7:24 AM in reply to: #4007467 |
Champion 9407 Montague Gold Mines, Nova Scotia | Subject: RE: Joe Paterno maxmattmick - 2012-01-24 9:15 AM is this really that hard to understand?? I didn't say it was hard to understand however, it is also not hard to understand why others feel outraged by the hero worship. it's really as simple as the golden rule... regardless of what you may think his misdeeds were why not be the better person and just find something good to say about somebody in death? Where do we draw the line? I would think that being admirable is what you would be shooting for? Where did I say it wasn't? I wouldn't want to set that example for my kids... I'd want to tell them, yeah, the guy mad e a bad mistake here but let's remember the good he did at this sad time Once again, where do we draw the line? How do we determine the point at which the good outweighed the bad and we should be silent on misdeeds? Shane |
2012-01-24 7:31 AM in reply to: #4007474 |
Champion 7347 SRQ, FL | Subject: RE: Joe Paterno maxmattmick - 2012-01-24 8:20 AM I'm not saying they're not entitled to their opinions, I'm sure they expressed them three months ago... a person died here and some respect should be shown again it's just common courtesy Respect is earned. Many people believe that Paterno did not earn that respect. Just because someone dies (we all do) does not make their misdeeds go away. |
2012-01-24 7:38 AM in reply to: #4007467 |
Champion 16151 Checkin' out the podium girls | Subject: RE: Joe Paterno maxmattmick - 2012-01-24 8:15 AM gsmacleod - 2012-01-24 8:02 AM maxmattmick - 2012-01-24 8:40 AM you can keep bringing up the victims all you want and what he knew or did not know... While I believe that this is an admirable position (don't say anything at this time unless you have something nice to say) I think that it is only reasonable that with all the hero worship that is going on, there will be reaction from those who think that his actions in the face of child abuse need to be weighed alongside the good that he did for a sports program. I do hope that you are consistent with this application and avoid ever commenting on someone's misdeeds or transgressions immediately following their death. Shanebottom line is the guy just passed away if you don't have anything nice to say about him don't say anything... again... common courtesy and respect for a human being is this really that hard to understand?? it's really as simple as the golden rule... regardless of what you may think his misdeeds were why not be the better person and just find something good to say about somebody in death? I would think that being admirable is what you would be shooting for? I wouldn't want to set that example for my kids... I'd want to tell them, yeah, the guy mad e a bad mistake here but let's remember the good he did at this sad time I wouldn't exactly call a cover-up and inaction from 1998 to present a mistake. I'd say that's a continued pattern of behavior to protect an institution from shame. Edited by pitt83 2012-01-24 7:38 AM |
|
2012-01-24 7:43 AM in reply to: #4007481 |
Member 5452 NC | Subject: RE: Joe Paterno gsmacleod - 2012-01-24 8:24 AM . . . it is also not hard to understand why others feel outraged by the hero worship. Are you suggesting that those that feel it's inappropriate to dance on the grave of the dead are guilty of hero worship? Or did I misunderstand?
|
2012-01-24 7:47 AM in reply to: #4007526 |
Champion 9407 Montague Gold Mines, Nova Scotia | Subject: RE: Joe Paterno Goosedog - 2012-01-24 9:43 AM Are you suggesting that those that feel it's inappropriate to dance on the grave of the dead are guilty of hero worship? Or did I misunderstand? No, I'm saying that those who feel that is inappropriate to dance on the grave of the dead are entitled to their position and that I feel that is an admirable position (assuming that they are logically consistent in the application of this belief). However, I do believe that it is also not hard to understand why others feel that the hero worship of Paterno needs to be answered with the reminder that while he may have done great things during his life, he did not act appropriately when he was presented with information about abuse by Sandusky. Shane |
2012-01-24 7:53 AM in reply to: #4007529 |
Member 5452 NC | Subject: RE: Joe Paterno gsmacleod - 2012-01-24 8:47 AM However, I do believe that it is also not hard to understand why others feel that the hero worship of Paterno needs to be answered with the reminder that while he may have done great things during his life, he did not act appropriately when he was presented with information about abuse by Sandusky. Shane This hero worship you mention, where do you see it? I'm nowhere near PA, but the only thing I've seen on television so far are people on campus just acting sad and saying things like "it's a shame." I haven't seen anything, since his death, that I would consider hero worship. All media coverage I have seen included a discussion of the recent scandal. Are you seeing coverage or reaction to his death that suggests we disregard recent events? I'm sure it's somewhere, but it certainly hasn't been the norm (as far as I've seen).
|
2012-01-24 8:08 AM in reply to: #4007512 |
Master 1699 Malvern, PA | Subject: RE: Joe Paterno pitt83 - 2012-01-24 8:38 AM maxmattmick - 2012-01-24 8:15 AM I wouldn't exactly call a cover-up and inaction from 1998 to present a mistake. I'd say that's a continued pattern of behavior to protect an institution from shame. gsmacleod - 2012-01-24 8:02 AM maxmattmick - 2012-01-24 8:40 AM you can keep bringing up the victims all you want and what he knew or did not know... While I believe that this is an admirable position (don't say anything at this time unless you have something nice to say) I think that it is only reasonable that with all the hero worship that is going on, there will be reaction from those who think that his actions in the face of child abuse need to be weighed alongside the good that he did for a sports program. I do hope that you are consistent with this application and avoid ever commenting on someone's misdeeds or transgressions immediately following their death. Shanebottom line is the guy just passed away if you don't have anything nice to say about him don't say anything... again... common courtesy and respect for a human being is this really that hard to understand?? it's really as simple as the golden rule... regardless of what you may think his misdeeds were why not be the better person and just find something good to say about somebody in death? I would think that being admirable is what you would be shooting for? I wouldn't want to set that example for my kids... I'd want to tell them, yeah, the guy mad e a bad mistake here but let's remember the good he did at this sad time here we go again... didn't we go through this three months ago... cover-up is a huge assumption that everybody's making you can't just show some courtesy in death and recognize the good things a man has contributed in his lifetime |
2012-01-24 8:15 AM in reply to: #4007549 |
Champion 9407 Montague Gold Mines, Nova Scotia | Subject: RE: Joe Paterno Goosedog - 2012-01-24 9:53 AM This hero worship you mention, where do you see it? I'm nowhere near PA, but the only thing I've seen on television so far are people on campus just acting sad and saying things like "it's a shame." I haven't seen anything, since his death, that I would consider hero worship. All media coverage I have seen included a discussion of the recent scandal. Are you seeing coverage or reaction to his death that suggests we disregard recent events? I'm sure it's somewhere, but it certainly hasn't been the norm (as far as I've seen). I haven't really been following the mainstream media reports of his death but the response I've seen from people has generally fallen into four groups: 1) Those who mention his decisions regarding Sandusky; 2) Those who don't care; 3) Those who don't wish to speak ill of the dead and simply celebrate his legacy; 4) Those who want to defend all the good things he did and respond with anger when someone from group 1 speaks up. As to hero worship, to me those would the individuals in group 4 (I guess Paterno apologists may be a more apt description) and while they appear to be a minority, they are quite vocal about their support for Paterno and condemnation of those who feel differently. Shane |
|
2012-01-24 8:33 AM in reply to: #4007598 |
Member 5452 NC | Subject: RE: Joe Paterno gsmacleod - 2012-01-24 9:15 AM As to hero worship, to me those would the individuals in group 4 (I guess Paterno apologists may be a more apt description) and while they appear to be a minority, they are quite vocal about their support for Paterno and condemnation of those who feel differently. Shane OK, I guess I can understand someone feeling the need to ignore what I consider to be good manners if faced with this, but I haven't seen this in this thread. Have you? In fact, the initial reactions in this thread were rather negative opinions about Paterno. What were they reacting to? The initial post was deleted so maybe it was that?
|
2012-01-24 8:33 AM in reply to: #4003807 |
Veteran 494 Berkley | Subject: RE: Joe Paterno I'm not spitting on the grave of JP, I'm just saying lets not forget all that was destroyed in his wake. He did do many good things, won a lot of football games, but he was no saint as many label him. I'm not bashing him, I just don't think he is a deity. All of the programs he did for the community and the youth were admirable, but as far as his coaching.... well I'm just going to say that there has been a long line of corruption (many student athletes with criminal records or run ins). He was above the school and could use that power as he wanted. On the other hand he coached his kids as his own sons, and wanted the best for them. It is sad that the man was football, and when all caught up to him and football was taken away from him, he had nothing left and passed away. That is sad. It is just sad that such a legend has his reputation scarred in such a way after this that who really knows the fall out. Opinions are like buttholes, Most people have one. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/PMH0002132/ |
2012-01-24 8:35 AM in reply to: #4007639 |
Member 5452 NC | Subject: RE: Joe Paterno deboerkj - 2012-01-24 9:33 AM I'm not bashing him, I just don't think he is a deity. Has anyone on this thread suggested he was/is a deity?
|
2012-01-24 8:44 AM in reply to: #4007638 |
Champion 9407 Montague Gold Mines, Nova Scotia | Subject: RE: Joe Paterno Goosedog - 2012-01-24 10:33 AM OK, I guess I can understand someone feeling the need to ignore what I consider to be good manners if faced with this, but I haven't seen this in this thread. Have you? In fact, the initial reactions in this thread were rather negative opinions about Paterno. What were they reacting to? The initial post was deleted so maybe it was that? Group 1 - those who feel compelled to comment on his actions regarding Sandusky. I don't know what they were reacting to but I suspect the reactions may have had something to do with the response of Paterno defenders following his dismissal by Penn State. Shane |
2012-01-24 8:47 AM in reply to: #4007675 |
Member 5452 NC | Subject: RE: Joe Paterno gsmacleod - 2012-01-24 9:44 AM I don't know what they were reacting to but I suspect the reactions may have had something to do with the response of Paterno defenders following his dismissal by Penn State. Yeah, I don't know what they were reacting to either. But it seems odd that you feel that they are compelled to react in this manner to somehow counteract a minority (although local, I suppose) opinion that wasn't even expressed here. ETA: I missed the bolded part when I wrote what I did above. We already had that discussion. I disagreed strongly with the Paterno defenders then. I just don't see what purpose it serves to now try to reassert the points that were made months ago in the wake of his death.
Edited by Goosedog 2012-01-24 8:51 AM |
|
2012-01-24 8:48 AM in reply to: #4007682 |
Champion 9407 Montague Gold Mines, Nova Scotia | Subject: RE: Joe Paterno Goosedog - 2012-01-24 10:47 AM Yeah, I don't know what they were reacting to either. But it seems odd that you feel that they are compelled to react in this manner to somehow counteract a minority (although local, I suppose) opinion that wasn't even expressed here.
Perhaps because of the importance our society places on protecting children? Shane |
2012-01-24 8:52 AM in reply to: #4007688 |
Member 5452 NC | Subject: RE: Joe Paterno gsmacleod - 2012-01-24 9:48 AM Goosedog - 2012-01-24 10:47 AM Yeah, I don't know what they were reacting to either. But it seems odd that you feel that they are compelled to react in this manner to somehow counteract a minority (although local, I suppose) opinion that wasn't even expressed here. Perhaps because of the importance our society places on protecting children? You're stretching now. This has absolutely nothing to do with what we are talking about now.
|
2012-01-24 8:55 AM in reply to: #4003807 |
Master 1699 Malvern, PA | Subject: RE: Joe Paterno I'm not a Penn State fan - i grew up in PA and followed Penn State but not crazy about them or Joe Pa... Detached from the Sandusky situation I'm just saying that situation was beat into the ground three months ago can't we just show some respect for a person's passing on this one day?? he admitted he could have done more... he took that regret to his grave |
2012-01-24 8:57 AM in reply to: #4007700 |
Champion 9407 Montague Gold Mines, Nova Scotia | Subject: RE: Joe Paterno Goosedog - 2012-01-24 10:52 AM You're stretching now. This has absolutely nothing to do with what we are talking about now. Not at all. I would suspect people feel compelled to comment because they are outraged because they see his actions as not defending children for whom he was in a position of trust. Since they feel that he did not morally, if not legally, do what he should have done to protect children, they feel the need to point this out when Paterno is discussed. Shane |
|